[Bug 1450440] Review Request: perl-Ref-Util-XS - Utility functions for checking references

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth --- (In reply to Gerd Pokorra from comment #2) > Why you check the licensedir? > > I think > > %if 0%{?_licensedir:1} > %license LICENSE > %else > %doc LICENSE > %endif > > should be

[Bug 1448778] Review Request: cockatrice - A cross-platform virtual tabletop for multiplayer card games

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778 --- Comment #10 from Link Dupont --- Fixed up those. I ran fedora-review myself, so I hope I cleared up everything. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/linkdupont/public_git/cockatrice.git/plain/cockatrice.spec SRPM

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 --- Comment #14 from RĂ©mi Verschelde --- (In reply to Gwyn Ciesla from comment #9) > Package request has been approved: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jumpnbump Thanks Gwyn, and thanks Neal for

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- jumpnbump-1.60-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7f7dd3851b -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- jumpnbump-1.60-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2206fc38a0 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- jumpnbump-1.60-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bf8d29889c -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jumpnbump-1.60-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e6d3ae98ce -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1426193] Review Request: ara - Ansible Run Analysis, Record and visualize Ansible Playbook runs

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193 --- Comment #31 from David Moreau Simard --- @Dusty, unless mistaken everything is in Fedora except ARA itself by now. Need a fedora packager to review the proposed spec:

[Bug 1426193] Review Request: ara - Ansible Run Analysis, Record and visualize Ansible Playbook runs

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193 --- Comment #30 from Dusty Mabe --- (In reply to David Moreau Simard from comment #29) > Just a small update, as much as I'd like to be able to wrap this up, I'm not > going to be able to look into this until at least

[Bug 1456203] Review Request: jumpnbump - Cute multiplayer platform game with bunnies

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jumpnbump -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: latte-dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/latte-dock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1444518] Review Request: libcoap - C library implementation of CoAP

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444518 Paul Whalen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pwha...@redhat.com

[Bug 1439342] Review Request: adapt - Mycroft's Adapt Intent Parser

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439342 Paul Whalen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1427341] Review Request: python-gamera - Gamera is a framework for building document analysis applications.

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341 --- Comment #29 from Charalampos Stratakis --- The submitter hasn't answered in over a month. According to the policy for stalled package reviews [0] I'm declaring this review as stalled, and if no response is given

[Bug 1426193] Review Request: ara - Ansible Run Analysis, Record and visualize Ansible Playbook runs

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193 --- Comment #29 from David Moreau Simard --- Just a small update, as much as I'd like to be able to wrap this up, I'm not going to be able to look into this until at least the second half of june. To recapitulate, everything

[Bug 1448778] Review Request: cockatrice - A cross-platform virtual tabletop for multiplayer card games

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778 --- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande --- - This software is looking for some private libraries which are not packed/installed: Error: nothing provides libcockatrice_common.so()(64bit) needed by

[Bug 1450440] Review Request: perl-Ref-Util-XS - Utility functions for checking references

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440 Gerd Pokorra changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review?

[Bug 1450440] Review Request: perl-Ref-Util-XS - Utility functions for checking references

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440 --- Comment #2 from Gerd Pokorra --- Why you check the licensedir? I think %if 0%{?_licensedir:1} %license LICENSE %else %doc LICENSE %endif should be replaced to %license LICENSE -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 --- Comment #56 from jiri vanek --- As this is going to final meter, I had pushed necessary changes to rawhide:

[Bug 1450440] Review Request: perl-Ref-Util-XS - Utility functions for checking references

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440 Gerd Pokorra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 --- Comment #55 from jiri vanek --- hmm, the devel as noarch is interesting, but those realy are scripts, and jars are plain java. So well ,strange, but ok :) /jsut for record -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 --- Comment #54 from jiri vanek --- (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #42) > A quick update: > > Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/openjfx.spec > SRPM URL:

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 jiri vanek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are

[Bug 758472] Review Request: Equalizer - Middleware to create and deploy parallel OpenGL-based applications

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758472 Stefan Eilemann changed: What|Removed |Added CC|eilem...@gmail.com |

[Bug 1440704] Review Request: cpprest - C++ REST SDK

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #13 from c72...@yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c72578/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/cpprest.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 755510] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510 --- Comment #99 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr --- Hello James, Thanks for your interest in this review request and your proposal to give the formal review and to sponsor me. I've noted that I have to issue a couple of informal

[Bug 1133826] Review Request: rfidiot - Python RFID / NFC library & tools

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133826 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1389202] Review Request: compat-openssl10-libp11 - engine_pkcs11 for openssl1.0.x

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389202 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 --- Comment #53 from jiri vanek --- There is /usr/libs/.build-id directory in main package. It should get renamed to .openjfx-build-id (or similarly) or move to... I don't know where. Is it useful at all? -- You are

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

2017-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 --- Comment #52 from jiri vanek --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #51) > Re: comment 50 > > using modified sources is only required if needed for legal reasons. > Otherwise, doing so makes it harder/obfuscated if