https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
foo2zjs-0.2015-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
foo2zjs-0.2015-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #32 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
foo2zjs-0.2015-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b6687a7b2d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
foo2zjs-0.2015-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-329c3c3c51
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #29 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
foo2zjs-0.2015-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-db15317851
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/foo2zjs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #26 from David Woodhouse ---
Done. You should now be able to make the new package request as described at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #25 from Christopher Atherton ---
My account name is "cjatherton".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
David Woodhouse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #23 from Jiri Popelka ---
(In reply to Jiri Popelka from comment #22)
> We can move these from foomatic-db into foomatic-db-filesystem as well I
> think.
Changed in rawhide
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/foomatic-db.git/commit/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #22 from Jiri Popelka ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #21)
> /usr/share/foomatic
> /usr/share/foomatic/db
> /usr/share/foomatic/db/source
These are already part of foomatic-db-filesystem.
> /usr/share/foomatic/db/sou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #21 from David Woodhouse ---
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/foomatic/db/source,
/usr/share/foomatic/db, /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/driver,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #20 from Christopher Atherton ---
I've switched COPYING from %doc to %license. SPEC/SRPM have the same location,
but for convenience...
SPEC => https://www.dropbox.com/s/tp49pw6n5ycb4gc/foo2zjs.spec?dl=0
SRPM =>
https://www.dropbo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #19 from Jiri Popelka ---
Download them manually and run
$ fedora-review -n foo2zjs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #18 from David Woodhouse ---
$ fedora-review -b 970393
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 970393
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 970393
INFO: --> SRPM url:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8936cco5xt85jg/foo2zjs-0.2015-1.fc23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jpope...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from Jir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jpope...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Christopher Atherton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(the8lack8ox@gmail |
|.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #13 from Jiri Popelka ---
(In reply to Christopher Atherton from comment #12)
> SPEC => https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzqpit9ten7ufle/foo2zjs.spec
Looks good to me. But next time please increase the Release tag (even it's
during review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Atherton ---
New revision based on suggestions:
SPEC => https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzqpit9ten7ufle/foo2zjs.spec
SRPM =>
https://www.dropbox.com/s/d7216fijemfd5lz/foo2zjs-0.20140126-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1050949
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #11 from Jiri Popelka ---
To the spec file:
> Requires(post): /bin/rm
/usr/bin/rm
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Can be removed, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
> # Xerox Phaser 6110 already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #10 from Jiri Popelka ---
(In reply to Zoltan Boszormenyi from comment #7)
> 4. These Requires lines are also not needed,
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+1. I don't see any reason why the other sub-packages shoul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||twa...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #8 from Jiri Popelka ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #2)
> But the incorrect-fsf-address should probably be fixed (not sure of
> packaging guidelines there
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||807760
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Zoltan Boszormenyi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbos...@pr.hu
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Atherton ---
Sorry. Forgot to update URLs after updating the package again. New links here:
SPEC => https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzqpit9ten7ufle/foo2zjs.spec
SRPM =>
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qv0s1n11t7faepa/foo2z
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Joonas Sarajärvi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@iki.fi
--- Comment #5 from Joo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Atherton ---
I have updated foo2zjs for Fedora 19 and given it more polish.
SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzqpit9ten7ufle/foo2zjs.spec
SRPM:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c3i9i2s92bih2qb/foo2zjs-0.20130626-1.fc19.sr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Atherton ---
Ok. Corrected FSF addresses in all files that rpmlint complains about. I hope
that's adequate. Also, fixed all the man page warnings, which all appeared to
be simple typos.
The spec and srpm are no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
David Woodhouse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dw...@infradead.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #1 from Robin Lee ---
*** Bug 970392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xTPf
42 matches
Mail list logo
