https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
--- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Can you link to an updated spec file and SRPM ?
Also, do you have a list of needed python dependencies, both available and
still to be packaged ?
I appreciate building all the needed dependencies will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
--- Comment #15 from Martin Juhl ---
Everything is in:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mrmeee/ansible-awx/builds/
I have already packaged everything.. right now they are utilizing Software
Collections..
So I wonder if it would be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517
sanford rockowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
--- Comment #17 from Martin Juhl ---
Sorry:
https://awx.wiki/repository/ansible-awx-8.0.0.0-1.el7.src.rpm
Two things are missing right now in the SPEC:
1. Source is prebuilt, so is included as binary, but this should be pretty
simple to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
Martin Juhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@rtinjuhl.dk)|
--- Comment #13 from Martin Juhl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
--- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot ---
(In reply to Martin Juhl from comment #15)
> Everything is in:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mrmeee/ansible-awx/builds/
>
A stable direct link to the spec would be useful.
Searching in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759883
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
--- Comment #19 from Xavier Bachelot ---
And also drop empty and unneeded anyway %clean section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764175
--- Comment #1 from Alejandro Alvarez ---
rpmlint output: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Build on Fedora 30:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38480829
Installed on a Fedora 30, tested compiling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529824
--- Comment #18 from Xavier Bachelot ---
According to what I read in the specfile and a bit of correction in the
packages names, I think the list of missing deps in F31 is not that big. The
list might not be fully accurate, but here's what I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659709
Andrew Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zonexpertconsulti |
|n...@outlook.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759883
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764175
Bug ID: 1764175
Summary: Review Request: Elements - A C++/Python build
framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758293
Dinesh Prasanth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #16)
> to add another clarification - mmc uses these libraries internally for file
> IO of specific inputs and computations purposes, and has no public
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
$ rpm -qp --requires did-0.14-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
/usr/bin/python3
python(abi) = 3.8
python3-bugzilla
python3-httplib2
python3-requests-gssapi
python3.8dist(python-dateutil)
python3.8dist(requests)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
1. Why do you have both:
Requires: python3-bugzilla
Requires: python3-httplib2
Requires: python3-requests-gssapi
And:
%?python_enable_dependency_generator
?
2. You miss BuildRequires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> $ rpm -qp --requires did-0.14-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
> /usr/bin/python3
> python(abi) = 3.8
> python3-bugzilla
> python3-httplib2
> python3-requests-gssapi
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
If you need those deps for EPEL, you can guard them by %if %{undefined
__pythondist_requires}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
--- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
I've tweaked the hack to not fail if _smp_build_ncpus is undefined now. That
should hopefully parse correctly:
Updated spec/srpm:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #4)
> I checked yours apt.spec and pkgconfig(gnutls) >= 3.4 is a problem for epel
> 7 so I'd like import my package first to have apt in epel7 .
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764368
Bug ID: 1764368
Summary: Review Request: duc - a collection of tools for
inspecting and visualizing disk usage.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645764
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045
--- Comment #5 from Petr Šplíchal ---
Thanks for the feedback. All issues should now be fixed:
https://github.com/psss/did/commit/630b239
Updated srpm:
https://github.com/psss/did/releases/download/0.14/did-0.14-1.fc29.src.rpm
Successfully
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759940
Jun Aruga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(John.W.Marshall@g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045
--- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok ---
The only remaining issue is missing BR python3-setuptools.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #4 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
I checked yours apt.spec and pkgconfig(gnutls) >= 3.4 is a problem for epel 7
so I'd like import my package first to have apt in epel7 .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
On second thought, I've removed the conditionals for the review. I'll re-add
them to get it to build afterwords:
Updated spec/srpm:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/debs/package/apt/
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/debs/build/1068807/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763518
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694366
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271
Bug ID: 1764271
Summary: Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature
full, GPU based terminal emulator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694366
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ego.cordatus@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #18 from Qianqian Fang ---
@Ankur
your points are taken - I have no objection to the current policy regarding
bundling: if a system library already exists and it makes sense to dynamically
link to it to avoid duplication, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261
--- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton ---
Updated with suggested changes:
Spec URL: https://bcotton.fedorapeople.org/z/z.spec
SRPM URL: https://bcotton.fedorapeople.org/z/z-1.11-1.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Neal, I wasn't aware of your package .
I see that 1.7.x change to ninja builds ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759883
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Thanks!
> - There are headers in the -doc package, but I assume they're simply there for
> documentation?
That's how I understand it: code that you can look at to see how to use the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
--- Comment #3 from Ben Cotton ---
Ah! From the RPM 4.15.0 release notes:
> Add %_smp_build_ncpus macro to determine number of CPUs used for build
F30 uses RPM 4.14. So that would explain why it gets mad (running rpmbuild also
gives the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski ---
I don't see how using packaged versions of static/header libraries could be
detrimental.
The roles of the "Provides: bundled()" idiom is to determine who makes use of a
library in any way. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #9 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt.spec
SRPM URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt-1.4.8-2.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #7 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
nope, [1] doesn't build and not forcing >= 3.4.6 [2] also doesn't build
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt.spec
SRPM URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt-1.4.8-2.fc31.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761032
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
Hmm, I need to get rid of that obsoletes in cobbler. They are just completely
separate packages at this point.
Unfortunately cobber and SELinux still don't entirely play well together. But
it's not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762230
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759883
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761032
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||galtu...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #20 from Qianqian Fang ---
ok, I added the "Provides:bundled()" statements, see
https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/commit/b86488daa0f88931ce15011de13ac898580592d1
but I want to mention that neither "ssemath" nor "cjson"
52 matches
Mail list logo