[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Hi Gil, thanks for review. Only ASL 2.0, EPL, BSD and MIT licenses require including the license text in the packages. Please take a look at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jbossws-native Short Description: JBossWS Native Owners: goldmann Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866325] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866325 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866325] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866325 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866325] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866325 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ugene-1.11.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ugene-1.11.3-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879903] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc - Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879903 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the review New Package GIT Request === Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc Short Description: Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver Owners: pbrobinson dgilmore Branches: F-17 F-18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 --- Comment #20 from Jan Vcelak jvce...@redhat.com --- You are right, I didn't. Sorry for that, I'm quite busy recently. Will do it soon. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772362] Review Request: sigil - Free, Open Source WYSIWYG ebook editor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-26 05:00:40 --- Comment #34 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- Imported, build for f16+ and bodhi tickets created for f16+, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866156] Review Request: giada - audio looper for JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156 --- Comment #9 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- You are right, I've been using the r2 one. Using r3 I got this: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext after: mock init -r fedora-rawhide-i386 mock --install -r fedora-rawhide-i386 rtaudio-devel-4.0.11-3.fc19.i686.rpm rtaudio-4.0.11-3.fc19.i686.rpm mock --no-clean giada-0.5.2-3.fc18.src.rpm -r fedora-rawhide-i386 I can build it with: mock --install -r fedora-rawhide-i386 libXext-devel mock --no-clean giada-0.5.2-3.fc18.src.rpm -r fedora-rawhide-i386 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 Jan Vcelak jvce...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||fatrat-subtitlesearch-1.2.0 ||-0.3.beta1.fc16 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-26 05:20:57 --- Comment #24 from Jan Vcelak jvce...@redhat.com --- Finished. Thanks to everyone involved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403 --- Comment #12 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com --- I'm running into some build errors in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Some logs for you here: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/svnkit/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866156] Review Request: giada - audio looper for JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156 --- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com --- Thats' strange because traditionally libXpm has pulled in libXext as a dependancy. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=3227992 Updated here (and tested in mock!) SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/giada.spec SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/giada-0.5.2-4.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845262] Review Request: mhwaveedit - Sound editing program
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845262 Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-11-26 06:25:11 --- Comment #12 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com --- Yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845262] Review Request: mhwaveedit - Sound editing program
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845262 Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834239] Review Request: monobristol - frontend for britsol in mono
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239 Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-26 06:26:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866012] Review Request: non-daw - a digital audio workstation using JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012 --- Comment #7 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com --- Good to close this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866012] Review Request: non-daw - a digital audio workstation using JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012 --- Comment #8 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com --- Not as yet. I've not submitted an update but will soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866012] Review Request: non-daw - a digital audio workstation using JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- @Jørn normally, it get's closed if a package hits stable. Apparently, there are no builds yet. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/non-daw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] New: Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 Bug ID: 880155 Summary: Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: rhug...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/PackageKit-Qt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/PackageKit-Qt-0.8.6-1.fc18.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4728316 Description: PackageKit-qt is a Qt support library for PackageKit Fedora Account System Username: rhughes $ rpmlint rpmbuild/*RPMS/PackageKit-Qt-* 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This package is the Qt code split out from the PackageKit project. The new package is blocking the release of PackageKit 0.8.6 as projects such as apper require the Qt interfaces provided by PackageKit-Qt. I'd really appreciate any help on this package as I'm a bit of a cmake newbie. Thanks. Richard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866012] Review Request: non-daw - a digital audio workstation using JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866012 --- Comment #10 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com --- Ahh, my bad. I was just cleaning up some of the packages I got reviewed during the summer that still weren't closed and were cluttering up my list of bugs. Guess i was a little hasty :p -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879953] Review Request: xs-config - XS/XSX default configuration
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879953 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879954] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879954] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-11-26 06:37:42 --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Rssh is already in Fedora, so closing this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libtvdb Short Description: Library to retrieve TV series information from web Owners: dvratil Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866156] Review Request: giada - audio looper for JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156 --- Comment #11 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- (In reply to comment #10) Thats' strange because traditionally libXpm has pulled in libXext as a dependancy. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=3227992 but not libXext-devel, as I can see Updated here (and tested in mock!) works fine now. Please notice there is probably a typo in description: «giada is an audio looper or ALSA/JACK using the FLTK toolit» should be «giada is an audio looper for ALSA/JACK using the FLTK toolit», I suppose. I'm not into audio but the word «machine» in Summary is inexact, isn't it? Next is my full review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] New: Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 Bug ID: 880179 Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: i...@stingr.net Spec URL: http://stingray.fedorapeople.org/review/libnetfilter_cthelper/libnetfilter_cthelper.spec SRPM URL: http://stingray.fedorapeople.org/review/libnetfilter_cthelper/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This library provides the infrastructure for the user-space helper infrastructure available since the Linux kernel 3.6. Fedora Account System Username: stingray -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- I'll review it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866156] Review Request: giada - audio looper for JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156 --- Comment #13 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- Summarizing: [?]: Package functions as described. * Seems my pulseaudio system is not compatible with rtaudio [!]: Latest version is packaged. * last upstream is 0.5.4 [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. * you should contribute desktop file, and the patch if considered useful to upstream and provide the links to those See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment [!]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. * as desktop file doesn't include a MimeType key it not needs the update-destkop-database calls See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879624] Review Request: jbossws-native - JBossWS Native
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879624 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866156] Review Request: giada - audio looper for JACK
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156 --- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org --- Other issues: Maybe you'll want to accept this enhancement for the desktop file: --- srpm-unpacked/giada.desktop2012-11-26 12:36:35.515736117 +0100 +++ giada.desktop2012-11-26 14:04:20.306506516 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ [Desktop Entry] Name=Giada -Comment=Realtime software looping sampler +Name[es]=Giada +GenericName=Drum machine and loop sequencer +GenericName[es]=Caja de ritmos y sequenciador de loops Icon=giada Type=Application Exec=giada After a fast watch at Giada website I think you could add more info into the descrption to be more descriptive, something like: Features Ultra-lightweight internal design Multi-thread/multi-core support 32 bit floating point audio engine Experimental VST support Up to 32 audio channels controlled via computer keyboard Different playback modes and combinations Bpm and beat sync with sample-accurate loop engine Live sampler from external inputs Live quantizer Action recorder Patch-based systemBuilt-in wave editor Support for all major uncompressed file formats at your own consideration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879954] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954 --- Comment #2 from Alex aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca --- yes but which release? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879903] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc - Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879903 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- WARNING: dgilmore is not a valid FAS account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880195] New: Review Request: python-di - Dependency injection library for python unittesters
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880195 Bug ID: 880195 Summary: Review Request: python-di - Dependency injection library for python unittesters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: msi...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://msivak.fedorapeople.org/newpkg/python-di.spec SRPM URL: http://msivak.fedorapeople.org/newpkg/python-di-0.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Python library for dependency injection design patterns (also known as Inversion of Control). Its purpose is to help isolate units from each other without changing the code and algorithms much. It is helping mostly in environments and teams where high unittest coverage is a goal. Fedora Account System Username: msivak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- willie-3.1.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/willie-3.1.2-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- willie-3.1.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/willie-3.1.2-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879903] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc - Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879903 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com --- New Package GIT Request === Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc Short Description: Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver Owners: pbrobinson ausil Branches: F-17 F-18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880203] New: strong_parameters - Permitted and required parameters for Action Pack
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880203 Bug ID: 880203 Summary: strong_parameters - Permitted and required parameters for Action Pack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: jstri...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-strong_parameters.spec SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-strong_parameters-0.1.5-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: strong_parameters is an implementation of the slice pattern. The basic idea is to move mass-assignment protection out of the model and into the controller where it belongs. Fedora Account System Username: jstribny Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4728639 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879903] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-armsoc - Xorg X11 armsocdrm driver
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879903 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879954] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954 --- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rssh 2.3.3 However, the package seems to be orphaned, so someone need to take care of it. Are you willing to do it ? That's the same as pushing the new version, except the procedure is a little bit different. ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers for the procedure ) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880203] rubygem-strong_parameters - Permitted and required parameters for Action Pack
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880203 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|strong_parameters - |rubygem-strong_parameters - |Permitted and required |Permitted and required |parameters for Action Pack |parameters for Action Pack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880203] Review Request: rubygem-strong_parameters - Permitted and required parameters for Action Pack
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880203 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|rubygem-strong_parameters - |Review Request: |Permitted and required |rubygem-strong_parameters - |parameters for Action Pack |Permitted and required ||parameters for Action Pack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873813] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories - Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813 --- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- I am on f18, 64 bits, running gnome-shell. My account is mscherer. However, i just noted that I gave a wrong password, so maybe that's the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is mostly silent (except few false positives):
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/libnetfilter_cthelper-*
../SRPMS/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
libnetfilter_cthelper.ppc: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0/COPYING
libnetfilter_cthelper-debuginfo.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
libnetfilter - filibusterer
libnetfilter_cthelper-debuginfo.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cthelper
- ct helper, ct-helper, helper
libnetfilter_cthelper-debuginfo.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
libnetfilter - filibusterer
libnetfilter_cthelper-debuginfo.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cthelper - ct helper, ct-helper, helper
libnetfilter_cthelper-devel.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libnetfilter
- filibusterer
libnetfilter_cthelper-devel.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cthelper -
ct helper, ct-helper, helper
libnetfilter_cthelper-devel.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
libnetfilter - filibusterer
libnetfilter_cthelper-devel.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cthelper - ct helper, ct-helper, helper
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
- The License field in the package spec file MUST matche the actual license
(GPLv2 or later). A correct License tag is GPLv2+.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0.tar.bz2*
07618e71c4d9a6b6b3dc1986540486ee310a9838ba754926c7d14a17d8fccf3d
libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0.tar.bz2
07618e71c4d9a6b6b3dc1986540486ee310a9838ba754926c7d14a17d8fccf3d
libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0.tar.bz2.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ The package stores shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's
default paths, and it calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
0 The package DOESN'T have a %clean section, so it won't build cleanly on
systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are stored in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries.
+ The pkgconfig(.pc) file is stored in a -devel package.
+ The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) is(are) stored in a
-devel package.
+ The -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
0 At the beginning of %install, the package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4
and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
Assuming that you set License tag to GPLv2+ I don't see any issues and this
package is
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879954] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954 --- Comment #4 from Alex aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca --- in order for it to be process I have to change the version? or the release? according to my course it has to be fully maintain not orphaned. got to check with ctyler first, not sure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- (In reply to comment #8) I'll be taking a two-week vacation now, so I won't be able to look at this until I get back. Whoops... Anyway, I have rebased the package to 0.2.5, otherwise the spec is pretty much the same as the one reviewed above. I ran into some speed issues with ATLAS, so I'd like to get this package in the repos now. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas-0.2.5-1.fc18.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4728927 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 Paul P Komkoff Jr i...@stingr.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Paul P Komkoff Jr i...@stingr.net --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libnetfilter_cthelper Short Description: User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers Owners: stingray Branches: f16 f17 f18 el5 el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Can you fedpkg clone? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #8) Can you fedpkg clone? Yes, I can. It got stuck during fedpkg import, at file uploading. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868717] Review Request: libtvdb - Library to retrieve TV series information from web
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtvdb-0.3.0-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I can help with the review, it's fairly small and should be pretty simple and straight-forward... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876915] Review Request: erlang-emmap - Erlang mmap interface
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876915 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Ok, I've re-created the git repo, try it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873813] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories - Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- ok so just after testing, the issue is that I use the mouse to click on the button, and only with keyboard, this work. So I tested, this work fine. if you do not forget to remove the macro at the top ( since they are defined in fedora since a long time, so that just add potential bugs in the futur, IMHO ), the package is approved. ( also, you forgot to update the spec file on your website ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
$ rpmlint *.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
naming: ok
sources: ok
41f6fa67e980733d7d8a2cd881bbe5b4 PackageKit-Qt-0.8.6.tar.gz
license: ok
$ licensecheck -r src
src/daemonprivate.h: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/transactionprivate.h: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/common.h: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/bitfield.cpp: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
src/daemonprivate.cpp: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/daemon.cpp: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/transaction.h: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/bitfield.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
src/transaction.cpp: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/transactionprivate.cpp: LGPL (v2 or later)
src/daemon.h: LGPL (v2 or later)
macros: ok
builds/installs: mostly ok, but...
1. MUST: need some Obsoletes (and at least a temporary Provides) here to
handle upgrade from older PackageKit-qt...
Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt 0.8.6
Provides: PackageKit-qt = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: PackageKit-qt%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
and for -devel subpkg:
Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt-devel 0.8.6
Provides: PackageKit-qt-devel = %{version}-%{release}
that seems to be the only review blocker i see. there's a handful of smaller
SHOULD things we can do, but i'll be happy to wait until after import to help
implement that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873813] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories - Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813 --- Comment #9 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Cool. Thanks :) Just for posterity, here's one more new release that fixes the ctrl-C issue we talked about in IRC and removes those python macros. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories-1.0.2-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873813] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories - Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories Short Description: Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell Owners: ralph Branches: f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155
--- Comment #3 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
1. MUST: need some Obsoletes (and at least a temporary Provides) here to
handle upgrade from older PackageKit-qt...
Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt 0.8.6
Provides: PackageKit-qt = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: PackageKit-qt%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
and for -devel subpkg:
Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt-devel 0.8.6
Provides: PackageKit-qt-devel = %{version}-%{release}
Fixed in:
Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/PackageKit-Qt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/PackageKit-Qt-0.8.6-1.fc18.src.rpm
Thanks for the super-speedy review.
Richard.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- invert the order of your changelog (newest first), and we have a winner. :) please add me (rdieter) as comaintainer. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 847322] Review Request: libnetfilter_cttimeout - Timeout policy tuning for Netfilter/conntrack
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847322 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-26 11:20:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761619] Review Request: cross-binutils - Multiple cross-build binutils
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-26 11:23:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766166] Review Request: cross-gcc - Multiple cross-build gcc
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166 Bug 766166 depends on bug 761619, which changed state. Bug 761619 Summary: Review Request: cross-binutils - Multiple cross-build binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766166] Review Request: cross-gcc - Multiple cross-build gcc
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-26 11:24:19 --- Comment #22 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- This package was imported and built for a very long time. All other questions and issues should be discussed in a separate rhbz tickets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873813] Review Request: gnome-shell-search-github-repositories - Search your Github Repos from the gnome-shell
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873813 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879435] Review Request: c-graph - an interactive package that demonstrates the mathematical operation of convolution
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879435 --- Comment #5 from Adrienne Thompson a...@codeartnow.com --- Having given further thought to the problem, I have decided that my workload does not allow the task of building the SRPM any time in the near future. Extrapolating the download statistics for gnu.org, I estimate that since its release last year, C-Graph's user base is somewhere in the tens of thousands. GNU C-Graph seems likely to become a popular educational tool for engineering signals/systems theory and computer vision. Accordingly, you might consider undertaking the requisite packaging yourselves as Fedora will find the investment of time and resources worthwhile. Please advise me should you decide to do so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 --- Comment #5 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #4) invert the order of your changelog (newest first), and we have a winner. :) Gahh, Monday :) Sorry about that. Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 --- Comment #6 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: PackageKit-Qt Short Description: Qt support library for PackageKit Owners: rhughes rdieter Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: rdieter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880155] Review Request: PackageKit-Qt - Qt support library for PackageKit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880155 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 853775] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853775 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? Flags||needinfo?(alexisis-pristont ||a...@hotmail.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841266] Review Request: plink - whole genome association analysis toolset
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(raymondpete@fedor ||aproject.org) --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Are you still interested in this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878653] Review Request: NetworkManager-l2tp - NetworkManager VPN plugin for l2tp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878653 --- Comment #8 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- License text issue fixed by upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877763] Review Request: gnome-photos - Access, organize and share your photos on GNOME
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877763 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880195] Review Request: python-di - Dependency injection library for python unittesters
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880195 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- The source tarball contains a bundled egg-info. Please remove it before building your package (in the %prep section): rm -rf di.egg-info See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Eggs for more information. Additionally, you will need python-setuptools in BuildRequires. Another question: Are you planning to provide this package for EPEL 5? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879954] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879954 --- Comment #5 from Alex aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca --- yeah i am willing to do it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 841266] Review Request: plink - whole genome association analysis toolset
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266 Ray Pete raymondp...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(raymondpete@fedor | |aproject.org) | --- Comment #7 from Ray Pete raymondp...@fedoraproject.org --- Hi Volker, Indeed I have updated the spec per your requests above. I'll submit the new srpm to koji and update the ticket when all is completed. Regarding the .jar file. This is a gui application, which does not seem to include src. I also dealt with a few of the warnings mentioned above, but this is not included on the website source yet. Cheers, Ray -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875299] Review Request: slowhttptest - An Application Layer DoS attack simulator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875299 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|volke...@gmx.at Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877763] Review Request: gnome-photos - Access, organize and share your photos on GNOME
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877763
--- Comment #6 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru ---
I couldn't to use this application. When I started it it has no any photos and
I couldn't find any way to add them.
In .spec you use https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Photos but About of
Gnome-Photos used https://live.gnome.org/GnomePhotos.
Probably it should be fixed.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation
Any relevant documentation included in the source distribution should be
included in the package as %doc. Irrelevant documentation include build
instructions, the omnipresent INSTALL file containing generic build
instructions
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address), LGPL (v2 or later),
GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 4 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/taurus/877763-gnome-
photos/licensecheck.txt
Use GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ for License tag
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[-]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is
such a file.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address), LGPL (v2 or later),
GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 4 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/taurus/877763-gnome-
photos/licensecheck.txt
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes
[Bug 875299] Review Request: slowhttptest - An Application Layer DoS attack simulator
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875299
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Antonio, you should actually fill out this form!
There are warnings about comparing unsigned and signed integers. Maybe you can
patch that and send it upstream!
Please ask upstream to provide a license file.
=APPROVED=
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[-]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0). 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in
/media/speicher1/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS/875299-slowhttptest/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: Package functions as described.
Ran one of the tests from the manpage
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 Ron jokeyrh...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jokeyrh...@gmail.com --- Comment #46 from Ron jokeyrh...@gmail.com --- This is great news. So Node.JS 0.10.x will be in the official repositories? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879932] Review Request: SocketW - It is a streaming socket C++ library designed to be easy to use
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879932 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info --- Thank you for the comments. All addressed. http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora17/SocketW/SocketW.spec http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora17/SocketW/SocketW-031026-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
--- Comment #14 from Michael Shigorin shigo...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 652233
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=652233action=edit
spec accepted into ALT Linux Sisyphus
Here's a brief overview of changes to get it working (basically a closer look
at the INSTALL file and translation into spec lingo without trying to be even
smarter ass):
%define _libdir %_usr/lib
# ...
%install
mkdir -p %buildroot{%_bindir,%_libdir/%name,%_datadir}
cp -a bin/{picolisp,pil} %buildroot%_bindir/
# TODO: emacs subpackage
rm -rf lib/el
# lib/ and lib.l
cp -a lib* %buildroot%_libdir/%name/
# as per INSTALL
ln -s ../lib/%name %buildroot%_datadir/%name
%files
%doc CHANGES CREDITS README
%_bindir/*
%_libdir/%name/
%_datadir/%name/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875087] Review Request: pbsclusterviz - Visualise the status of PBS clusters
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Hello Paul!
Thank you for your contribution. You must become a packager to maintain
packages in Fedora.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
I left a comment on the ticket that you'll need a sponsor first.
vtk is only in EPEL 6. If you want your package to appear in EPEL 5, you'll
have to convince the vtk maintainer to create a build there. :)
---
Some comments:
License is GPLv2+
Use the name and version macro in Source0.
You don't need defattr anymore.
You must own %{_sysconfdir}/pbsclusterviz.d. and
%{python_sitelib}/pbsclusterviz
Drop all version constraints from BuildRequires. No maintained release of
Fedora or EL has older versions. I don't know whether you need those packages
while you're building. But if you need them during operation, you'll have to
make them Requires.
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pbsclusterviz-0.7a-py2.7.egg-info
Also include AUTHORS and COPYING. The postal address in COPYING is outdated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863796] Review Request: printrun - RepRap printer interface and tools
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- The last SRPM link is dead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879928] Review Request: rigsofrods - Vehicle simulator based on soft-body physics
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||880364 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855605] Review Request: hexchat - GTK IRC Client
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855605 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Don't use macros for make, rm, chmod and install. Header and source code files have executable permissions. Please inform upstream to update the FSF address, if you haven't done it yet. Make the build verbose so the exact command line becomes visible. Drop the version constraints for glib2, gtk2 and bison. No maintained release has versions older than that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879931] Review Request: angelscript - AngelCode Scripting Library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879931 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info --- (In reply to comment #1) Hm, the spec looks like mine from http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/angelscript.html :-) Absolutely! You may find it copyright in sole changelog entry of my spec file. So if you have Fedora account in packager group and wish (co)maintain this packet - welcome. I had packaged it as dependency to rigsofrods package. And with hope fix come in upstream bug to interoperability with new version. Also thank you for the patch. I'll look it. May be you are willing submit it upstream? Are you author them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506 --- Comment #12 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com --- thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863796] Review Request: printrun - RepRap printer interface and tools
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796 --- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz --- Sorry for that. I've only raised the revision number in the link and forget to change the commit number and date. Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/printrun.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/printrun-0.0-12.20121103git6fa47668f2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880387] New: Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387 Bug ID: 880387 Summary: Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: amcn...@mcnabbs.org Spec URL: http://aml.cs.byu.edu/~amcnabb/python-pymongo.spec SRPM URL: http://aml.cs.byu.edu/~amcnabb/python-pymongo-2.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This review request is for renaming the pymongo package to python-pymongo. It also adds initial support for Python 3. Fedora Account System Username: amcnabb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880387] Review Request: python-pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880387 --- Comment #1 from Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org --- I submitted this srpm to koji, and it built without any errors: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4730498 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874905] Review Request: php-drush-drush - Command line shell and Unix scripting interface for Drupal
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874905 --- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #8) There has to be some sort of cache somewhere. I had a system with drush custom installed in /usr/local/bin and /usr/share/drush. I removed the custom install, installed these RPMS, and get the same type error you are seeing (except showing that it is trying to point to the old location): # which drush /usr/bin/drush # drush --version -bash: /usr/local/bin/drush: No such file or directory # /usr/bin/drush --version drush version 5.7 I found ~/.drush and /tmp/drush-env. I removed both directories but the test result was the same. I rebooted the VM and then the drush command worked perfectly fine. I need to figure out a way to make it work without a reboot... Also, version 5.8.0 was released so I need to update the RPM to that version too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
