[Bug 1561759] Review Request: golang-github-mholt-archiver - Easily create and extract archive files with Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561759

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-04-12 03:52:13



--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Imported and built for rawhide, thanks for the review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561757] Review Request: golang-github-dsnet-compress - Collection of compression related Go packages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561757

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-04-12 03:51:37



--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Imported and built for rawhide. Thanks for the review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561759] Review Request: golang-github-mholt-archiver - Easily create and extract archive files with Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561759
Bug 1561759 depends on bug 1561757, which changed state.

Bug 1561757 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-dsnet-compress - Collection 
of compression related Go packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561757

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26319063

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566358] New: Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358

Bug ID: 1566358
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use
ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward
compatible way
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-with-location.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-with-location-0.1.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1558473] Review Request: xtl - QuantStack tools library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558473



--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
Ping?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] New: Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433

Bug ID: 1566433
   Summary: Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to
interact with mercurial repositories
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//git-cinnabar.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//git-cinnabar-0.5.0-0.1.b2.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
git-cinnabar is a git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories.
Contrary to other such helpers, it doesn't use a local mercurial clone under
the hood, although it currently does require mercurial to be installed for some
of its libraries.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 10 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-logging-facade/review-ghc-logging-
 facade/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 225280 bytes in 20 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file 

[Bug 1565626] Review Request: python-nudatus - Strip comments from Python scripts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1565626] Review Request: python-nudatus - Strip comments from Python scripts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-nudatus-0.0.2-1.fc28 python-microfs-1.2.2-1.fc28 uflash-1.1.2-2.fc28
mu-0.9.13-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-368e017dd6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1565603] Review Request: python-microfs - CLI and Python module to work with BBC micro: bit filesystem

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-nudatus-0.0.2-1.fc28 python-microfs-1.2.2-1.fc28 uflash-1.1.2-2.fc28
mu-0.9.13-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-368e017dd6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1565603] Review Request: python-microfs - CLI and Python module to work with BBC micro: bit filesystem

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1564500] Review Request: pipenv - The higher level Python packaging tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564500



--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Upstream issue https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/issues/1961

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26321845

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566332] Review Request: ghc-doctest - Test interactive Haskell examples

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566332

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 24 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-doctest/review-ghc-
 doctest/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 430080 bytes in 31 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 

[Bug 1561626] Review Request: golang-github-sourcegraph-syntaxhighlight - Syntax highlighting of code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561626

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I hae reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1564206] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy-collectd - Collect SQLAlchemy connection statistics for collectd

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564206



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy-collectd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/borgmatic

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561624] Review Request: golang-github-sourcegraph-annotate - Apply multiple sets of annotations to a region of text

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561624

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL", "BSL", "GPL (v2.1) LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "*No
 copyright* BSL", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11
 (BSD like)", "BSD (unspecified)", "GPL (v2.0)", "Perl", "BSD (3
 clause)", "ISC", "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect
 FSF address)", "GPL (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL (v2.1 or
 later)", "*No copyright* Public domain", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright*
 Apache (v2.0)". 3030 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/git-cinnabar/review-git-
 cinnabar/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package 

[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159



--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Pereto  ---
my bad,

updated spec and srpm:
- inserted the SystemD scriplets

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-stringbuilder/review-ghc-
 stringbuilder/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 13 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 

[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-with-location/review-ghc-with-
 location/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 13 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains

[Bug 1561608] Review Request: golang-github-satori-uuid - UUID package for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561608

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines, and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561597] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-guid - Generates a Go package that acts as a ghost of another

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561597

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, it conforms to the packaging guidelines, and is
APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561597] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-guid - Generates a Go package that acts as a ghost of another

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561597



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
Also, just as a heads-up -- I think you pasted the wrong description into this
package review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561590] Review Request: golang-github-peterbourgon-diskv - A disk-backed key-value store

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561590

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package.  It conforms to the packaging guidelines, and is
APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561596] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-goalias - Generates a Go package that acts as a ghost of another

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561596

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package.  It is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561610] Review Request: golang-github-sevlyar-daemon - A library for writing system daemons in golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561610

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561595] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-collection - Golang Implementation of a few basic data structures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561595

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this pacakge, it conforms to the packaging guidelines, and is
APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561601] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-randname - A Go package which creates random names

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561601

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it conforms with the packaging guidelines,
and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561605] Review Request: golang-github-okzk-sdnotify - sd_notify utility for golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561605

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2018-04-04 13:10:11 |2018-04-12 14:03:00



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566702] New: Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702

Bug ID: 1566702
   Summary: Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight,
object-oriented finite state machine implementation in
Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rbar...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-transitions.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-transitions-0.6.4-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: A lightweight, object-oriented state machine implementation in 2
Python. Compatible with Python 2.7+ and 3.0+.
Fedora Account System Username: bowlofeggs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-with-location

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551402] Review Request: falkon - Modern web browser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551402



--- Comment #18 from Kevin Kofler  ---
Maybe with 3.0.1, when the configuration migration will be in place. For 3.0.0,
no, because it does not migrate configuration from QupZilla.

What I want to do is to push QupZilla 2.2.6, the final release of QupZilla,
which has the features from Falkon 3.0.0 backported.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl - library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-04-12 16:24:06



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
libocxl-1.0.0-0.1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-stringbuilder

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551402] Review Request: falkon - Modern web browser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551402

Luke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lu...@wp.pl



--- Comment #17 from Luke  ---
Is there a chance to package Falkon for Fedora 27 as well?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566718] New: Review Request: quasselgrep - Tool for searching quassel logs from the commandline

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566718

Bug ID: 1566718
   Summary: Review Request: quasselgrep - Tool for searching
quassel logs from the commandline
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/quassel/quasselgrep/quasselgrep.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/quassel/quasselgrep/quasselgrep-0.1-0.2.20170411git502c88b.fc27.src.rpm

Description: quasselgrep is a tool for searching quassel logs from the
commandline.
It can run against both SQLite and PostgreSQL databases, and also
supports running in a client/server mode.

Fedora Account System Username: tc01

This should hopefully be a pretty simple Python application. (As it is an
application, the package is named "quasselgrep" and not "python-quasselgrep").

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566702] Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702

Brian Stinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||br...@bstinson.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566332] Review Request: ghc-doctest - Test interactive Haskell examples

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566332



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-doctest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-cinnabar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561575] Review Request: golang-github-neelance-astrewrite - Go tool to write AST

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561575

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package.  It conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. 
It is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-logging-facade

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566702] Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|br...@bstinson.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561580] Review Request: golang-github-neelance-sourcemap - JavaScript source map reader & writer for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561580

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED.  It conforms to the Fedora
Packaging Guidelines.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-stringbuilder-0.5.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-86b9a52b82

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
git-cinnabar-0.5.0-0.1.b2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6fb02b03f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-with-location-0.1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4693cf9bc2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-logging-facade-0.3.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-33bb565861

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
git-cinnabar-0.5.0-0.1.b2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8cc6cceeb5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561623] Review Request: golang-github-shurcool-highlight-diff - Syntax highlighter for diff format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561623

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines.  It is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561602] Review Request: golang-github-microcosm-cc-bluemonday - Fast golang HTML sanitizer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561602

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
This package conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines, and is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
borgmatic-1.1.15-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-edb3fd0810

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561620] Review Request: golang-gopkg-pipe-2 - Unix-like pipelines for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561620

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561612] Review Request: golang-github-shopspring-decimal - Arbitrary-precision fixed-point decimal numbers in go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561612

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines.  It is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
borgmatic-1.1.15-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-62788c91a5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1085612] Review Request: voxelands - The Fun-Focused Free Software Voxel World Game (was: minetest-classic)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085612



--- Comment #22 from Andrew Toskin  ---
Any updates on this package, Maverick Kaung?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566340] New: Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340

Bug ID: 1566340
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging
abstraction that allows multiple back-ends
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-logging-facade.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-logging-facade-0.3.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26318761

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26318885

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1566343] New: Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343

Bug ID: 1566343
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for
multi-line string literals
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-stringbuilder.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-stringbuilder-0.5.1-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
A string builder can be used to construct multi-line string literals in a
monadic way. This is primarily meant for test suites that use a lot of
multi-line string literals, and when it really matters that the syntax is as
easy on the eyes as it can get.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org