https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
(In reply to comment #1)
%files -f django.lang
%doc CHANGELOG CONTRIBUTORS.txt README.txt LICENSE.txt
%{python_sitelib}/avatar/
%{python_sitelib}/*.egg-info/
The last two
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835103
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735160
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
Oh, sorry, for delaying this.
Looking again at your spec, I stumbled upon this:
%files
%doc AUTHORS LICENSE README.rst
%{python_sitelib}/socialregistration/*
(last line). This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829015
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #29 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
This doesn't seem to be to do with 32 bit. Xdr.safe_add is
an ocamlnet symbol, and whenproto_aux.ml is a generated file
(from /usr/bin/ocamlrpcgen). We need to add to %build:
rm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835103
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830421
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488
--- Comment #35 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
any news regarding this?
Many thanks,
--Simone
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820642
--- Comment #34 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
any news from Legal? Is there a way I can check the progress on this or as part
of the Legal scrutiny updates will be posted here in the bug?
Thanks regards,
--Simone
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820642
--- Comment #35 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
It looks like legal problems were cleared.
(In reply to comment #33)
Lifting FE-Legal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
Bug ID: 836940
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749291
--- Comment #13 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com ---
First official review :
OK: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
dpm-xrootd.src: W: invalid-url
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749291
Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835103
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Pod-Parser
Short Description: Basic perl modules for handling Plain Old Documentation
(POD)
Owners: ppisar jplesnik mmaslano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835103
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #30 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/whenjobs/whenjobs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/whenjobs/whenjobs-0.7.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
F17 scratch build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Bug ID: 836945
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836840
Al bebo.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817022
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747
--- Comment #12 from Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de ---
I noticed that GPS brings its own version of AUnit, too. Will try to separate
it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836693
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836693
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836693
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835103
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836693
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--- Comment #5 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Great. The current installation Perl procedure was broken, or to be fair,
the current uninstallation procedure was broken as there is no reliable way
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836693
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836693
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
felix-configadmin-1.4.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/felix-configadmin-1.4.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835103
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #20 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
Updating in place, same links, no release bump (which actually is OK,
promise :) )
Hmm... Once bitten twice shy for me. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833855
Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlay...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #68 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #67)
Agreed, that doesn't seem to be an issue with cinnamon, but rather with
muffin. Has anyone filed a bug against it?
Yes, 5 months ago.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833855
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #69 from Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com ---
Well, there is a bit of a problem here...not with the cinnamon package, but
with your repo...
It looks like there are newer muffin packages within that repo that will
probably conflict with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
Bug ID: 837004
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||821191
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837008
Bug ID: 837008
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837008
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837008
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837008
--- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
Please note, that I have already asked upstream to fix the rpmlint warning
about outdated license file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837006
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822046
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837008
Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpie...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #70 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Are there any other renaming issues with the current submission?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837008
--- Comment #3 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you also remove the -ruby- from the package name since it's redundant?
No, I don't think that's a good idea, as there is a libvirt gem [1] - and if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #71 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #69)
Well, there is a bit of a problem here...not with the cinnamon package, but
with your repo...
It looks like there are newer muffin packages within
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
--- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com ---
Yes, I checked that using rpmls, and all directories are already included. Any
way I didn't make any changes yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830421
--- Comment #6 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-django-pylibmc
Short Description: Django cache backend using pylibmc
Owners: kumarpraveen
Branches: devel
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830421
Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
--- Comment #2 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST ldconfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #72 from Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com ---
Ok, it seems then that you should update the buildrequires in the spec to
reflect that dependency.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
--- Comment #3 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
In libpari23.spec only %clean should be an issue.
(Note, I did not add any ! they were filled by fedora-review)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817022
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Upgraded package is available on:
Spec URL:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Apocalypse/perl-Test-Apocalypse.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817022
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830421
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
Bug ID: 837050
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824976
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glassfish-toplink-essentials-2.0.46-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-toplink-essentials-2.0.46-3.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #73 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to comment #71)
cinnamon-1.4.1-0.3.fc17.x86_64 is a snapshot build of cinnamon/master
You should probably indicate this with correct versioning of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809086
Leonid Podolny leonidp.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Building on an installed system (to check for possible conflicts), not a
buildroot I got this:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
--- Comment #6 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
[...]
I've got a re-worked perl-Math-Pari package here, with quite a few changes
for moving to libpari23:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731906
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
The next question is why this is marked as an EPEL package. With very specific
exceptions (such as things which simply cannot work in Fedora), all EPEL
packages must be maintained in at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
--- Comment #12 from pierrejourda...@gmail.com ---
I am updating the package because the upstreamer release a new version with my
patchs and add experimental UTF8 support .
The spec is updated :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
--- Comment #10 from Michael Shigorin shigo...@gmail.com ---
Requires: java looks a bit overrated to me as it's only needed for Ersatz
PicoLisp (see http://software-lab.de/down.html), not for the native binary.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785903
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
Bug 817315 depends on bug 817311, which changed state.
Bug 817311 Summary: Review Request: miniupnpc - Library and tool to control NAT
in UPnP-enabled routers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837004
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815624
--- Comment #17 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
Please set fedora-review-+ if applicable, as rawhide libXaw now has been
updated to the latest version, that does not crash xedit built with gcc 4.7.
BTW, a screenshot with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817306
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
Bug 817315 depends on bug 817306, which changed state.
Bug 817306 Summary: Review Request: libircclient - C library to create IRC
clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817306
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #22 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Ok, got the full review done. One final nit but not a blocker.
%attr(0755,openerp,openerp) %{_localstatedir}/run/openerp
should probably be prefixed with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817268
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #23 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Two things:
1. The git/scm crawler may find your request but generally it should go at the
top and any explanatory text goes under it.
2. Don't forget to set the fedora-cvs flag to ?.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823071
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823071
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823071
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823071
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.fc16
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.fc16
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821195
Bug 821195 depends on bug 821191, which changed state.
Bug 821191 Summary: RFE: Update to pari 2.5.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821191
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753452
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
