https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425833
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444397
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.orti.alca...@gmail.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450271
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882
--- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #5)
> (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #4)
> > Any suggestion how to properly write %check? Writing the line
> > "%{_python2} setup.py tests/lcms2_testsu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445675
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
alembic-1.7.1-3.fc26 blender-2.78c-4.fc26 openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-feb18d14f2
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
alembic-1.7.1-3.fc26 blender-2.78c-4.fc26 openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-feb18d14f2
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445675
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445412
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448298
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445412
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(paulo.cesar.perei |
|ra.de.andr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1364745 (FE-GAMESIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309703
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libratbag-0.8-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424832
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
xreader-1.4.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447120
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pyfakefs-3.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445675
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447213
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-wavelet-decompose-0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083
Ricky Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rel...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #14 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Greg Bailey from comment #13)
> Do you have any plans to make EPEL6 and/or EPEL7 builds of this?
Even MP3 decoding support (e.g. mpg123) has yet to be enabled in EPEL, so it
would seem a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450230
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #13 from Greg Bailey ---
Do you have any plans to make EPEL6 and/or EPEL7 builds of this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450227
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450226
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450225
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.0-3.fc26 lame-3.99.5-8.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e750c345f4
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882
--- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Athos Ribeiro from comment #2)
> You might want to have a python 2 subpackage (even if upstream still does
> not support python 3) and use the python_provide macro [1]. This will
> probabl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #12 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #6)
> Yaakov, looking (slightly) ahead, could you please create a BuildRoot
> override as soon as the package will be approved and built, so we can start
> buil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
lame-3.99.5-8.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e062f31edf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
lame-3.99.5-8.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e750c345f4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/lame
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
I've also enabled building the CLI tool accompanying this go package. A
successful build (with the binary and a -debuginfo package) can be found at
[1].
[1]:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/deca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450149
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450212
--- Comment #1 from Paul Whalen ---
Updated spec and srpm
SPEC: https://pwhalen.fedorapeople.org/packages/pyowm/pyowm.spec
SRPM:
https://pwhalen.fedorapeople.org/packages/pyowm/pyowm-2.6.1-2.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
The failing test needs more than 1024 open sockets to succeed, which results in
more open files than fedora's default setting (1024) allows. As a result, I
have disabled that test with a patch.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cstra...@redhat.com
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425833
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.orti.alca...@gmail.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438853
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450212
Bug ID: 1450212
Summary: Review Request: pyowm - Python wrapper library for the
OpenWeatherMap
Product: Fedora
Version: 26
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449882
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||athoscribe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450149
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||goe...@uddeborg.se
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: lame|Review Request: lame - MP3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Yeah, sounds good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #9 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
It's a Bash completion script, so it's not intended to be run at all, rather
sourced.
It looks like that should be placed in /etc/bash_completion.d/ rather than in
/usr/bin. I'll update to have t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450149
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1445286
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450149
Bug ID: 1450149
Summary: Review Request: python-minidb - Simple python object
store
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Yep, that would be the one. If it's a script that's meant to run by linchpin
(as opposed to the user), then it should probably go in /usr/libexec/linchpin.
As for whether or not it needs a shebang, if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448694
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-json-schema-2.8.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e08c3c0474
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448694
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-json-schema-2.8.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2290ea410a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450144
Bug ID: 1450144
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-yell - Yell - Your Extensible
Logging Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448694
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #7 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
OK, the shebang and spurious file permissions are easy enough to fix. I'm
curious which executable you think should have a shebang. Is it
linchpin_complete.sh? Those completion scripts are not sup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440500
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448694
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-json-schema
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #7 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
> The only issues with this package I see are a lack of a desktop file[1] and
> an AppData file[2] for the mp3x subpackage.
mp3x requires both an input and outp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122
Bug ID: 1450122
Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426785
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426785
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
pyjokes-0.5.0-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-eb1ff4415e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pleme...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450108
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1397261 |
|(gstreamer1-plug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1449467 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.0-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-72ed1ea3c5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445321
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/freeipa-desktop-profile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.10.4-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01143cb336
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #33 from mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #30)
> > > * Bundled engine.io library?
> > > - It seems engine.io library is bundled by nuvolaplayer. Is it required
> > > for
> > > something? If yes, s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #31 from Ralf Corsepius ---
Jason, apologies for not having reponded to your needinfo, but I never agreed
to review this package. I only commented on a detail and was slightly surprized
to sending me a needinfo.
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #6 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Agreed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Ok, if it's all right with you, then, I'll go ahead and do the review once
you've published the 1.0 package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I'll update the shebang/permissions issues, including sending a PR upstream.
As for the packages, this issue has been addressed in upstream and will be
released in their 1.0 milestone (due out th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
Jason Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rc040203@freenet. |
|de)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-petar-GoLLRB-0-0.1.git53be0d3.fc26 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a4823d5756
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-petar-GoLLRB-0-0.1.git53be0d3.fc24 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-646178adbe
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-petar-GoLLRB-0-0.1.git53be0d3.el7 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-a03ab90854
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-petar-GoLLRB-0-0.1.git53be0d3.el6 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-c70875d8ca
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-petar-GoLLRB-0-0.1.git53be0d3.fc25 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-28ba110089
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
Thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449467
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #3)
> I wonder if these explicit "Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}"
> still required? It looks like a leftover to me.
They are. It ensures that the vari
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447741
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #32 from mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #30)
> There are still few things remaining from my previous review:
>
> (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #21)
> > * AppData should be validated
> > - Ple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432983
--- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel ---
Rest of the review:
* Package named correctly
* Packaging the latest version
* License good for Fedora (see below for remarks about the license tag)
* License text included
* Filelist sane
* Requires/Pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #30 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
