https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #12 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
No, I just mean the new specfile/srpm, addressing the issues in comment #6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #8)
Yes, I can review it. :-)
Do you plan to push it to EPEL? I can imagine dput could be useful also
there (RHEL or RHEL-based server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #6)
My observations:
1) description could be improved
Inspiration can be found in upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #8 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
Yes, I can review it. :-)
Do you plan to push it to EPEL? I can imagine dput could be useful also there
(RHEL or RHEL-based server working with Debian packages...).
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ed Santiago from comment #4)
Oh I forgot to cleanup my brain ;)
Manpage should be installed to destdit mandir/man1 with install.
Then RPM will automatically gzip them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #4 from Ed Santiago santi...@redhat.com ---
[ disclaimer#1: I'm not a packager yet; I'm just trying to learn the ropes ]
[ disclaimer#2: total n00b, so my interpretation of the guidelines may be off ]
That said...
1. Thanks for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Ed Santiago santi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||santi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right
to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it
as %config, or maybe I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right
to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it
as %config, or maybe I
16 matches
Mail list logo