https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
--- Comment #6 from hannes ---
Thanks for the quick review, requested the necessary stuff from release
engineering and I hope it will be back in fedora 32 soon. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
hannes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(johannes.lips@goo |
|glemail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
--- Comment #3 from Lyes Saadi ---
Hello!
In this section of the guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling
> All packages whose upstreams have no mechanism to build against system
> libraries MAY opt to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
--- Comment #2 from hannes ---
Thank you for the review. I've opened an upstream ticket regarding the two
bundled libraries and will follow up on the issue as soon as I get some
answers. If I understand correctly, the bundled libraries are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
hannes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1829496
Referenced Bugs:
