https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115881
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-module-afterburner.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-module-afterburner-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.4.1
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039300
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-guava.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-guava-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.4.1
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-joda.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-joda-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.4.1
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@curioussymbols.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116238
Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
1) X11 is not a valid license, it should be MIT and also it seems there is no
LGPLv2+ licensed file
2) Wrong url in Source0, there is no kmediaplayer tarball in given folder
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113951
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116177
--- Comment #3 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com ---
Sounds like a good idea. I don't think you can build glibc for all arches, but
I guess you'd need this for uclibc or any other C library too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015
--- Comment #11 from Cheng-Chia Tseng pswo10...@gmail.com ---
Thanks!
I will find some packages to review! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363
Bug ID: 1116363
Summary: Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data
format module for Concise Binary Object Representation
(CBOR)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #24 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 -- Review request for
jackson-dataformat-cbor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||902086
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1116363
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7106912
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115574
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1116371
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
--- Comment #6 from Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name ---
I also think that /usr/bin/if and /usr/bin/goto is OK here.
Christofer, can osh be used as login shell? If yes, it should be added/remove
to /etc/shells like other shells (zsh for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101043
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=43
Bug 43 depends on bug 1101043, which changed state.
Bug 1101043 Summary: Review Request: ming - A library for generating Macromedia
Flash files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101043
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956525
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com ---
Quick update on this review.
The current package fails to build with recent xorg-server in rawhide.
But the newer snapshot (1) depends on non yet upstreamed patches from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
--- Comment #8 from Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name ---
1. How binary can interfere with builtin?
2. What shell have goto?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Alexey I. Froloff from comment #8)
1. How binary can interfere with builtin?
E.g. by explictly calling them.
IIRC, some shells have settings to manipulate search orders.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790
--- Comment #13 from Mohammed Isam mohammed_isam1...@yahoo.com ---
Spec URL:
http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/gnudos.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083698
Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@axilleas.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089553
Ganapathi Kamath hgkam...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487
Bug ID: 1116487
Summary: Review Request: perl-App-DuckDuckGo - Application to
query DuckDuckGo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487
--- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
koji builds
rawhide at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7108188
f20 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7108185
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115122
Jason Taylor jason.tay...@secure-24.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115122
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
42 matches
Mail list logo