https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for Eric Smith
's needinfo:
Bug 832853: Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #37 from Package Review
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #35 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oh, nice. Not sure if Eric still plans to package this. Even if not, somebody
will sooner or later because there's still software out there that depends on
java3d.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Harvey Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(harvey.harrison@g |
|mail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(harvey.harrison@g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #32 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
On a cursory look, it does not seem like there is any real active upstream for
Java3d. I might be mistaken though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgans...@online.de
--- Comment #31
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #30 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jerboaa's scratch build of
java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 for
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22
and rawh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #29 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
FWIW, even Sun/Oracle agrees that the "nuclear clause" makes that license
non-free, as do the lawyers who've reviewed it in the past.
In the not-too-distant past, Sun and Oracle were willing to reli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Felix Schwarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fschw...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #27 from Harvey Harrison ---
Sure, at this point I'm down to a single dependency, the Font3D class which
uses tesselation code from the j3dutils package. I don't have huge amounts of
time these days to spend on Javs3d, so work is s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loganje...@gmail.com
--- Comment #26 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Harvey Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #25 from Harvey Harriso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #23 from Susi Lehtola ---
(In reply to Harvey Harrison from comment #22)
> I believe the boost license is an acceptable Fedora license, and is GPL
> compatible, whom do I ask to make sure that is OK?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #22 from Harvey Harrison ---
Looking at the remaining functions, it turns out the code in question was a
java port of some c++ code that was under a much more permissive license, I'm
just going to go back to the original c++ and re-po
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #21 from Harvey Harrison ---
FWIW, I put in a bit of time this weekend and now have it down to only two
functions remaining in Java3d-utils that are used from Java3d-core, once those
are removed/reimplemented, Java3d should be ready t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #20 from Eric Smith ---
And the work I did on packaging upstream Java3d, and more recently on Harvey's
fork, has been based on using the existing Fedora vecmath package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #18 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/jogl2
after login, ask to become co-maintainer
regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #17 from Harvey Harrison ---
Updating status, I've removed the Java3d core dependency from j3dutils for all
but one class which I'm still working one. The class in question is
com.sun.j3d.internal.Distance which is a collection of st
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #16 from Eric Smith ---
Thanks Harvey! I'm definitely interested in packaging a version of Java3D with
the licensing problem resolved. I'll look at the code at your links.
My primary interest in packaging Java3D was
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Please do so, and thank you for undertaking this cleanup effort.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzill
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Harvey Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harvey.harri...@gmail.c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Indeed, if Java3D goes to RPM Fusion, everything depending on it goes to RPM
Fusion too. They could be moved back to Fedora once Java3D moves back to Fedora
too (providing there are no othe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Xavier,
I understand the problem but I do not need to have a package that is used only
in RPM Fusion. for me it is necessary to import
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/ and
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot ---
The problem with the "nuclear facility" clause is it makes the license
non-free, and thus voids the possibility to have the package in Fedora.
Has anyone filled a bug upstream to try and r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
there is someone want use this package for some nuclear facility?
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java3d.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java3d-1.5.2-1.fc16.src.rpm
--
You a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #8 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||endofl...@fedoraproject.org
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Lameire Alexis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Lameire Alexis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexisis-pristontale@hotmai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #4 from Eric Smith ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/java3d/java3d.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/java3d/java3d-1.5.2-3.fc16.src.rpm
Has most of the changes suggested by Joachim Katzer (thanks!). Did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Joachim Katzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jokat...@gmx.de
--- Comment #3 from Joa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #2 from Joachim Katzer ---
Created attachment 602385
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=602385&action=edit
Suggested changes to java3d.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #1 from Eric Smith ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/java3d/java3d.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/java3d/java3d-1.5.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
Updated to fix problem building with OpenJDK7.
Dropped bundled vecma
39 matches
Mail list logo
