[Bug 1582861] Review Request: vkd3d - D3D12 to Vulkan translation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861 --- Comment #13 from Michael Cronenworth --- New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/vkd3d.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/vkd3d-1.0-4.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IOELQUJKTYEXWS4KUPNWA4RSY5T5ZZQQ/
[Bug 1583448] Review Request: gap-pkg-crime - Group cohomology and Massey products
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583448 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > Fix the license like Artur said, otherwise the package is ok. Thank you! New URLs: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-crime/gap-pkg-crime.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-crime/gap-pkg-crime-1.4-2.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MGECHC3NAJVCWYZP6LJDV6UNBBOXECXU/
[Bug 1583448] Review Request: gap-pkg-crime - Group cohomology and Massey products
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583448
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #1)
> doc/crime.xml says "GNU Public Licence, version 2 or later (at your
> preference)". As such, the License: tag should be "GPLv2+".
So it does! I looked for the phrase "any later version" and didn't find it.
Thanks for spotting that. I will fix the license tag.
> You can use %{URL} as part of Source0 to avoid repetition.
Personally, I find that harder (as a human) to read. It makes no difference to
the computer, of course, but I prefer the way it is currently. Thanks for the
suggestion, anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WRQVYIHIKWLQAFKOZFA44KDOPLOCI2XM/
[Bug 1582861] Review Request: vkd3d - D3D12 to Vulkan translation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861 --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa --- Please remove the empty %files section, as `vkd3d` is not a metapackage or anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WR7FP5VAKNT4QN7QVXHIOSZQSCDZO5NK/
[Bug 1582876] Review Request: perl-Diff-LibXDiff - Calculate a diff with LibXDiff (via XS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582876 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- Addressed in the following new iteration: Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/perl-Diff-LibXDiff.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/perl-Diff-LibXDiff-0.05-0.fc28.3.src.rpm Note that the Release is below 1. That will change when I upload after completed review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TOW7GUBT56UQ7AL4ANZYOYMILRAVXF3B/
[Bug 1582861] Review Request: vkd3d - D3D12 to Vulkan translation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861 --- Comment #11 from Michael Cronenworth --- New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/vkd3d.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/vkd3d-1.0-3.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CLXZ5WROHNCNDLAQITLGOZQZEVYKPORH/
[Bug 1582861] Review Request: vkd3d - D3D12 to Vulkan translation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ---
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
Please consider using "%make_build" instead.
> #Remove static libraries
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libvkd3d.{a,la}
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libvkd3d-utils.{a,la}
Consider using the following instead:
# Remove libtool archives
find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -delete
# Remove static libraries
find %{buildroot} -name '*.a' -delete
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTNADIYNU472NGGDHRW4QNSC75AOB3AA/
[Bug 1583887] New: Review Request: golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial - An UNOFFICIAL Dropbox v2 API SDK for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583887 Bug ID: 1583887 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial - An UNOFFICIAL Dropbox v2 API SDK for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00732701-golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial/golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00732701-golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial/golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial-4.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: An UNOFFICIAL Dropbox v2 API SDK for Go Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZSSQUPNLSOYD47CWKHF64MBWL2XUIP7P/
[Bug 1573977] Review Request: golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega - A client library in go for mega.co.nz storage service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573977 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega-0-0.1.20180529git3ba4983.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-39de3b8f35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YAXLEF77VYIN6SDN2SOZRY53GAXYW6QY/
[Bug 1573977] Review Request: golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega - A client library in go for mega.co.nz storage service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573977 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T2EUR2SWOZJMISNHAGEJM2OQMY3EHLNP/
[Bug 1573977] Review Request: golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega - A client library in go for mega.co.nz storage service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573977 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega-0-0.1.20180529git3ba4983.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f2c7180edc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/32USONCKAPBODHWJNXVC6JDYRQZA7TPL/
[Bug 1573952] Review Request: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil - Psutil for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573952 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-shirou-gopsutil-2.18.04-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a14db8d55f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4CC3HTP6ZK7G6B3LP76J4U72STPQIUAU/
[Bug 1573952] Review Request: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil - Psutil for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573952 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-shirou-gopsutil-2.18.04-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-62ec711b79 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IOY3RUVBDJCSGUKTLYFGPMCQHJQTXAIQ/
[Bug 1573952] Review Request: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil - Psutil for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573952 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/D4IXASG3N3QAVCMLHVWUGHWKP5EYMEZD/
[Bug 1583308] Review Request: python-netdisco - Python library to scan local network for services and devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583308 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-netdisco -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DAQ7ZZBEZS7R6XVEBM77M7LAMLKLYAWD/
[Bug 1495387] Review Request: nodejs-acorn-jsx - Alternative, faster React.js JSX parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495387 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1583859 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-acorn-jsx Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583859 [Bug 1583859] Review Request: nodejs-estree-walker - Traverse an ESTree-compliant AST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GPMNVQ4L5TUZT6LUWOUFWFPHCMQEPWTD/
[Bug 1583859] New: Review Request: nodejs-estree-walker - Traverse an ESTree-compliant AST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583859 Bug ID: 1583859 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-estree-walker - Traverse an ESTree-compliant AST Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends On: 1495387 Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1572709 (mozgw) Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-estree-walker/nodejs-estree-walker.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-estree-walker/nodejs-estree-walker-0.5.2-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Traverse an ESTree-compliant AST Fedora Account System Username: jsmith Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495387 [Bug 1495387] Review Request: nodejs-acorn-jsx - Alternative, faster React.js JSX parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572709 [Bug 1572709] Tracker for Mozilla IoT Gateway on Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LEBDEFFOTYJZRA35LBAC24S57CHFTCKL/
[Bug 1573982] Review Request: golang-github-dchest-safefile - Implements safe "atomic" saving of files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573982 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-dchest-safefile-0-0.1.20180529git855e8d9.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0811b47ae8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZDDHY36TRQDWIRZQXX34HFM5T5WFI4YI/
[Bug 1573982] Review Request: golang-github-dchest-safefile - Implements safe "atomic" saving of files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573982 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YMUYBUANENLUGTBXB5PJ4YWU46FCLZHJ/
[Bug 1573982] Review Request: golang-github-dchest-safefile - Implements safe "atomic" saving of files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573982 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-dchest-safefile-0-0.1.20180529git855e8d9.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b9347a58a1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BPCR7FTJKEBLFPBOT2UVTBM23GV3AILK/
[Bug 1583798] Review Request: termy-qt - TermySequence terminal multiplexer client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583798 Artur Iwicki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@svgames.pl --- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki --- The stuff inside /usr/share/qtermy is 6.2 MiB. It should go in termy-qt-data or some other noarch subpackage, IMHO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TWT3J7I774EGE7OQUQFWT7NSSKRFSFES/
[Bug 1573987] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith - A sleep-aware-sleep() function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573987 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith-0-0.1.20180529gitc35da9b.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3f6e163451 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QX7F256NUYYKKTAU2EEQTASCM6BIHFUN/
[Bug 1573987] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith - A sleep-aware-sleep() function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B45IKTZM3QBFJSNXWAXHXTGJYTN6Q7IT/
[Bug 1573987] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith - A sleep-aware-sleep() function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573987 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith-0-0.1.20180529gitc35da9b.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-61a22cfe2a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WNPTS6GUCWNOHTE6WGQQBU3B6EQGHNFZ/
[Bug 1583308] Review Request: python-netdisco - Python library to scan local network for services and devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583308 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-netdisco -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VSVT3QP256TDDUQYWSEOI74V3HPRMPJW/
[Bug 1495387] Review Request: nodejs-acorn-jsx - Alternative, faster React.js JSX parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495387 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Jared Smith --- Repo requested at https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/6802. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/23RYY27VXLJIA3T6KSKMUIGRS6EI4CL6/
[Bug 1583308] Review Request: python-netdisco - Python library to scan local network for services and devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583308 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1269538 (IoT) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538 [Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4MUKSKTQKSHCNBYT2THAJJSXNOIGMLFX/
[Bug 1495387] Review Request: nodejs-acorn-jsx - Alternative, faster React.js JSX parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495387 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Latest version packaged - License ok - Builds in Mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to the Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FPENSTAFGZL4LQUTPZTWQIPOCWATPQFI/
[Bug 1573989] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-minisign - Minisign library for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573989 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-minisign-0-0.1.20180529gitf4dbde2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-20c65a7771 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SIBBDHOKL5ZPBEZSWKNY4MAVPISLPKSI/
[Bug 1573989] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-minisign - Minisign library for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573989 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CKA4STELV7XPOIDBPZXXRAWZSSTSVEES/
[Bug 1573989] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-minisign - Minisign library for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573989 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-minisign-0-0.1.20180529gitf4dbde2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4d1ebd0c52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3SJ2RU7IGUKTTP6NVCHLOLMVTLAWHCTV/
[Bug 1495387] Review Request: nodejs-acorn-jsx - Alternative, faster React.js JSX parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495387 --- Comment #2 from Jared Smith --- Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-acorn-jsx/nodejs-acorn-jsx.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-acorn-jsx/nodejs-acorn-jsx-4.1.1-1.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YUME35OHOJKHS2ZU4WAJIBLZ55GWJOTW/
[Bug 1583448] Review Request: gap-pkg-crime - Group cohomology and Massey products
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583448
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Fix the license like Artur said, otherwise the package is ok.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 51 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/gap-pkg-crime
/review-gap-pkg-crime/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items
[Bug 1378423] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-contrib-compress - Compress files and folders
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378423 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2018-05-29 15:35:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWJNTPVP42FTOBA3JRSOKNYSK2UYGRKF/
[Bug 1378420] Review Request: nodejs-autoprefixer - Parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to rules by Can I Use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378420 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2018-05-29 15:35:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ADJ5AWEX24MEYY6UM3HDAQ4BU7RB27Q/
[Bug 1583475] Review Request: airnef - Wireless download from your Nikon/ Canon Camera
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583475
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Remove the Python shebangs in %prep:
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/airnef.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/airnef.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/airnefcmd.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/airnefcmd.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/applog.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/applog.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/dlinkedlist.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/dlinkedlist.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/mtpdef.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/mtpdef.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/mtpwifi.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/mtpwifi.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/rename.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/rename.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/ssdp.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/ssdp.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/strutil.py /usr/bin/env python
airnef.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/airnef/strutil.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
- Perms should be 644 for the patch:
airnef.src: W: strange-permission airnef-1.1-rpm-paths.patch 600
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 14 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/airnef/review-
airnef/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build
[Bug 1583608] Review Request: golang-github-10gen-escaper - escaper lets you create your own formatting syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583608 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- That website is inaccessible for me. Could you please repost the files on your Fedorapeople space? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YOKQFNPYJ4HS2T2H3VSDPWLHZMKIKVG6/
[Bug 1583468] Review Request: php-phpunit-php-file-iterator2 - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583468
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD
(3 clause)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/php-phpunit-php-file-
iterator2/review-php-phpunit-php-file-iterator2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann(php-phpunit-Version)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]:
[Bug 1582866] Review Request: elementary-sound-theme - Set of system sounds for elementary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582866
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/elementary-sound-
theme/review-elementary-sound-theme/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead
[Bug 1581240] Review Request: pcb-rnd - Printed Circuit Board (PCB) editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Use the %configure macro instead of ./configure
- Use %{_prefix} instead of /usr and %{_usr}
%if %{debug} == 1
prefix=/usr --debug
%else
prefix=/usr --symbols
%endif
%define plugindir %{_usr}/lib/%{name}/plugins
- Don't comment out %install
#%%install
- Add a changelog entry
- Separate the license by "and":
License:GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD
- Shouldn't the plugins be in /usr/lib64 on 64bits arches?
- Install the license file COPYING in %files and add the %doc too:
%files core
%license COPYING
%doc README Changelog AUTHORS Release_notes
I can't sponsor, try introducing yourself to the devel mailing list and do some
informal reviews to show you understand the guidelines and to find a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TOSYJPA3AHVUFEKQ76U43PSECHDTBF7D/
[Bug 1582876] Review Request: perl-Diff-LibXDiff - Calculate a diff with LibXDiff (via XS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582876 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- URL and Source addresses are Ok. Source archive (SHA-256: 12605c10fc4649a5b9e2bcda6960ec39e498ea25e060db4362c926de4594e590) is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Diff/LibXDiff.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/Diff/LibXDiff.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/Diff/LibXDiff.pm and README. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Diff-LibXDiff.spec review-perl-Diff-LibXDiff/results/perl-Diff-LibXDiff-0.05-1.fc29.src.rpm review-perl-Diff-LibXDiff/results/perl-Diff-LibXDiff-0.05-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm perl-Diff-LibXDiff.spec:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(libxdiff) perl-Diff-LibXDiff.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(libxdiff) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Please specify the version of the bundled libxdiff (0.23). Please use DESTDIR instead of PERL_INSTALL_ROOT. $ rpm -q -lv -p perl-Diff-LibXDiff-0.05-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib/.build-id drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib/.build-id/d8 lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 70 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib/.build-id/d8/221f1486f1e9bde59cbf9c62a648ab841699a6 -> ../../../../usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Diff/LibXDiff/LibXDiff.so drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Diff -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 5215 avril 21 2010 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Diff/LibXDiff.pm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Diff drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Diff/LibXDiff -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot57904 mai 29 19:36 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Diff/LibXDiff/LibXDiff.so drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mai 29 19:36 /usr/share/doc/perl-Diff-LibXDiff -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 433 avril 21 2010 /usr/share/doc/perl-Diff-LibXDiff/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2675 avril 21 2010 /usr/share/doc/perl-Diff-LibXDiff/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2320 mai 29 19:36 /usr/share/man/man3/Diff::LibXDiff.3pm.gz File permissions and layout are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p perl-Diff-LibXDiff-0.05-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 19:43:01 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.26()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.2) 2 perl(Carp::Clan) 1 perl(DynaLoader) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Test::More) >= 0.42 1 perl(Test::Most) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Please explain why you've added: Requires: perl(Test::More) >= 0.42 Requires: perl(Test::Most) They don't seem necessary for the package to work, they're only used for the tests. Also you need to add gcc as a BR since it will be removed from the buildroot. $ rpm -q --provides -p perl-Diff-LibXDiff-0.05-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm bundled(libxdiff) perl(Diff::LibXDiff) = 0.05 perl-Diff-LibXDiff = 0.05-1.fc29 perl-Diff-LibXDiff(x86-64) = 0.05-1.fc29 Binary provides are Ok. Package builds in F28 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27284941) Ok Please address all the points mentioned above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TRIXZSH5C7HQ4WBXOZVM5HZIPLCWME63/
[Bug 1582876] Review Request: perl-Diff-LibXDiff - Calculate a diff with LibXDiff (via XS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582876 --- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth --- - URL: search.cpan.org is disappearing soon. Why don't we go ahead and update it? http://search.cpan.org/dist/Diff-LibXDiff/ - License. I'm confused, but this is my first perl package to review. The source code is declaring LGPLv2+, but the CPAN page and your spec show GPL+ or Artistic. Which is correct? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PDJC2CN2HZYXXBTPT3QN6PROY3HOOK22/
[Bug 1583798] Review Request: termy-qt - TermySequence terminal multiplexer client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583798 Eamon Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: -|multiplexer client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6E3AFSGBMM6XD3AZGI25WQ3ULNYXTJKJ/
[Bug 1582983] Review Request: termy-server - TermySequence terminal multiplexer server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582983 Eamon Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1583798 --- Comment #2 from Eamon Walsh --- Also, I am the upstream author and maintainer. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583798 [Bug 1583798] Review Request: - -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/77SLPZUPREWWXDNI6NIU4CTFBXPRUDFV/
[Bug 1583798] Review Request: - < short summary here>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583798 Eamon Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1582983 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582983 [Bug 1582983] Review Request: termy-server - TermySequence terminal multiplexer server -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DOFROUEJMYDKYSBKVZIVAQVEU6IBLZXH/
[Bug 1583798] New: Review Request: - < short summary here>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583798 Bug ID: 1583798 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ewa...@termysequence.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://termysequence.io/fedora/termy-qt.spec SRPM URL: https://termysequence.io/fedora/termy-qt-1.0.2-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: A Qt-based multiplexing terminal emulator client implementing the TermySequence protocol. TermySequence is a terminal emulation system with a focus on connectivity, productivity, and collaboration. The termy-server package should go before this one (see #1582983) Available in COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ewalsh/termysequence/ Koji scratch builds: f28 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27283817 f29 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27284228 Fedora Account System Username: ewalsh I am the upstream author and maintainer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HMVIIDKF66YB7LIXDSAT754PXX4JH36H/
[Bug 1582876] Review Request: perl-Diff-LibXDiff - Calculate a diff with LibXDiff (via XS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582876 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@cchtml.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TTTDYH46FJT6KCHCAZ7FOIF2GHYTBKSZ/
[Bug 1582861] Review Request: vkd3d - D3D12 to Vulkan translation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861 --- Comment #9 from Michael Cronenworth --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #5) > Actually, there is such a (recently revised) policy: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#Libraries_and_Applications Thanks, this was the answer I was looking for. New Spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/vkd3d.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/vkd3d-1.0-2.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EFZHUFVYBKNFDFOEUKAEEWPIF4N75PKR/
[Bug 1583268] Review Request: ghc-cmark-gfm - Fast, accurate GitHub Flavored Markdown parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583268
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 72 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/ghc-cmark-gfm/review-ghc-cmark-gfm/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 389120 bytes in 15 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English
[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK ) library for C and C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 --- Comment #18 from Hiro Wakabayashi --- I have a question. I found warnings in rpmlint in my self-review. Would this be a problem that can be a blocker? I think some warnings can be fixed. ```[vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo rpmlint /home/vagrant/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libfullock-1.0.27-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm /home/vagrant/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libfullock-debugsource-1.0.27-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm /home/vagrant/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libfullock-devel-1.0.27-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm /home/vagrant/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libfullock-debuginfo-1.0.27-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm libfullock.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullock -> bullock, Bullock, fullback libfullock.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ality -> laity, amity, quality libfullock.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pthread -> thread, p thread libfullock.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rwlock -> rowlock, warlock libfullock.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mutex -> mute, mutes, muter libfullock.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.27 ['1.0.27-1.fc27', '1.0.27-1'] libfullock.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfullock.so libfullock.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/fullock.3.gz 127: warning: macro `L"' not defined libfullock.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/fullock.3.gz 127: warning: macro `R"' not defined libfullock-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation libfullock-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. ``` https://github.com/hiwkby/libfullock-self-review#x-rpmlint-is-run-on-all-rpms-the-build-produces Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RZ2SQXLWSKWTJHGLS2EVIXVM6MTOU4Y3/
[Bug 1583271] Review Request: ghc-hslua-module-text - Lua module for text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583271
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-hslua-module-text/review-ghc-hslua-
module-text/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 14 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for
[Bug 1583308] Review Request: python-netdisco - Python library to scan local network for services and devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583308
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Tests fail:
+ py.test-3 tests/
= test session starts
==
platform linux -- Python 3.6.5, pytest-3.5.1, py-1.5.3, pluggy-0.6.0
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/netdisco-1.4.0, inifile: setup.cfg
collected 0 items / 1 errors
ERRORS
_ ERROR collecting tests/discoverables/test_yamaha.py
__
ImportError while importing test module
'/builddir/build/BUILD/netdisco-1.4.0/tests/discoverables/test_yamaha.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/discoverables/test_yamaha.py:5: in
from netdisco.discoverables.yamaha import Discoverable
E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'netdisco'
!!! Interrupted: 1 errors during collection
=== 1 error in 0.10 seconds
To fix this pass the PYTHONPATH variable:
%check
PYTHONPATH=. py.test-3 tests/
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "CC by-sa (v3.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright*
Apache (v2.0)". 77 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-netdisco/review-
python-netdisco/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
[Bug 1582858] Review Request: pantheon-agent-geoclue2 - Pantheon Geoclue2 Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582858 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- pantheon-agent-geoclue2-1.0-1.fc27 pantheon-session-settings-27.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eac044af8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7INBEQW7WS7VRFRJS5JYLXLCZZKVBIWN/
[Bug 1582858] Review Request: pantheon-agent-geoclue2 - Pantheon Geoclue2 Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CAYNE4WLGG4LQG4IBN5MJKHF4LAVZ6B6/
[Bug 1582858] Review Request: pantheon-agent-geoclue2 - Pantheon Geoclue2 Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582858 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- pantheon-agent-geoclue2-1.0-1.fc28 pantheon-session-settings-28.1-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cc37228fe2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3INU3QJHOZS2BEQW77KILGSNCUG2SIIP/
[Bug 1417646] Review Request: mingw-wxWidgets3 - MinGW port of the wxWidgets GUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417646
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- License should be included with %license, not %doc
%license docs/licence.txt docs/licendoc.txt docs/lgpl.txt docs/gpl.txt
- Fix the version/release in the %changelog to it is the same as in the header
- Group: is not needed
Package is approved, please fix the aforementioned issues before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file licence.txt is not marked as %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Public domain", "GPL", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or
later)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* CC0", "*No copyright*
GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)",
"NTP", "BSD (4 clause)", "zlib/libpng", "BSD (3 clause)", "GPL (v2 or
later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Unicode strict", "*No
copyright* Apache", "BSD (unspecified)", "*No copyright* Public
domain". 8123 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-wxWidgets3/review-
mingw-wxWidgets3/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
[Bug 1373007] Review Request: rubygem-cool.io - A cool framework for doing high performance I/O in Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373007 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Bonazzola --- Anyone willing to continue on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CLWHAMB7Z6LBLS3I7NZSP3ST2QPRU5HO/
[Bug 1581318] Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication using the requests library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581318 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requests-credssp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MNMAEREVZSF6EUQEXITP2RBEORHOFTSQ/
[Bug 1582276] Review Request: python-distroinfo - packaging metadata interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582276 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-distroinfo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WMMERD4GFPLF6EIAJAPQ45MOJ453UHYC/
[Bug 1582858] Review Request: pantheon-agent-geoclue2 - Pantheon Geoclue2 Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582858 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pantheon-agent-geoclue2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4EDFWLVVTC6TVQQGWR7W76A35KDDHC7C/
[Bug 1582520] Review Request: python-collectd_cvmfs - Collectd module for CvmFS clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582520 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-collectd_cvmfs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/REEVDJSYHHXPP7T54VF64CMODHKYI363/
[Bug 1573952] Review Request: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil - Psutil for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573952 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-shirou-gopsutil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NJLMBUI4YDELF7SYESRYNZM5HIKI4GZI/
[Bug 1573977] Review Request: golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega - A client library in go for mega.co.nz storage service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573977 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-t3rm1n4l-go-mega -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JPQMVZEGSA5INJJ7LFWBKHBYXMIWKVS6/
[Bug 1573982] Review Request: golang-github-dchest-safefile - Implements safe "atomic" saving of files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573982 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-dchest-safefile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WGWELWLNTMEYOZ76WM5QWNBNKFLULWFT/
[Bug 1573987] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith - A sleep-aware-sleep() function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573987 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GOU3VUCVD7QTWSJAP5WQFWO4DHGRAXGK/
[Bug 1573989] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-minisign - Minisign library for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573989 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-jedisct1-minisign -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5QIA3DELNAVBO4DJAONG7BAB6O3ZSGBX/
[Bug 1490454] Review Request: leiningen - the easiest way to try clojure ( http://leiningen.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490454 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2018-05-29 08:48:06 --- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UYVSKGZ5SGZBK57OGXYTWAM742BFV3YU/
[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950 Bug 1235950 depends on bug 1241752, which changed state. Bug 1241752 Summary: opencsv-3.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241752 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EG6LOLUJWAEB2ODQZKNQUAOS55HXELF5/
[Bug 1493932] Review Request: plasma-vault - strong encryption features presented in a user-friendly way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493932 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2018-05-29 07:58:57 --- Comment #9 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WLBCKLKFVEFQBRLPSRDF55RIFBSEY2DI/
[Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226204, which changed state. Bug 226204 Summary: Merge Review: nss - [TODO: remove rpath] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3HMYFZNXOV4C36FMG3BSFPMC5SDUHN54/
[Bug 1357204] Review Request: jmockit - Java toolkit for unit/ integration testing [+ dependencies tracker]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 Bug 1357204 depends on bug 1290790, which changed state. Bug 1290790 Summary: spock-1.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BAWU5EJLB6MJZWMEXMBGGTGGHKY333MF/
[Bug 1387927] Review Request: numcosmo - Numerical cosmology tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387927 Bug 1387927 depends on bug 1387924, which changed state. Bug 1387924 Summary: Rebuild including C version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387924 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PEG36LB4HCDXUGIY7OFA65WR3GYKNKEH/
[Bug 1372892] Review Request: python-backports-csv - Backport of Python 3' s csv module for Python 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372892 Bug 1372892 depends on bug 1372890, which changed state. Bug 1372890 Summary: Provide python3-backports subpkg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372890 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SIC7VZX4DCCASQRDPRGG7K57SMID6GUK/
[Bug 1460325] Review Request: gnome-flashback - GNOME Flashback desktop session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460325 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2018-05-29 07:38:17 --- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KNKMYAXHADR5MALHI3RJHLR4NR72C52V/
[Bug 1460319] Review Request: gnome-applets - GNOME Flashback panel applets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460319 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2018-05-29 07:38:20 --- Comment #3 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SXCQ4SI76OZVSLH7KS7NIV6O7K5O2JT3/
[Bug 1460325] Review Request: gnome-flashback - GNOME Flashback desktop session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460325 Bug 1460325 depends on bug 1460319, which changed state. Bug 1460319 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applets - GNOME Flashback panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460319 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WTL2O2Q4V5OO42TABZBTVXK66K7S67SM/
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #93 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Done, sorry for the delay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QS5XHBMZJLY3PI37NFAA3OXWHAF7JMIU/
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CT7C4ZCREQATRKACZHRNXE3B4CASMOIE/
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q5ICK5XVG6EHJ5IPHAKG3CQXYAZESCNF/
[Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225778, which changed state. Bug 225778 Summary: Merge Review: gcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TRUAQE33JHME62XCOGADTTODBUFOV2UK/
[Bug 1583608] New: Review Request: golang-github-10gen-escaper - escaper lets you create your own formatting syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583608 Bug ID: 1583608 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-10gen-escaper - escaper lets you create your own formatting syntax Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mskal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://file.brq.redhat.com/mskalick/review/golang-github-10gen-escaper.spec SRPM URL: http://file.brq.redhat.com/mskalick/review/golang-github-10gen-escaper-0-0.1.20180528git17fe61c658dcbdcbf246c783f4f7dc97efde3a8b.20180528git17fe61c.fc27.src.rpm Description: escaper lets you create your own formatting syntax Fedora Account System Username: mskalick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JBUJH2MNZHTHJLX76O3SM3V47ZNKQN2W/
[Bug 1574362] Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574362 Christian Heimes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-05-29 06:55:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SMIE4WTZG7UNUPPK5WXXUP6EV3MNXX4A/
[Bug 1574362] Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DVCK7PPX6A7YLX24Q7ULVHLXYOU3FBEX/
[Bug 1574362] Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574362 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-black-18.5b1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7ff0ccb6c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EFRDWQT2SVFS5RVPPIOCF3EIOEC3PKCT/
[Bug 1574362] Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574362 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-black-18.5b1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4d9977a1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5P23YAS6255VAHOEBXTQNBAI4U5MWBVN/
[Bug 1583448] Review Request: gap-pkg-crime - Group cohomology and Massey products
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583448
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki ---
>License: GPL+
doc/crime.xml says "GNU Public Licence, version 2 or later (at your
preference)". As such, the License: tag should be "GPLv2+".
>URL: http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~marcus/Crime/
>Source0:
>http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~marcus/Crime/%{pkgname}-%{version}.tar.gz
You can use %{URL} as part of Source0 to avoid repetition.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P2U6HW64XSDKT7OLECPUNKHR7R3HL2Z3/
[Bug 1546534] Review Request: golang-github-paulrosania-go-charset - Character set conversion for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546534 --- Comment #10 from Jiri Kucera --- https://github.com/i386x/golang-github-paulrosania-go-charset/ no longer exists, its content has been moved here: https://github.com/i386x/files/tree/0303d09da06514a7d5a134f0d18148a0da62a3eb/golang-github-paulrosania-go-charset -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GVUSCQCWKAPZCK42IXK6G65SPD6TJAB5/
[Bug 1544716] Review Request: golang-github-inconshreveable-go-vhost - HTTP/ TLS hostname multiplexing library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544716 --- Comment #11 from Jiri Kucera --- https://github.com/i386x/golang-github-inconshreveable-go-vhost/ no longer exists, its content has been moved here: https://github.com/i386x/files/tree/8ab83153b141069669966a0a2d6dc47b4a3d39f7/golang-github-inconshreveable-go-vhost/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZUG2OUG3XOFV56OVN7IR6VNPVNO27NFN/
[Bug 1246285] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-charset - Character set conversion for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246285 Jiri Kucera changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jkuc...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkuc...@redhat.com Last Closed||2018-05-29 05:42:51 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Kucera --- Closing this review request since go-charset was added to Fedora three months ago as golang-github-paulrosania-go-charset (#1546534). Btw, it seems that original upstream repo is no longer maintained: $ spectool -g golang-googlecode-go-charset.spec Getting https://go-charset.googlecode.com/archive/ebbeafdc430eb6c7e44e9a730a38eaff4c56ba3a.tar.gz to ./ebbeafdc430eb6c7e44e9a730a38eaff4c56ba3a.tar.gz % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed 0 00 00 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1546534 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FMBYL3YF22OCJPFQABDAMPIBZCFXW2RH/
[Bug 1546534] Review Request: golang-github-paulrosania-go-charset - Character set conversion for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546534 Jiri Kucera changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jchal...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Jiri Kucera --- *** Bug 1246285 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R26772BADNWYTBAJMXDW4NSLFHRCM6AW/
[Bug 1583023] Review Request: shobhika-fonts - Free Indian truetype/ open type fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583023 --- Comment #2 from vishalvvr --- Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/vishalvvr/shobhika-fonts/fedora-28-x86_64/00759724-shobhika-fonts/shobhika-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/vishalvvr/shobhika-fonts/fedora-28-x86_64/00759724-shobhika-fonts/shobhika-fonts-1.04-2.fc28.src.rpm Resolved the issues mentioned above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7PMBDMKZJH6SRRLNEBF6HUE3HTSH3NQI/
[Bug 1447517] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(rockowitz@minsoft ||.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HIQCZKZPXIKMVYRH5AYUZJM425PWZHQB/
[Bug 1447517] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 --- Comment #13 from James Hogarth --- Hi Sanford, I am a sponsor and can take this to the finish line with you. As per the following documentation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group in the section "Show Your Expertise by Commenting on other Review Requests" please can you carry out a few informal review requests to demonstrate your understanding of the guidelines. Any questions please give me a poke. When that's done we can complete your sponsorship and get this package into Fedora :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KDB5IICODSXULSFLHOUGIC2CBZ2JXKEM/
[Bug 1447517] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|james.hoga...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SEAKK677LERGH2R4EVYP6FYJSCFMQIDM/
[Bug 1368855] Review Request: radare2 - The reverse engineering framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855 Anton Kochkov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo? --- Comment #32 from Anton Kochkov --- Please provide the feedback so we can try to target all issues with radare2 code before 2.7.0 for a smooth packaging. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YOUJKJCVJMSSTGYQGFOK67J3R2XODXXG/
