[Bug 1468995] Review Request: python-geopandas - Geographic pandas extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468995 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||davejohan...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(davejohansen@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Let's ask the maintainer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1519081] Review Request: scribus-generator - Open source high-quality PDF template and mail-merge alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 Luya Tshimbalangachanged: What|Removed |Added Alias||scribus-template -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1519081] New: Review Request: scribus-generator - Open source high-quality PDF template and mail-merge alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 Bug ID: 1519081 Summary: Review Request: scribus-generator - Open source high-quality PDF template and mail-merge alternative Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: l...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/scribus-generator.spec SRPM URL: https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/scribus-generator-2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Mail-Merge-like extension to Scribus, to generate Scribus and PDF documents automatically from external data. Fedora Account System Username:luya -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1515080] Review Request: ocaml-qcheck - QuickCheck inspired property-based testing for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515080 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- ocaml-qcheck-0.7-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4da5fb82d9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1515080] Review Request: ocaml-qcheck - QuickCheck inspired property-based testing for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515080 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1515080] Review Request: ocaml-qcheck - QuickCheck inspired property-based testing for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515080 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- ocaml-qcheck-0.7-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ff77070f53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514326] Review Request: ocaml-obuild - Simple package build system for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514326 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- ocaml-obuild-0.1.9-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d6ca002a36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514326] Review Request: ocaml-obuild - Simple package build system for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514326 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514326] Review Request: ocaml-obuild - Simple package build system for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514326 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- ocaml-obuild-0.1.9-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ffd33643ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501992] Review Request: opam - Source-based package manager for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501992 --- Comment #4 from Andy Li--- I noticed there are two files licensed in LGPLv3+ instead of LGPLv2+. I asked upstream to upgrade everything to LGPLv3+ https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/3125 I think it is good to change the spec License field to LGPLv3+ anyway since v3+ is valid for v2+. For %check, I can reproduce the `make tests` failure in mock. I've also dump the test log at https://gist.github.com/andyli/39c567d847439ebb752ca3d14e91d037 I can't tell why did it fail either. Would you check to see if the tests pass outside mock? If not, we have to ask upstream. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL", "LGPL (v2.1)", "Unknown or generated". 322 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/andy/Documents/1501992-opam/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/ocaml [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/.build-id(cups- client, efivar-libs, rsyslog, policycoreutils-python-utils, lz4-libs, qemu-block-gluster, rpm-plugin-selinux, abrt, libmediaart, libimagequant, giflib, libreoffice-graphicfilter, trousers, libdb- utils, tracker-miners, xorg-x11-font-utils, PackageKit-command-not- found, perl-Sys-Syslog, libcom_err, libseccomp, p11-kit, libabw, gtkspell, libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, libmodman, argyllcms, parted, gnome-disk-utility, libdvdread, zstd, bluez-libs, libwebp, libxslt, system-config-printer-udev, perl-Encode, elfutils, python2-cryptography, libevdev, libgpg-error, lvm2-libs, perl-Digest- SHA, libzstd, gtk-murrine-engine, libdazzle, avahi, lua-lpeg, symlinks, libcdr, mate-sensors-applet, e2fsprogs-libs, pulseaudio- libs, usermode-gtk, lcms2, qemu-guest-agent, ntfs-3g, libxcb, libyubikey, sssd-common-pac, python3-brlapi, openconnect, rtkit, xcb- util-keysyms, sushi, libgphoto2, xcb-util, libwmf-lite, python3-coverage, anaconda-widgets, http-parser, pulseaudio-utils, libeot, systemd-bootchart, perl-Time-Piece, dbusmenu-qt, ncurses-libs, polkit, ldns, libreport-plugin-logger, gnome-color-manager, fcoe- utils, libyui-mga-ncurses, xorg-x11-xkb-utils, ibus-hangul, NetworkManager-openvpn, libxkbfile, hplip-libs, libwvstreams, xmlrpc-c-client, cheese, python3-hawkey, libwpd, libvirt-daemon- driver-qemu, mbedtls, perl-Time-HiRes, qemu-block-ssh, libwps, gssdp, gnome-calendar, sssd-ldap, libacl, xorg-x11-drv-ati, libSM, policycoreutils, mcelog, abrt-plugin-bodhi, libmusicbrainz5, pptp, gnote, sane-backends-drivers-scanners, libXxf86misc, foomatic, colord- gtk, libpath_utils, libicu-devel, rpm-build, libvirt-daemon-driver- storage-sheepdog, pygtk2, libglvnd-gles, rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit, setroubleshoot, gstreamer1, gom, python2-krbv, dbus-libs, libreoffice- gtk3, libreoffice-gtk2, cairo-gobject, gnome-screenshot, gutenprint, usermode, qpdf-libs, linux-atm-libs, libedit, openssh, libvirt- gconfig, python3-cairo, accountsservice, isl, hfsplus-tools, ImageMagick, perl-IPC-SysV, gssproxy, mesa-libGLU, libblockdev-btrfs, libatomic_ops, gupnp-av, caja-extensions, libmpcdec, gtk-update-icon- cache, python3-iscsi-initiator-utils, libyui-ncurses, libvirt-daemon- driver-interface, NetworkManager, liblangtag, NetworkManager-glib, NetworkManager-l2tp-gnome, libdatrie, glade-libs, setuptool, gstreamer-plugins-good, guile, pcre-utf16, tree, isdn4k-utils, gvfs- goa, pipewire, gnupg, cronie-anacron, xfsprogs, libcroco, NetworkManager-iodine, telepathy-glib, plymouth-plugin-label, colord- libs, perl-Unicode-Collate, totem-pl-parser, gpgmepp, libgcab1, libzhuyin, gvnc, hypervfcopyd, cronie, caja-image-converter, rpm-libs, libreport, nettle, libcacard, libverto-libev, colord, libpipeline, pkcs11-helper, accountsservice-libs, gnome-system-monitor, findutils, popt, python2-xpyb, qt5-qtx11extras, libsss_idmap, imsettings- gsettings, libraw1394, folks, gnome-clocks, python3-dbus, iproute-tc, isomd5sum, gamin, spice-glib, woff2, coolkey, dotconf, luajit, libXfont, PackageKit-glib, patch, sqlite-libs, lttng-ust, enchant, libXxf86dga, rhash, xdg-user-dirs-gtk, libwayland-client, pinentry-
[Bug 1468995] Review Request: python-geopandas - Geographic pandas extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468995 --- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade--- There's an upstream patch for a spatialindex crash that's triggered by geopandas; if that can be applied, then I can finish this request up. https://github.com/libspatialindex/libspatialindex/pull/108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1517584] Review Request: ocaml-qtest - Inline (Unit) Tests for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517584 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-qtest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518463] Review Request: tinyobjloader - Tiny wavefront obj loader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518463 --- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes--- Thanks. I removed the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" line, which fixes both suggestions. Spec URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/tinyobjloader/tinyobjloader.spec SRPM URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/tinyobjloader/tinyobjloader-1.0.6-2.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518463] Review Request: tinyobjloader - Tiny wavefront obj loader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518463 Iwicki Arturchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@svgames.pl --- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur --- >%install >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT The packaging guidelines say that "The contents of the buildroot SHOULD NOT be removed in the first line of %install." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT >rm -rf %{buildroot}/%{_docdir} The guidelines also say that it's preferred not to mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. You should pick one and stick with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518713] Review Request: guidelines-support-library - Guidelines Support Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518713 --- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev--- No. It will work fine with #include . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518713] Review Request: guidelines-support-library - Guidelines Support Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518713 Iwicki Arturchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@svgames.pl --- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur --- >mkdir -p "%{buildroot}%{_includedir}/%{name}/gsl" >cp -a include/gsl %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/%{name} I'm not 100% familiar with the C/C++ include process, but I think that if the library is installed this way, it will require dependent programs to use "#include ", instead of just "#include ". Unless that's intentional. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1510565] Review Request: ntpstat - Utility to print NTP synchronization status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510565 Pavel Zhukovchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||mlich...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(mlichvar@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #10 from Pavel Zhukov --- Revuew is below. Few remarks: 1) You are using %makeinstall macros while Makefile is pretty simple and either make install prefix=%{DESTDIR}/%{prefix} can be used or Makefile patched to accept DESTDIR (upstream first). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used 2) Description should start with capitalized letter as normal English sentense Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/pavel/work/bugs/bz1510565/ntpstat/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [!]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. Note: %makeinstall used in %install section [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [!]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can
[Bug 1517993] Review Request: rmtest - A simple framework for testing Redis modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517993 Lukas Berkchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||lb...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Lukas Berk --- Running fedora-review on the above... = EXTRA items = Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). [...] Diff spec file in url and in SRPM - --- /home/lberk/src/fedora-scm/review/1517993-python-rmtest/srpm/python-rmtest.spec 2017-11-29 15:40:08.286849396 -0500 +++ /home/lberk/src/fedora-scm/review/1517993-python-rmtest/srpm-unpacked/python-rmtest.spec 2017-11-26 23:48:18.0 -0500 @@ -18,6 +18,4 @@ BuildRequires: python2-devel python3-devel BuildRequires: python-redis python3-redis -BuildRequires: redis-devel -Requires: redis >= 4 %description -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518957] Review request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518957 Germano Massullochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||antti.andreim...@mail.ee, ||klem...@redhat.com, ||t...@iki.fi Blocks|1518962 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518962 [Bug 1518962] Review request: libdigidoc - Library for handling digitally signed documents -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518962] Review request: libdigidoc - Library for handling digitally signed documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518962 Germano Massullochanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1518957 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518957 [Bug 1518957] Review request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518957] Review request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518957 Germano Massullochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1518962 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518962 [Bug 1518962] Review request: libdigidoc - Library for handling digitally signed documents -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518962] New: Review request: libdigidoc - Library for handling digitally signed documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518962 Bug ID: 1518962 Summary: Review request: libdigidoc - Library for handling digitally signed documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: germano.massu...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends On: 1518957 Review request to bring back into Fedora reporitories retired libdigidoc[1] package Description: libDigiDoc is a library implementing a subset of the XAdES digital signature standard on top of Estonian specific .ddoc container format. It allows to create, sign, verify, and modify digidoc XML containers. [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdigidoc [2]: https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/libdigidoc/libdigidoc.spec [3]: https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/libdigidoc/libdigidoc-3.10.2-2.fc27.src.rpm Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518957 [Bug 1518957] Review request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518957] New: Review request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518957 Bug ID: 1518957 Summary: Review request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: germano.massu...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Review request to bring back into Fedora reporitories retired esteidcerts[1] package esteidcerts - Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/esteidcerts spec file https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/esteidcerts/blob/f25/f/esteidcerts.spec src rpm file https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/esteidcerts/3.8.0.9128/5.fc26/src/esteidcerts-3.8.0.9128-5.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1513169] Review Request: ghc-concurrent-extra - Extra concurrency primitives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513169 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-concurrent-extra-0.7.0.11-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4ab9b1e065 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1513169] Review Request: ghc-concurrent-extra - Extra concurrency primitives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513169 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1513169] Review Request: ghc-concurrent-extra - Extra concurrency primitives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513169 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-concurrent-extra-0.7.0.11-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1e23ab49fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1447517] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin--- The package is okay to be accepted imho. You still need a sponsor thogh, try introducing yourself to the fedora-devel mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1447517] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 --- Comment #9 from sanford rockowitz--- ddcutil.spec has been modified per Robert-André Mauchin's comments. In particular, the %doc/%licence simplification has been implemented. Having upstream not install the docdir files actually simplifies both the Debian and SuSE packaging as well. However, upstream will not be changed until the next release, 0.8.6. As a transitional aid, the %install step removes the COPYING file: rm -f %{buildroot}/usr/share/doc/%{name}/COPYING Architecture s390x is now explicitly excluded, since ddcutil makes no sense in that environment. On the other hand, the commented out lines regarding armv7hl and aarch64 have been deleted, since ddcutil is known to work on those architectures. File locations are unchanged: Spec URL: http://www.ddcutil.com/fedora/ddcutil.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ddcutil.com/fedora/ddcutil-0.8.5-1.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1483262] Review Request: phpdoc - Documentation generator for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483262 --- Comment #13 from Shawn Iwinski--- Sorry for the delay and the churn on this package. The licenses were a major pain with this package so hopefully I got then correct. I'm wondering if I could reduce "MIT and ASL 2.0 and BSD and CC-BY and (DWPL and MIT) and (MIT and GPLv2) and (MIT and GPLv2 and Public Domain and CC-BY) and (MIT and GPLv3) and (MIT or GPLv2) and OFL" to "MIT and ASL 2.0 and BSD and CC-BY and DWPL and GPLv2 and GPLv3 and OFL and Public Domain and (MIT or GPLv2)"? Changes/diff: https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/369f0492f086242e5ae2685b67b3608cb1f66220 Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/369f0492f086242e5ae2685b67b3608cb1f66220/phpdoc/phpdoc.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/phpdoc-2.9.0-5.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518898] New: Review Request: rust-peeking_take_while - Like `Iterator::take_while`, but calls the predicate on a peeked value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518898 Bug ID: 1518898 Summary: Review Request: rust-peeking_take_while - Like `Iterator::take_while`, but calls the predicate on a peeked value Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-peeking_take_while.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-peeking_take_while-0.1.2-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Like `Iterator::take_while`, but calls the predicate on a peeked value. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518896] New: Review Request: rust-shlex - Split a string into shell words, like Python's shlex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518896 Bug ID: 1518896 Summary: Review Request: rust-shlex - Split a string into shell words, like Python's shlex Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-shlex.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-shlex-0.1.1-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Split a string into shell words, like Python's shlex. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518893] New: Review Request: rust-which - Rust equivalent of Unix command "which"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518893 Bug ID: 1518893 Summary: Review Request: rust-which - Rust equivalent of Unix command "which" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-which.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-which-1.0.3-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Rust equivalent of Unix command "which". FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518883] New: Review Request: rust-edit-distance - Levenshtein edit distance between strings, a measure for similarity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518883 Bug ID: 1518883 Summary: Review Request: rust-edit-distance - Levenshtein edit distance between strings, a measure for similarity Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-edit-distance.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-edit-distance-2.0.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Levenshtein edit distance between strings, a measure for similarity. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518882] New: Review Request: rust-brev - Helpers for quick and dirty scripting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518882 Bug ID: 1518882 Summary: Review Request: rust-brev - Helpers for quick and dirty scripting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-brev.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-brev-0.1.12-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Helpers for quick and dirty scripting. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518881] New: Review Request: rust-sha1 - Minimal implementation of SHA1 for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518881 Bug ID: 1518881 Summary: Review Request: rust-sha1 - Minimal implementation of SHA1 for Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-sha1.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-sha1-0.2.0-3.fc28.src.rpm Description: Minimal implementation of SHA1 for Rust. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518438] Review Request: rust-mnt - Parse mount points
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518438 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 12:00:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518438] Review Request: rust-mnt - Parse mount points
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518438 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-mnt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518438] Review Request: rust-mnt - Parse mount points
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518438 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - only sources installed PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518438] Review Request: rust-mnt - Parse mount points
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518438 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512065] Review Request: ghc-hspec-core - A Testing Framework for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512065 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512069] Review Request: ghc-hspec - A Testing Framework for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512069 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514164] Review Request: ghc-servant-client-core - Core functionality and class for client function generation for servant APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514164 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512065] Review Request: ghc-hspec-core - A Testing Framework for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512065 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-hspec-core-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-hspec-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-servant-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-client-core-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-server-0.12-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1e88ebe293 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514057] Review Request: ghc-servant - A family of combinators for defining webservices APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514057 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512069] Review Request: ghc-hspec - A Testing Framework for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512069 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-hspec-core-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-hspec-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-servant-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-client-core-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-server-0.12-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1e88ebe293 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514057] Review Request: ghc-servant - A family of combinators for defining webservices APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514057 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-hspec-core-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-hspec-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-servant-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-client-core-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-server-0.12-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1e88ebe293 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514111] Review Request: ghc-servant-server - A family of combinators for defining webservices APIs and serving them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514111 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514111] Review Request: ghc-servant-server - A family of combinators for defining webservices APIs and serving them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514111 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-hspec-core-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-hspec-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-servant-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-client-core-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-server-0.12-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1e88ebe293 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514164] Review Request: ghc-servant-client-core - Core functionality and class for client function generation for servant APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514164 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- ghc-hspec-core-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-hspec-2.4.4-1.fc26 ghc-servant-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-client-core-0.12-1.fc26 ghc-servant-server-0.12-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1e88ebe293 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518604] Review Request: rust-openssl - OpenSSL bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518604 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 10:31:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System--- cool-retro-term-1.0.1-5.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-813b682539 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- cool-retro-term-1.0.1-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-12f2895029 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- cool-retro-term-1.0.1-5.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-603b011e54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518646] Review Request: rust-unicase - Case-insensitive wrapper around strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518646 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 09:40:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518626] Review Request: rust-serde_urlencoded - `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518626 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 09:40:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518624] Review Request: rust-yes - Same as `yes` command, written in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518624 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 09:40:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518644] Review Request: rust-md5 - MD5 hash function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518644 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 09:38:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-24.el7 perl-PAR-1.015-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-fe2035adcd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-24.el7 perl-PAR-1.015-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-fe2035adcd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268742] Review Request: rubygem-bacon-colored_output - Colored output for Bacon test framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742 --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch--- BTW the BR: rubygem(bacon) is probably not required, because there is no test suite enabled ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424233] Review Request: GNOME Internet Radio Locator - Locate Internet Radio Stations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424233 Ole Aamotchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2017-11-29 08:59:23 --- Comment #9 from Ole Aamot --- Obsolete package. See bug #1517451 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518713] New: Review Request: guidelines-support-library - Guidelines Support Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518713 Bug ID: 1518713 Summary: Review Request: guidelines-support-library - Guidelines Support Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: vit...@easycoding.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/EasyCoding/guidelines-support-library/raw/master/guidelines-support-library.spec SRPM URL: https://www.easycoding.org/files/fedora/guidelines-support-library-0-1.20171014git1c95f94.fc27.src.rpm Description: Header-only Guidelines Support Library. Fedora Account System Username: xvitaly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518604] Review Request: rust-openssl - OpenSSL bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518604 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-openssl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Vít Ondruchchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch --- Could you please consider removing the following build dependencies: BuildRequires: rubygem(bacon-colored_output) BuildRequires: rubygem(simplecov) BuildRequires: rubygem(coveralls) BuildRequires: rubygem(yard) I don't think they are strictly necessary for build of the package. We don't care about code coverage (simplecov, coveralls), the documentation doesn't need to by in yard formant and if the bacon output is colored or not, it changes nothing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518624] Review Request: rust-yes - Same as `yes` command, written in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518624 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518646] Review Request: rust-unicase - Case-insensitive wrapper around strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518646 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-unicase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268742] Review Request: rubygem-bacon-colored_output - Colored output for Bacon test framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742 Vít Ondruchchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch --- Ping ... Could you please import this into Fedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518644] Review Request: rust-md5 - MD5 hash function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518644 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-md5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268703] Review Request: rubygem-powerpack - A few useful extensions to core Ruby classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703 Vít Ondruchchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch --- Ping ... What is the status here, please? The package was approved already ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518626] Review Request: rust-serde_urlencoded - `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518626 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-serde_urlencoded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1447517] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin--- > When I upload the updated package, should I bump the release number from 1 to > 2, given that the package is still under review? It's not needed, no. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1517584] Review Request: ocaml-qtest - Inline (Unit) Tests for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517584 Robert-André Mauchinchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package accepted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431637] Review Request: python-fypp - Fortran preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431637 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski--- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518671] New: Review Request: mozilla-ublock-origin - An efficient blocker for Firefox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518671 Bug ID: 1518671 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-ublock-origin - An efficient blocker for Firefox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: domi...@greysector.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-ublock-origin/mozilla-ublock-origin.spec SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-ublock-origin/mozilla-ublock-origin-1.14.18-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: An efficient blocker: easy on memory and CPU footprint, and yet can load and enforce thousands more filters than other popular blockers out there. Flexible, it's more than an "ad blocker": it can also read and create filters from hosts files. Fedora Account System Username: rathann -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518624] Review Request: rust-yes - Same as `yes` command, written in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518624 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - as this is a CLI crate that provides no API, it installs binaries correctly PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518646] Review Request: rust-unicase - Case-insensitive wrapper around strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518646 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - only sources installed PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518646] Review Request: rust-unicase - Case-insensitive wrapper around strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518646 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518644] Review Request: rust-md5 - MD5 hash function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518644 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - only sources installed PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518644] Review Request: rust-md5 - MD5 hash function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518644 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518626] Review Request: rust-serde_urlencoded - `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518626 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518626] Review Request: rust-serde_urlencoded - `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518626 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - only sources installed PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518624] Review Request: rust-yes - Same as `yes` command, written in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518624 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518604] Review Request: rust-openssl - OpenSSL bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518604 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518604] Review Request: rust-openssl - OpenSSL bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518604 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - only sources installed PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518646] New: Review Request: rust-unicase - Case-insensitive wrapper around strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518646 Bug ID: 1518646 Summary: Review Request: rust-unicase - Case-insensitive wrapper around strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-unicase.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-unicase-2.1.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Case-insensitive wrapper around strings. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518644] New: Review Request: rust-md5 - MD5 hash function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518644 Bug ID: 1518644 Summary: Review Request: rust-md5 - MD5 hash function Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-md5.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-md5-0.3.6-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: MD5 hash function. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- cool-retro-term-1.0.1-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b3c73d2cbc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- cool-retro-term-1.0.1-4.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dfcc097b97 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509590] Review Request: cool-retro-term - Terminal emulator mimicking a CRT display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509590 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System--- cool-retro-term-1.0.1-4.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a03ca8d850 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518626] New: Review Request: rust-serde_urlencoded - `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518626 Bug ID: 1518626 Summary: Review Request: rust-serde_urlencoded - `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-serde_urlencoded.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-serde_urlencoded-0.5.1-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: `x-www-form-urlencoded` meets Serde. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518624] New: Review Request: rust-yes - Same as `yes` command, written in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518624 Bug ID: 1518624 Summary: Review Request: rust-yes - Same as `yes` command, written in Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-yes.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-yes-0.2.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Same as `yes` command, written in Rust. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518604] New: Review Request: rust-openssl - OpenSSL bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518604 Bug ID: 1518604 Summary: Review Request: rust-openssl - OpenSSL bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-openssl.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-openssl-0.9.21-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: OpenSSL bindings. FAS account: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1518434] Review Request: rust-foreign-types-shared - Internal crate used by foreign-types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518434 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-11-29 04:03:25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1221474] Review Request: rrd4j - A high performance data logging and graphing system for time series data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221474 --- Comment #5 from Fabrice Bacchella--- I think that a +ex.printStackTrace(); +System.err.println("Font not loaded."); in a library is never a good idea. I would rather wrap the Exception in a RuntimeException. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1489668] Review Request: slurm - HPC cluster management and job scheduling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668 --- Comment #21 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich--- (In reply to Philip Kovacs from comment #20) > I'm happy to build for EPEL7 also. You are the owner. You can do it already. So I'l just wait for it though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org