https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
oshinko-cli-0.5.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
oshinko-cli-0.5.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7074932c8c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #25 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oshinko-cli
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #23 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
last repo request was closed because my e-mail in bugzilla was different than
my FAS account e-mail (unbelievable!) so I created another one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #22 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
repo request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8170
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #21 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Don't wait too long to request your repo, you have 60 days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #20 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
Fixed the Source URL:
https://github.com/rimolive/oshinko-cli-rpm/commit/ab7b25c98d3fc9f5bfa01bb04b6b72b2c783a6e2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #18 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
Hope to have everything fixed:
https://github.com/rimolive/oshinko-cli-rpm/commit/e9dcd008a5c0993244da89845aa451d98ff1c94b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #17 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira from comment #16)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #15)
> > - I would switch 0%{?rhel} >= 7 to == 7, I hope for RHEL 8 we will have our
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #16 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #15)
> - I would switch 0%{?rhel} >= 7 to == 7, I hope for RHEL 8 we will have our
> new Go packaging working.
>
> - Use a more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- I would switch 0%{?rhel} >= 7 to == 7, I hope for RHEL 8 we will have our
new Go packaging working.
- Use a more meaningful name for your archive:
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #14 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
https://github.com/rimolive/oshinko-cli-rpm/commit/4da4cebae1bb6e514a634a57e22a054c309d6fb9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I'll be busy tomorrow so if you could make the necessary changes to remove the
-devel subpackage right now, it would be great.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #12 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
You are right, we can ignore -devel package. All I need is to package the
binary, but I thought the -devel package would be required.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
On the other hand, do we really need
golang-github-radanalyticsio-oshinko-cli-devel? If this is to be used as a
command line tool only, I think we could skip it. The -devel package is only
useful
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira from comment #8)
> >If you plan for EPEL, the new Go packaging doesn't work there yet so you
> > would need to redo the SPEC in the old style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #9 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #7)
> Another issue is that the -devel package requires other non packaged
> dependencies to install:
>
> rpm -q --requires -p
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #8 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> - I'd rather you do the opposite as I said:
>
> %global GIT_COMMIT 7acbd8382
> %global TAG %{VERSION}-%{GIT_COMMIT}
> %global
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Another issue is that the -devel package requires other non packaged
dependencies to install:
rpm -q --requires -p
golang-github-radanalyticsio-oshinko-cli-devel-0.5.4-0.fc30.noarch.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- I'd rather you do the opposite as I said:
%global GIT_COMMIT 7acbd8382
%global TAG %{VERSION}-%{GIT_COMMIT}
%global SPARK_IMAGE "radanalyticsio/openshift-spark:2.3-latest"
export
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #5 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
Thanks for the clarification. I made the changes according to the review,
please take a look:
https://github.com/rimolive/oshinko-cli-rpm/commit/da1c772b1955ae6852ec3c0760cfcca490790cb7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Yeah that's the gist of it, it will take a lot of time to package them all. If
you're not up to it that's okay, that's a considerable task which maybe should
fall on the new Golang SIG,s shoulders.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #3 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - ExclusiveArch: x86_64
>
>
> Why?
>
> - Unbundle vendor
Just to make sure I understood what you meant by "Unbundle vendor": You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
--- Comment #2 from Ricardo Martinelli de Oliveira ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - ExclusiveArch: x86_64
As specified in the github repo, it is intended to use with openshift. Having
that said, I will change this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613036
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
29 matches
Mail list logo
