[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.el8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.el8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7ebd6d0199 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7ebd6d0199 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-ac6ef059e8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.36-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cb0ba17f5e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #27 from

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #26 from

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #25 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libfullock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Blocks|177841

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #24 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hi, Robert-André Mauchin I see. Anyway, Thank you very much for your review! Hirotaka Wakabayashi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #22 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello, Robert-André Mauchin I sincerely appreciate your immediate review! The upstream developer, Takeshi Nakatani has released a new version that fixed the bugs you have pointed out in #21. I have

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #21 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - BuildRoot: and Prefix: are not needed - Do you really reed to redefine all macros? - Patch the obsolete m4 macro: replace AC_PROG_LIBTOOL with LT_INIT and send the patch upstream if

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #20 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello, Robert-André Mauchin I really appreciate your help! The upstream developer, Takeshi Nakatani is so helpful to fix bugs you have pointed out. Please review them. Here are fixed and

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #19 from Robert-André Mauchin --- libfullock.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.27 ['1.0.27-1.fc27', '1.0.27-1'] → You need to add the release info in the %changelog too: * Tue May 15 2018 Takeshi Nakatani

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #18 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- I have a question. I found warnings in rpmlint in my self-review. Would this be a problem that can be a blocker? I think some warnings can be fixed. ```[vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo rpmlint

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #17 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki and reviewers, I have fixed some issues. Any comments are welcome! https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hiwkby/fullock/master/buildutils/libfullock.spec

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #16 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- > https://github.com/hiwkby/fullock/blob/master/buildutils/libfullock.spec Please wait a moment! because I found no %license macro in the new spec file in my self-review. I must

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #15 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki and reviewers, Here is my successful build on Koji. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27151088 Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #14 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki and reviewers, Please review my spec file and src.rpm again I have updated today! I removed comments and the BuildRoot which should not be used in the guideline.

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #13 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki, Please check the new spec and src.rpm again! https://github.com/hiwkby/fullock/blob/master/buildutils/libfullock.spec

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #12 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki, Thanks for your reply! I understand my situation. I will keep this ticket as it is. Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #11 from Iwicki Artur --- There's no need to close and re-submit the ticket. We've had some Review Requests going on for over a year. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #10 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki, I am sorry for waiting! Should I close this ticket once and re-submit a new ticket after fixing the current problem and releasing a new FULLOCK version if I would have

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #9 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello Iwicki, Thanks a lot for your quick response and a nice suggestion! Please wait a moment once again! I discussed about it with the upstream developer yesterday again. He is so

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #8 from Iwicki Artur --- You could just put the workaround from Comment #6 into a .patch file, and add it to the spec as "Patch0: some-descriptive-name.patch". You'll probably need to add "-p1" to %autosetup as

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #7 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello, Iwicki I would like to ask you to continue this review as it is if it is not a big problem because upstream currently declined my idea for a reasonable reason. I discussed

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #6 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Hello, Iwicki I found a workaround but I need to ask upstream to accept code change. Please wait a moment. I know it's not friendly for packagers to use a comment in the spec file

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #5 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- (In reply to Iwicki Artur from comment #3) > >Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > Use the following: "%{URL}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz" Hello, Iwicki Thanks you

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #4 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > Hello and welcome, > > > I can't sponsor, but a couple preliminary remarks: > > - %clean is rot needed > > %clean > rm -rf

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Iwicki Artur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@svgames.pl

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #1 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- Here is a link to a successful Copr build. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hiwkby/libfullock/build/735310/ Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Hiro Wakabayashi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841