[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 Sergey Avseyev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/utop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 --- Comment #8 from Sergey Avseyev --- Thank you, Ben. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 --- Comment #6 from Sergey Avseyev --- I agree, and I checked that *.mli files are not necessary for utop to run. I moved them into -devel and put versions on Provides tags. Spec URL:

[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 --- Comment #5 from Ben Rosser --- Great! Just two things; otherwise the package looks fine: > utop.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/utop/uTop.mli > utop.x86_64: W:

[Bug 1553835] Review Request: utop - Improved toplevel for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553835 Sergey Avseyev changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ocaml-utop |Review