[Bug 1250884] Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 compatibility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
future-0.15.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update future'. You can provide feedback for this
update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15909

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258874] Review Request: libmaxminddb - C library for the MaxMind DB file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874



--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System  ---
libmaxminddb-1.1.1-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update libmaxminddb'. You can provide feedback for
this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15900

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1222484] Review Request: rhythmbox-ampache - Ampache plugin for Rhythmbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora
22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su
-c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rhythmbox-ampache'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15919

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1163612] Review Request: asql - run SQL queries against an Apache log file

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163612

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1223990] Review Request: openssl101e - A general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223990



--- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof  ---
Key:
 + pass
 - fail
 ? needs feedback/clarification
 NA Not applicable


MUST
+ rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces.
The output should be posted in the review.

# rpmlint /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result/*.rpm ./openssl101e.spec
openssl101e.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic ->
cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl101e.src: W: strange-permission hobble-openssl 0755L
openssl101e.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 0755L
openssl101e.src: W: strange-permission renew-dummy-cert 0755L
openssl101e.src:289: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line
289)
openssl101e.src: W: invalid-url Source0: openssl-1.0.1e-hobbled.tar.xz
openssl101e.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic ->
cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl101e.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1e-2
['1.0.1e-2.el5.centos', '1.0.1e-2.centos']
openssl101e.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libcrypto.so.10.hmac
openssl101e.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e/CHANGES
openssl101e.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libcrypto.so.1.0.1e.hmac
openssl101e.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libssl.so.10.hmac
openssl101e.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/.libssl.so.1.0.1e.hmac
openssl101e.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openssl101e
openssl101e.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs
/usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e/INSTALL
openssl101e-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/openssl-1.0.1e/crypto/bn/bn_const.c
openssl101e-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic
-> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl101e-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
openssl101e-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openssl101e-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openssl101e-perl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary c_rehash101e
openssl101e-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
openssl101e-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
./openssl101e.spec:289: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab:
line 289)
./openssl101e.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: openssl-1.0.1e-hobbled.tar.xz
6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 25 warnings.

'invalid-url' is adequately explained in the spec file, although a link to the
original tarball might be a good.
It would be nice if 'mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs' was fixed but
'spelling-error' is clearly bogus.
Could I get some comment on 'strange-permission' and 'hidden-file-or-dir'
though?
Some other minor cleanups seem to be called for.


+ The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .

Consistent with the section on 'Multiple packages with the same base name'

+ The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
+ The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
+ If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %license.
+ The spec file must be written in American English. 
+ The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
+ The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.

Consistent with 'When Upstream uses Prohibited Code'

+  The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least
one primary architecture. 
NA If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. NA Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work
on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. 
+ All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
+ The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
+ Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call

[Bug 1260246] Review Request: memtailor - C++ library of special-purpose memory allocators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260246

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
memtailor-0-1.20130809.git722a30c.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update memtailor'. You can provide feedback for
this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15975

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410

Stephen Chandler Paul  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #5 from Stephen Chandler Paul  ---
Whoops, sorry about this, just noticed I didn't ever actually change the status
of this bug!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410

Stephen Chandler Paul  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cp...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|thatsly...@gmail.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258874] Review Request: libmaxminddb - C library for the MaxMind DB file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
libmaxminddb-1.1.1-5.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update libmaxminddb'. You can provide feedback for
this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15901

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1249368] Review Request: python-pyqtgraph - Scientific Graphics and GUI Library for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249368



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyqtgraph-0.9.10-4.fc21.1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15974

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250887] Review Request: preprocess - A portable multi-language file Python2 preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Jerry James  ---
Okay, everything looks good now.  APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 527971] Review Request: ocaml-react - OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527971

Ding-Yi Chen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dc...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #10 from Ding-Yi Chen  ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: ocaml-react
Short Description: OCaml framework for Functional Reactive Programming (FRP)
Owners: rjones dchne
Branches: epel7 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206



--- Comment #10 from William Brown  ---
I'm not interested in this any more. You may take it over, and I'm happy to
advise however via email.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1129224] Review Request: libsearpc - A simple and easy-to-use C language RPC framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129224

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsearpc-3.0-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update libsearpc'. You can provide feedback for
this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15947

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1222484] Review Request: rhythmbox-ampache - Ampache plugin for Rhythmbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su
-c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rhythmbox-ampache'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15912

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-TeX-Encode-1.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-TeX-Encode'. You can provide feedback
for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15938

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1221781] Review Request: zipios - C++ library for reading and writing Zip files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781



--- Comment #21 from Raphael Groner  ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #20)
…
> > > > zipios-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency zipios-devel
> > > > => Please fix.
> > > 
> > > I think this one can safely be ignored. The -doc package only contains
> > > documentation relevant to development, so it is actually a devel package,
> > > but rpmlint doesn't have a way of knowing this.
> > 
> > Please merge the doc package into devel. I do not see any reason why it's to
> > be separate when there's the devel intention only.
> 
> The point of separating them is that you shouldn't have to download the
> extra 3.3MB of documentation when all you want is a build requirement.

With that said, it's just documentation like any other. Please remove that
dependency to devel.

> I have tried calling the package %{name}-devel-doc in the past but other
> reviewers didn't like that idea.

No. %{name}-doc is okay.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246790] Review Request: mdp - Minimalist password safe

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com  |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|needinfo?(i.gnatenko.brain@ |
   |gmail.com)  |



--- Comment #22 from Raphael Groner  ---
Removing Assignee cause no response since over a month. :(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246790] Review Request: mdp - Minimalist password safe

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1259061] Review request: python-securepass - SecurePass Python library & tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259061



--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
Hi, If you run fedora-review tool on this review bugzilla you will see
review.txt output from it showing

Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel

=> You need to specify for which version of python you are building package. I
see on upstream that there is no information if the module is dual compatible
that mean same code can be run under python2 or python3 environment. So, Let's
take default that upstream code is python2 code. You may want to ask upstream
if existing code supports python3 as well.

We are soon moving to python3 as default so all python module should start
providing python3 subpackages as well.

You can fix this for now as
BuildRequires: python2-devel


- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
  Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros

=> Use only one style and not to mix it.

- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

==> This is okay as it looks you want your package to be built for EPEL6 also.


There are other issues in the spec that need to be cleaned. See more
information for those on  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging

1) Spec file contains Buildroot tag which is not needed now. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#BuildRoot_tag , remove it form
spec

2) You also don;t need Group tag. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Group_tag
remove it from spec file.

3) You also don't need to specify in spec file
[ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

remove this line. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install

4) prefix macro is not needed as install already using it as /usr

5) You don't need %clean section at all, its optional, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Cleaning_BuildRoot_in_.25clean

6) Then you created subpackage securepass-tools but written it below %build and
%install. You should have written all subpackages before %prep section

Move following lines just before %prep section
=
%package -n securepass-tools
Requires:   python-securepass
Summary:SecurePass Tools

%description -n securepass-tools
The official tools for accessing SecurePass platform.

It uses the SecurePass public APIs.
=

7) we have macros for /usr/bin why not to use it?
change
%{_usr}/bin/*
to
%{_bindir}/*

See more on this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros

8) securepass-tools subpackage needs securepass library at runtime so add
following to %package section of securepass-tools package

Requires: python-securepass


9) You need to follow python packaging guidelines as well. 

a) For that you should use specific python version macros. e.g.
%build
%{__python} setup.py build

%install
%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root="%{buildroot}"

Should be written as
%build
%{__python2} setup.py build

%install
%{__python2} setup.py install --skip-build --root %{buildroot}

b) If you want to build this package for EPEL6 as well then add following lines
at top of spec file
==
%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <= 6
%{!?__python2: %global __python2 /usr/bin/python2}
%{!?python2_sitelib: %global python2_sitelib %(%{__python2} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")}
%{!?python2_sitearch: %global python2_sitearch %(%{__python2} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")}
%endif
=

This is as per given on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Old#Macros



I suppose there can be few more issues in this package but for now please fix
above and submit a new SPEC and SRPM by increasing release number and adding
relevant changelog.

You should also read all requires Guidelines pages like 
1) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging
2) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Old
3) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1133479] Review Request: vdsm-arch-dependencies - architecture specific dependencies for VDSM

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133479

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
  Flags|fedora-review?  |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1260246] Review Request: memtailor - C++ library of special-purpose memory allocators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260246

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1260246] Review Request: memtailor - C++ library of special-purpose memory allocators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260246



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
memtailor-0-1.20130809.git722a30c.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15975

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1190510] Review Request: gitshelf - Manage a shelf full of git repos

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190510

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1233963] Review Request: python-cachetools - Extensible memoizing collections and decorators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233963

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250884] Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 compatibility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
future-0.15.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update future'. You can provide feedback for this
update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8090

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 910067] Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran Study Software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910067

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1240634] Review Request: python-afl - Module that enables Afl fork server for Python code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240634

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1041924] Review Request: fish - Friendly Interactive Shell

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924

Andy Lutomirski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #28 from Andy Lutomirski  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: fish
New Branches: el7
Owners: luto ohaessler

Oliver asked me if he could (co-)maintain an EPEL branch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208738] Review Request: vera++ - A tool for verification, analysis and transformation of C++ source code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208738

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||NotReady



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1010613] Review Request: ck - Concurrency Kit

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613



--- Comment #25 from Christopher Meng  ---
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/ck.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/ck-0.4.5-1.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261042] Review Request: python-django-babel - Utilities for using Babel in Django

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261042



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-django-babel-0.4.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update python-django-babel'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8075

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.3-1.el7,
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8071

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.3-1.el7,
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8071

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1260290] Review Request: python-XStatic-roboto-fontface - roboto-fontface 0.4.3 (XStatic packaging standard)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260290



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-XStatic-roboto-fontface-0.4.3.2-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-XStatic-roboto-fontface'. You
can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8069

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208695] Review Request: liberasurecode - Erasure Code API library written in C with pluggable backends

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #17 from Petr Pisar  ---
(In reply to Pete Zaitcev from comment #16)
> (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #15)
> 
> > TODO: Add `CRC32' identifier to the License tag.
> 
> What is the exact syntax you have in mind? Whitespace? Comma? "And"? "Or"?

License: BSD and CRC32

See
.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 829097] Review Request: sicktoolbox - The SICK LIDAR Toolbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829097

Ralf Corsepius  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius  ---
APPROVED

2 final remarks:

- I'd prefer the program to be prefixed with "sick-".
But, ... this is largely a matter of personal test ;)

- With --disable-static, there is no need for this:
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.a

Please remove it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258874] Review Request: libmaxminddb - C library for the MaxMind DB file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874

Jan Včelák  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #20 from Jan Včelák  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libmaxminddb
Short Description: C library for the MaxMind DB file format
Upstream URL: https://maxmind.github.io/libmaxminddb/
Owners: jvcelak
Branches: f21 f22 f23 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1211529] Review Request: docker-machine - Tool for managing Docker hosts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211529



--- Comment #6 from Robert P. J. Day  ---
Is there any ETA for this package? And docker-swarm as well?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262709] Review Request: golang-github-stevvooe-resumable - Subset of the Go `crypto` Package with a Resumable Hash Interface

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262709

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262709] Review Request: golang-github-stevvooe-resumable - Subset of the Go `crypto` Package with a Resumable Hash Interface

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262709



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262705] Review Request: golang-github-gorilla-handlers - A collection of useful handlers for Go's net/http package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262705

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262711] Review Request: golang-github-noahdesu-go-ceph - Go bindings for RADOS, RBD, and CephFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262711

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262710] Review Request: golang-github-ncw-swift - Go language interface to Swift

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262710

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262714] Review Request: golang-github-AdRoll-goamz - Fork of the GOAMZ with additional functionality with DynamoDB

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262714

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262714] Review Request: golang-github-AdRoll-goamz - Fork of the GOAMZ with additional functionality with DynamoDB

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262714



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262716] Review Request: golang-github-Azure-azure-sdk-for-go - Microsoft Azure SDK for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262716

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-Azure-azure-sdk-for-go
Short Description: Microsoft Azure SDK for Go
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262711] Review Request: golang-github-noahdesu-go-ceph - Go bindings for RADOS, RBD, and CephFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262711

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-noahdesu-go-ceph
Short Description: Go bindings for RADOS, RBD, and CephFS
Upstream URL: https://github.com/noahdesu/go-ceph
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262710] Review Request: golang-github-ncw-swift - Go language interface to Swift

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262710

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-ncw-swift
Short Description: Go language interface to Swift
Upstream URL: https://github.com/ncw/swift
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262426] Review Request: golang-github-go-fsnotify-fsnotify - File system notifications for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262426



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262710] Review Request: golang-github-ncw-swift - Go language interface to Swift

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262710



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258874] Review Request: libmaxminddb - C library for the MaxMind DB file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874



--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System  ---
libmaxminddb-1.1.1-5.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8095

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262714] Review Request: golang-github-AdRoll-goamz - Fork of the GOAMZ with additional functionality with DynamoDB

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262714

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-AdRoll-goamz
Short Description: Fork of the GOAMZ with additional functionality with
DynamoDB
Upstream URL: https://github.com/AdRoll/goamz
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262426] Review Request: golang-github-go-fsnotify-fsnotify - File system notifications for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262426

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-go-fsnotify-fsnotify
Short Description: File system notifications for Go
Upstream URL: https://github.com/go-fsnotify/fsnotify
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262426] Review Request: golang-github-go-fsnotify-fsnotify - File system notifications for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262426

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262704] Review Request: golang-github-denverdino-aliyungo - Go SDK for Aliyun Services

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262704

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262704] Review Request: golang-github-denverdino-aliyungo - Go SDK for Aliyun Services

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262704



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262705] Review Request: golang-github-gorilla-handlers - A collection of useful handlers for Go's net/http package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262705



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262716] Review Request: golang-github-Azure-azure-sdk-for-go - Microsoft Azure SDK for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262716

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258874] Review Request: libmaxminddb - C library for the MaxMind DB file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1211529] Review Request: docker-machine - Tool for managing Docker hosts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211529



--- Comment #7 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
Hi Robert, how much urgent/important is this for you?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1197505] Review Request: libnfs - Client library for accessing NFS shares over a network

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197505



--- Comment #11 from Mohamed El Morabity  ---
Hello,
Are they plans to make libnfs available for F22 and F23?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1211529] Review Request: docker-machine - Tool for managing Docker hosts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211529



--- Comment #8 from Robert P. J. Day  ---
It's not *urgent*, but it would at least be nice to have an idea of when it
will show up, given that there has been no activity on this BZ filing for a few
months. Being available with Fedora 23 would be fine with me, I would just like
some clue as to progress.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1245791] Review Request: python-influxdb - Python client for interacting with InfluxDB

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245791

Chandan Kumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||chku...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Hello Pradeep,

Thanks for submitting for package review.

Below is my inline comments.

[1.] include license file as
Source1:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/influxdb/influxdb-python/master/LICENSE
under %build section
copy the license file as cp Source1 .
and then include it in %files section as 
%license LICENSE

[2.]under %prep section delete *-requirements.txt using
rm -f {test-,dev-,}requirements.tx

[3.] under %build and %install section, replace %{__python} to %{__python2}

[4.] Since the tarfile contains the documentation of influxdb
please build the documentation under %build section
using sphinx-build -b html docs/source docs/build
 and create a doc subpackage.

[5.] Since this package is python3 supported, Please create python2 and python3
subpackge : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python

[6.] you can also run tests under %check section.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1224397] Review Request: admeshgui - STL viewer and manipulation tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224397

Martin Kolman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mkol...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mkol...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1224397] Review Request: admeshgui - STL viewer and manipulation tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224397

Martin Kolman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1222484] Review Request: rhythmbox-ampache - Ampache plugin for Rhythmbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc22 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15919

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1224397] Review Request: admeshgui - STL viewer and manipulation tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224397

Martin Kolman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Martin Kolman  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
  file-validate if there is such a file.


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
 contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
 Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in admeshgui
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
 contains icons.
 Note: icons in admeshgui
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = 

[Bug 1233168] Review Request: python-oslo-service - Oslo service library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1222484] Review Request: rhythmbox-ampache - Ampache plugin for Rhythmbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15912

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1222484] Review Request: rhythmbox-ampache - Ampache plugin for Rhythmbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1233168] Review Request: python-oslo-service - Oslo service library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Summary is ok
License is ok
Description is ok
URL is ok
All tests passed

FIX: Source0 should contains %{version} instead of explicit version 1.3
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMBRODY/TeX-Encode-%{version}.tar.gz

TODO: Please add Group tag
Group: Development/Libraries

TODO: Please replace %{__perl} by 'perl'

FIX: Please add following build-requires
- coreutils - perl-TeX-Encode.spec:35
- findutils - perl-TeX-Encode.spec:35
- make - perl-TeX-Encode.spec:31
- perl - perl-TeX-Encode.spec:30
- perl(Carp) - lib/TeX/Encode.pm:9
- perl(Encode) - t/01ltgt.t:9 
- perl(strict) - lib/TeX/Encode.pm:4
- perl(vars) - lib/TeX/Encode/charmap.pm:13

FIX: Please replace PERL_INSTALL_ROOT by DESTDIR

TODO: The following line could be remove, it is done by rpm
find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';'


$ rpm -qp --requires perl-TeX-Encode-1.3-1.fc24.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
  1 perl >= 0:5.008
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.0)
  1 perl(Carp)
  1 perl(Encode::Encoding)
  1 perl(TeX::Encode)
  1 perl(TeX::Encode::BibTeX)
  1 perl(TeX::Encode::charmap)
  1 perl(strict)
  1 perl(vars)
  1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

Binary requires are Ok.

$  rpm -qp --provides perl-TeX-Encode-1.3-1.fc24.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
  1 perl(TeX::Encode) = 1.3
  1 perl(TeX::Encode::BibTeX) = 1.2
  1 perl(TeX::Encode::charmap)
  1 perl-TeX-Encode = 1.3-1.fc24

Binary provides are Ok.

$ rpmlint ./perl-TeX-Encode*
perl-TeX-Encode.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US LaTeX -> Lat Ex,
Late X, Latex
perl-TeX-Encode.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US undef -> unfed,
under, funded
perl-TeX-Encode.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US LaTeX -> Lat
Ex, Late X, Latex
perl-TeX-Encode.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US undef -> unfed,
under, funded
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Rpmlint is ok

Please correct all 'FIX' issues and consider fixing 'TODO' item

The package is not approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Please provide new spec file when you fix it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1233168] Review Request: python-oslo-service - Oslo service library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168

Javier Peña  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Javier Peña  ---
There is no %check section but since this is a SHOULD item we can live without
it.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
 (v2.0)". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
 in /tmp/1233168-python-oslo-service/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
 Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
 -oslo-service , python-oslo-service-doc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec 

[Bug 1233168] Review Request: python-oslo-service - Oslo service library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1243550




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243550
[Bug 1243550] Review Request: openstack-aodh - OpenStack Telemetry Alarming
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1233168] Review Request: python-oslo-service - Oslo service library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1243533
   ||(RDO-LIBERTY-REVIEWS)



--- Comment #9 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
Good catch, I updated spec accordingly

Spec URL: https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-service.spec
SRPM URL:
https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-service-0.9.0-2.fc22.src.rpm


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243533
[Bug 1243533] (RDO) Tracker: Review requests for new RDO Liberty packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410

Christopher Meng  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1263227] New: Review Request: python-os-brick - OpenStack Cinder brick library for managing local volume attaches

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263227

Bug ID: 1263227
   Summary: Review Request: python-os-brick - OpenStack Cinder
brick library for managing local volume attaches
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jp...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-os-brick/python-os-brick.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-os-brick/python-os-brick-0.4.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: OpenStack Cinder brick library for managing local volume attaches
Fedora Account System Username: jpena

Plesae note the current spec has some requirements that are not yet met in
Rawhide, such as python-oslo-service (currently under review) and the python3
subpackages for oslo-log and oslo-concurrency.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1243550] Review Request: openstack-aodh - OpenStack Telemetry Alarming

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243550

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1233168



--- Comment #7 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
* Latest tarball was not uploaded in PyPI, could you get it fixed?
If we can't, we could switch to launchpad url but they have OpenStack release
name there.
* License should be ASL 2.0
* We have to fix oslo.messaging first (needs oslo.service first) => I'm
currently fixing it.

Minor stuff:
* wrapping openstack-aodh-compat description (line too long)
* cleanup tabs from spec files


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168
[Bug 1233168] Review Request: python-oslo-service - Oslo service library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262709] Review Request: golang-github-stevvooe-resumable - Subset of the Go `crypto` Package with a Resumable Hash Interface

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262709

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-stevvooe-resumable
Short Description: Subset of the Go `crypto` Package with a Resumable Hash
Interface
Upstream URL: https://github.com/stevvooe/resumable
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-TeX-Encode-1.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15938

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-TeX-Encode-1.3-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15939

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250887] Review Request: preprocess - A portable multi-language file Python2 preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887



--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande  ---
Sorry; now it should be fine.

Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/preprocess/preprocess.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/preprocess/preprocess-1.2.1-2.20150914gitb23422.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262872] Review Request: perl-TeX-Encode - Encoding to LaTeX escapes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262872

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-TeX-Encode
Short Description: Encoding to LaTeX escapes
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/TeX-Encode/
Owners: spot
Branches: f21 f22 f23 
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099033] Review Request: adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts - A set of serif OpenType fonts designed to complement Source Sans Pro

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099033

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|fedora-review?  |
   |needinfo?(rel...@redhat.com |
   |)   |
Last Closed||2015-09-15 12:36:00



--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
there is no reply here. I am closing this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1163612] Review Request: asql - run SQL queries against an Apache log file

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163612

Eduardo Mayorga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(wpo...@gmail.com) |
   |needinfo?(wpo...@gmail.com) |
Last Closed||2015-09-15 13:54:05



--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Mayorga  ---
It's been a week so I'm closing this bug. Feel free to submit a new review
request if you are interested again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1190510] Review Request: gitshelf - Manage a shelf full of git repos

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190510

Eduardo Mayorga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(herculesoplimpus@ |
   |gmail.com)  |
Last Closed||2015-09-15 13:53:50



--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Mayorga  ---
It's been a week so I'm closing this bug. Feel free to submit a new review
request if you are interested again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262705] Review Request: golang-github-gorilla-handlers - A collection of useful handlers for Go's net/http package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262705

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-gorilla-handlers
Short Description: A collection of useful handlers for Go's net/http package
Upstream URL: https://github.com/gorilla/handlers
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262704] Review Request: golang-github-denverdino-aliyungo - Go SDK for Aliyun Services

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262704

Jan Chaloupka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-denverdino-aliyungo
Short Description: Go SDK for Aliyun Services
Upstream URL: https://github.com/denverdino/aliyungo
Owners: fpokorny jchaloup
Branches: f23 f22 f21 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250884] Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 compatibility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
future-0.15.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update future'. You can provide feedback for this
update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15908

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258874] Review Request: libmaxminddb - C library for the MaxMind DB file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258874

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
libmaxminddb-1.1.1-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update libmaxminddb'. You can provide feedback for
this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15902

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1150445] Review Request: Random123 - Library of random number generators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150445

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|Random123-1.08-3.fc23   |1.08-3.fc22
 Resolution|ERRATA  |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1150445] Review Request: Random123 - Library of random number generators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150445



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
Random123-1.08-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4
   ||ec395.fc22
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2015-09-15 15:51:15



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review