https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter component|Rebase clufter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter component|Rebase clufter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1272592
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> Undid adding gcc-c++
By guidelines you must include all dependencies which you are using.
Don't rely completely on fedora-review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1272592
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1272570
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270740
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
--- Comment #11 from Donald Pellegrino ---
I received the needinfo alert but I have not played with this build in a bit. I
had given up due to the extent of the dependencies necessary. What next step
might I take to help
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #19 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #18)
> (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #16)
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147817
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Junghans ---
Undid adding gcc-c++ and added as-needed to LDFLAGS:
Spec URL: http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1328078
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1328078 |
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
The URL and Source0 are wrong for this package.
From what I can tell, this would be valid for this package:
URL: https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2
Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter component|Rebase clufter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> xattr_runs=true
>
>
> hmm, then don't drop it.
As I said, it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #18 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #17)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> > if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> > xattr_runs=true
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Junghans ---
Re-added gcc-c++
Spec URL: http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion.spec
SRPM URL:
http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion-16.10.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Bug 1271193 depends on bug 1381892, which changed state.
Bug 1381892 Summary: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488
Bug ID: 1383488
Summary: Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin
resource sharing library and stack middleware
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487
Bug ID: 1383487
Summary: Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth -
Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Fixed your remarks.
new Spec URL: https://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/mirrormanager2.spec
new SRPM URL:
https://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/mirrormanager2-0.7.3-3.fc26.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Since it is no longer 2005, I have removed the rm -rf %{buildroot} line from
%install.
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev ---
Raphael?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Regarding client, crawler or list needing -lib: no.
-lib is only for things that directly communicate with the database, meaning
the backend and the frontend.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1382986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
Bug ID: 1383474
Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian - Julian
Calendar support for DateTime.pm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner ---
Thanks for the reminder. Could you take a look into bug #1380942?
As I'm busy with other things during the weeks, don't expect anything from me
for this review here earlier than
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Koji Rawhide scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16032959
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1383483
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mirrormanager2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #30 from William Moreno ---
Hi, sorry for the last feedback, but can you please update links using the
format:
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Please ask upstream to add a LICENSE file in the project directory, files have
the MIT License text in header but it is prefered to add a LICENSE text.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Something I noticed right off the bat: perl-generators is missing as a
BuildRequires. perl-generators is no longer in the buildroot by default, so
dependencies will not be generated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Add BR: perl-generators
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
It's common in perl packages. Because it uses this structure:
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/DateTime/Calendar/Julian.pm
Any perl-DateTime-Calendar module will put a pm file in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260845
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358741
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291877
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
--- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner ---
Pravin,
thanks again. Approved in PkgDB.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
Is the file/folder ownership conflict intentional?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
This package is licensed under the MIT License, the MIT License is visible in
setup.py and pypi page, and all source files have the full license text in
header, it is fine to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
Bug ID: 1383445
Summary: Review Request: python-requests_ntlm - HTTP NTLM
authentication using the requests library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383434
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1383445
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
Bug ID: 1383447
Summary: Review Request: python-winrm - Python library for
Windows Remote Management
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1383447
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #20 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Debian is using same approach as me, using the precompiled ttf/otf
The only thing is that we're deploying only ttf and debian both ones.
And i personally don't know if worth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374947
Michal Ruprich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Fixed those remarks except for %{buildroot} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, as that's
personal preference.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155058
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #13 from Igor Gnatenko ---
As I can see, not all bits were applied from patch which I attached...
> BuildRequires: attr
not removed, it's useless BR
> sed -i -e "/s,@ARCH_FLAGS@/s|,|!|g" configure
I don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #5 from Brad Hubbard ---
1) I have no tests so I think %check is unneeded.
2) Are you saying %description is still too long since I removed the
"Features:" section?
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511
--- Comment #3 from Stuart Campbell ---
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/stuartcampbell/rpm-packages/blob/master/nexus/nexus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
jitterentropy-rngd-1.0.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #31 from Stuart Campbell ---
Hi, no problem I know how things are.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/stuartcampbell/rpm-packages/blob/master/sphinx-theme-bootstrap/sphinx-theme-bootstrap.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372893
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372889
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
libXfont2-2.0.1-2.fc25, tigervnc-1.7.0-3.fc25, xorg-x11-drivers-7.7-18.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu-1.1.2-3.20160929git97d7386c.fc25,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #6 from Josef Ridky ---
No, it is not about length of %description, but about structure of this
section. Description should be breathe paragraph or a few sentences, but no
"checklist".
If you change this list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #15 from Igor Gnatenko ---
if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
xattr_runs=true
hmm, then don't drop it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #21 from Shawn Starr ---
Well, if it's acceptable to Debian surely this should be acceptable to Fedora,
if not something seems wrong with our policy...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #13)
> As I can see, not all bits were applied from patch which I attached...
>
> > BuildRequires: attr
> not removed,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #4 from Josef Ridky ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #38 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #37)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #36)
> > PETSc needs fftw-mpi libraries; it does not work with fftw actually
> > available on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Bug ID: 1383416
Summary: Review Request: python-inlfuxdb - InfluxDB Python
client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #37 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #36)
> PETSc needs fftw-mpi libraries; it does not work with fftw actually
> available on Fedora/EPEL.
OK, so we should get rid of that (and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Donald Pellegrino from comment #11)
> I received the needinfo alert but I have not played with this build in a
> bit. I had given up due to the extent of the dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
URL and source updated
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383434
Bug ID: 1383434
Summary: Review Request: python-ntlm3 - Python 3 compatible
NTLM library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155058
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
Donald Pellegrino changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
99 matches
Mail list logo