https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #22 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: rubygem-puppet-lint
New Branches: epel7
Owners: rharrison
I was reminded by a user that I forgot to request a el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #21 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: rubygem-puppet-lint
New Branches: el7
Owners: rharrison
InitialCC:
I was reminded by a user that I forgot to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #14 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
Updated files for the changes requested in comment 12
Spec URL:
http://rharrison.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.fc18.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #11 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
puppet-lint 0.2.1 has been released. I've update my package with the new
version.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #10 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
puppet-lint 0.2.0 was finally released a few days ago. I'd been waiting for
this version to be released because of some bugs I'd encountered before
continuing with this review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #9 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Hi guys, I'd like to take this for a review, are you both ok with it? Could
you please tell me, where the current versions of your SPEC and SRPM are?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-31 19:51:37 EDT ---
Why not co maintain, but i am far from being a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #6 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com 2012-03-28
12:24:35 EDT ---
If you'd prefer we could
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #3 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com 2012-03-26
18:46:45 EDT ---
Ruby Gidelines:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #4 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com 2012-03-26
18:54:45 EDT ---
As I mentioned earlier I had
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-27 01:41:41 EDT ---
I just did a rpm because I used it, but if you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-24 08:53:05 EDT ---
Made the rpm compile on f17 ( but I am not sure it
27 matches
Mail list logo
