https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444560
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450723
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450723
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1444560, 1442275
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442275
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1450723
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-cache-adapter-common
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-cache-integration-tests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450723
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450296
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433658
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
mustache-d-0.1.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-46e8f80d96
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433658
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456900
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #3)
> Single blocker, trivial to fix
>
> [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> Note: Dirs in package are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review! Pkg request submitted via pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review! Pkg request submitted via pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444397
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
certbot-0.14.1-3.fc24, python-acme-0.14.1-1.fc24,
python-certbot-apache-0.14.1-1.fc24, python-certbot-nginx-0.14.1-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445366
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
unicode-emoji-4.0-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456902
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430364
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Gallagher ---
Spec:
https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/argbash/argbash-2.4.0-0.2.fc26.src.rpm
SRPM:
https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/argbash/argbash-2.4.0-0.2.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456973
Bug ID: 1456973
Summary: Review Request: R-GenomeInfoDbData - Species and
taxonomy ID look up tables used by GenomeInfoDb
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438842
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433658
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mustache-d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
- Exclude all translation files in main
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433658
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #61 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #60)
> (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #58)
> > (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #54)
> > > You are not requireing any "java" ( or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #60 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #58)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #54)
> > You are not requireing any "java" ( or "java-devel" for devel subpackage) is
> > it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456902
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456900
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456902
Bug ID: 1456902
Summary: Review Request: R-plogr - C++ Logging Library for R
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456900
Bug ID: 1456900
Summary: Review Request: R-BH - Boost C++ Header Files for R
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #14 from Gerd Pokorra ---
Okay; sorry for my mistake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth ---
perl-devel is a build-require, not a require, and is not only allowed, it is
required for building XS packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #12 from Gerd Pokorra ---
P.S.
Would you please consider to remove the following BuildRequires before
uploading the package:
perl-devel coreutils gcc make findutils
Explicit dependency on perl-devel is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421605
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Ref-Util-XS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth ---
Thanks for the review Gerd.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
Gerd Pokorra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452649
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452649
--- Comment #13 from Luke Hinds ---
Apologies, I did not git add the newer spec and srpm:
>> [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>> Note: No known owner of /usr/share/exabgp
>> [!]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Gerd Pokorra from comment #7)
> But we do not need to care about EL 6. Do you want to make packages for EPEL
> 6?
No, hence the update in the -2 build (Comment #5).
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #7 from Gerd Pokorra ---
P.S.
Also the test
rm -f t/all-permutations.t
needed to be removed.
But we do not need to care about EL 6. Do you want to make packages for EPEL 6?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #6 from Gerd Pokorra ---
Yast for a moment I tested this to support EL-6:
# Optional Tests
BuildRequires: perl(B::Concise)
%{!?el6:BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta)}
BuildRequires: perl(Readonly)
.
.
.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth ---
Hmm, good point. The EL-6 bits are a leftover from my local repo build, where I
do have those packages. Neither the base not EPEL 6 repos are ever likely to
get these packages, so I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451411
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406881
--- Comment #4 from Filip Szymański ---
Spec URL: https://fszymanski.fedorapeople.org/vint/vint.spec
SRPM URL: https://fszymanski.fedorapeople.org/vint/vint-0.3.12-1.fc25.src.rpm
Update to 0.3.12
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358870
François Kooman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fkoo...@tuxed.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439342
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/adapt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114146
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
Hm, this does not appear to lead anywhere, so here is my shot:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441813
Iwicki Artur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1364745
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450440
--- Comment #4 from Gerd Pokorra ---
My EL-6 scratch builds with
koji build --scratch dist-6E-epel
/home/gz016/rpmbuild/SRPMS/perl-Ref-Util-XS-0.116-1.fc25.src.rpm
fails:
DEBUG util.py:439: Error: No Package found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452649
--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #10)
> - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
>
> I don't know why fedora-review prints this, but according to the
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634
--- Comment #13 from Fabio Valentini ---
Updated .spec and SRPM files for the newest 0.14.29 upstream release:
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/syncthing.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452649
--- Comment #11 from Luke Hinds ---
Spec file and SRPM updated.
Current status:
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #59 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #55)
> hmm, the devel as noarch is interesting, but those realy are scripts, and
> jars are plain java. So well ,strange, but ok :) /jsut for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #58 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #54)
> You are not requireing any "java" ( or "java-devel" for devel subpackage) is
> it intentional? It may be (and my bindings are bringing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #57 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #53)
> There is /usr/libs/.build-id directory in main package. It should get
> renamed to .openjfx-build-id (or similarly) or move to... I don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413038
Jiri Konecny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
60 matches
Mail list logo