[Bug 1541516] Review Request: compat-giflib - Compatibility packaging providing libgif.so.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Why don't you package the devel stuff? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541516] Review Request: compat-giflib - Compatibility packaging providing libgif.so.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- See an example with the use of a private dir: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-readline6/blob/master/f/compat-readline6.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541587] Review Request: python-kiwisolver - A fast implementation of the Cassowary constraint solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541587 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Some curious files perm: Issues: === - Permissions on files are set properly. Note: See rpmlint output See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions python2-kiwisolver.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/kiwisolver.so 775 python3-kiwisolver.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/kiwisolver.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 775 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541516] Review Request: compat-giflib - Compatibility packaging providing libgif.so.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani --- Because no-one is supposed to use this package to compile stuff, it is just there to satisfy the libgif.so.4 dependency while packages are being rebuilt for giflib5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541441] Review Request: python-txredisapi - Non-blocking Redis client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541441
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Apache", "Unknown or
generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-txredisapi/review-
python-txredisapi/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python2-txredisapi , python3-txredisapi
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Pa
[Bug 1537805] Review Request: python-josepy - JOSE protocol implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- certbot-0.21.1-1.el7, python-acme-0.21.1-1.el7, python-certbot-apache-0.21.1-1.el7, python-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.21.1-1.el7, python-certbot-nginx-0.21.1-1.el7, python-josepy-1.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9f169b75bd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541516] Review Request: compat-giflib - Compatibility packaging providing libgif.so.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Ah yes now I remember your message on the ML regarding openjdk.
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 147 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/compat-giflib/review-compat-
giflib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[-]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if
[Bug 1526717] Review Request: python-giacpy - Python binding for Giac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- giac-1.4.9.45-2.fc26, python-giacpy-0.6.5-3.fc26, qcas-0.5.3-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-20e6c0f7cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1537805] Review Request: python-josepy - JOSE protocol implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537805 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- certbot-0.21.1-1.fc26, python-acme-0.21.1-1.fc26, python-certbot-apache-0.21.1-1.fc26, python-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.21.1-1.fc26, python-certbot-nginx-0.21.1-1.fc26, python-josepy-1.0.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0ebece1f82 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1535291] Review Request: rubygem-terminal-table - Simple, feature rich ascii table generation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535291 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-terminal-table-1.8.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fe77c33969 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1535292] Review Request: vagrant-openstack-provider - Vagrant plugin for OpenStack provider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535292 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- vagrant-openstack-provider-0.11.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-16e56293b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1537805] Review Request: python-josepy - JOSE protocol implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537805 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- certbot-0.21.1-1.fc27, python-acme-0.21.1-1.fc27, python-certbot-apache-0.21.1-1.fc27, python-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.21.1-1.fc27, python-certbot-nginx-0.21.1-1.fc27, python-josepy-1.0.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f1e68f5a90 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1495293] Review Request: python-Naked - A command line application framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495293 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-Naked-0.1.31-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-472ea01f77 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1526717] Review Request: python-giacpy - Python binding for Giac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526717 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- giac-1.4.9.45-2.fc27, python-giacpy-0.6.5-3.fc27, qcas-0.5.3-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6fd9d49e4d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1519081] Review Request: scribus-generator - Open source high-quality PDF template and mail-merge alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- scribus-generator-2.5-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-56d598bde5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1519081] Review Request: scribus-generator - Open source high-quality PDF template and mail-merge alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- scribus-generator-2.5-5.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1e35738efa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1519081] Review Request: scribus-generator - Open source high-quality PDF template and mail-merge alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541587] Review Request: python-kiwisolver - A fast implementation of the Cassowary constraint solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541587 --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Odd, those are built via normal setuptools Extensions. I don't see that linting issue in the packages on koji. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541516] Review Request: compat-giflib - Compatibility packaging providing libgif.so.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541516] Review Request: compat-giflib - Compatibility packaging providing libgif.so.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-giflib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541441] Review Request: python-txredisapi - Non-blocking Redis client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541441 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-txredisapi. You may commit to the branch "f27" in about 10 minutes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1536878] Review Request: elementary-wallpapers - Collection of wallpapers from the elementary project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: [x] Package name looks good [x] Content is installed correctly [x] Licensing is correct [!] License file is missing Please add the license file (in this case, debian/copyright) as %license in the files section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541441] Review Request: python-txredisapi - Non-blocking Redis client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541441 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541441] Review Request: python-txredisapi - Non-blocking Redis client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541441 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- python-txredisapi-1.4.4-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eea6a3c68f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1536878] Review Request: elementary-wallpapers - Collection of wallpapers from the elementary project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Fixed, same links. Also, please verify that the Provides/Obsoletes are right - since this is required by the package renaming guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1535207] Review Request: ravada - Remote Virtual Desktops Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535207 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > So we finally have all needed dependencies as official packages? That's > awesome. > > I could look into this request later. Thanks for your great work. Do you plan on reviewing it soon? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1536878] Review Request: elementary-wallpapers - Collection of wallpapers from the elementary project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
The gnome subpackage needs %epoch in the Requires line, such that:
Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506428] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search - Use PageUp and PageDown to search for previous GNOME Shell commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506428] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search - Use PageUp and PageDown to search for previous GNOME Shell commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search-10-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b866dfc687 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506428] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search - Use PageUp and PageDown to search for previous GNOME Shell commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search-10-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a458392fef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506429] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons - Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-27-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1f07259844 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506429] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons - Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506429] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons - Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-27-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ce6a4c1ec9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1506429] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons - Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-27-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e271543907 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1541862] New: Review Request: clover2 - Yet another compiler language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541862 Bug ID: 1541862 Summary: Review Request: clover2 - Yet another compiler language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mtas...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/clover2/clover2.spec SRPM URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/clover2/clover2-3.5.6-1.20180202git93d24a6.fc28.src.rpm Description: clover2 is a Ruby-like compiler language with static type like Java. This language consists of compilers and virtual machines like Java and C#. In order to compile, type checking can be done at compile time. In addition, it is designed to be able to use an easy-to-use library like Ruby. Regular expressions, lambda, closure etc are first class objects. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka koji scratch build for F-28: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24698918 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
