https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285515
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287120
--- Comment #7 from Arie Bregman ---
Updated:
Spec URL: https://bitbucket.org/abregman/bregman-rpms/downloads/python-ryu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/abregman/bregman-rpms/downloads/python-ryu-3.26-1.el7.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
openmx-3.7.10-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285515
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
remi's scratch build of php-symfony-polyfill-1.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
pyrrd-0.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
openmx-3.7.10-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277408
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #15 from Ken Dreyer ---
Zbigniew, you pointed out some other things that I missed earlier. I've fixed
them in this latest version.
* Sun Dec 06 2015 Ken Dreyer - 0.6-7
- Correct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277408
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mtasaka's scratch build of rubygem-hocon-0.9.3-2.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12080106
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285515
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
See: https://github.com/symfony/polyfill/pull/15
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285515
--- Comment #9 from Remi Collet ---
I think it will be simpler to provide everything, whatever the PHP version is.
- this will be better with SCL.
- this will be noop (bootstrap will be ignored)
- this will avoid to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288719
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288719
Bug ID: 1288719
Summary: Review Request: dcm2niix - DICOM to NIfTI converter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273141
--- Comment #6 from Jared Smith ---
Ooops, sorry about that -- that's what I get for rushing again :-(
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-sprintf-js/nodejs-sprintf-js.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ktdreyer's scratch build of python-cram-0.6-6.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12078505
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #13 from Ken Dreyer ---
Thanks Zbigniew, I've fixed this in the new version.
* Sun Dec 06 2015 Ken Dreyer - 0.6-6
- Update for latest Python packaging guidelines (thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ktdreyer's scratch build of python-cram-0.6-7.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12078681
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288756
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-amico
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273601
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288731
Bug ID: 1288731
Summary: Review Request: os-autoinst - OS-level test automation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
> 'freedv' executable file results Not PIE, Partial RELRO. Some compiler/linker
> flags are missing.
- 'freedv' executable file is 'Not PIE, Partial RELRO'. Some compiler/linker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-CommonMark-0.5.4-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-288b77d774
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
--- Comment #23 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-music21.spec
SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-music21-2.2.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/wayland-protocols
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1279202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
Bug ID: 1288737
Summary: Review Request: openmeeg - Low-frequency
bio-electromagnetism solving forward problems in the
field of EEG and MEG
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288240
--- Comment #2 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-tmp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #6 from Julien Enselme ---
> Suggests: python-CommonMark-doc to the python2- and python3- subpackages.
Indeed, thanks for the suggestion.
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288739
Bug ID: 1288739
Summary: Review Request: petpvc - Toolbox for partial volume
correction (PVC) in positron emission tomography (PET)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288739
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262552
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ---
ok. I created the python2 subpackage.
Can you explain how run.sh in Tests is broken? It worked fine here, but note
(as per the comment in the spec file) it's commented out because you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-CommonMark-0.5.4-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6cc818a6aa
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273141
--- Comment #8 from Jared Smith ---
In the interest of time, I'll just eliminate the dist/ directory -- it can
easily be made into another (sub-)package at a future date if needed.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
- A temporary bundling of Sox libraries is permitted but you cannot download
Sox during build process, i think.
- 'freedv' executable file results Not PIE, Partial RELRO. Some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ccfb0585fe
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279202
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1288737
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #7 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-CommonMark
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262552
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
kevin's scratch build of python-pyhsm-1.0.4l-3.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12073282
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
- Your package needs 'nifticlib' libraries, it cannot be built as is now.
Have you tested a scratch build?
- You could include the documentation and Python binding
- Shouldn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273877
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273877
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-path-is-absolute-1.0.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-43aac34ded
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273877
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-path-is-absolute-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6973f607b0
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273877
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-path-is-absolute-1.0.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-d42a37a953
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273141
--- Comment #7 from Tom Hughes ---
If we're going to ship the contents of dist then I think it should be in a
js-sprint-js package following the javascript guidelines, with dist as a link
if you want (in case a node module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286844
--- Comment #4 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-propagate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288239
--- Comment #4 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-pg-escape
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
--- Comment #9 from Francesco Frassinelli (frafra) ---
Ok, thank you :) Here it comes:
Spec URL: https://frafra.fedorapeople.org/copr/xxhsum.spec
SRPM URL: https://frafra.fedorapeople.org/copr/xxhsum-42-3.fc23.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
frafra's scratch build of xxhsum-42-3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12066749
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273141
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tomh's scratch build of nodejs-sprintf-js-1.0.3-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288239
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286844
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286844
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288239
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
Maybe now the only problem is xxhash.c
shared by libxxhash and xxhsum during build
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288239
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Fixed:
Spec URL: http://tomh.fedorapeople.org//nodejs-pg-escape.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomh.fedorapeople.org//nodejs-pg-escape-0.2.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
frafra's scratch build of xxhsum-42-4.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12067362
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286818
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Tests aren't being run. There's no obvious instructions, but this seems to
work:
tap test/**/test*.js
Two of them fail though:
test/fixture/test-fail.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283228
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283228
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288242
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288240
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #20 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/letsencrypt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288245
--- Comment #2 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-packet-reader
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288242
--- Comment #2 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-pff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288240
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288244
--- Comment #2 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-pg-connection-string
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273141
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
This is required for the new argparse that you pushed yesterday, so we need to
get this sorted...
The minimal packaging is just to package package.json and src. That works for
node, but if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287899
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-funcsigs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, remove %license LICENSE in devel subpackage is not ncessary
and add
%post -n libxxhash -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -n libxxhash -p /sbin/ldconfig
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288242
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288236
Bug 1288236 depends on bug 1288242, which changed state.
Bug 1288242 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-pff - Minimal implementation of
printf, which is really fast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288242
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288245
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288244
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286844
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286818
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288239
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review- |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273141
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1170998
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283228
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Needs updating to 2.0.3 but other than that it looks good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> > - Shouldn't you compile with OpenMPI to get the Parallel computation?
> Is there OpenMPI support? O_o
-DUSE_OMP=ON ?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Rpmlint
---
Checking: nacl-binutils-2.24-4.git1d8592c.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nacl-binutils-debuginfo-2.24-4.git1d8592c.fc23.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> > > - Shouldn't you compile with OpenMPI to get the Parallel computation?
> > Is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288750
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288750
Bug ID: 1288750
Summary: Review Request: nuitka - Python compiler with full
language support and CPython compatibility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118885
--- Comment #7 from Ranjan Maitra ---
I have reviewed your package and here is my report. Note that I also used
fedora-review tool which I would suggest you do, also. Some of the responses
from fedora-review tool, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Created attachment 1102597
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102597=edit
License details on a file by file basis
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo