[Bug 1572007] Review Request: R-colorspace - Color Space Manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572007



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-colorspace-1.3.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562643] Review Request: python-slixmpp - Slixmpp is an XMPP library for Python 3.4+

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562643



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-slixmpp-1.3.0-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1570047] Review Request: prestopalette - A tool for artists to create harmonious color palettes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047



--- Comment #7 from Darryl T. Agostinelli  ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PrestoPalette/PrestoPalette-Packaging/master/Fedora/prestopalette.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8166/26828166/prestopalette-0.1.31-1.fc29.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1570047] Review Request: prestopalette - A tool for artists to create harmonious color palettes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047



--- Comment #6 from Darryl T. Agostinelli  ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PrestoPalette/PrestoPalette-Packaging/master/Fedora/prestopalette.spec
SRPM URL: 

Thank you for your detailed review.  I have made the adjustments to the spec
file that you noted.

In your review, you also noted the output to rpmlint:

- prestopalette.x86_64: W: no-documentation
- prestopalette.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary PrestoPalette
- prestopalette-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation

It is not necessary for these files to have a man page or documentation.

- koji build working

$ koji build --scratch rawhide `(ls ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/prestopalette* | sort -n |
head -1)`
Results: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26828165

- COPR working

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dagostinelli/prestopalette/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572461] Review Request: R-munsell - Utilities for Using Munsell Colours

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572461

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-05-06 23:37:59



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-munsell-0.4.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562643] Review Request: python-slixmpp - Slixmpp is an XMPP library for Python 3.4+

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562643



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-slixmpp-1.3.0-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572007] Review Request: R-colorspace - Color Space Manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572007



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-colorspace-1.3.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572486] Review Request: R-rex - Friendly Regular Expressions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572486

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-05-06 23:38:01



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-rex-1.1.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-roxygen2-6.0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e34e1455e8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-roxygen2-6.0.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1b9849a204

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562643] Review Request: python-slixmpp - Slixmpp is an XMPP library for Python 3.4+

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562643

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-05-06 22:00:07



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-slixmpp-1.3.0-5.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572105] Review Request: R-listenv - Environments Behaving (Almost) as Lists

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572105

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-05-06 22:00:05



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-listenv-0.7.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572007] Review Request: R-colorspace - Color Space Manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572007

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-05-06 22:00:01



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-colorspace-1.3.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574001] Review Request: golang-github-vividcortex-godaemon - Daemonize Go applications deviously

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574001

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package.

 . It conforms to the Fedora packaging guidelines
 . It builds cleanly in mock
 . The license is acceptable.

This package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575452] Review Request: R-chron - Chronological Objects which can Handle Dates and Times

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575452



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26825372

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575453] Review Request: R-quadprog - Functions to solve Quadratic Programming Problems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575453



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26825137

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575453] New: Review Request: R-quadprog - Functions to solve Quadratic Programming Problems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575453

Bug ID: 1575453
   Summary: Review Request: R-quadprog - Functions to solve
Quadratic Programming Problems
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-quadprog.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-quadprog-1.5.5-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
This package contains routines and documentation for solving quadratic
programming problems.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575452] New: Review Request: R-chron - Chronological Objects which can Handle Dates and Times

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575452

Bug ID: 1575452
   Summary: Review Request: R-chron - Chronological Objects which
can Handle Dates and Times
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-chron.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-chron-2.3.52-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
Provides chronological objects which can handle dates and times.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-roxygen2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1573778] Review Request: pixiewps - tool for offline bruteforce WPS PIN

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573778



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pixiewps

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574004] Review Request: golang-gopkg-natefinch-lumberjack-2 - Rolling logger for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574004

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package submission, and it conforms to the Fedora
Packaging Guidelines, and it also builds cleanly in mock.  It is approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574892] Review Request: R-reprex - Prepare Reproducible Example Code for Sharing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574892

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-reprex-0.1.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-44cc2234ae

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574863] Review Request: R-desc - Manipulate DESCRIPTION Files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574863

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-desc-1.2.0-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-876a3be70c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574007] Review Request: golang-github-kardianos-service - Run go programs as a service on major platforms

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574007

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines, and is approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #11)
> Package approved.
> 
> There's a mismatch between the Version-Header in the header and in the
> %changelog. Please fix this before import.
> 

I meant the Version-Release info.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---

Package approved.

There's a mismatch between the Version-Header in the header and in the
%changelog. Please fix this before import.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "LGPL", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "LGPL
 (v2.1)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "*No copyright* LGPL (v2.1 or
 later)". 59 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/pidgin-chime/review-pidgin-
 chime/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned 

[Bug 1574287] Review Request: R-rvest - Easily Harvest (Scrape) Web Pages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574287



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-rvest-0.3.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-03d53db8c2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574283] Review Request: R-whoami - Username, Full Name, Email Address, 'GitHub' Username of the Current User

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574283



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-whoami-1.1.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9867605b32

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
libefp-1.5.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e7f0d10a09

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572969] Review Request: zipper - C++ wrapper around minizip compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572969



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
COPASI-4.23.184-2.fc27, libCombine-0.2.2-3.20180426git8902b68.fc27,
libsbml-5.16.0-7.fc27, zipper-0.9.1-3.20170831giteee877a.fc27 has been pushed
to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d516abc03f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574362] Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574362



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-black-18.4a4-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-db0d9aed55

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574284] Review Request: R-gmailr - Access the Gmail RESTful API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574284



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-gmailr-0.7.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7ca525fe1a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572970] Review Request: libCombine - C++ library for working with the COMBINE Archive format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572970



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
COPASI-4.23.184-2.fc27, libCombine-0.2.2-3.20180426git8902b68.fc27,
libsbml-5.16.0-7.fc27, zipper-0.9.1-3.20170831giteee877a.fc27 has been pushed
to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d516abc03f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1573855] Review Request: editorconfig - Parser for EditorConfig files written in C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573855



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
editorconfig-0.12.2-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-15253e3e70

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 190 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/R-roxygen2/review-R-roxygen2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: 

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #10 from David Woodhouse  ---
Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/pidgin-chime.spec
SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/pidgin-chime-0.95-2.fc28.src.rpm

BR:gcc again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #9 from David Woodhouse  ---
Ack. Will put it back then. Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
fedora-review is not up to date regarding this, current guidelines say it needs
to be there: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B And we have
also removed gcc from the default buildroot during the F28/F29 cycle, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse  ---
Hm, I just *removed* the GCC BR because fedora-review complained about it...?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575412] Review Request: libmml - MML Widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575412

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575412] Review Request: libmml - MML Widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575412

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande  ---
Created attachment 1432408
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1432408=edit
LGPL exception

This license includes an exception; please, we need a legal review before.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575412] New: Review Request: libmml - MML Widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575412

Bug ID: 1575412
   Summary: Review Request: libmml - MML Widget
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: 
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/ForTesting/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00750934-libmml/libmml.spec

SRPM URL: 
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/ForTesting/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00750934-libmml/libmml-2.4-1.20180425git07159b0.fc29.src.rpm

Description: 
The QtMmlWidget component renders mathematical formulas written in
MathML 2.0.

Fedora Account System Username: sagitter

Note: this library is required for building latest COPASI release.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Add a BR for gcc.

I'll finish the review when Rawhide is not broken anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520024] Review Request: netatalk - Open Source Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) File Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520024

Steven Schlansker  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||stevenschlans...@gmail.com



--- Comment #7 from Steven Schlansker  ---
I have been running the discontinued fc26 netatalk, which I uninstalled.  I
then upgraded the host f27 -> f28.
HAT, I was not able to download your SRPM (404) but I did build 3.1.11-1.3.fc28
based on your specfile.  I installed it, restored the afp.conf.rpmsave so I had
configuration, and am working through a Time Machine backup.  Thanks to all of
you for picking this package up, looking forward to seeing it in the repos
soon.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1573778] Review Request: pixiewps - tool for offline bruteforce WPS PIN

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573778

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 25 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/pixiewps/review-pixiewps/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all 

[Bug 1573778] Review Request: pixiewps - tool for offline bruteforce WPS PIN

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573778



--- Comment #3 from Tomáš Korbař  ---
Thanks for reply.I'll keep these things in mind for next time. Everything
solved.
SRPM: https://tkorbar.fedorapeople.org/pixiewps-1.4.2-1.fc29.src.rpm
SPEC: https://tkorbar.fedorapeople.org/pixiewps.spec
Koji build for Rawhide.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26810308

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572970] Review Request: libCombine - C++ library for working with the COMBINE Archive format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572970

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
COPASI-4.23.184-2.fc28, libCombine-0.2.2-3.20180426git8902b68.fc28,
libsbml-5.16.0-7.fc28, zipper-0.9.1-3.20170831giteee877a.fc28 has been pushed
to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4d4225641

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572969] Review Request: zipper - C++ wrapper around minizip compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572969

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
COPASI-4.23.184-2.fc28, libCombine-0.2.2-3.20180426git8902b68.fc28,
libsbml-5.16.0-7.fc28, zipper-0.9.1-3.20170831giteee877a.fc28 has been pushed
to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4d4225641

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
libefp-1.5.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6815cd48a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574362] Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574362

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-black-18.4a4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dd672651f7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1558473] Review Request: xtl - QuantStack tools library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558473

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
xtl-0.4.7-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f47e9aa2e2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574287] Review Request: R-rvest - Easily Harvest (Scrape) Web Pages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574287

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-rvest-0.3.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7a98341a4d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561528] Review Request: golang-github-ajstarks-svgo - Go library for SVG generation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561528

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-ajstarks-svgo-0-0.2.20180421git644b8db.fc28 has been pushed to
the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-11b052a5d8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574283] Review Request: R-whoami - Username, Full Name, Email Address, 'GitHub' Username of the Current User

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574283

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-whoami-1.1.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-15ad30fd25

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1574284] Review Request: R-gmailr - Access the Gmail RESTful API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574284

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-gmailr-0.7.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-350a27062e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561574] Review Request: golang-github-gopherjs - Compiler from Go to JavaScript for running Go code in a browser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561574



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-gopherjs-0-0.2.20180418gite14987c.fc28 has been pushed to the
Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7c8f2137d3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1573855] Review Request: editorconfig - Parser for EditorConfig files written in C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573855

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
editorconfig-0.12.2-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a56047d297

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1572084] Review Request: colin - Tool to check generic rules/ best-practices for containers/images/dockerfiles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572084



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
colin-0.0.4-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-28f57e0247

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561682] Review Request: golang-x-debug - Debugging tools for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561682

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-x-debug-0-0.1.20180421git7fa577e.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-77182eeac2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561634] Review Request: golang-github-shurcool-events - Events service definition for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561634

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-shurcool-events-0-0.1.20180420git6abd291.fc28 has been pushed to
the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-81e6a7a5e7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561613] Review Request: golang-github-shurcool - Common Go code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561613

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-shurcool-0-0.1.20180419git47fa5b7.fc28 has been pushed to the
Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa085a1d3e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561661] Review Request: golang-x-build - Continuous build and release infrastructure

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561661

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-x-build-0-0.1.20180421git86f50f0.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8eae2dcd18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1561708] Review Request: golang-cloud-google - Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561708

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-cloud-google-0.20.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b9821bbbd8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575008] Review Request: pidgin-chime - Pidgin/ libpurple protocol plugin for Amazon Chime

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575008



--- Comment #5 from David Woodhouse  ---
Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/pidgin-chime.spec
SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/pidgin-chime-0.95-1.fc28.src.rpm

Thanks for the review.

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
>  - Latest version is 0.94

0.95 now; I'm tagging "releases" as I go, for testing. When the review is done
and I'm ready to do a proper build, I'll call it 1.0.

>  - Group: is not needed 
>  - %defattr(-,root,root,-) is not needed

Removed.

>  - Source0: should be a URL, like:
> 
> Source0:%{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

Fixed.

>  - The snapshot info should be in Release, not Version:

I'm not doing snapshots for the real Fedora package builds; I'll always tag a
proper release before building in Fedora. The snapshot support in the specfile
is just for the COPR which autobuilds each github commit. I'll rip it out
completely for the real builds. FWIW that's what rpkg does with its
{{{git_version}}} macro, which COPR seems to be pushing us to use these days.

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
>  - In %files: /etc → %{_sysconfdir}

Done. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26804196

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1575342] New: Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575342

Bug ID: 1575342
   Summary: Review Request: R-roxygen2 - In-Line Documentation for
R
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-roxygen2.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-roxygen2-6.0.1-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
Generate your Rd documentation, 'NAMESPACE' file, and collation field using
specially formatted comments. Writing documentation in-line with code makes it
easier to keep your documentation up-to-date as your requirements change.
'Roxygen2' is inspired by the 'Doxygen' system for C++.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org