https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486508
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486508
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-aeson-compat-0.3.7.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-61e5032a1d
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486580
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486580
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-http-api-data-0.3.7.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01986dbdf3
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486584
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486584
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-microlens-th-0.4.1.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5090f19dc7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486593
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-torrent-1.1.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-25bf8732d0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487419
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487658
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487776
Bug ID: 1487776
Summary: Review Request: wsjtx - Weak Signal communication by
K1JT
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238379
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-geos
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486068
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-dose3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487430
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-lfs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484164
--- Comment #10 from Charlie Sale ---
Hey Neal. Can I have an update on the review process of my package? Is there
anything I can fix for you?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238384
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani ---
Right, the whole cross-compiling python stuff is still a bit experimentation in
progress, I still occasionally encounter some rough edges, so I think I'll
still hold it off for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487505
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/qulogic/IRkernel/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00597336-R-sp/R-sp-1.2.5-3.fc28.src.rpm
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487542
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/qulogic/IRkernel/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00597336-R-sp/R-sp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486068
--- Comment #6 from Ben Rosser ---
> It's reviewed already, but yes I believe you are correct about
> the subpackage. The main package is an OCaml library so it of
> course does need to remain ocaml-*, as is the case.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431300
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484561
--- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok ---
I've sponsored you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486068
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #3)
> Switched to using the configure macro.
>
> Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/ocaml/opam/ocaml-dose3.spec
> SRPM URL:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487416
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
> Supported Python versions: >= 2.6 and >= 3.2
Not sure if this is useful in the package description.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485046
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
purple-mattermost-1.1-4.20170805git4524538.el7 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ef4b31d27a
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485046
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
purple-mattermost-1.1-4.20170805git4524538.fc25 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b6275a251b
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485046
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
purple-mattermost-1.1-4.20170805git4524538.fc26 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-830882c1f9
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485046
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
purple-mattermost-1.1-4.20170805git4524538.fc27 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5fa9df44c6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485046
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487416
--- Comment #2 from Richard Kellner ---
Thank you for the review.
Yes, 1.2.3 had a bug that it was not distributed with a LICENSE file. That I
have fixed in 1.2.4.
I have mentioned it at the end of the bug that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487542
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
No, you're right. These should have been put in a -devel subpackage:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R#R_headers
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487430
--- Comment #9 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
According to its man page, git only seems to support a single /etc/gitconfig
file and not a directory like /etc/mercurial/hgrc.d. So I don't see how this
could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
dahdi-tools-2.11.1-6.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a7778ba64a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431420
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-agate. You may create the branch
"f27" using git in about 10 minutes.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475850
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-rfjakob-eme
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475863
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-xanzy-ssh-agent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475846
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-nsf-termbox-go
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475832
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-go-unofficial
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486068
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475841
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-ncw-go-acd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487632
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431420
--- Comment #7 from Julien Enselme ---
> Can this be used in make in docs?
I don't think it is possible to build the doc in parallel nor that it will
speed up the thing.
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310901
--- Comment #4 from Athmane Madjoudj ---
Thank you for your input.
Release tag fixed, I'll check the build on non-x86 archs
Regarding make, it does not harm, plus it might be needed with minimal
Buildroot [1]
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487611
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487632
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369560
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486068
--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser ---
Switched to using the configure macro.
Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/ocaml/opam/ocaml-dose3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487505
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487430
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko ---
to me scriptlets don't look sane... I would expect it to be executed while
package is built, but this is one thing...
Another thing could be done is to reference all files it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
> I wanted to wait until it's supported in latest EL to avoid %if but OK, I'll
> pave the way ;)
I'm not sure how it could get supported in EL7, since RPM 4.11 and Yum don't
support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487430
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483300
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487419
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Btw at the moment I am trying to package WSJT-X, which is a bit tricky.
According to upstream WSJT-X superseded WSPR-X, so if I successfully package
it, I will probably drop this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487542
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487419
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - Why do you make a -doc subpackage for a single file? Just include it in
> the %doc directive:
>
> %files
> %doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483300
--- Comment #9 from sensor@gmail.com ---
https://github.com/FZUG/repo/commit/fd12d9afda0ef2ead48064c5271b9f3ca2d4f0c9
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487419
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10)
> > The Python 3 support is rather fresh and not well tested. Furthermore,
> > python3-bunch isn't available. I'll switch python3-rdopkg to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487416
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486238
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani ---
As soon as you post the updated SRPM I can finish the series ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310901
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475850
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475863
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475846
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475841
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475832
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486226
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238374
--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani ---
Statement from legal:
"
> cfitsio is licensed MIT. Is my understanding correct that this special
> exception means that these files are also MIT licensed, being
> distributed as part
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487658
Bug ID: 1487658
Summary: Review Request: powerline-go - A beautiful and useful
low-latency prompt for your shell, written in go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486904
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ---
> The Python 3 support is rather fresh and not well tested. Furthermore,
> python3-bunch isn't available. I'll switch python3-rdopkg to provide rdopkg
> as soon as I'm confident in py3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484222
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
no-more-secrets-0.3.2-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483381
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-flow-jsonpath-0.3.4-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483372
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
php-behat-gherkin-4.4.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484350
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-treq-17.8.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483376
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-dflydev-dot-access-data-1.1.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483375
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-consolidation-log-1.0.3-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470448
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
php-simplesamlphp-saml2_3-3.0.2-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
Rex-1.5.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System ---
gdeploy-2.0.2-14.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485869
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
compat-ImageMagick693-6.9.3.10-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482997
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
prename-1.9-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484331
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-incremental-17.5.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477362
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
ocaml-opam-file-format-2.0.0-0.2.beta3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475750
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-bazil-fuse
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487611
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1487632
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8)
> Why does the Python 2 version "Provides: rdopkg = %{version}-%{release}"?
Because previously, the package was called just `rdopkg`, this is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487632
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1487611
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487632
Bug ID: 1487632
Summary: Review Request: perl-Acme-Alien-DontPanic - Test
module for Alien::Base
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238384
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487595
--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Fixed Urls:
Spec URL:
https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/python34-gobject.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238379
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487578
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is silent
lemenkov ~/Downloads: rpmlint open62541-0.2-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
open62541-devel-0.2-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487578
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Couple of notes:
* The following line must be moved to devel files section:
%{_libdir}/libopen62541.so
* Please add _isa macro to Requires section in -devel subppackage. E.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487611
Bug ID: 1487611
Summary: Review Request: dontpanic - Very simple library and
executable used in testing Alien::Base
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487578
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487578
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481912
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
jbuilder-1.0-0.3.beta12.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484764
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
R-uuid-0.1.2-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484738
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
R-png-0.1.7-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo