[Bug 1115881] Review Request: scheme48 - Scheme48 Scheme implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115881 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1039299] Review Request: jackson-module-afterburner - Jackson module that uses byte-code generation to further speed up data binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-module-afterburner.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-module-afterburner-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm - update to 2.4.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1039300] Review Request: jackson-datatype-guava - Add-on module for Jackson JSON processor which handles Guava data-types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039300 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-guava.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-guava-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm - update to 2.4.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1039301] Review Request: jackson-datatype-joda - Extension module to properly support full datatype set of Joda date-time library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-joda.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-joda-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm - update to 2.4.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894604] Review Request: coin-or-Ipopt - Interior Point OPTimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894604 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@curioussymbols.com --- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- *** Bug 817119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116238] Review Request: openstack-tempest-icehouse - set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116238 Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com, ||slina...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(slinaber@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com --- What's the motivation for OpenStack release specific Tempest package when upstream switched to Branchless[1] ? [1] https://github.com/openstack/qa-specs/blob/master/specs/branchless-tempest.rst -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111967] Review Request: kf5-kmediaplayer - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 module with interface for media player features
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jgrul...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111964] Review Request: kf5-kross - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for multi-language application scripting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- All issues fixed, approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111967] Review Request: kf5-kmediaplayer - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 module with interface for media player features
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967 --- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- 1) X11 is not a valid license, it should be MIT and also it seems there is no LGPLv2+ licensed file 2) Wrong url in Source0, there is no kmediaplayer tarball in given folder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113951] Review Request: perl-App-GitHooks - Extensible plugins system for git hooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113951 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-07-04 05:05:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111968] Review Request: kf5-kactivities - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 run-time and library to organize user work into separate activities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jgrul...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116177] Review Request: cross-kernel-headers - Header files for the Linux kernel for use by glibc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116177 --- Comment #3 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- Sounds like a good idea. I don't think you can build glibc for all arches, but I guess you'd need this for uclibc or any other C library too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #11 from Cheng-Chia Tseng pswo10...@gmail.com --- Thanks! I will find some packages to review! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1111968] Review Request: kf5-kactivities - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 run-time and library to organize user work into separate activities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- Looks good, only summary is too long and needs to be fixed, but this could be done during import. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116363] New: Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 Bug ID: 1116363 Summary: Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-dataformat-cbor.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-dataformat-cbor-2.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Support for reading and writing Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR), see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7049 encoded data using Jackson abstractions (streaming API, data binding, tree model). Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 --- Comment #24 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 -- Review request for jackson-dataformat-cbor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116363] Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||902086 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 [Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1116363 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 [Bug 1116363] Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116363] Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7106912 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115574] Review Request: jackson-parent - Parent pom for all Jackson components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115574 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116363] Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116363] Review Request: jackson-dataformat-cbor - Jackson data format module for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116363 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1116371 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116371 [Bug 1116371] jackson-jaxrs-providers 2.4.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115121] Review Request: osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121 --- Comment #6 from Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name --- I also think that /usr/bin/if and /usr/bin/goto is OK here. Christofer, can osh be used as login shell? If yes, it should be added/remove to /etc/shells like other shells (zsh for example) do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115121] Review Request: osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Alexey I. Froloff from comment #6) I also think that /usr/bin/if and /usr/bin/goto is OK here. IMO, they are not OK, because they can interfere with other shells and potentially disturbe them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1112864] Review Request: elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- elpa-2013.11-3.008.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1101043] Review Request: ming - A library for generating Macromedia Flash files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101043 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ming-0.4.5-3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-07-04 08:29:22 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ming-0.4.5-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455553] Review Request: pencil - A traditional 2D animation software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=43 Bug 43 depends on bug 1101043, which changed state. Bug 1101043 Summary: Review Request: ming - A library for generating Macromedia Flash files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101043 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956525] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-opentegra - open source NVidia Tegra driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956525 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com --- Quick update on this review. The current package fails to build with recent xorg-server in rawhide. But the newer snapshot (1) depends on non yet upstreamed patches from libdrm (2). (I don't know what is holding there, maybe kernel-headers related to tegra drm interface) From the kernel side, I still hope to have CMA bumped to 64M I'm also working on a kernel with tagr and tegra-3.17-next patches applied on top of 3.16 rawhide kernel. (and few CONFIG options builtin). Here is my tests report on this kernel: - AC100 panel works, but need to sort out which modules to bundle into the initramfs (specially pwm_tegra, backlight, etc) (4) - Trimslice, doesn't work for me. the hdmi output a black screen from where I can see lxdm gliches on VT switches. Looking at Xorg.0.log everything is normal. (probably a problem from the kernel side and hdmi init). Switching to modesettings ( DDX cannot find the device). (1) - http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagr/xf86-video-opentegra (2) - http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagr/drm/ (3) - http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/kwizart/ac100/fedora-20/armhfp/ (4) - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-initramfs/msg03636.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115121] Review Request: osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121 --- Comment #8 from Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name --- 1. How binary can interfere with builtin? 2. What shell have goto? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115121] Review Request: osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Alexey I. Froloff from comment #8) 1. How binary can interfere with builtin? E.g. by explictly calling them. IIRC, some shells have settings to manipulate search orders. Also take into account that if is not amongst those shell commands which POSIX are guarantes to be built-in. I.e. your if may clash with another shell's or other arbitrary tools external if at any time. 2. What shell have goto? None that I am aware about, but other languages may have it and may pickup tools from $PATH. In any case both names, if and goto are way too common names to allow them to be put inside in a standard path. I'd suggest to delegate this issue to FPC and have it discussed there. I am not familiar with osh's implementation details, but for now, I'd suggest to install these osh-private helper programs into /usr/libexec/osh/ and modify osh in such a way it picks up these tools there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086790] Review Request: gnudos - A GNU library to help new users of the GNU system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790 --- Comment #13 from Mohammed Isam mohammed_isam1...@yahoo.com --- Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/gnudos.spec SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/gnudos-1.2-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083698] Review Request: rubygem-coveralls - A Ruby implementation of the Coveralls API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083698
Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@axilleas.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||axill...@axilleas.me
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|axill...@axilleas.me
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@axilleas.me ---
Love for coveralls!
I'm going to approve this, but here are some minor things you might want to
consider before you push it.
- If you are building this only for rawhide, you can drop all Requires as they
are now autogenerated.
- %check should be better surrounded by `pushd %{gem_instdir}/popd` just to be
sure we're on the right path.
- Since you are already removing some unneded files you could also do the same
for Gemfile and coveralls-ruby.gemspec
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
/usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[ ]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains
[Bug 1089553] Review request: python-SPARQLWrapper - SPARQL Endpoint interface to Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089553 Ganapathi Kamath hgkam...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hgkam...@hotmail.com --- Comment #4 from Ganapathi Kamath hgkam...@hotmail.com --- I beleive the same SPEC and SRPM will also compile to a python3-SPARQLWrapper-1.5.2-1.fc20.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116487] New: Review Request: perl-App-DuckDuckGo - Application to query DuckDuckGo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487 Bug ID: 1116487 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-DuckDuckGo - Application to query DuckDuckGo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dd...@cpan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-App-DuckDuckGo.spec SRPM URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-App-DuckDuckGo-0.008-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Application to query DuckDuckGo Fedora Account System Username: ddick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116487] Review Request: perl-App-DuckDuckGo - Application to query DuckDuckGo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487 --- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- koji builds rawhide at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7108188 f20 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7108185 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115122] Review Request: zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115122 Jason Taylor jason.tay...@secure-24.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115122] Review Request: zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115122 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- Thanks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: zsh-lovers Short Description: A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell Upstream URL: http://grml.org/zsh/#zshlovers Owners: cicku Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
