https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
FPC has now published the new guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/
They are operational in F33, F32, and queued to F31 (only in testing for now)
The bulk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
Adam Borowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Hey, don't give up, the guidelines changes mostly simplify the spec part of the
packaging, and it would be nice to have people from other packager teams taking
a look as what we do in Fedora, if only to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
--- Comment #3 from Adam Borowski ---
Hmm... if you've already did the work, it'd probably be better for you to take
it. Our upstream isn't very likely to produce frequent (or any) updates —
Intel isn't exactly known for font making.
I'm a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
See also:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/package/intel-clear-sans-fonts/
I don’t especially want to end up as Clear Sans Fedora maintainer (I have more
than enough things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
