[Bug 1336255] Review Request: vim-wiki - A personal wiki For Vim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255 Josef Ridky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2018-08-06 01:54:08 --- Comment #12 from Josef Ridky --- Closing as EOL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GANCJMYYV4DN2PZQPXS6HKSDM37L6SDX/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 --- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner --- License upgrade requested: https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/161 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BWVD5HJHAFV7GAKSUHJJUNGAIRTTNGRJ/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 --- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10) > Well, the authors try to get compatible with GPL. Maybe ask upstream to > upgrade. > https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5 Further: "You must re-license to EPL-2.0 adding GPL Compatibility as per Exhibit A." - but not always needed for LGPL. https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.r4jspab0hx2c https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.hsnsfg4e0htq "a project can use the new version by simply updating the file headers and notices. […] You must gain permission from all copyright holders to re-license the content" https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.tci84nlsqpgw https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.cktcxkzh8ks4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MOEHWVC26WEROLI4B4IKFSKFPHXUG3YW/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|projects...@smart.ms -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DLWFDYPB5ONZTBX4YCDSP6J7LEZPXEKU/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner --- Well, the authors try to get compatible with GPL. Maybe ask upstream to upgrade. https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3AZPXUCCDZULICJZA6MADHFA5NPNIPZS/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 --- Comment #9 from Georg Sauthoff --- (In reply to Georg Sauthoff from comment #8) > The asyncssh author explicitly chose the EPL for it's weak copyleft features > (cf. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asyncssh-users/lS8FlyxSVEo/iDsuUH9or-EJ > ). When the first code was released in 2013, EPL 2.0 simply wasn't > available. EPL 2.0 was just released in August 2018. to correct myself: s/it's/its/ and the EPL 2.0 was released in August 2017. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5DPYGQE7YUS7KQC6GTWK4B4DDPRTDLSO/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 --- Comment #8 from Georg Sauthoff --- The asyncssh author explicitly chose the EPL for it's weak copyleft features (cf. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asyncssh-users/lS8FlyxSVEo/iDsuUH9or-EJ ). When the first code was released in 2013, EPL 2.0 simply wasn't available. EPL 2.0 was just released in August 2018. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BRQQES2D5GUX4DYOZX3AOIZAWWI2AAIX/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for this review and the package. I can approve this request on trust in the result from original reviewer. A question: Any idea why upstream explicitly choose EPL 1.0? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WNKOS5FDNDPJC6DN5KEBGPQW2UBRVMDN/
[Bug 1612551] New: Review Request: python-abimap - A helper for library maintainers to use symbol versioning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612551 Bug ID: 1612551 Summary: Review Request: python-abimap - A helper for library maintainers to use symbol versioning Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ansas...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ansasaki/abimap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00783889-python-abimap/python-abimap.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ansasaki/abimap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00783889-python-abimap/python-abimap-0.3.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Description: This script allows to generate and update symbol version linker scripts which adds version information to the exported symbols. The script is intended to be integrated as part of a shared library build to check for changes in the set of exported symbols and update the symbol version linker script accordingly. Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ansasaki/abimap/build/783889/ Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28819575 Note: This review request replaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592254. The project upstream was renamed. Fedora Account System Username: ansasaki -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VI36S77P4647HHMAQPTFLWJQXN4BGXK4/
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #6 from Iñaki Ucar ---
Thanks, Georg. It looks good to me, but I cannot assign this to myself, because
I still need a sponsor. I attach below the revised version of the output of
the fedora-review tool as a reference for another reviewer.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 92160 bytes in 40 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded
[Bug 1611828] Review Request: python-asyncssh - Asynchronous SSH for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828 --- Comment #5 from Georg Sauthoff --- Yes, it makes sense to suggest/recommend the optional packages. I added the optional packages as weak dependencies (one recommends and the rest as suggests). Regarding EPL-1.0 - yes, it's a false positive because the rpmlint config includes this comment: # These are the short names for all of the Fedora approved licenses. # The master list is kept here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing # Last synced with revision "2.36, 18 April 2017" of that page. (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/blob/master/f/rpmlint.config#_43-45 or /usr/share/rpmlint/config) Also, the config even lists 'EPL' (without version qualifier): https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/blob/master/f/rpmlint.config#_114 I'll try to submit a pull-request that adds the version qualified EPL tags to the rpmlint package. I added a sed call that fixes the shebang lines. The spec file now uses the srcname macro in more places. AFAICS, the main advantage of the py3_dist macro is that I don't have to change a dependency name (in requires/buildrequires) when the fedora name of such a dependency changes - because the standardized name (usually) doesn't change. Since I don't see this as a big advantage for this package right now, I haven't transformed the requires/buildrequires to py3_dist macro calls. Updated SPEC file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gsauthof/copr-fedora/196fafef5f720f7322ae4b44e599d09eadedc83d/python-asyncssh/python-asyncssh.spec New SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/gsauthof/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00784369-python-asyncssh/python-asyncssh-1.13.3-1.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P6TKSIELKLV4WMCGCVLDPYS65NPZQ4SL/
[Bug 1293043] Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293043 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hi Ilya, Would you like to continue the review so that the package can be included in NeuroFedora? Cheers! Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NAYCWNP3GDXBMNWH2CF7VSMII3G3FTPR/
[Bug 1288739] Review Request: petpvc - Tools for partial volume correction (PVC) in positron emission tomography (PET)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288739 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-08-05 05:37:58 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Imported, built, and available for use. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DIAD5Q7DCDXP2YQOLB3FM5RFP52C4EAQ/
[Bug 1285112] Review Request: DiffusionKurtosisFit - Code to reconstruct the Diffusion Kurtosis Tensor from Diffusion Weighted MRI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285112 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-08-05 05:34:35 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Builds correctly in rawhide, and current stable releases. Closing. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=21476 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2K6TP4YMURN4YJFPRBFUL6H2D3XRNBTD/
[Bug 1280155] Review Request: python-cregg - Utilities for running psychology experiments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280155 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Adrian, Would you like to continue the review, else we'll close this and open a new one so that the package can be included in neurofedora. Cheers! Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MZC6YF63IXM76WVVQZC7PQQ4GNLJOBS4/
[Bug 1280141] Review Request: python-psychopy - Psychophysics toolkit for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280141 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Adrian, Would you like to continue the review? Otherwise I can submit the package for review to be included in neuro-fedora. Cheers, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KDO3HFA3VXYNEBEVEFKRLOXZG6IAAPXG/
[Bug 1279579] Review Request: itktools - Practical command line tools based on the ITK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279579 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(i.gnatenko.brain@ ||gmail.com) --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hello, If the package has been reviewed, should we import it to SCM? Cheers! Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ASHH476EU7HUQ4IYL3APOWCNKJ6JCTVV/
[Bug 1291877] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291877 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Igor, should I review this package if you'd still like to package it for neurofedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GIOPVL5EYJKVKH4OKZH5B4PCZT6JDUFN/
[Bug 1611804] Review Request: tendrl-ansible - Ansible playbook for Tendrl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611804 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for your review request. You need to get sponsored as a packager to can do valid package requests. Please follow the official guideline. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L4PAX6GENBFPWANINSHDU5P4ZX23RXMX/
[Bug 1611648] Review Request: tendrl-ui - Web frontend for tendrl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611648 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for your review request. You need to get sponsored as a packager to can do valid package requests. Please follow the official guideline. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NJI4ATJ72P7XI4FBKW43ZEXQKTC7OFAP/
[Bug 1611604] Review Request: tendrl-gluster-integration - Extracts all data from a Gluster cluster for consumption by Tendrl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611604 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for your review request. You need to get sponsored as a packager to can do valid package requests. Please follow the official guideline. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W6DWTH6UWXV7XDUGWCSVO57HHPQ6E4B2/
[Bug 1611644] Review Request: tendrl-api - Provides rest api service for tendrl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611644 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for your review request. You need to get sponsored as a packager to can do valid package requests. Please follow the official guideline. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FN7VDZKXFWAZC4FIHQUYFHRKLHPXTDE3/
[Bug 1611805] Review Request: tendrl-selinux - Independent SELinux policy for Tendrl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611805 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner --- Please use also same e-mail address for rhbz and FAS, to not confuse people when they try to find and to better identify you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CLQGRJOUOU3MIBY7N6BAN6R73C6FPD3V/
[Bug 1611805] Review Request: tendrl-selinux - Independent SELinux policy for Tendrl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611805 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks for your review request. You need to get sponsored as a packager to can do valid package requests. Please follow the official guideline. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Further, I'm not sure if it's allowed to have extra policies outside of the default SELinux packages. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EAB6JG7QYLXCVRJPLPQJJDHKEIWNKI24/
