[Bug 804824] Review Request: JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824 --- Comment #5 from Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu 2012-03-22 02:06:16 EDT --- Changed license to CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~asasadeusz/jboss-jsp-2.2-api/3/jboss-jsp-2.2-api.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~asasadeusz/jboss-jsp-2.2-api/3/jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-3.fc18.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3921411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798998] Review Request: libcdr - a library for import of Corel Draw drawings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? Last Closed||2012-03-22 02:08:16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803089] Review Request: whenjobs - Replacement for cron with dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-22 02:56:56 EDT ---
So :
- The guideline say that you should use %global instead of %define :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
- there is no need nowadays to clean the buildroot before install
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
- the line
%define opt %(test -x %{_bindir}/ocamlopt echo 1 || echo 0)
is still not used. If you have added directly support in the makefile, then
this line can be removed, no ?
- why are debug disabled ? While I am sure that you have good reasons, it
should be mentioned in a comment ( and that's maybe the reason why you have to
strip by hand the software, as you mention later in the spec )
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797706] Review Request: ghc-aeson - Fast JSON parsing and encoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797706 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 03:15:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) (Note the latest release requires newer text lib than in current F16 and earlier. This also applies to aeson-0.5.0.0: Data/Aeson/Encode.hs:30:8: Could not find module `Data.Text.Lazy.Builder.RealFloat': which actually needs text 0.11.1 (should be fixed in git). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737293] Review Request: python-django - A high-level Python Web framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737293 --- Comment #32 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me 2012-03-22 03:15:45 EDT --- I've retired Django's master/devel branch on both git and pkgdb, and renamed Django to python-django in comps and Upstream Release Monitoring, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process Question: anyone knows for sure which Fedora release RHEL 7 will be branched from? We would want to have python-django there, instead of Django. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737293] Review Request: python-django - A high-level Python Web framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737293 --- Comment #33 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me 2012-03-22 03:29:26 EDT --- .. and requested that Django be blocked from the Rawhide collection: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5139 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 --- Comment #50 from Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch 2012-03-22 04:07:33 EDT --- Looks like I'm doomed. The new version compiles fine on fed17 and fed18 but the package was removed from there because it did not build, and I cannot upgrade. On fed16 the old package builds but the new one fails in the installation step. This might be related to the version of rubygem-mkrf which is older than on fed17. It builds fine locally on an el6 box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #28 from Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net 2012-03-22 04:09:00 EDT --- Looks like a packaging problem... For sysv-initscripts the pidfile is created by the initscript, not by the daemon. Not sure how this should work with systemd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #29 from Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net 2012-03-22 04:13:09 EDT --- Looks like pidfile isn't needed for type=simple systemd services. I'll just remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 --- Comment #51 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 04:26:55 EDT --- I'm not sure if I understand you problem correctly, but wouldn't placing the 0.6.81 into F16 and 0.7.2.1 into F17 and above solve the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803089] Review Request: whenjobs - Replacement for cron with dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 04:42:11
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
So :
- The guideline say that you should use %global instead of %define :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
G!
http://git.annexia.org/?p=whenjobs.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea28f8eebc4d8434e7e66d62b769d747656d27ae
- there is no need nowadays to clean the buildroot before install
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
http://git.annexia.org/?p=whenjobs.git;a=commitdiff;h=a84570d0991652a864d90e8e3fee685cc05982c7
- the line
%define opt %(test -x %{_bindir}/ocamlopt echo 1 || echo 0)
is still not used. If you have added directly support in the makefile, then
this line can be removed, no ?
http://git.annexia.org/?p=whenjobs.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c27f26c486961d1b7799d4f4274aa31d04df845
- why are debug disabled ? While I am sure that you have good reasons, it
should be mentioned in a comment ( and that's maybe the reason why you have to
strip by hand the software, as you mention later in the spec )
The reason is that the OCaml compiler doesn't add DWARF
information to its output, so you end up with debuginfo
files that work but are content-free. This is a standard
thing that is added to every OCaml spec file, eg picking
one at random:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ocaml-pcre.git;a=blob;f=ocaml-pcre.spec;hb=HEAD
I've no idea why stripping didn't happen. It *does*
happen normally, even with debug disabled, so it could
be a bug in my local RPM, but in any case rpmlint warned
about it, and stripping twice won't be a problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 04:49:03 EDT --- trafficserver-3.0.3-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trafficserver-3.0.3-6.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753676] Review Request: gnome-shell-extention-netspeed -an internet speed indicator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753676 --- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 04:56:07 EDT --- Package must work on current development version. Please make sure your extensions will work in F17 and F18. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753677] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-no11y - remove acceblity icon from status area
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753677 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 04:56:08 EDT --- Package must work on current development version. Please make sure your extensions will work in F17 and F18. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805666] Review Request: lldpd - Link Layer Discovery Protocol Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805666 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 04:54:39 EDT --- Just a note: Fedora already ships with the Open-LLDP daemon, lldpad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800102] Review Request: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts - Use Perl to access, list and edit Google Contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800102 --- Comment #7 from Avi Alkalay a...@unix.sh 2012-03-22 05:02:40 EDT --- Thanks for approving. Rally, cpanspec made most of the work. I`m http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=aviram -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805561] Review Request: jvnet-parent - Java.net parent POM file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805561 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 05:24:37 EDT --- jvnet-parent-3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jvnet-parent-3-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 05:23:49 EDT --- trafficserver-3.0.3-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trafficserver-3.0.3-6.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753676] Review Request: gnome-shell-extention-netspeed -an internet speed indicator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753676 --- Comment #22 from Amir Hedayaty heday...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 05:25:22 EDT --- I tried the extension on FC17 unfortunately it did not work! I think before release of FC17 I can make the changes to make it work. The problem is that there is no documentation about migrating or writing extension for gnome 3.4(or 3.3) right now! I am thinking of writing to people and asking for help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805561] Review Request: jvnet-parent - Java.net parent POM file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805561 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 05:23:58 EDT --- trafficserver-3.0.3-6.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trafficserver-3.0.3-6.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746215] Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215 Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2012-03-22 05:29:11 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth Short Description: RT Authentication using External Sources Owners: ksyz somlo Branches: f16 f17 el5 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804185] Review Request: python-django-tastypie - A flexible and capable API layer for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804185 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-22 05:27:11 --- Comment #10 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 05:27:11 EDT --- Ok, this has been built in F18 and django-tastypie has been retired there, so closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761619] Review Request: cross-binutils - Multiple cross-build binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619 David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 05:48:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: cross-binutils Short Description: Cross-compilation binutils Owners: dhowells Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766166] Review Request: cross-gcc - Multiple cross-build gcc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166 David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 05:50:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: cross-gcc Short Description: Cross-compilation gcc set Owners: dhowells Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805547] Review Request: colord-kde - Colord support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805547 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 05:48:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: colord-kde Short Description: Colord support for KDE Owners: jreznik than ltinkl kkofler rdieter Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803089] Review Request: whenjobs - Replacement for cron with dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089 --- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-22 06:04:56 EDT --- Then I think it would be nice to add this fact to the ocaml packaging page ( not sure if there is a official process for that, that's why I didn't added it ) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml So people reviewing can just see this is normal, that's the policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805864] New: Review Request: glassfish-jsp-api - Glassfish J2EE JSP API specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jsp-api - Glassfish J2EE JSP API specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805864 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jsp-api - Glassfish J2EE JSP API specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/glassfish-jsp-api.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/glassfish-jsp-api-2.2.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This project provides a container independent specification of JSP 2.2. Note that this package doesn't contain implementation of this specification. See glassfish-jsp for one of implementations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752771] Review Request: darkserver - A GNU build-id details service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752771 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 06:24:52 EDT --- darkserver-0.5.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darkserver-0.5.2-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 --- Comment #21 from Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 06:37:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) - %patch1 and %patch2 are commented out but still in preamble of spec file fixed - invalid patch url (Patch3) url is correct: go to http://www.oakton.edu/user/3/jwade/cyrus/cyrus-imapd-2.1.3/ and you will see that patch file, but if you click it, you'll get 404 error, probably some problem on their server - warnings about hardcoded library paths - might be solved by replacing hard-coded paths with macros fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 --- Comment #52 from Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch 2012-03-22 06:47:28 EDT --- Yes, that was my original intention. I probably misunderstood you then. I was trying to upgrade f16 as well. Sorry about that, will have to roll that back. I lost access to f17 and the development branch, cannot commit any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804824] Review Request: JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824 --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 07:06:04 EDT --- Looks good now. You misunderstood #2. Please change the title of the bug to this: Review Request: jboss-jsp-2.2-api - JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API. Afterwards I'll approve the package and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805889] New: Review Request: p6spy - Framework for database interception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: p6spy - Framework for database interception https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805889 Summary: Review Request: p6spy - Framework for database interception Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/p6spy/1.3-1/p6spy.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/p6spy/1.3-1/p6spy-1.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: P6Spy is a framework that enables database data to be seamlessly intercepted and manipulated with no code changes to existing application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784156] Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156 --- Comment #28 from Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ewoud+red...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl 2012-03-22 07:44:30 EDT --- I'd like to use uwsgi on EL6 but I'm unsure if I should request this here or in a separate bug. Would you be interested in maintaining it for EL6 as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|steve.tray...@cern.ch |ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746215] Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:21:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761619] Review Request: cross-binutils - Multiple cross-build binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:31:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). David W, please take ownership of review BZs, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766166] Review Request: cross-gcc - Multiple cross-build gcc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:32:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805547] Review Request: colord-kde - Colord support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805547 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:35:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798998] Review Request: libcdr - a library for import of Corel Draw drawings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:34:28 EDT --- Not sure why the flag was re-set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785448] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Autoloader - Horde Autoloader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785448 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:33:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800102] Review Request: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts - Use Perl to access, list and edit Google Contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800102 --- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2012-03-22 08:40:38 EDT --- By the way, until FAS gets the ability to have a dedicated Bugzilla Email Address field, you'll probably want to line up your FAS email address with your Bugzilla email address. Right now your FAS email is avibrazil gmail.com, but you post to Bugzilla with avi unix.sh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805911] New: Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805911 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: https://uschwick.web.cern.ch/uschwick/software/rubygem-xmlparser.spec SRPM URL: https://uschwick.web.cern.ch/uschwick/software/rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2-1.el6.src.rpm Description: Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch |steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #53 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2012-03-22 08:55:06 EDT --- Ticket stays with me as record of who approved the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805911] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805911 --- Comment #1 from Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch 2012-03-22 08:58:43 EDT --- This package is an upstream update of rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1, see review request #719854. This old version 0.6.81-1 fails to build on f17 and newer.Therefore, it has been deprecated on those. rubygem-xmlparser-0.7.2-1 is an upstream update which compiles fine on f17 and newer.Attempts to backport it to f16 failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803089] Review Request: whenjobs - Replacement for cron with dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 09:09:21 EDT --- It turns out there's a problem with the way I'm using Dynlink in native code (I noticed that whenjobs --upload doesn't work in the native version): https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/arc/caml-list/2012-03/msg00276.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |16 --- Comment #54 from Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch 2012-03-22 09:08:54 EDT --- I've opened a new review request (805911) for f17 and rawhide for the new version 0.7.2.1 This version here is good for up to f16 (included). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800102] Review Request: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts - Use Perl to access, list and edit Google Contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800102 --- Comment #9 from Avi Alkalay a...@unix.sh 2012-03-22 09:13:40 EDT --- Ken, thank you for sponsoring. What happens now if there are upstream updates or there is a need to update the package in the future? I'll manage to merge my e-mails on both systems. What about these other submissions, please consider sponsoring them too! They are basically the same for Google Spreadsheets and Google Calendar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800105 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800265 And here is also AtomicParsley to edit MPEG-4 tags. The review started on RPMFusion but we decided it belongs to main Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284 Thank you again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790215] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp - Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790215 --- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2012-03-22 09:43:02 EDT --- Hi Steve, I know you're super busy. Are you still interested in reviewing this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802758] Review Request: drupal6-drush - cli for drupal management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802758 Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 09:44:36 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal6-drush Short Description: Drush is a command line shell and scripting interface for Drupal Owners: afsilva Branches: f16 f17 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800102] Review Request: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts - Use Perl to access, list and edit Google Contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800102 --- Comment #10 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2012-03-22 09:45:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Ken, thank you for sponsoring. Well, a member of FESCo or another sponsor still needs to approve the request. Fingers crossed. What happens now if there are upstream updates or there is a need to update the package in the future? There is a Package Update HOWTO on the wiki. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO#Build_a_package_for_Rawhide . Fedora also has a tool that can monitor upstream releases. You can set that up once you're sponsored. I'll manage to merge my e-mails on both systems. Ok, please do this soon. Once you're sponsored into the packagers group, it's important that the accounts match so that your Bugzilla privileges stay in sync with Fedora's package database. What about these other submissions Once you're sponsored and someone reviews these Perl packages, you'll be allowed to import them into Fedora also. Maybe we can work out some review swaps once you're sponsored. I have two open myself, at Bug 713313 and Bug 790215 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790215] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp - Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790215 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2012-03-22 09:47:55 EDT --- Hi, It's approved already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802761] Review Request: drupal6-geshifilter - geshifilter module for drupal6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802761 Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 09:49:04 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal6-geshifilter Short Description: The GeShi Filter module provides a filter for source code syntax highlighting Owners: afsilva Branches: f16 f17 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ansi...@redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 09:52:09 EDT --- drupal6-date 2.8 has been out for quite a while and has security updates available. I was not able to contact the user that owns the RPM. I have a SRC RPM ready for it. Can someone tell me what would be the best way to get the update out into the distro with an existing package where the 'owner' in koji doesn't seem to be reachable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790215] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp - Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790215 --- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2012-03-22 09:54:24 EDT --- Hi Steve, Sorry I'm slightly confused. Is your review complete? Can I go ahead with the SCM change request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790215] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp - Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790215 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 10:00:06 EDT --- Well, Steve gave you fedora-review+. You should now proceed with an SCM request, Ken. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#New_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800102] Review Request: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts - Use Perl to access, list and edit Google Contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800102 --- Comment #11 from Avi Alkalay avibra...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 10:05:56 EDT --- Both systems have now same e-mail address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 10:03:12 EDT --- I own it, and I didn't see any Bugs filed. I'll push the update ASAP. How did you try to contact me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800526] Review Request: seahorse-sharing - Sharing of PGP public keys via DNS-SD and HKP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800526 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcla...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 10:05:37 EDT --- Yeah, I don't think we have any bundled() provides in desktop packages, currently. So why not make a start here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 --- Comment #25 from Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 10:10:12 EDT --- Hi Jon, Via the email listed on the %files section of the rpm SPEC: l...@jcomserv.net It bounced back. Thanks for the quick reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790215] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp - Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790215 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2012-03-22 10:10:17 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp Short Description: Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges Owners: ktdreyer Branches: f16 f17 el6 InitialCC: Thanks for the clarification :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 10:14:27 EDT --- Ah, I changed. limburg...@gmail.com. Which bugzilla knows. :) Next time, file a BZ. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802758] Review Request: drupal6-drush - cli for drupal management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802758 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 10:19:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790215] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-Match-Regexp - Efficiently match IP addresses against ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790215 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 10:19:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802761] Review Request: drupal6-geshifilter - geshifilter module for drupal6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802761 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 10:22:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730314] Review Request: jboss-invocation - JBoss Invocation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730314 --- Comment #8 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:07:32 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805967] Review Request: jboss-metadata - JBoss Metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805967 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgold...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:11:28 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922487 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? Bug 801680 depends on bug 801651, which changed state. Bug 801651 Summary: Review Request: jboss-jacc-1.4-api - JBoss Java Authorization Contract for Containers 1.4 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801651 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805967] New: Review Request: jboss-metadata - JBoss Metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-metadata - JBoss Metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805967 Summary: Review Request: jboss-metadata - JBoss Metadata Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-metadata/7.0.1-1/jboss-metadata.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-metadata/7.0.1-1/jboss-metadata-7.0.1-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This package contains JBoss Metadata for JBoss AS 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805967] Review Request: jboss-metadata - JBoss Metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805967 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:19:44 EDT --- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805547] Review Request: colord-kde - Colord support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805547 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-22 11:31:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||tra...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tra...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
Bug 785694 depends on bug 784592, which changed state.
Bug 784592 Summary: Review Request: jpf - Java Plug-in Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784592
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:41:14 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[!]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[?]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint jpfcodegen-0.4-2.fc18.src.rpm
jpfcodegen.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x ml
jpfcodegen.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US simplyfies -
simplifies, simpleness
jpfcodegen.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jpfcodegen-0.4.tbz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint jpfcodegen-0.4-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x ml
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US simplyfies -
simplifies, simpleness
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/src/com/example/Main.java
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/plugins/plugin2/src/com/example/plugin2/Plugin2Panel.java
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/build.xml
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/plugins/core/build.xml
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
[Bug 790512] Review Request: jboss-ejb-client - JBoss EJB client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790512 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:42:36 EDT --- Fixed! Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-ejb-client/2/jboss-ejb-client.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-ejb-client/2/jboss-ejb-client-1.0.5-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802909] Review Request: jboss-interceptor - JBoss EJB Interceptor Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802909 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:48:23 EDT --- Fixed! Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-interceptor/2/jboss-interceptor.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-interceptor/2/jboss-interceptor-2.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922556 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803089] Review Request: whenjobs - Replacement for cron with dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089 --- Comment #13 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-22 11:47:58 EDT --- Fedora-review complaint about the address of the FSF in the various files, for example in whenjobs-0.7.1/lib/flock.c but the address is however correct in others files. ( see the licensecheck tools, from rpmdev ). And so, for the Dynlink issue, should I wait for a new tarball before trying to setup a vm for testing it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805332] Review Request: pyp - Python-centric command line text manipulation tool similar to awk and sed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805332 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-22 12:06:30 EDT --- Hi, a few comment : - why %doc without any doc ? - you requires python, but I think you need to tell the version ( 2 or 3 ) - BuildRoot is uneeded, unless you plan to support epel 5 ( if you need to do so, there is then others stuff, like %clean section, etc ) and there is no license at all in the source code ( nor shipped as part of a tarball, since there is no tarball ), which is a blocking point : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||splinu...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:11:09 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: obconf New Branches: el6 Owners: mlichvar splinux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803089] Review Request: whenjobs - Replacement for cron with dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:08:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Fedora-review complaint about the address of the FSF in the various files, for example in whenjobs-0.7.1/lib/flock.c but the address is however correct in others files. ( see the licensecheck tools, from rpmdev ). http://git.annexia.org/?p=whenjobs.git;a=commitdiff;h=602f482985977184bfa2794cfb91b15337035a0a And so, for the Dynlink issue, should I wait for a new tarball before trying to setup a vm for testing it ? Unfortunately the Dynlink issue breaks reloads, so I really need to think about how to resolve this. In the worst case the daemon might need to restart itself; or I could go back to compiling the daemon as bytecode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805995] New: Review Request: jboss-jaxb-2.2-api - Java Architecture for XML Binding 2.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-jaxb-2.2-api - Java Architecture for XML Binding 2.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805995 Summary: Review Request: jboss-jaxb-2.2-api - Java Architecture for XML Binding 2.2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, mgold...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jaxb-2.2-api/1.0.4-1/jboss-jaxb-2.2-api.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jaxb-2.2-api/1.0.4-1/jboss-jaxb-2.2-api-1.0.4-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Java Architecture for XML Binding Version 2.2 classes. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922671 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805999] New: Review Request: jboss-saaj-1.3-api - SOAP with Attachments API for Java 1.3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-saaj-1.3-api - SOAP with Attachments API for Java 1.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805999 Summary: Review Request: jboss-saaj-1.3-api - SOAP with Attachments API for Java 1.3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, mgold...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-saaj-1.3.api/1.0.2-1/jboss-saaj-1.3-api.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-saaj-1.3.api/1.0.2-1/jboss-saaj-1.3-api-1.0.2-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: The SOAP with Attachments API for Java Version 1.3 classes. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922705 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730314] Review Request: jboss-invocation - JBoss Invocation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730314 --- Comment #9 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:24:55 EDT --- Fails to build. ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922704 ) I assume jboss-interceptors-1.1-api BR is missing. I will evaluate the package when it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790512] Review Request: jboss-ejb-client - JBoss EJB client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790512 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:28:41 EDT --- Looks good now. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803082] Review Request: pogo - Probably the simplest and fastest audio player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803082 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802909] Review Request: jboss-interceptor - JBoss EJB Interceptor Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802909 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:38:52 EDT --- Looks good now. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803082] Review Request: pogo - Probably the simplest and fastest audio player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803082
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-22 12:40:31 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using desktop-
file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Licenses found: GPL (v2 or later) GENERATED FILE, GPL (v2 or
later) For detailed output of licensecheck see file:
/home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/src/803082/licensecheck.txt
[x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint pogo-0.5-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
pogo.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found de
pogo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US harddrive - hard drive,
hard-drive, overdrive
pogo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist - play list,
play-list, pluralist
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint pogo-0.5-2.fc18.src.rpm
pogo.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found de
pogo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US harddrive - hard drive,
hard-drive, overdrive
pogo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist - play list,
play-list, pluralist
pogo.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/src/803082/pogo-0.5.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : 6e77d4b15753b6eed2fc8f4dce92d770
MD5SUM upstream package : 6e77d4b15753b6eed2fc8f4dce92d770
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #33 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com 2012-03-22 12:41:29 EDT --- Works great now Jan-Frode. Thanks. BTW, a small typo in your package Description for the next update. It reads Apache Traffic Server is fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 compliant caching proxy server. I think you need an a before the word fast -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790512] Review Request: jboss-ejb-client - JBoss EJB client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790512 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:39:32 EDT --- Thanks for review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jboss-ejb-client Short Description: JBoss EJB client Owners:goldmann Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 12:43:16 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790512] Review Request: jboss-ejb-client - JBoss EJB client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790512 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 12:46:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730314] Review Request: jboss-invocation - JBoss Invocation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730314 --- Comment #10 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:47:50 EDT --- Fixed! Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-invocation/3/jboss-invocation.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-invocation/3/jboss-invocation-1.1.1-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3922877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802909] Review Request: jboss-interceptor - JBoss EJB Interceptor Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802909 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:47:08 EDT --- Thanks for review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jboss-interceptor Short Description: JBoss EJB Interceptor Library Owners:goldmann Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806011] New: Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011 Summary: Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, mgold...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jstl-1.2-api/1.0.3-1/jboss-jstl-1.2-api.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jstl-1.2-api/1.0.3-1/jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Java Server Pages Standard Template Library 1.2 API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||804824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 12:55:28 EDT --- python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802909] Review Request: jboss-interceptor - JBoss EJB Interceptor Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802909 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 12:56:00 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804824] Review Request: JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||806011 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 12:59:10 EDT --- python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 12:57:35 EDT --- python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mock-0.8.0-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804824] Review Request: jboss-jsp-2.2-api - JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824 Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2|jboss-jsp-2.2-api - |API |JavaServer(TM) Pages 2.2 ||API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802909] Review Request: jboss-interceptor - JBoss EJB Interceptor Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802909 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) |805468 Depends on|805468 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
