subject:"\[Bug 1878902\] Review Request\: naga \- Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets"

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-10-01 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-10-01 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-09-29 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- Thank you Andy. That build failure on armhfp is a segfault in a futex call inside libpthread. That can't possibly be the fault of naga, which contains no native code. I'll cross my fingers and hope that

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-09-29 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-09-28 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James --- Upstream request for a license file: https://github.com/lerno/naga/issues/18 New URLs for the package with a license file included: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/naga/naga.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 --- Comment #3 from Andy Mender --- > The wording is a bit unclear there. It means that if the main package is > architecture-specific, then the javadoc package must explicitly be marked as > noarch. In the case where the main package is

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-09-25 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > I don't have much experience with packaging Java stuff, but I see this has > been sitting around for a while so I want to help. Thank you, Andy! I appreciate

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 --- Comment #1 from Andy Mender --- I don't have much experience with packaging Java stuff, but I see this has been sitting around for a while so I want to help. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51604491 >