[Bug 1638824] New: Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824 Bug ID: 1638824 Summary: Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cas...@meijn.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/caspermeijn/kdsoap/fedora-28-x86_64/00808717-kdsoap/kdsoap.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/caspermeijn/kdsoap/fedora-28-x86_64/00808717-kdsoap/kdsoap-1.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: A Qt-based client-side and server-side SOAP component Fedora Account System Username: caspermeijn Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30190312 This is my first package for Fedora and therefore I need a sponsor. I use this library for an application I am developing and have contributed a few times to kdsoap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638824] Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824 Luis Segundo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@blackfile.net --- Comment #1 from Luis Segundo --- you need to make some changes Issues: === - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++ See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE.GPL.txt is not marked as %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638431] Review Request: - < Python3 module to get the MAC address of local network interfaces and LAN hosts >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431 Henrik Boeving changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638824] Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824 Casper Meijn changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1546544] Re-Review Request: renaming package bear to bear-factory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544 --- Comment #6 from MartinKG --- Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/bear-factory.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/bear-factory-0.7.0-0.21.20180825git2a78522.fc29.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2018 Martin Gansser - 0.7.0-0.21.20180825git2a78522 - Remove scriptlets - Add -Wl,--as-needed" to avoid "unused-direct-shlib-dependency" warnings - Remove subpackage engine to bear-engine - Disable the bear editor with -DBEAR_EDITORS_ENABLED=0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638768] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638768 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts --- But fmt is already in the distribution, so a package review ticket is not helpful. Name : fmt Version : 3.0.2 Release : 5.fc28 Arch : x86_64 Size : 43 k Source : fmt-3.0.2-5.fc28.src.rpm Repo : fedora Summary : Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++ URL : https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt License : BSD Description : C++ Format is an open-source formatting library for C++. It can be used as a : safe alternative to printf or as a fast alternative to IOStreams. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fmt If you were trying to get the existing version updated, you should work with the existing maintainer. Submit patches or a pull request. If the maintainer is unresponsive, begin the process to address that: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers. If there are bugs or the outdated version is blocking something, ask for the assistance of a provenpackager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1546544] Re-Review Request: renaming package bear to bear-factory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544 --- Comment #8 from MartinKG --- Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/bear-factory.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/bear-factory-0.7.0-0.22.20180825git2a78522.fc29.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2018 Martin Gansser - 0.7.0-0.22.20180825git2a78522 - Use global macro srcname bear -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638824] Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824
--- Comment #3 from Luis Segundo ---
Hi Casper,
For documentation use the macro: %doc
and this one "%{_datarootdir}" can be removed
for License replace
%license %{_datarootdir}/doc/KDSoap/LICENSE.txt
%license %{_datarootdir}/doc/KDSoap/LICENSE.GPL.txt
%license %{_datarootdir}/doc/KDSoap/LICENSE.US.txt
to %doc doc/KDSoap/LICENSE*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1546544] Re-Review Request: renaming package bear to bear-factory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544
--- Comment #7 from Till Hofmann ---
Issues:
> %package bear-engine
should be
> %package -n bear-engine
and
> Requires: %{name}-engine%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
should be
> Requires: bear-engine%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
because %name is bear-factory.
If you want to keep using a macro, you could do instead:
> %global srcname bear
and then use
> %package -n %{srcname}-engine
and
> Requires: %{srcname}-engine%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Whatever you prefer.
The packages are currently not installable due to the wrong sub-package naming.
I'll continue the review when this is fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636668] Review Request: wxHexEditor - A graphical Hex Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636668 --- Comment #8 from John F --- (In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #7) > Please check this issues > > Issues: > === > - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Those header files aren't actually useful for development and this tool is not really intended to be a usable library as I understand. Since that package isn't something that I actually created myself, my expectation is that the Fedora system knows which header files are useful for creating a valid debugsource package. I couldn't find further information on exactly what should be in the debugsource package, but using an example of Firefox, $ rpm -qlp firefox-debugsource-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm | grep "[.]h$" | head /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/aom/AccessibleNode.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/AccessibleWrap.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/ApplicationAccessibleWrap.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/AtkSocketAccessible.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/DOMtoATK.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/DocAccessibleWrap.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/InterfaceInitFuncs.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/RootAccessibleWrap.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/nsMai.h /usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.3-1.fc28.x86_64/accessible/atk/nsMaiHyperlink.h there are 11176 header files in that debugsource file as well as a bunch of cpp files. There's more info here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SubpackageAndSourceDebuginfo > - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that > are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. > Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++ > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 On Fedora 29 and Rawhide, that's actually a requirement for a successful build. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot Since it's a no-op on Fedora 28, I suspect that it's not really worthwhile making conditional for Fedora 28. > - [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). That's because I switched to building the RPM using the rawhide mock configuration which generated a file with fc30 in the path and forgot to put a new link to the package. The correct link is http://johnford.org/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc30.src.rpm and I have deleted the fc28.src.rpm file from my server. I have updated the Spec and Srpm which the links point to, and I'll upload a new spec file shortly. >none document file? There aren't really any documentation files as such. The README.md file contains nothing useful, though I did fine a GPL.txt and Change.log file in the repository which I've updated the spec file to include. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636668] Review Request: wxHexEditor - A graphical Hex Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636668 John F changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1491103 is|| obsolete|| --- Comment #9 from John F --- Created attachment 1493390 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1493390=edit Spec File v3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1634701] Review Request: R-quantities - Quantity Calculus for R Vectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634701 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-10-12 16:17:28 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-quantities-0.1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638824] Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824 --- Comment #2 from Casper Meijn --- Thanks for the quick reaction. I cleaned up the BuildRequires and Requires and marked the license files. However I am not sure whether I used the %license macro correctly nor how to validate it. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/caspermeijn/kdsoap/fedora-28-x86_64/00808791-kdsoap/kdsoap.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/caspermeijn/kdsoap/fedora-28-x86_64/00808791-kdsoap/kdsoap-1.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638824] Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #1)
> you need to make some changes
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
> are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
> Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
It's a false positive. 'gcc-c++' must be listed as BuildRequires package else
compiler is not installed.
(In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #3)
> Hi Casper,
>
> For documentation use the macro: %doc
> and this one "%{_datarootdir}" can be removed
>
>
> for License replace
> %license %{_datarootdir}/doc/KDSoap/LICENSE.txt
> %license %{_datarootdir}/doc/KDSoap/LICENSE.GPL.txt
> %license %{_datarootdir}/doc/KDSoap/LICENSE.US.txt
>
> to %doc doc/KDSoap/LICENSE*
'doc/KDSoap/' is the wrong place for installing license files. Casper needs to
remove all LICENSE* files inside 'doc/KDSoap/', mark them with the '%license'
macro and comment for indicate which files are licensed with a specific
license.
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638768] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638768 Kefu Chai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2018-10-12 21:18:08 --- Comment #2 from Kefu Chai --- Thank you Jason for the links and detailed instructions! they helped a lot. I didn't realize that fmt's rpm packaging is maintained using a gith repo. this is a lot easier to track the changes. will close this bug as NOTABUG, and send a PR instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1546544] Re-Review Request: renaming package bear to bear-factory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544 --- Comment #5 from MartinKG --- Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/bear-factory.spec %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2018 Martin Gansser - 0.7.0-0.21.20180825git2a78522 - Remove scriptlets - Add -Wl,--as-needed" to avoid "unused-direct-shlib-dependency" warnings - Remove subpackage engine to bear-engine I have only uploaded the rpm SPEC file due compilation issues: [ 12%] Building CXX object bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/CMakeFiles/bear-editor.dir/code/accelerator_table.cpp.o cd /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf && /usr/bin/c++ -DBEAR_FACTORY_TEXT_DOMAIN_PATH=/usr/share/locale -DWXUSINGDLL -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D__WXGTK__ -Dbear_editor_EXPORTS -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-engine/common/include -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/.. -isystem /usr/lib64/wx/include/gtk3-unicode-3.0 -isystem /usr/include/wx-3.0 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -pthread -fPIC -Wall -std=c++11 -pedantic -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wuninitialized '-DBF_IMAGES_PATH="/usr/share/bear-factory/images"' -o CMakeFiles/bear-editor.dir/code/accelerator_table.cpp.o -c /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/code/accelerator_table.cpp /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/code/accelerator_table.cpp: In member function 'void bf::accelerator_table::on_key_pressed(wxKeyEvent&)': /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/code/accelerator_table.cpp:102:45: error: 'virtual bool wxEvtHandler::ProcessEvent(wxEvent&)' is inaccessible within this context m_event_handler.ProcessEvent( command ); ^ In file included from /usr/include/wx-3.0/wx/window.h:18, from /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/../bf/accelerator_table.hpp:19, from /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/bear-2a785228d85997dc1682ee71899841528fa09c33/bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/code/accelerator_table.cpp:14: /usr/include/wx-3.0/wx/event.h:3355:18: note: declared here virtual bool ProcessEvent(wxEvent& event); ^~~~ make[2]: *** [bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/CMakeFiles/bear-editor.dir/build.make:66: bear-factory/bear-editor/src/bf/CMakeFiles/bear-editor.dir/code/accelerator_table.cpp.o] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638743] Review Request: erlang-rebar3 - Tool for working with Erlang projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638743 Timothée Floure changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1434779 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434779 [Bug 1434779] Add package for rebar3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638743] New: Review Request: erlang-rebar3 - Tool for working with Erlang projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638743 Bug ID: 1638743 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar3 - Tool for working with Erlang projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: timothee.flo...@fnux.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/erlang-rebar3/1/erlang-rebar3.spec SRPM URL: https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/erlang-rebar3/1/erlang-rebar3-3.6.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Rebar3 is an Erlang tool that makes it easy to create, develop, and release Erlang libraries, applications, and systems in a repeatable manner. Fedora Account System Username: fnux -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638768] New: Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638768 Bug ID: 1638768 Summary: Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kc...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tchaikov/libfmt/fedora-28-x86_64/00808669-fmt/fmt.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tchaikov/libfmt/fedora-28-x86_64/00808669-fmt/fmt-5.2.1-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: C++ Format is an open-source formatting library for C++. It can be used as a safe alternative to printf or as a fast alternative to IOStreams. Fedora Account System Username: tchaikov Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30190023 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1244678] Review Request: duperemove - Tools for deduping file systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244678 Jonathan Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(frap...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Dieter --- This review appears to be stalled. Francesco, if you're still interested in packaging this, I'd be happy to help, but, if not, I would like to take it over. Please respond one way or another within a week. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1633741] Review Request: notify-python - Python bindings for libnotify
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633741 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1636520 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636520 [Bug 1636520] nicotine+ is not installable on Fedora 29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638768] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638768 Kefu Chai changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1465701 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
