https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
- Use %{__isa_bits} macro to expand to either 32 or 64 according to the
architecture of the package
%ifarch x86_64
--enable-optimizations=sse2
%else
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923035
Bug 923035 depends on bug 927550, which changed state.
Bug 927550 Summary: Review Request: pycdf - A python interface to the Unidata
netCDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927550
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927550
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923035
--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
Well, there's no documentation to suggest what optional dependency is required
for what purpose. The docs specify the pyode is required for using ODEs and
nothing else.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986641
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057919
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Summary:A library for highly efficient multi-dimensional array
I would find it worthwhile to mention that it's a header-only library or
header-only API and written in C++:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986641
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026252
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(brendan.jones.it@ |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Ok, a couple of questions/differences about your spec...
1. You move the bakefiles but Dan's spec mentions that they're not supported
and just deletes them.
2. I've got the compat26
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5)
- Use %{__isa_bits} macro to expand to either 32 or 64 according to the
architecture of the package
%ifarch x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054565
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989847
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851680
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054565
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
--- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
1) Package installs properly.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
I'll review the licenses after you un-bundled xmlrpc++.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Well, whose idea was it to add that? ;) There is no comment above that section
in the spec file. So, take a look at the configure script and figure out what
it does if that option
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062911
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Newton alexjn...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #17)
Ok, a couple of questions/differences about your spec...
1. You move the bakefiles but Dan's spec mentions that they're not supported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062920
--- Comment #1 from Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnara...@fedoraproject.org ---
Spec URL: http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-amq-protocol.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063038
Bug ID: 1063038
Summary: Review Request: cookiejar - he Ruby CookieJar is a
library to help manage client-side cookies in pure
Ruby
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063039
Bug ID: 1063039
Summary: Review Request:em-http-request -EventMachine based,
async HTTP Request client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063040
Bug ID: 1063040
Summary: Review Request: em-socksify - Transparent proxy
support for any EventMachine protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Bug ID: 1063042
Summary: Review Request: em-websocket - EventMachine based
WebSocket server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044
Bug ID: 1063044
Summary: Review Request: dh-autoreconf - debhelper add-on to
call autoreconf and clean up after the build
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043
Bug ID: 1063043
Summary: Review Request: cdbs - Common build system for Debian
packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
Bug ID: 1063045
Summary: Review Request: gnome-pkg-tools - Tools for the Debian
GNOME Packaging Team
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063047
Bug ID: 1063047
Summary: Review Request: em-websocket-client - A WebSocket
client implementation for EventMachine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063048
Bug ID: 1063048
Summary: Review Request: eventmachine_httpserver - short
summary here
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063050
Bug ID: 1063050
Summary: Review Request: http_parser - This gem provides a high
quality http parser library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063052
Bug ID: 1063052
Summary: Review Request: middleman - A static site generator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063053
Bug ID: 1063053
Summary: Review Request: middleman-sprockets - Sprockets
support for Middleman
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063054
Bug ID: 1063054
Summary: Review Request: rb-fsevent - FSEvents API with Signals
catching (without RubyCocoa)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063055
Bug ID: 1063055
Summary: Review Request: rb-kqueue - A Ruby wrapper for BSD's
kqueue, using FFI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063056
Bug ID: 1063056
Summary: Review Request: rb-kqueue - A Ruby wrapper for BSD's
kqueue, using FFI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063057
Bug ID: 1063057
Summary: Review Request:sprockets-helpers - Asset path helpers
for Sprockets 2.x applications
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063058
Bug ID: 1063058
Summary: Review Request: sprockets-sass - sprockets-sass` fixes
all of this by creating a Sass::Importer that is
Sprockets aware.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063058
--- Comment #1 from Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnara...@fedoraproject.org ---
Spec URL:
http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-sprockets-sass-1.0.2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
Bug ID: 1063060
Summary: Review Request: websocket - Universal Ruby library to
handle WebSocket protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
1. great.
2. Ok, now that we have verbose build info we can see that it's not using our
default flags. ;(
You can look at the macros directly in the redhat-rpm-macros package, or on any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #23 from Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de ---
(In reply to Paul Cochrane from comment #22)
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #21)
- cluster_status (and perhaps even gen_nodes_file) is too generic. Please
add a pbs (or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
--- Comment #21 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org ---
Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/opentrep/opentrep.spec
SRPM URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/opentrep/opentrep-0.6.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Successful Koji build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989847
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
--- Comment #9 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to Erik van Pienbroek from comment #8)
The BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem mingw64-filesystem should be versioned
(to = 95).
Please fix this before importing this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063075
Bug ID: 1063075
Summary: Review Request: dput - Debian package upload tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062911
--- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #1)
Did you leave out README.loconet and README.selectrix on purpose?
I found them not really informative, don't remember why.. I can add them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
--- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
You can ignore that, it's a copy/paste issue in my review template which I
forgot to remove
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013258
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053222
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063075
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
dpkg-checkbuilddeps exists but does not work, i.e. you get
$ dpkg-checkbuilddeps
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: build-essential:native
For dpkg-checkbuilddeps to work,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063052
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: middleman - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063052
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063055
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063038
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063040
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063039
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063054
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063050
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063053
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com ---
Hi Antonio :).
Thank you for your inputs. I've had removed the BuildRoot and added the doc
files that are available.
Here you can find the current version of the files:
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. It's a good habit to move BuildRequires above Requires:
2. No need to use %{__make}, just make.
3. Remove these:
rm -rf %{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054565
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Well I've gone back and forth with the developer and of course from his point
of view he doesn't have a problem with bundled libraries since he makes sure it
builds for not just Linux,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687875
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839260
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823661
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047647
--- Comment #8 from Ben Reedy theben...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the help Denis.
New URL for the SRPM:
http://breed808.com/rpmfusion-submission/libchardet-1.0.2-4.fc20.src.rpm
Michael, I'm not sure how to get %find_lang to work in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-pkg-tools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-pkg-tools-0.19.3-2.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Feb 10 2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823661
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Issues:
===
- Package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/*
(according to Guidelines/Perl). Otherwise /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Debian
and subdirectories will be unowned.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
*blush* first time I managed to forget %description ...
As far as /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Debian is concerned, that is owned by
debhelper. So I don't think owning it again is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #3)
As far as /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Debian is concerned, that is owned by
debhelper. So I don't think owning it again is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-pkg-tools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-pkg-tools-0.19.3-3.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Feb 10 2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1063043
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1063044
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948359
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948359
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-volatility-2.3.1-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
./configure with Fedora default flags throws up error.
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/75748/92002850/
I am looking into this and based on the interactions on #fedora-devel, I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7)
./configure with Fedora default flags throws up error.
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/75748/92002850/
I am looking into this and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063119
Bug ID: 1063119
Summary: EPEL7 Branch Request: advancecomp
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062786
--- Comment #2 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org ---
Having some troubles running fedora-review on my centos box. May have to file
some bugs there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063119
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
