date:20171222

[Bug 1514119] Add python-rsdclient to RDO

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514119

Lin Yang  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lin.a.y...@intel.com



--- Comment #4 from Lin Yang  ---
@Alfredo Current the tests failed because of missing python-rsd-lib package,
now the rsd-lib rdo project has been merged. Any suggestion about how to fix
this failure? Thanks in advance.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528393



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
urlscan-0.8.6-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-760127997c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528561] Review Request: ocaml-ptmap - Maps over integers implemented as Patricia trees

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528561

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "LGPL (v2.1)". 7 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
 /ocaml-ptmap/review-ocaml-ptmap/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 14 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on

[Bug 1528530] Review Request: ocaml-rope - Ropes ("heavyweight strings") for OCaml

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528530

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL (v2.1 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2.1)",
 "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output
 of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ocaml-rope/review-ocaml-
 rope/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ocaml:
[x]: This should never happen

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check

[Bug 1517993] Review Request: python-rmtest - A simple framework for testing Redis modules

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517993



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-rmtest-0.6.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517993] Review Request: python-rmtest - A simple framework for testing Redis modules

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517993



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-rmtest-0.6.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526091] Package Review: python-sushy - a small Python library to communicate with Redfish based systems

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526091

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||python-sushy-1.2.0-1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST



--- Comment #9 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
Package is imported in pagure and package built in
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23843529

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||python-rsd-lib-0.1.1-1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526091] Package Review: python-sushy - a small Python library to communicate with Redfish based systems

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526091

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-12-22 08:57:35



--- Comment #14 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
Package is built and published in rawhide repo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rsd-lib

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115



--- Comment #7 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
I'm requesting the new package in Fedora and will assign openstack-sig group as
admin.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: Add rsd-lib |Review Request:
   |- python library for|python-rsd-lib - python
   |communicating with Intel|library for communicating
   |Rack Scale Design enabled   |with Intel Rack Scale
   |hardware|Design enabled hardware



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: Add rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
formal review:

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file license.png is not marked as %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Apache", "Unknown or
 generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 54 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1514115-python-rsd-
 lib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
 -rsd-lib , python2-rsd-lib-tests ,

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528393

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528393



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
urlscan-0.8.6-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7f6aad0d2b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528303] Review Request: python-pytest-vcr - Py.test plugin for managing VCR.py cassettes

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528303

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pytest-vcr-0.3.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f0a4ab9a51

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525860] Review Request: naver-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts - Nanum Gothic Coding family of Korean TrueType fonts

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525860

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
naver-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-9.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dbfe23fb09

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1513290] Review Request: ocaml-oasis - Tooling for building OCaml libraries and applications

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513290

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
ocaml-oasis-0.4.10-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1b7266f53e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528393



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/urlscan

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528612] New: Review Request: librs232 - Library for serial communications over RS-232 with Lua bindings

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528612

Bug ID: 1528612
   Summary: Review Request: librs232 - Library for serial
communications over RS-232 with Lua bindings
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/librs232.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/librs232-1.0.3-2.20171219gitc0a3c75.fc27.src.rpm
Description: librs232 is a multi-platform library that provides support for
communicating over serial ports (e.g. RS-232). It also provides Lua bindings.
Fedora Account System Username: dwrobel

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528598] New: Review Request: python-simplebayes - A memory-based, optional-persistence naïve bayesian text classifier

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528598

Bug ID: 1528598
   Summary: Review Request: python-simplebayes - A memory-based,
optional-persistence naïve bayesian text classifier
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-simplebayes.spec
SRPM URL:
http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-simplebayes-1.5.8-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
A memory-based, optional-persistence naïve bayesian text classifier. This work
is heavily inspired by the python "redisbayes" module and this was written to
alleviate the network/time requirements when using the bayesian classifier to
classify large sets of text, or when attempting to train with very large sets
of sample data.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528598] Review Request: python-simplebayes - A memory-based, optional-persistence naïve bayesian text classifier

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528598



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23840920

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: Add rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514115

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|hgue...@redhat.com  |amora...@redhat.com



--- Comment #5 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
SPEC: https://amoralej.fedorapeople.org/python-rsd-lib/python-rsd-lib.spec
SRPM:
https://amoralej.fedorapeople.org/python-rsd-lib/python-rsd-lib-0.1.1-1.fc28.src.rpm

scratch build successful in
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23840234

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1514119] Add python-rsdclient to RDO

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

[Bug 1528561] Review Request: ocaml-ptmap - Maps over integers implemented as Patricia trees

[Bug 1528530] Review Request: ocaml-rope - Ropes ("heavyweight strings") for OCaml

[Bug 1517993] Review Request: python-rmtest - A simple framework for testing Redis modules

[Bug 1517993] Review Request: python-rmtest - A simple framework for testing Redis modules

[Bug 1526091] Package Review: python-sushy - a small Python library to communicate with Redfish based systems

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

[Bug 1526091] Package Review: python-sushy - a small Python library to communicate with Redfish based systems

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: python-rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: Add rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

[Bug 1528303] Review Request: python-pytest-vcr - Py.test plugin for managing VCR.py cassettes

[Bug 1525860] Review Request: naver-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts - Nanum Gothic Coding family of Korean TrueType fonts

[Bug 1513290] Review Request: ocaml-oasis - Tooling for building OCaml libraries and applications

[Bug 1528393] Review Request: urlscan - Extract and browse the URLs contained in an email ( urlview replacement)

[Bug 1528612] New: Review Request: librs232 - Library for serial communications over RS-232 with Lua bindings

[Bug 1528598] New: Review Request: python-simplebayes - A memory-based, optional-persistence naïve bayesian text classifier

[Bug 1528598] Review Request: python-simplebayes - A memory-based, optional-persistence naïve bayesian text classifier

[Bug 1514115] Review Request: Add rsd-lib - python library for communicating with Intel Rack Scale Design enabled hardware

24 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information