https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Bug 1878903 depends on bug 1878902, which changed state.
Bug 1878902 Summary: Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous
sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James ---
Thank you for the review, Andy.
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #6)
> Before I approve, could you have a look at the failed builds on Fedora 32?
> It seems like it's picking up Java 8 and not 11. Or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #6 from Andy Mender ---
> I have added javapackages-filesystem. However, java-headless is not good
> enough. This package uses Java's GUI features, so the dependency has to be
> on java. This is covered by
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #3)
> The unretiring guideline
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
> says: "Restore the contents in GIT and prepare a new build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #4 from Andy Mender ---
Thanks a lot for packaging Jmol! I remember using it quite a bit during my PhD
studies.
COPR project with jmol and its dependency naga:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/jmol/
If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola ---
The unretiring guideline
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers says:
"Restore the contents in GIT and prepare a new build and update (if necessary)"
which means that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Which parts do you think are worth keeping? Certainly not the automatic
rebuilds. Even the "update to " entries aren't worth keeping, in my
opinion, since we're starting out on a newer version than the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1878902
Doc Type|---
14 matches
Mail list logo
