https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #22 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #17)
> @FranciscoD: done.
>
> since I have backported the package to f29-f31, I am wondering if someone
> need to approve the update in order for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #17 from Qianqian Fang ---
@FranciscoD: done.
since I have backported the package to f29-f31, I am wondering if someone need
to approve the update in order for the package to appear in the update repo?
for some reason, I remember
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
That's great---thanks very much for working on these.
Can you please give the neuro-sig commit access to the package (in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/octave-mcxlab, go to "settings" ->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-3e7b73a7fe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3e7b73a7fe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-c809ee9857 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c809ee9857
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-0d03b32c8d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0d03b32c8d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
Qianqian Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #11 from Qianqian Fang ---
fedpkg build gives me an error
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38127282
error: Bad source: /builddir/build/SOURCES/mcxcl-0.9.5.tar.gz: No such file or
directory
I checked the URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/octave-mcxlab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang ---
@eclipseo, the bug you found was exactly the one that caused the earlier
problem, and I confirm the patch works.
I also added a condition to wrap around this for portability (I intend to
backport this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Probably related to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733898 and
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/octave/c/c32f37ff6c776af9486f4f128b2a87e1055e420a?branch=master
It should work on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #5)
> I made the suggested changes,
>
> https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/commit/
> 2850a787f4e99d9a14290c9e5107da11befc6799
>
> but similar to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #5 from Qianqian Fang ---
I made the suggested changes,
https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/commit/2850a787f4e99d9a14290c9e5107da11befc6799
but similar to octave-iso2mesh (#1758626, comment 7), I am not able to build
the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neuro-sig@lists.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang ---
Created attachment 1622600
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1622600=edit
screenshot of the installed software - everything works
screenshot of the installed software - everything works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #2 from Qianqian Fang ---
similar to #1758626, this is also configured as a semi-noarch package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #1 from Qianqian Fang ---
rpmlint output for srpm:
--
fangq@localhost:~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc30.src.rpm
octave-mcxlab.src: W:
25 matches
Mail list logo
