[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-efel-3.0.22-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1531eeb1bd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1619458] Review Request: python-pyphi - A library for computing integrated information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619458 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyphi-1.1.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a352df747a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650937] Review Request: python-dipy - Diffusion MRI utilities in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650937 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-dipy-0.15.0-0.3.git756b519.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b3d5c7b663 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649874] Review Request: hpx - a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649874 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- hpx-1.2.0-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a9b53adbdc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-mne-0.17-1.fc29, python-pymatreader-0.0.17-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e65d3f09c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-18c38b185e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-mne-0.17-1.fc28, python-pymatreader-0.0.17-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f9dc990324 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-efel-3.0.22-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-91dbe4e2b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1619458] Review Request: python-pyphi - A library for computing integrated information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619458 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyphi-1.1.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c8dd8701a6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649874] Review Request: hpx - a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649874 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- hpx-1.2.0-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8367209bd8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650937] Review Request: python-dipy - Diffusion MRI utilities in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650937 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-dipy-0.15.0-0.3.git756b519.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-373dc3e3a0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-127affe1d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651849] New: Review Request: python-pure-sasl - A pure python SASL client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651849 Bug ID: 1651849 Summary: Review Request: python-pure-sasl - A pure python SASL client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tdeca...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Hello, this is a new requirement of recent python-kazoo version. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~tdecacqu/python-pure-sasl.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~tdecacqu/python-pure-sasl-0.5.1-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: A pure python SASL client Fedora Account System Username: tdecacqu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1639186] Review Request: libcerf - a library that provides complex error functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639186 Dmitri A. Sergatskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dasergats...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Dmitri A. Sergatskov --- libcerf 1.8 and 1.9 are broken. Please downggrade to 1.7 before 1.10 release. http://apps.jcns.fz-juelich.de/doku/sc/libcerf Dmitri. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1631987] Review Request: python-deepdiff - Deep Difference and search of any Python object/data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-20 22:10:59 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-deepdiff-3.3.0-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1639186] Review Request: libcerf - a library that provides complex error functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639186 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-20 22:10:00 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- libcerf-1.9-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651759] Review Request: rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu - Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759 --- Comment #2 from Luis Segundo --- Hello Robert, I would like include this Package "dutree" more info https://docs.rs/dutree/0.2.9/dutree/ this package need the follow Dependencies getopts ^0.2 regex ^0.2 terminal_size ^0.1.7 unicode-segmentation ^1.2.0 unicode-width ^0.1.1 now "terminal_size" it's not include yet on fedora this one requiere the follow Dependencies libc ^0.2 winapi ^0.3 "winapi" need the lib "winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu" that I try to include referecen http://eminence.github.io/terminal-size/doc/terminal_size/index.html https://docs.rs/winapi/0.3.6/winapi/ I will be waiting your comments Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651824] Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824 --- Comment #2 from Luis Bazan --- Reference for test: https://elephant.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developers_guide.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651824] Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824
--- Comment #1 from Luis Bazan ---
I excluded test because failed. (need contact upstream to check these)
%{__python2} setup.py nosetests
%{__python3} setup.py nosetests
Or
%{__python2} setup.py nosetests --with-coverage --cover-package=elephant
--cover-erase
%{__python3} setup.py nosetests --with-coverage --cover-package=elephant
--cover-erase
Or using
%{__python2} setup.py -m unittest discover
%{__python3} setup.py -m unittest discover
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651824] Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-elephant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651824] Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@blackfile.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651824] Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651824] New: Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824 Bug ID: 1651824 Summary: Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bazanlui...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-elephant.spec SRPM URL: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-elephant-0.6.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Elephant - Electrophysiology Analysis Toolkit Elephant is a package for the analysis of neurophysiology data, based on Neo.Code status -- :target: Fedora Account System Username: lbazan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651808] Review Request: python-hkdf - HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF )
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-hkdf
/review-python-hkdf/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package
[Bug 1405548] Review Request: emacs-json-mode - Major mode for editing JSON files with Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405548
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* GPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)".
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/emacs-
json-mode/review-emacs-json-mode/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of
[Bug 1405547] Review Request: emacs-json-snatcher - Get the path to a JSON element in Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405547
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group is not needed in Fedora
Package approved
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/emacs-json-snatcher/review-emacs-json-
snatcher/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]:
[Bug 1590431] Review Request: qemu-lite - OpenBIOS development utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590431 Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(berrange@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz --- Hi, Today Kata uses some packages as part of its CI: qemu-lite: qemu with additional patches to improve boot time and memory usage. qemu-vanilla: This is a qemu that is not modified. The idea is that yes, kata could work with default qemu package from a distro. I think it is ok as intial work to use qemu from vedora, to avoid add an additional package to maintain. Be aware qemu with a lot of features enabled may decrease the boot time or memory footprint. But as part of a initial work we could test the current qemu version for f28 and f29 and request any change or patch is needed to the qemu package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1405546] Review Request: emacs-json-reformat - Reformatting tool for JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405546
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/emacs-json-reformat/review-emacs-json-reformat/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless
[Bug 1651759] Review Request: rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu - Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651808] New: Review Request: python-hkdf - HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF )
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808 Bug ID: 1651808 Summary: Review Request: python-hkdf - HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-hkdf.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-hkdf-0.0.3-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: This module implements the HMAC Key Derivation function, defined at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krawczyk-hkdf-01. There are two interfaces: a functional interface, with separate extract and expand functions as defined in the draft RFC, and a wrapper class for these functions. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31025263 The .spec file was generated with pyp2rpm and adapted by me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1183169] Review Request: ykfde - opening LUKS with yubikey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183169 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bper...@fedoraproject.org, ||or...@nwra.com Flags||needinfo?(bpereto@fedorapro ||ject.org) --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski --- Benjamin - Are you still interested in packaging this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647354] Review Request: wfdb - Software working with recordings of physiologic signals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647354 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Regarding rman: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rman/blob/master/f/dead.package Package was removed due to licensing issues (it was only available under Artistic 1.0). Every effort was made to contact upstream for relicensing, but no response was ever received. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Artistic1Removal No luck there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651759] Review Request: rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu - Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Update your rust2rpm to the very latest version (from Rawhide), your generated SPEC use the old format. Also I don't see the point of packaging this, it seems Windows only like Winapi, why do you need it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651739] Review Request: caribou EPEL7 - EPEL7 branch of caribou ( cinnamon prereq)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651739 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||zebo...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Last Closed||2018-11-20 16:54:39 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- If you want an EPEL branch to be made, contact the current maintainer and ask him for one, maybe ask him to comaintain it. Making a Review request is not the way to proceed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-18c38b185e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-127affe1d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-pymatreader-0.0.17-1.fc28 python-mne-0.17-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f9dc990324 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-pymatreader-0.0.17-1.fc29 python-mne-0.17-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e65d3f09c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647354] Review Request: wfdb - Software working with recordings of physiologic signals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647354 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Also, it seems some tests only work with network access, which won't work in Mock/Koji. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647354] Review Request: wfdb - Software working with recordings of physiologic signals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647354
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Vendor: is forbidden in Fedora
- Not needed anymore:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
Use %ldconfig_scriptlets for F27 or EPEL. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
- Not needed, it is the default:
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
- You forgot %{?_isa} in the Requires for the devel subpackage:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
- This part should be in %build:
cd doc/wpg-src
%__make
cd ../wag-src
# package pdftk was removed from distribution (in F21) replace it by qpdf
command
sed -i -e 's/pdftk/qpdf --empty wag.pdf --pages wag1.pdf wag2.pdf wag3.pdf
wag4.pdf -- # /g' Makefile
%__make
cd ../wug-src
%__make
- Use make, not %__make. These kind of macros are not useful.
- You could use pushd/popd instead of cd ../ in that section
- GCC should be a BR rot a RR
BuildRequires: gcc
- Remove the glob here to own the include dir:
%files devel
%{_includedir}/%{name}/
%{_libdir}/libwfdb.so
- Same here and own %{_datadir}/%{name}
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/database/
%{_datadir}/%{name}/ps/
- Your build must respect Fedora's CCFLAGS and LDFLAGS
- Build fails:
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: No matching package to install: 'rman'
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: Error: Some packages could not be found.
I have no idea what rman is in this context.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] Review Request: python-xnat - A new XNAT client that exposes XNAT objects/ functions as python objects/functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-xnat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pymatreader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1651388 (python-xnat) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 [Bug 1651388] Review Request: python-xnat - A new XNAT client that exposes XNAT objects/functions as python objects/functions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] Review Request: python-xnat - A new XNAT client that exposes XNAT objects/ functions as python objects/functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1648728 ||(python-progressbar2) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 [Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651365] Review Request python-pynwb - PyNWB is a Python package for working with NWB files.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651365 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|python-pynwb|Review Request python-pynwb ||- PyNWB is a Python package ||for working with NWB files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651407] Review Request: python-wxnatpy - wxnatpy is a wxPython widget which allows users to browse the contents of a XNAT repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651407 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|python-wxnatpy |Review Request: ||python-wxnatpy - wxnatpy is ||a wxPython widget which ||allows users to browse the ||contents of a XNAT ||repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] Review Request: python-xnat - A new XNAT client that exposes XNAT objects/ functions as python objects/functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|python-xnat: A new XNAT |Review Request: python-xnat |client that exposes XNAT|- A new XNAT client that |objects/functions as python |exposes XNAT |objects/functions |objects/functions as python ||objects/functions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] python-xnat: A new XNAT client that exposes XNAT objects/ functions as python objects/functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Summary|python-xnat |python-xnat: A new XNAT ||client that exposes XNAT ||objects/functions as python ||objects/functions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - Don't think there should be a 0 here: > > %bcond_without py2 0 Ah, of course not. Corrected. > > Package approved. > Thanks for the quick review Robert. SCM requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8937 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Don't think there should be a 0 here:
%bcond_without py2 0
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or generated",
"*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 43 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-
pymatreader/review-python-pymatreader/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[Bug 1649574] Review Request: jaf - JavaBeans Activation Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574 --- Comment #5 from Jie Kang --- The notice file [1] has: SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 WITH Classpath-exception-2.0 I believe the spec should follow this. [1] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaf/blob/master/NOTICE.md -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-127affe1d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650947] Review Request: python-pygiftiio - Python bindings for Gifti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650947 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-pygiftiio-1.0.4-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-625dee4559 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651759] Review Request: rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu - Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bazanlui...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bazanlui...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649576] Review Request: fix-info-plist-maven-plugin - Fix Info.plist file generated by p2-maven-plugin during Tycho build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576 --- Comment #5 from Jie Kang --- The package will need to have a runtime dependency on dd-plist and xz-java as it does not include the packages in the jar it builds. It looks like the rpm build system adds the requires automatically but I think it's best to specify it explicitly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] python-xnat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Luis Segundo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] python-xnat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Luis Segundo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] python-xnat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1648728 | |(python-progressbar2) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 [Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1651388 (python-xnat) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 [Bug 1651388] python-xnat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649797] Review Request: imwheel - Mouse Event to Key Event Mapper Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649797 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to sensor.wen from comment #4) > Robert. I want to know... How long does it take to update rawhide > repository? From `fedpkg build` to package can be downloaded. > > I use following command to monitor package. :) > # curl > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/ > x86_64/os/Packages/g/ | grep go-lib I don't know what go-lib is, but packages are added every couple of days at each "compose" which are announced on the devel mailing list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6IH2EOQCC2TFWXHNJDJJYGZVZSSOQ35V/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649797] Review Request: imwheel - Mouse Event to Key Event Mapper Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649797 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/imwheel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f6b899126d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1435035, 1276941 ||(fedora-neuro) Alias||python-pymatreader Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435035 [Bug 1435035] python-mne-v0.17 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651766] New: Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651766 Bug ID: 1651766 Summary: Review Request: python-pymatreader - Convenient reader for Matlab mat files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-pymatreader/python-pymatreader.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-pymatreader/python-pymatreader-0.0.17-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: A Python module to read Matlab files. This module works with both the old (< 7.3) and the new (>= 7.3) HDF5 based format. The output should be the same for both kinds of files. Documentation can be found here: http://pymatreader.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1590423] Review Request: kata-proxy - Kata proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590423 --- Comment #4 from Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz --- This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: make See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 = MUST items = C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)", "BSD (3 clause)", "ISC", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 290 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jcvenega/1590423-kata-proxy/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/.build-id(cups- client, efivar-libs, qemu-block-gluster, rpm-plugin-selinux, abrt, ghc-transformers, libmediaart, libimagequant, giflib, libreoffice- graphicfilter, trousers, libdb-utils, tracker-miners, xorg-x11-font- utils, PackageKit-command-not-found, libcom_err, libseccomp, p11-kit, libabw, libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, libmodman, argyllcms, parted, gnome-disk-utility, libdvdread, zstd, bluez-libs, libwebp, libxslt, system-config-printer-udev, perl-Encode, libverto-libev, python2-cryptography, libevdev, libgpg-error, lvm2-libs, perl-Digest- SHA, libzstd, qemu-system-ppc-core, libdazzle, avahi, lua-lpeg, symlinks, libcdr, cdparanoia-libs, e2fsprogs-libs, pulseaudio-libs, libdwarf, lcms2, qemu-guest-agent, annobin, ntfs-3g, libxcb, libyubikey, sssd-common-pac, python3-brlapi, openconnect, xcb-util- keysyms, m4, expat, libgphoto2, xcb-util, gvfs-fuse, udisks2-iscsi, python3-coverage, weechat, anaconda-widgets, http-parser, file-roller- nautilus, libeot, systemd-bootchart, dbusmenu-qt, ncurses-libs, libidn2, checkpolicy, libreport-plugin-logger, gnome-color-manager, fcoe-utils, xorg-x11-xkb-utils, ibus-hangul, perl-IO-Tty, NetworkManager-openvpn, libxkbfile, hplip-libs, libwvstreams, ghc- binary, freerdp-libs, xmlrpc-c-client, sane-backends-drivers-cameras, libwpg, libwpd, enchant2, libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu, perl-Time-HiRes, qemu-block-ssh, libwps, gssdp, gnome-calendar, libacl, xorg-x11-drv- ati, libSM, policycoreutils, mcelog, abrt-plugin-bodhi, libmusicbrainz5, ghc-unix, pptp, sane-backends-drivers-scanners, libXxf86misc, foomatic, minizip, colord-gtk, nspr, rpm-build, libvirt- daemon-driver-storage-sheepdog, libglvnd-gles, python3-audit, rpm- plugin-systemd-inhibit, gstreamer1, gom, gmime30, webkit2gtk3-plugin- process-gtk2, dbus-libs, libreoffice-gtk3, libreoffice-gtk2, cairo- gobject, gnome-screenshot, libkkc, gutenprint, usermode, qpdf-libs, linux-atm-libs, libedit, openssh, subversion-libs, openssl, python3-cairo, accountsservice, ghc-containers, isl, hfsplus-tools, gssproxy, libblockdev-btrfs, libatomic_ops, gupnp-av, librepo, gtk- update-icon-cache, python3-iscsi-initiator-utils, libvirt-daemon- driver-interface, NetworkManager, liblangtag, NetworkManager-glib, libdatrie, glade-libs, setuptool, libcryptui, guile, pcre-utf16, tree, gvfs-goa, pipewire, gnupg, cronie-anacron, libserf, xfsprogs, authselect, libcroco, telepathy-glib, plymouth-plugin-label, libisoburn, colord-libs, totem-pl-parser, gpgmepp, libgcab1, libzhuyin, gvnc, hypervfcopyd, cronie, libexttextcat, nettle, libcacard,
[Bug 1649797] Review Request: imwheel - Mouse Event to Key Event Mapper Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649797 --- Comment #4 from sensor@gmail.com --- Robert. I want to know... How long does it take to update rawhide repository? From `fedpkg build` to package can be downloaded. I use following command to monitor package. :) # curl https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/g/ | grep go-lib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649797] Review Request: imwheel - Mouse Event to Key Event Mapper Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649797 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651759] New: Review Request: rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu - Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759 Bug ID: 1651759 Summary: Review Request: rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu - Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: l...@blackfile.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://blackfile.fedorapeople.org/rust/rust-winapi-pcwg/rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu.spec SRPM URL: https://blackfile.fedorapeople.org/rust/rust-winapi-pcwg/rust-winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu-0.4.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Import libraries for the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target. Fedora Account System Username:blackfile Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31020644 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-efel-3.0.22-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1531eeb1bd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-efel-3.0.22-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-91dbe4e2b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650633] Review Request: pam_2fa - Second factor authentication for PAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650633 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- pam_2fa-1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-18c38b185e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650947] Review Request: python-pygiftiio - Python bindings for Gifti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650947 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-pygiftiio-1.0.4-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-aa97f027d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1651388 (python-xnat) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 [Bug 1651388] python-xnat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] python-xnat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1648728 ||(python-progressbar2) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 [Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1651388 (python-xnat) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 [Bug 1651388] python-xnat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651388] python-xnat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1648728 | |(python-progressbar2) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 [Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651739] Review Request: caribou EPEL7 - EPEL7 branch of caribou ( cinnamon prereq)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651739 Pat Riehecky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651739] New: Review Request: caribou EPEL7 - EPEL7 branch of caribou (cinnamon prereq)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651739 Bug ID: 1651739 Summary: Review Request: caribou EPEL7 - EPEL7 branch of caribou (cinnamon prereq) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: riehe...@fnal.gov QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/caribou.git#ae1aaf05d779ad77727e17e2ca05b55d6235 SRPM URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jcpunk/caribou-epel7/build/827089/ Description: This is a direct fork of the Fedora 29 package without changes Fedora Account System Username: jcpunk The EPEL7 branch of caribou is required to reintroduce cinnamon to EPEL7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1612092] Review Request: mailman3 - The GNU mailing list manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092 --- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mailman3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1619458] Review Request: python-pyphi - A library for computing integrated information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619458 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyphi-1.1.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a352df747a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1619458] Review Request: python-pyphi - A library for computing integrated information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619458 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyphi-1.1.0-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c8dd8701a6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1612092] Review Request: mailman3 - The GNU mailing list manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Neal Gompa --- Package looks good to me. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645766] Review Request: python-azure-devtools - Devtools for Azure SDK and CLI for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645766 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1228503] Review Request: springframework-amqp - Support for Spring programming model with AMQP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228503 Bug 1228503 depends on bug 1231430, which changed state. Bug 1231430 Summary: Missing jinterface maven metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231430 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|EOL |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650987] Review Request: libgenht - A simple generic hash table implementation in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650987
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Initial comments:
1) Package name
Did you consider naming the main package just "genht", and adding a "-libs"
sub-package? The upstream project is called "genht", after all. That would also
make defining "generic_name" unnecessary, since you could just use "%{name}"
everywhere, instead.
2) Build system problems
a) The upstream project seems to have some isses with their build system. I
don't think it honors build flags from the environment (e.g. CFLAGS, LDFLAGS) -
but you didn't set them in the .spec file, either.
b) You should use the "%set_build_flags" macro (see [0]) at the top of %build
(it sets CFLAGSm LDFLAGS, etc. to the fedora defaults), and change "make" to
"%make_build", and "make install" to "%make_install" - those macros set some
important flags for fedora builds (including DESTDIR).
c) The upstream build system also doesn't define an SONAME for the library
("-Wl,-soname,libfoo.so.1" flag) - that's missing from the upstream Makefile as
well, and will throw RPM off - right now, it renders the "-devel" package
uninstallable. If upstream won't introduce an SONAME, you will have to add one
for the fedora build.
d) Don't include the static library in your package (and drop the "-static"
sub-package), unless you are sure that other packages will want to use it, and
have a good reason to do so.
e) The Makefile also defines a binary, is that not used for anything?
I'm curious if you could work with the upstream project to add support for a
proper build system ("porting" the Makefile to meson could probably be done
within an hour, and it would make it more portable than a crusty Makefile).
3) .spec issues
You don't need to use macros in summary, description, etc. It just makes the
.spec less readable, IMO. But that's a matter of taste, I guess.
I also think you can just remove all the comments. They are pretty redundant
with the code below them. If you want to keep them, move the ones above %prep
and %install into the sections, otherwise RPM will probably treat them as
belonging to the previous section.
a) By using a glob for the shared library ("%{_libdir}/libgenht.so.*") in line
54, which conceals the library version, you increase the likelihood of
unintended breakage because of SONAME bumps. Use "%{_libdir}/libgenht.so.1*")
instead, as documented in the Guidelines.
b) The summary should not start with "A" and not end with ".". Change it to:
"Simple generic hash table implementation in C".
c) The "-devel" sub-package must depend on the package containing the shared
library (right now, libgenht; if you decide to change the package name to
"genht", then "genht-libs") like this:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} # for libgenht
or this:
Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} # for genht-libs
d) What does the comment "# Untar the correct tar.gz file" mean? I think you
can just drop it. (The benefit of renaming the main package to "genht" would be
that you can drop the "-n" argument from the "%autosetup" call.)
e) The following entries in %files lists are equivalent:
%dir %{_includedir}/%{generic_name}
%{_includedir}/%{generic_name}/*
and
%{_includedir}/%{generic_name}/
This is probably just a stylistic issue, so you decide which one you'd like to
use.
[0]:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/master/f/buildflags.md
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636019] Review Request: java-runtime-decompiler - a tool for extraction and decompilation of bytecode from JVM memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636019 --- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-runtime-decompiler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-efel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1619458] Review Request: python-pyphi - A library for computing integrated information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619458 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyphi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1590428] Review Request: kata-shim - Kata shim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590428 --- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- Filed Bug 1650620 since fedora-review doesn't seem to be working for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649797] Review Request: imwheel - Mouse Event to Key Event Mapper Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649797 --- Comment #2 from sensor@gmail.com --- SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827039-imwheel/imwheel-1.0.0-0.1.pre12.fc30.src.rpm SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827039-imwheel/imwheel.spec Fixed ~ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1612092] Review Request: mailman3 - The GNU mailing list manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092 --- Comment #16 from Aurelien Bompard --- I added the license file. The rpm does not build at the moment because it requires a more recent aiosmtpd. I've updated it in rawhide but it's not available just yet. Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mailman3/mailman3.spec SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mailman3/mailman3-3.2.0-1.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626134] Review Request: fips - OpenGL-based FITS image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-11-20 08:55:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649874] Review Request: hpx - a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649874 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- hpx-1.2.0-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8367209bd8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649874] Review Request: hpx - a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649874 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- hpx-1.2.0-3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a9b53adbdc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645766] Review Request: python-azure-devtools - Devtools for Azure SDK and CLI for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645766 --- Comment #7 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-devtools/python-azure-devtools.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-devtools/python-azure-devtools-1.0.0-2.fc30.src.rpm Changes: - Don't glob everything under the Python sitelib directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the review Luis. SCM requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8927 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1651397] Review Request: python-efel - Electrophys Feature Extraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397 Luis Segundo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Luis Segundo --- (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #3) > (In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #2) > I think this is a false positive. Hello Ankur, if it makes sense Package approved! Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649573] Review Request: directory-maven-plugin - Establish locations for files in multi-module builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573 Severin Gehwolf changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649573] Review Request: directory-maven-plugin - Establish locations for files in multi-module builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573 --- Comment #14 from Severin Gehwolf --- APPROVED. Please fix the 'ASL 2.0' vs. 'ASL-2.0' issue before you push. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649573] Review Request: directory-maven-plugin - Establish locations for files in multi-module builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573
--- Comment #13 from Severin Gehwolf ---
Issues:
- Please use 'ASL 2.0' instead of 'ASL-2.0' in
License field.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Package is
ASL 2.0
[?]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
directory-maven-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from
