[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 --- Comment #8 from Alejandro Alvarez --- Thanks a lot to you both! Good luck with your permissions, Breno. I hope that gets fixed soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792430] Review Request: php-laminas-permissions-acl - aminas Framework Permissions/Acl component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792430 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-13 06:00:05 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- Built in rawhide But cannot build for F32 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9199 BTW, closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792432] Review Request: php-laminas-mvc-i18n - Laminas Framework Mvc/I18n component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792432 Bug 1792432 depends on bug 1792430, which changed state. Bug 1792430 Summary: Review Request: php-laminas-permissions-acl - aminas Framework Permissions/Acl component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792430 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802177] Review Request: elementary-tweaks - tweak tool for pantheon de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802177 harshjain...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798798] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-deriving - Type-driven code generation for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798798 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James --- Thank you, Ankur! I had to make some changes due to a recent ocaml-ounit update, so I just pushed fixed spec and srpm files to the URLs above. Let me know if you need anything reviewed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801423] Review Request: ocaml-zmq - ZeroMQ bindings for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801423 --- Comment #1 from Jerry James --- Thanks Dan! I just did the same changes as you requested for ocaml-stdint (remove *.ml files, do not BR ocaml-findlib) and pushed the updated spec and srpm to the URLs above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802377] New: Review Request: libretro-gw - Libretro core for Game & Watch simulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802377 Bug ID: 1802377 Summary: Review Request: libretro-gw - Libretro core for Game & Watch simulators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01237955-libretro-gw/libretro-gw.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01237955-libretro-gw/libretro-gw-0-1.20200213git819b1dd.fc32.src.rpm Description: gw-libretro is a libretro core that runs Game & Watch simulators. It runs simulators converted from source code for the games available at MADrigal. Each simulator is converted with pas2lua, which was written specifically for this purpose, and uses bstree, which was also specifically written to obfuscate the generated Lua source code as per MADrigal's request. Fedora Account System Username: atim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802370] New: Review Request: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay - Fastest JSON encoder/decoder with powerful stream API for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802370 Bug ID: 1802370 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay - Fastest JSON encoder/decoder with powerful stream API for Golang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-francoispqt-gojay.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-francoispqt-gojay-1.2.13-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: GoJay is a performant JSON encoder/decoder for Golang (currently the most performant, see benchmarks). It has a simple API and doesn't use reflection. It relies on small interfaces to decode/encode structures and slices. Gojay also comes with powerful stream decoding features and an even faster Unsafe API. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802362] New: Review Request: golang-github-viant-assertly - Arbitraty datastructure validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802362 Bug ID: 1802362 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-viant-assertly - Arbitraty datastructure validation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-viant-assertly.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-viant-assertly-0.5.3-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Arbitraty datastructure validation. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802360] New: Review Request: golang-github-viant-afs - Abstract File Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802360 Bug ID: 1802360 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-viant-afs - Abstract File Storage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-viant-afs.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-viant-afs-0.15.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Abstract File Storage. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802357] New: Review Request: golang-github-viant-toolbox - Go utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802357 Bug ID: 1802357 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-viant-toolbox - Go utility library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-viant-toolbox.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-viant-toolbox-0.29.6-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Toolbox - Go utility library. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773855] Review Request: tpm2-tss-engine - Engine for OpenSSL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773855 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4) > LGTM, package is approve. You still need to find a sponsor: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group I've sponsored Mathias, so he's good to go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802343] New: Review Request: golang-github-alangpierce-forceexport - Access unexported functions from other packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802343 Bug ID: 1802343 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alangpierce-forceexport - Access unexported functions from other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-alangpierce-forceexport.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-alangpierce-forceexport-0-0.1.20200212git8f1d694.fc33.src.rpm Description: Go-forceexport is a golang package that allows access to any module-level function, even ones that are not exported. You give it the string name of a function , like "time.now", and gives you a function value that calls that function. More generally, it can be used to achieve something like reflection on top-level functions, whereas the reflect package only lets you access methods by name. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802337] New: Review Request: golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack - A (minimal) QPACK implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802337 Bug ID: 1802337 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack - A (minimal) QPACK implementation in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack-0.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: This is a minimal QPACK implementation in Go. It is minimal in the sense that it doesn't use the dynamic table at all, but just the static table and (Huffman encoded) string literals. Wherever possible, it reuses code from the HPACK implementation in the Go standard library. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802335] New: Review Request: golang-github-marten-seemann-chacha20 - ChaCha20 in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802335 Bug ID: 1802335 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-marten-seemann-chacha20 - ChaCha20 in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-marten-seemann-chacha20.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-marten-seemann-chacha20-0.2.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Copy of ChaCha20. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802042] Review Request: rust-randomize - Randomization routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802042 --- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow --- I could use review on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802292 too, if you have time and don't mind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802042] Review Request: rust-randomize - Randomization routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802042 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rbar...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rbar...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow --- Due to https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8644 I was unable to mark the ticket as approved with my personal Bugzilla account, so I am marking this approved with my Red Hat account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802042] Review Request: rust-randomize - Randomization routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802042
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ra...@electronsweatshop.com
--- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow ---
Two notes:
* The license has changed to Zlib in the master branch, so you will need to
remember to update that when they make a release.
* Some of the installed files have DOS line endings instead of Unix line
endings, so you might want to run dos2unix in the spec file.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 21 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bowlofeggs/reviews/1802042-rust-
randomize/licensecheck.txt
rbarlow: Note that the master branch has switched to Zlib, so we will
need to remember to change it when they make the next release.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
randomize-devel , rust-randomize+default-devel , rust-
randomize+rand_core-devel , rust-randomize+serde-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]:
[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Stephen Gallagher --- I'm setting fedora-review+ on Breno's behalf while the permissions issue is sorted out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 --- Comment #6 from Breno --- Thanks Alejandro, I didn't set it to + yet, because of this issue here[1]. I am waiting for the feedback from the fedora-infrastructure team. 1 - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786830] Review Request: ghc-text-metrics - Calculate various string metrics efficiently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786830 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-text-metrics-0.3.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786827] Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter - A modern, easy to use, well-documented, extensible pretty-printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786827 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-prettyprinter-1.2.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1791527] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791527 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-curl-1.3.8-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798811] Review Request: waybar - Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798811 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- date-2.4.1-1.20200207git9a0ee25.fc31, waybar-0.9.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7371874e98 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801013] Review Request: date - Date and time library based on the C++11/14/17 header
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801013 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- date-2.4.1-1.20200207git9a0ee25.fc31, waybar-0.9.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7371874e98 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767751] Review Request: ghc-data-clist - Simple functional ring type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767751 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-data-clist-0.1.2.3-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786831] Review Request: ghc-path - Support for well-typed paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786831 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-path-0.6.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786829] Review Request: ghc-repline - Haskeline wrapper for GHCi-like REPL interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786829 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-repline-0.2.1.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767906] Review Request: ghc-microlens-ghc - Microlens + array, bytestring, containers, transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767906 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-microlens-ghc-0.4.10-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767756] Review Request: ghc-word-wrap - A library for word-wrapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767756 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-word-wrap-0.4.1-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802292] Review Request: rust-serde-big-array - Big array helper for serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802292 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1782551 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782551 [Bug 1782551] rust-rpick-0.5.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802292] New: Review Request: rust-serde-big-array - Big array helper for serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802292 Bug ID: 1802292 Summary: Review Request: rust-serde-big-array - Big array helper for serde Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ra...@electronsweatshop.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/rust-serde-big-array.spec SRPM URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/rust-serde-big-array-0.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Big array helper for serde. Fedora Account System Username: bowlofeggs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801423] Review Request: ocaml-zmq - ZeroMQ bindings for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801423 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801422] Review Request: ocaml-stdint - Various signed and unsigned integers for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801422 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801422] Review Request: ocaml-stdint - Various signed and unsigned integers for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801422 --- Comment #3 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com --- Thanks for the fixes, package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796268] Package review request - nodejs-p-try
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Looks good. One or two nitpicks, like the Changelog. Once these are fixed, this
can be approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues =
- Please correct the changelog.
- the guidelines say that the npm archives should be preferred to using
checkouts from git etc:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/#_using_tarballs_from_the_npm_registry
- I don't think both BuildArch and ExclusiveArch are necessary. Please remove
BuildArch?
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
^
Please correct the changelog, it has "mga" suffixes and so on. Please also
update it to include your information etc.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
^
Not checked, please do verify.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: python-pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hi Luis, Do you have an updated spec/srpm that I could review? Cheers, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795414] Review Request: rust-time-macros - Procedural macros for the time crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795414 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 18:32:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796263] Review Request: rust-rle-decode-fast - Fast decoder for Run-Length Encoded data in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796263 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 18:32:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795413] Review Request: rust-time-macros-impl - Procedural macros for the time crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795413 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 18:07:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795414] Review Request: rust-time-macros - Procedural macros for the time crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795414 Bug 1795414 depends on bug 1795413, which changed state. Bug 1795413 Summary: Review Request: rust-time-macros-impl - Procedural macros for the time crate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795413 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795414] Review Request: rust-time-macros - Procedural macros for the time crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795414 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-time-macros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796263] Review Request: rust-rle-decode-fast - Fast decoder for Run-Length Encoded data in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796263 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rle-decode-fast -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796263] Review Request: rust-rle-decode-fast - Fast decoder for Run-Length Encoded data in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796263 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798798] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-deriving - Type-driven code generation for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798798 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- I can review this one too since no one has taken it up yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798797] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-tools - Tools for authors of ppx rewriters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798797 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-12 16:33:17 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- Built in Rawhide and F32. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798798] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-deriving - Type-driven code generation for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798798 Bug 1798798 depends on bug 1798797, which changed state. Bug 1798797 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-tools - Tools for authors of ppx rewriters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798797 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 jiri vanek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 --- Comment #7 from Martin Styk --- I blame Packit. Nevermind. I will deliver it tmrw. Thank Ernestas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 --- Comment #6 from Ernestas Kulik --- (In reply to Ernestas Kulik from comment #3) > [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. I was thinking of _smp_mflags there, oops. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 --- Comment #5 from Ernestas Kulik --- (In reply to Ernestas Kulik from comment #3) > [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [?]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Brain damage manifesting itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 --- Comment #4 from Ernestas Kulik --- (In reply to Ernestas Kulik from comment #3) > [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. Also, some items might not make sense, because I had to use the Copr build. The SRPM is a bit borked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171
--- Comment #3 from Ernestas Kulik ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: restraint-upstream.spec should be restraint.spec
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_spec_file_naming
- systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
Note: Systemd service file(s) in restraint
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/Scriptlets/#_scriptlets
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/restraint/client/bootstrap, /usr/share/restraint/plugins,
/usr/share/selinux/packages/restraint, /usr/share/restraint/client,
/usr/share/restraint
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ x: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under
[Bug 1800666] Review Request: golang-github-dchest-uniuri - generates random strings good for use in URIs to identify unique objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800666 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-dchest-uniuri -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795330] Review Request: vmem - volatile memory allocation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795330 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vmem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800672] Review Request: golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig - Go implementation of XML Digital Signatures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800672 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802177] Review Request: elementary-tweaks - tweak tool for pantheon de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802177 harshjain...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 Marián Konček changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marián Konček --- This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to get additional checks - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tagsoup See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Apache License (v2.0)", "Apache License", "Apache License (v2.0) GPL (v2 or later)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jvanek/git/tagsoup/master/1802153-tagsoup/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/class-use(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/jaxp(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/javadoc/tagsoup/org/ccil/cowan/tagsoup/jaxp/class- use(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/licenses/tagsoup-javadoc(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/doc/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to), /usr/share/licenses/tagsoup(Failed, locale,, set, C, defaulting, to) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text
[Bug 1802177] Review Request: elementary-tweaks - tweak tool for pantheon de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802177 --- Comment #1 from harshjain...@gmail.com --- Sorry I forgot to mention this in the description, This is my first package and I'm looking for someone to sponsor me into the packagers group . Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 --- Comment #2 from Martin Styk --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beaker-project/restraint/master/specfiles/restraint-upstream.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/martstyk/packit-cli-restraint-master/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01237268-restraint/restraint-restraint.0.1.45.1.8.ga4f5a7c-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800663] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-etree - Parse and generate XML easily in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800663 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Gerstmayr --- Just tried to request a repo, but it complains that the bug is not approved yet. Can you please set the flag to approved, thanks! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 Marián Konček changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mkon...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mkon...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802177] New: Review Request: elementary-tweaks - tweak tool for pantheon de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802177 Bug ID: 1802177 Summary: Review Request: elementary-tweaks - tweak tool for pantheon de Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: harshjain...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL:https://github.com/a-mere-peasant/elementary-tweaks-fedora/blob/master/Packages/tweaks/elementary-tweaks.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/a-mere-peasant/elementary-tweaks-fedora/blob/master/Packages/tweaks/elementary-tweaks-5.0.3-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Elementary-tweak tool lets you customize the pantheon desktop's appearance environment easily and safely Fedora Account System Username:amerepeasant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 --- Comment #1 from Ernestas Kulik --- The spec URL does not point to the spec file directly, so FedoraReview errors out. Can you please repost the URLs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801765] Review Request: accounts-qml-module - QML bindings for libaccounts-qt + libsignon-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801765 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- $ fedpkg request-repo accounts-qml-module 1801765 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22111 $ fedpkg request-branch --repo accounts-qml-module --all-releases https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22112 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22113 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22114 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 Ernestas Kulik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||eku...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|eku...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] New: Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 Bug ID: 1802171 Summary: Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mas...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/beaker-project/restraint/blob/master/specfiles/restraint-upstream.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/martstyk/packit-cli-restraint-master/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01237268-restraint/restraint-restraint.0.1.45.1.8.ga4f5a7c-1.fc32.src.rpm COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/martstyk/packit-cli-restraint-master/build/1237268/ Description: Restraint is designed to execute tasks. These tasks can be tests that report results or simply code that you want to automate. Which tasks to execute is determined by a job. The job also describes where to retrieve the tasks from and what parameters to pass in. These tasks can report multiple PASS, FAIL, WARN results along with an optional score. Tasks also have the ability to report log files. Each task can have metadata describing dependencies and max run time for example. Execution and reporting can be further enhanced with plugins. You can read more about the project here: https://restraint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Fedora Account System Username: martstyk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 jiri vanek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1787725 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787725 [Bug 1787725] icedtea-web uninstallable in Rawhide due to missing tagsoup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 --- Comment #2 from jiri vanek --- Self review run at: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/self-review/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 --- Comment #1 from jiri vanek --- Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup.spec SRPM URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup-1.2.1-18.fc32.src.rpm builds and run fine on f32/master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] New: Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 Bug ID: 1802153 Summary: Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jva...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup.spec SRPM URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/tagsoup/tagsoup-1.2.1-src.zip Description: TagSoup is a SAX-compliant parser written in Java that, instead of parsing well-formed or valid XML, parses HTML as it is found in the wild: nasty and brutish, though quite often far from short. TagSoup is designed for people who have to process this stuff using some semblance of a rational application design. By providing a SAX interface, it allows standard XML tools to be applied to even the worst HTML. Fedora Account System Username: jvanek tagsoup was orphaned three months ago, and retired six weeks ago. This review to put it back is based on latests bits. I will maintain it, as icedtea-web is only one eyed without it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795414] Review Request: rust-time-macros - Procedural macros for the time crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795414 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- - License correct, pull request to ship LICENSE-* files with the crate was merged upstream - Latest version is packaged - Package builds on rawhide (if rust-time-macros-impl is present) - Package installs on rawhide (if rust-time-macros-impl is present) - Standard autogenerated rust package with simple fixes Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802102] New: Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock5 - DocBlock parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802102 Bug ID: 1802102 Summary: Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock5 - DocBlock parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpdocumentor/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock5.git/plain/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock5.spec?id=711ea5f9df368c3625933f65ab92a9671bbcd1e6 SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock5-5.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: The ReflectionDocBlock component of phpDocumentor provides a DocBlock parser that is fully compatible with the PHPDoc standard. With this component, a library can provide support for annotations via DocBlocks or otherwise retrieve information that is embedded in a DocBlock. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/phpDocumentor/Reflection/DocBlock5/autoload.php Fedora Account System Username: remi Already reviewed for Version 4 see bug #1625190 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801429] Review Request: rust-futures-timer - Timeouts and intervals for futures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801429 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks! Once we need newer futures-timer versions, I can move 0.1.1 to a futures-timer0.1 compat package. Unretirement request: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9248 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797366] Review Request: rust-rustyline - Readline implementation based on Antirez's Linenoise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797366 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-rustyline-6.0.0-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 11:04:53 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1459475 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801426] Review Request: rust-tower-util - Utilities for working with a Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801426 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-tower-util-0.3.0-1.fc3 ||3 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 11:04:04 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1459474 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796370] Review Request: pipewire0.2 - PipeWire 0.2 compatibility libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796370 Wim Taymans changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 10:49:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801426] Review Request: rust-tower-util - Utilities for working with `Service`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801426 Bug 1801426 depends on bug 1801425, which changed state. Bug 1801425 Summary: Review Request: rust-tower-test - Utilities for writing client and server `Service` tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801425 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801425] Review Request: rust-tower-test - Utilities for writing client and server `Service` tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801425 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-tower-test-0.3.0-1.fc3 ||3 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 10:35:17 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1459461 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801425] Review Request: rust-tower-test - Utilities for writing client and server `Service` tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801425 Bug 1801425 depends on bug 1800864, which changed state. Bug 1800864 Summary: Review Request: rust-tower-layer - Decorates a Service to allow easy composition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800864 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800864] Review Request: rust-tower-layer - Decorates a Service to allow easy composition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800864 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-tower-layer-0.3.0-1.fc ||33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 10:12:13 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1459454 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801464] Review Request: mediawiki-lastmodified - Show the last modified page time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801464 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-12 09:26:17 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Built for rawhide, and stable releases. Closing. (Bodhi sometimes hangs when updating bugs for me, so not specifying the bug there for the moment). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802049] New: Review Request: rust-oorandom - Tiny, robust PRNG implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802049 Bug ID: 1802049 Summary: Review Request: rust-oorandom - Tiny, robust PRNG implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-oorandom.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-oorandom-11.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Tiny, robust PRNG implementation. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801765] Review Request: accounts-qml-module - QML bindings for libaccounts-qt + libsignon-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801765 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich --- I wasn't able to run fedora-review. Anyway, doing this manually: 1) Naming - ok 2) License - ok 3) Scriptlets - ok - they are not needed 4) Running rpmlint - ok : accounts-qml-module.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libaccounts -> lib accounts, lib-accounts, accountants accounts-qml-module.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libsignon -> monsignor accounts-qml-module.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libaccounts -> lib accounts, lib-accounts, accountants accounts-qml-module.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsignon -> monsignor 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. I don't see anything wrong → approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802048] New: Review Request: rust-random-fast-rng - Rust library for Blazing fast non cryptographic random number generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802048 Bug ID: 1802048 Summary: Review Request: rust-random-fast-rng - Rust library for Blazing fast non cryptographic random number generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-random-fast-rng.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-random-fast-rng-0.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Rust library for Blazing fast non cryptographic random number generator. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802047] New: Review Request: rust-random-trait - Rust library for a random trait meant to produce random generic types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802047 Bug ID: 1802047 Summary: Review Request: rust-random-trait - Rust library for a random trait meant to produce random generic types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-random-trait.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-random-trait-0.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Rust library for a random trait meant to produce random generic types. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802042] New: Review Request: rust-randomize - Randomization routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802042 Bug ID: 1802042 Summary: Review Request: rust-randomize - Randomization routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-randomize.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-randomize-3.0.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Randomization routines. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256047] Review Request: purple-events - Plugin for fine-grained control over libpurple events
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256047 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(bugzilla.redhat@m | |e.benboeckel.net) | Last Closed||2020-02-12 08:26:27 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel --- I haven't used this package personally for a while. I may pick this review up again if I end up using it again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
