[Bug 1113392] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-libinput - Xorg X11 libinput input driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113392
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Just a hint, you only need to keep github tags with version filled only, and
then use this in the SPEC(Assume that the tag is v0.1.1):
Source0:
https://github.com/whot/xf86-input-libinput/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113392] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-libinput - Xorg X11 libinput input driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113392 --- Comment #2 from Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com --- yeah, thanks. I'm planning to move this driver over to xorg eventually once libinput stabilises a bit so I'd prefer to keep the same tag names as all the other drivers, hence the odd double-name in the tarball. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092376] Review Request: python-pyScss - Scss compiler for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092376 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-pyScss.spec SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-pyScss-1.2.0-1.post3.fc20.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7075227 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092376] Review Request: python-pyScss - Scss compiler for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092376 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-06-26 02:42:34 --- Comment #3 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Looks like this a duplicate of [1]. Closing here… [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-scss/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092376] Review Request: python-pyScss - Scss compiler for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092376 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113405] New: Review Request: ibus-libzhuyin - New Zhuyin engine based on libzhuyin for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113405 Bug ID: 1113405 Summary: Review Request: ibus-libzhuyin - New Zhuyin engine based on libzhuyin for IBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: p...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus/ibus-libzhuyin/ibus-libzhuyin.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ibus/ibus-libzhuyin/ibus-libzhuyin-1.6.99.20140626-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: It includes a Chinese Zhuyin (Bopomofo) input method based on libzhuyin for IBus. Fedora Account System Username: pwu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113405] Review Request: ibus-libzhuyin - New Zhuyin engine based on libzhuyin for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113405 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111242] Review Request: perl-App-s2p - Convert sed script to Perl program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-App-s2p Short Description: Convert sed script to Perl program Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-s2p/ Owners: jplesnik ppisar psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103545] Review Request: granite - GTK extensions for the elementary desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103545 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Hmm...Looks like 0.3 is available... Please build again(sorry I forgot to mention this previously). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093541] Review Request: ghc-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Haskell source packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093541 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Thanks for reviewing! (In reply to Ricky Elrod from comment #5) APPROVED, but yes please add a URL, Okay I will, thanks. especially since no LICENSE file is included here I should probably have commented more on this initially. I largely followed the packaging of the perl- and ocaml- -srpm-macros packages which also don't include a license files. Since it is just a file listing a few arches there is not too much to license anyway. :) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5121489 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5129300 (but presumably exists in the upstream). Well pkg git for this package itself now becomes upstream. :) It is true though that ghc-rpm-macros does have a license file (it is also a lot more complicated) though redhat-rpm-config (the former home of macros.ghc-srpm) doesn't. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-srpm-macros Short Description: RPM macros for building Haskell source packages Upstream URL: Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093541] Review Request: ghc-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Haskell source packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093541 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- added URL: New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-srpm-macros Short Description: RPM macros for building Haskell source packages Upstream URL: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ghc-srpm-macros.git Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- (In reply to Dave Love from comment #1) I've just been doing it; never mind. Would you accept a patch for EPEL6? Of course. I'll most likely keep it in that branch only, though. I can't find any packaging rules about library names, but wouldn't it be better to call it libelpa? If nothing else it helps things like rpmorphan. Upstream calls it ELPA. The naming (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines) guidelines don't mandate any lib* prefix for libraries and suggest using upstream naming. It would probably be useful to package versions with other optimizations, like sandybridge in our case, but I wasn't sure how best to do it and couldn't find any examples. I wonder if there should be a policy on that. atlas and qtwebkit do something like that, for example, but only for i686 with and without SSE2 support. Unfortunately, hwcap support is completely undocumented (see my 6 year old bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7100) and no hwcaps are defined on x86_64 (check /usr/include/bits/hwcap.h on your system). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111952] Review Request: kf5-kparts - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for KParts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952 Bug 952 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108827] Review Request: kf5-kbookmarks - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for bookmarks manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827 Bug 1108827 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111948] Review Request: kf5-kio - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for filesystem abstraction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948 Bug 948 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108828] Review Request: kf5-kcmutils - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon with extra API to write KConfigModules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108828 Bug 1108828 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111981] Review Request: kf5-kdelibs4support - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 4 module with porting aid from KDELibs 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981 Bug 981 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108827] Review Request: kf5-kbookmarks - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for bookmarks manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-06-26 04:54:42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111961] Review Request: kf5-kdesignerplugin - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 integration module for Qt Designer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961 Bug 961 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111948] Review Request: kf5-kio - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for filesystem abstraction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948 Bug 948 depends on bug 1108827, which changed state. Bug 1108827 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kbookmarks - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for bookmarks manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108824] Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-06-26 04:54:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111967] Review Request: kf5-kmediaplayer - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 module with interface for media player features
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967 Bug 967 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111970] Review Request: kf5-plasma - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 framework with foundations to build a primary user interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970 Bug 970 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111965] Review Request: kf5-knewstuff - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 module for downloading application assets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965 Bug 965 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111964] Review Request: kf5-kross - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for multi-language application scripting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 Bug 964 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111982] Review Request: kf5-khtml - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 4 solution with KHTML, a HTML rendering engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982 Bug 982 depends on bug 1108824, which changed state. Bug 1108824 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kxmlgui - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
--- Comment #4 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #2)
- Unowned directory issues:
* No package seems to own %{_libdir}/gfortran (possibly gfortran should do
so?)
In case it's not clear, the guidelines say the devel package needs
Requires:gcc-gfortran%{_isa}
* Same goes with %{_libdir}/*mpi*/pkgconfig
It looks like an openmpi packaging bug, at least in EPEL6. Its environment
module file references the directory, but the package doesn't create it.
The mpich2 module file doesn't add to PKG_CONFIG_PATH.
This looks like something which should be added to the MPI packaging
guidelines.
I'd assumed the pc files should have MPI-specific names in the usual directory,
put having them in the MPI tree seems sensible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] New: Review Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 Bug ID: 1113541 Summary: Review Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dhowe...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/xtrace/x11trace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/xtrace/x11trace-1.3.1-6.fc20.src.rpm Description: What strace is for system calls, xtrace is for X11 connections: you hook it between one or more X11 clients and an X server and it prints the requests going from client to server and the replies, events and errors going the other way. Fedora Account System Username:dhowells -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Review Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067665] Review Request: xtrace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665 David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Review Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003188] Review Request: eclipse-pdt - PHP Development Tools (PDT) Eclipse plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003188 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003188] Review Request: eclipse-pdt - PHP Development Tools (PDT) Eclipse plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003188 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- eclipse-pdt-3.3.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-pdt-3.3.0-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Review Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 --- Comment #1 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- The package and its components have been renamed from xtrace (which clashes with a glibc utility) to x11trace. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067665] Review Request: xtrace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665 --- Comment #21 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- The new package review is bug 1113541. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582369] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-I3 - Communicate with the i3 window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582369 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582369] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-I3 - Communicate with the i3 window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582369 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920387] Review Request: heat-cfntools - Instance tools for Heat provisioned instances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920387 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920387] Review Request: heat-cfntools - Instance tools for Heat provisioned instances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920387 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990423] Review Request: libsodium - A fork of networking and cryptography library with compatible APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423 --- Comment #46 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Any comments from the primary maintainers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990423] Review Request: libsodium - A fork of networking and cryptography library with compatible APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111242] Review Request: perl-App-s2p - Convert sed script to Perl program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111242] Review Request: perl-App-s2p - Convert sed script to Perl program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093541] Review Request: ghc-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Haskell source packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093541 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093541] Review Request: ghc-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Haskell source packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093541 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990423] Review Request: libsodium - A fork of networking and cryptography library with compatible APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #47 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Well, I'm the primary maintainer, and I requested the cvs for him. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990423] Review Request: libsodium - A fork of networking and cryptography library with compatible APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 990423] Review Request: libsodium - A fork of networking and cryptography library with compatible APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423 --- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 222191] Merge Review: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mat.bo...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111242] Review Request: perl-App-s2p - Convert sed script to Perl program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-App-s2p-1.001-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-06-26 08:24:07 --- Comment #8 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
I've filed [1] about the %{_libdir}/gfortran issue. In the meantime, yes please
require gcc-gfortran as the guidelines state.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113564
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #2)
Issues:
- A comment why %{?_smp_mflags} is disabled would be nice
- Comment how to obtain source tarball
Fixed. After talking to upstream again, I found the right homepage URL and
links to source tarballs there.
- Unowned directory issues:
* No package seems to own %{_libdir}/gfortran (possibly gfortran should do
so?)
Fixed by adding the missing Requires on gcc-gfortran, as Dave pointed out.
* Same goes with %{_libdir}/*mpi*/pkgconfig
- rpmlint
* undefined-non-weak-symbol : these should be fixable my linking against
the mpi / gomp libraries
I managed to fix that, but I'm still getting undefined symbols due to a bug in
scalapack package. Bug 1113567 filed.
* unused-direct-shlib-dependency : could try -Wl,--as-needed
It fails at linking when I add that. Also, these come from linking with mpif90
(which is as it turns out required to avoid the undefined mpi symbols). I'll
keep trying to fix that.
Note:
- Spec in SRPM differs
I'll keep the %if 0 there to allow disabling tests for quick local builds.
New spec and srpm:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/elpa/elpa.spec
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/elpa/elpa-2013.11-2.008.fc20.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 26 2014 Dominik Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net 2013.11-2.008
- remove executable stack from installed libraries
- fix undefined non-weak mpi symbols
- reorder build section and drop some redundant parts
- add missing gfortran Requires for -devel subpackages
- use correct URL and provide link to source tarball
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Let me see if I can find some time here but before that I see you need sponsorship. Have you started reviewing other new packages? If yes please provide here links to your package reviews. If you are not knowing about sponsorship process then please have a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Look for new packages at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html you may also find following links interested to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1013363] Review Request: libre - SIP protocol library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013363 Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) | |needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) | Last Closed||2014-06-26 09:21:07 --- Comment #6 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com --- I've abandoned this, since there was a long discussion on the list regarding the lack of versioned libraries, and I didn't feel like struggling with upstream to fix this issue on multiple libraries. If someone besides me is interested in this package I am happy to revisit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928541] Review Request: python-stem - Python controller library for Tor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928541 Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-stem New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: jorti -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #3 from Cheng-Chia Tseng pswo10...@gmail.com --- Thank you for your informaiton about sponsorship process! :) I haven't read that before, and haven't started reviewing other new packages yet. However, I will follow those instructions to get well prepared! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
* Same goes with %{_libdir}/*mpi*/pkgconfig
It looks like an openmpi packaging bug, at least in EPEL6. Its environment
module file references the directory, but the package doesn't create it.
Sorry, ignore that. The module file I had was actually from the fedora-19
package. In RHEL, and later Fedora by the looks of it, pkg-config won't
normally find the pc files in the MPI tree.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com --- Sorry, ignore that. The module file I had was actually from the fedora-19 package. In RHEL, and later Fedora by the looks of it, pkg-config won't normally find the pc files in the MPI tree. In my opinion the openmpi module file should set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to point to the corresponding directory. According to the pkg-config manpage, the default directory will always be searched after PKG_CONFIG_PATH. So it would make perfect sense to override it. Note that also other packages install .pc files in $MPI_LIB/pkg-config. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113625] New: Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113625 Bug ID: 1113625 Summary: Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: SRPM URL: Project URL: https://www.bro.org/sphinx/components/capstats/README.html Description: capstats is a small tool to collect statistics on the current load of a network interface, using either libpcap or the native interface for Endace's. It reports statistics per time interval and/or for the tool's total run-time. Koji scratch build: rpmlint output: capstats is a small tool to collect statistics on the current load of a network interface, using either libpcap or the native interface for Endace's. It reports statistics per time interval and/or for the tool's total run-time. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113625] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113625 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-06-26 10:11:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com --- Bugs filed: openmpi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113626 mpich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113627 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Rename Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|Review Request: x11trace - |Rename Request: x11trace -
|Utility for tracing X11 |Utility for tracing X11
|protocol for debugging |protocol for debugging
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Review:
+ mock build is successful for rawhide
+ rpmlint output on rpms gave
x11trace.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US strace - trace, traces,
strafe
x11trace.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xtrace - trace, x trace,
extract
x11trace.src: W: strange-permission xtrace_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz 0444L
x11trace.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US strace - trace,
traces, strafe
x11trace.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xtrace - trace, x
trace, extract
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball :
b22ca970efe24fcedff44f38075c5f34e0893f66abb419f3180ff92adf9e2a22
upstream tarball :
b22ca970efe24fcedff44f38075c5f34e0893f66abb419f3180ff92adf9e2a22
+ License GPLv2 is valid and included in source files.
suggestions:
1) Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without
known owners: /usr/share/x11trace
== fix this by changing
%{_datadir}/x11trace/*.proto
to
%{_datadir}/x11trace
2) you can change source tarball permission to 0644 before packaging to srpm
3) I see you have following which can be removed from spec
echo hello2
4) all your patche prefix names should start with package name i.e.
change xtrace to x11trace
5) Now the most important thing for a Rename package review is to follow
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
you will then need in your spec
Provides: xtrace = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: xtrace 1.3.1-7
also use the master branch spec only while renaming package. You should use
release number 7 and not 6
Fix above issues and submit new package for review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] New: Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 Bug ID: 1113640 Summary: Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/capstats.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/capstats-0.21-1.fc20.src.rpm Project URL: https://www.bro.org/sphinx/components/capstats/README.html Description: capstats is a small tool to collect statistics on the current load of a network interface, using either libpcap or the native interface for Endace's. It reports statistics per time interval and/or for the tool's total run-time Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7079464 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop014 SRPMS]$ rpmlint capstats-0.21-1.fc20.src.rpm capstats.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libpcap - slipcase 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab@laptop014 x86_64]$ rpmlint capstats* capstats.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libpcap - slipcase capstats.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary capstats 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113641] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113641 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||979726 (bro) Alias||capstats Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979726 [Bug 979726] bro 2.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113641] New: Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113641 Bug ID: 1113641 Summary: Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/capstats.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/capstats-0.21-1.fc20.src.rpm Project URL: https://www.bro.org/sphinx/components/capstats/README.html Description: capstats is a small tool to collect statistics on the current load of a network interface, using either libpcap or the native interface for Endace's. It reports statistics per time interval and/or for the tool's total run-time Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7079464 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop014 SRPMS]$ rpmlint capstats-0.21-1.fc20.src.rpm capstats.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libpcap - slipcase 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab@laptop014 x86_64]$ rpmlint capstats* capstats.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libpcap - slipcase capstats.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary capstats 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-06-26 10:30:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- *** Bug 1113625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113625] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113625 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@cicku.me Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1113640 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW CC||i...@cicku.me Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Keywords||Reopened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- What's the rationale of BR cmake then use autoconf? ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- cicku, Always give first priority to the first filed bug/review. So, package review should be done in bug 1113625 and not in bug 1113640 , bug 1113641. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #3) cicku, Always give first priority to the first filed bug/review. So, package review should be done in bug 1113625 and not in bug 1113640 , bug 1113641. LOL. That first one bug 1113625 contains nothing, and this is actually the first one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 --- Comment #4 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Added ownership of /etc/oozie and updated rpms in place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 --- Comment #5 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: oozie Short Description: A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop Upstream URL: https://oozie.apache.org/ Owners: rrati Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Rename Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 --- Comment #3 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/xtrace/x11trace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/xtrace/x11trace-1.3.1-7.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113640] Review Request: capstats - A command-line tool collecting packet statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113640 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- In that case bug 1113641 contains more information then ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113405] Review Request: ibus-libzhuyin - New Zhuyin engine based on libzhuyin for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113405
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
suggestions:
1) Package should add either BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
2) rpmlint output on rpms gave
ibus-libzhuyin.src: E: description-line-too-long C It includes a Chinese Zhuyin
(Bopomofo) input method based on libzhuyin for IBus.
ibus-libzhuyin.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %find_lang
ibus-libzhuyin.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
ibus-libzhuyin.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %files
ibus-libzhuyin.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
ibus-libzhuyin.src: W: file-size-mismatch ibus-libzhuyin-1.6.99.20140626.tar.gz
= 458962,
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libzhuyin/ibus-libzhuyin/ibus-libzhuyin-1.6.99.20140626.tar.gz
= 458946
ibus-libzhuyin.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C It includes a Chinese
Zhuyin (Bopomofo) input method based on libzhuyin for IBus.
ibus-libzhuyin.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ibus-libzhuyin/NEWS
ibus-libzhuyin.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs
/usr/share/doc/ibus-libzhuyin/INSTALL
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings.
Fix the above rpmlint messages
3) If this package is only for Fedora then remove lines
Group: System Environment/Libraries
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
4) Change
make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install
to
make install DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} INSTALL=install -p
5) No option available --enable-opencc to ./configure as its default enabled
6) Looks like package is failing to build for F20 but passed on F21.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Rename Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- now rpmlint only complains x11trace.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xtrace which is okay as glibc-utils provides /usr/bin/xtrace APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113541] Rename Request: x11trace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113541 David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: x11trace Short Description: A program for X11 protocol tracing Owners: dhowells Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067665] Review Request: xtrace - Utility for tracing X11 protocol for debugging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed|2014-04-02 12:09:35 |2014-06-26 12:14:18 --- Comment #22 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Let's close this then and review above package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069139] Review Request: python-gerritlib -- Client library for accessing Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069139 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(kchamart@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #18 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- ping is this built already? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069566] Review Request: python-gerrit-view -- A set of tools to query/view Gerrit patch reviews and their Zuul status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069566 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(kchamart@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- ping is this built already? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1062315] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo - Xorg X11 fbturbo video driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062315 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mho...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(mho...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- any updates here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069566] Review Request: python-gerrit-view -- A set of tools to query/view Gerrit patch reviews and their Zuul status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069566 Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Flags|needinfo?(kchamart@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #14 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com --- Yes it is. (That's what I meant in my previous reply. Sorry for being not clear.) $ koji latest-build f21 python-gerrit-view Build Tag Built by python-gerrit-view-0.3.2-2.fc21 f21 ausil $ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 168168] Review request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon - Locale::Maketext::Lexicon Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168168 Richard Henwood richard.henw...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.henw...@intel.com --- Comment #3 from Richard Henwood richard.henw...@intel.com --- New Package SCM Request == Package Name: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon New Branches: epel7 Owners: richardhenwood The Fedora maintainer (Ralf Corsepius, corsepiu) does not support EPEL7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 168168] Review request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon - Locale::Maketext::Lexicon Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168168 Richard Henwood richard.henw...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1097985] Rename Request: naver-nanum-fonts - Nanum family of Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097985 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Review: + mock build is successful for rawhide + rpmlint output on rpms gave naver-nanum-barun-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-brush-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-fonts.src:30: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 30, tab: line 10) naver-nanum-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-myeongjo-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-pen-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. == OK but good to fix mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball : 1ef5eb377e12ce1f4fc78eaff28858ded22ddcc5e01265458f14429abec53fc3 upstream tarball : 1ef5eb377e12ce1f4fc78eaff28858ded22ddcc5e01265458f14429abec53fc3 + License OFL is valid and included in source files. + rest looks following packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) Group tag can be removed for Fedora spec APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099499] add support for vmware backend to RDO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099499 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Release|Icehouse|--- CC||p...@draigbrady.com, ||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Component|openstack-glance|Package Review Version|unspecified |rawhide Product|RDO |Fedora QA Contact|d...@redhat.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099499] Review Request: python-oslo-vmware - Oslo VMware library for OpenStack projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099499
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|add support for vmware |Review Request:
|backend to RDO |python-oslo-vmware - Oslo
||VMware library for
||OpenStack projects
Flags|needinfo?(pbr...@redhat.com |fedora-review+
|) |
--- Comment #7 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
Looks good thanks!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0), Unknown or generated, *No copyright* Apache (v2.0).
1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/padraig/1099499-python-oslo-vmware/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/oslo(python-oslo-messaging, python-oslo-config),
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages(python-wsme, python-pecan, python-libs)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from
[Bug 1113712] New: Review Request: lua-bitop - C extension module for Lua 5.1/5.2 which adds bitwise operations on numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113712 Bug ID: 1113712 Summary: Review Request: lua-bitop - C extension module for Lua 5.1/5.2 which adds bitwise operations on numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-bitop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-bitop-1.0.2-1.el7.src.rpm Description: C extension module for Lua 5.1/5.2 which adds bitwise operations on numbers. Fedora Account System Username: orion This package is to provide a needed dependency for lua-posix for EPEL7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 168168] Review request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon - Locale::Maketext::Lexicon Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168168 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 168168] Review request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon - Locale::Maketext::Lexicon Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168168 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- ARNING: richardhenwood is not in the packager group. WARNING: No description provided. WARNING: fedora-review flag not set Also, use a Package Change request for a new branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928541] Review Request: python-stem - Python controller library for Tor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928541 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928541] Review Request: python-stem - Python controller library for Tor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928541 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071456] Review Request: oozie - A work-flow scheduling system for Apache Hadoop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
