[Bug 1787069] Review Request: ddnet - DDraceNetwork, a cooperative racing mod of Teeworlds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787069
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I will sponsor you.
1. Please update to latest version - 12.9.1.
2. Change %{optflags} -flto
to
%{optflags} -flto=auto
3. Remove
%license license.txt
%doc README.md
from %files server
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802933] Review Request: b'python-contextily' - b'Context geo-tiles in Python'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802933 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41489236 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802933] New: Review Request: b'python-contextily' - b'Context geo-tiles in Python'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802933 Bug ID: 1802933 Summary: Review Request: b'python-contextily' - b'Context geo-tiles in Python' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-contextily.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-contextily-0.99.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: b'contextily is a small Python 3 package to retrieve and write to disk tile maps\nfrom the internet into geospatial raster files. Bounding boxes can be passed in\nboth WGS84 (EPSG:4326) and Spheric Mercator (EPSG:3857).' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800791] Review Request: phpunit9 - The PHP Unit Testing framework version 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800791 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet --- Version 9.0.1 Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/phpunit9.git/plain/phpunit9.spec?id=15740494fac13c020e2ccf69536162dc806bbcb7 SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/phpunit9-9.0.1-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802047] Review Request: rust-random-trait - Rust library for a random trait meant to produce random generic types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802047 --- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-random-trait -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802042] Review Request: rust-randomize - Randomization routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802042 --- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-randomize -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801527] Review Request: golang-gopkg-redis-5 - type-safe Redis client for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801527 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gopkg-redis-5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801680] Review Request: rust-match_cfg - Macro to define an item depending on a large number of `#[cfg]` parameters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801680 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-14 06:17:47 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694295] Review Request: gwe - System utility designed to provide information of NVIDIA card
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295 --- Comment #12 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gwe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802699] Review Request: rust-average - Calculate statistics iteratively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802699 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802292] Review Request: rust-serde-big-array - Big array helper for serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802292 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802926] Review Request: b'python-mapclassify' - b'Classification Schemes for Choropleth Maps'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802926 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41488449 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802926] New: Review Request: b'python-mapclassify' - b'Classification Schemes for Choropleth Maps'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802926 Bug ID: 1802926 Summary: Review Request: b'python-mapclassify' - b'Classification Schemes for Choropleth Maps' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-mapclassify.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-mapclassify-2.2.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: b'mapclassify is an open-source python library for Choropleth map classification.\nIt is part of PySAL the Python Spatial Analysis Library.' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800675] Review Request: golang-github-crewjam-saml - SAML library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800675 Mark Goodwin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(agerstmayr@redhat ||.com) --- Comment #3 from Mark Goodwin --- waiting on : BZ#1800666 - Review Request: golang-github-dchest-uniuri BZ#1800672 - Review Request: golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig BZ#1800663 - Review Request: golang-github-beevik-etree fedora-review not working even with -L pointing to a directory with the above RPMS pre-built. So I guess just wait for them to appear in the rawhide and f32 buildroots before trying again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785974] Review Request: python-qtsass - Compile SCSS files to valid Qt stylesheets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785974 --- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Looks like we have pathtools in rawhide. @Zbigniew - Can we proceed with the review here? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786834] Review Request: ghc-brick - A declarative terminal user interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-02-14 01:42:30 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-brick-0.50.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786833] Review Request: ghc-microlens-platform - Feature-complete microlens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-02-14 01:42:29 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-microlens-platform-0.3.11-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1781608] Review Request: python-pathtools - bring python-pathtools out of retirement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781608 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pathtools-0.1.2-20.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9ed005ecfd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801988] Review Request: golang-github-mattetti-filebuffer - Filebuffer provides file-like interfaces, backed by an in-memory byte buffer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801988 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mattetti-filebuffer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797130] Review Request: golang-github-google-jsonnet - Implementation of Jsonnet in pure Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797130 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-google-jsonnet.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-google-jsonnet-0.15.0-1.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801527] Review Request: golang-gopkg-redis-5 - type-safe Redis client for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801527
Mark Goodwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mark Goodwin ---
Looks good, package approved
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
[Bug 1797130] Review Request: golang-github-google-jsonnet - Implementation of Jsonnet in pure Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797130 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Got new fails with 32 bits. Gotta report it upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801429] Review Request: rust-futures-timer - Timeouts and intervals for futures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801429 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-futures-timer-0.1.1-3. ||fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-13 22:11:50 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1460201 Though because Igor updated hyper + reqwest to the latest versions without introducing compat packages for the old versions, this package won't be needed until somebody packages hyper0.12 again, I guess :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795047] Review Request: golang-github-liquidweb - Golang API client for Liquid Web's Storm API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795047 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795056] Review Request: golang-gopkg-h2non-gock-1 - Expressive HTTP traffic mocking and testing made easy in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795056 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795056] Review Request: golang-gopkg-h2non-gock-1 - Expressive HTTP traffic mocking and testing made easy in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795056 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-gopkg-h2non-gock-1.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-gopkg-h2non-gock-1-1.0.15-1.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795056] Review Request: golang-gopkg-h2non-gock-1 - Expressive HTTP traffic mocking and testing made easy in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795056 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #3) > Actually, won't the compat package conflict with golang-github-h2non-gock? > Are you retiring that one (the compat package Obsoletes it)? Yes I'm retiring that one in favor of the new upstream import path. I should add Obsoletes as well then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|needinfo? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package reapproved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1770967] Review Request: python-arviz - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770967 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- LGTM, package reapproved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Omair Majid changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1802785 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802785 [Bug 1802785] Review Request: dotnet-build-reference-packages - Reference packages needed by the .NET Core SDK build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802785] Review Request: dotnet-build-reference-packages - Reference packages needed by the .NET Core SDK build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802785 Omair Majid changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1802803 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 [Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802803] New: Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Bug ID: 1802803 Summary: Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: oma...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://omajid.fedorapeople.org/package-review/dotnet3.1/dotnet3.1.spec SRPM URL: https://omajid.fedorapeople.org/package-review/dotnet3.1/dotnet3.1-3.1.101-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: .NET Core is a fast, lightweight and modular platform for creating cross platform applications that work on Linux, macOS and Windows. It particularly focuses on creating console applications, web applications and micro-services. .NET Core contains a runtime conforming to .NET Standards a set of framework libraries, an SDK containing compilers and a 'dotnet' application to drive everything. Fedora Account System Username: omajid A couple of things to note: - The SRPM is gigantic, around 2.5GB in size. Building it in mock will need around 50 GBs of disk size - This needs a bootstrap exception: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/946 - Building without bootstrap will require dotnet-build-reference-packages - The subpackages are named a bit non-standard to stay as close to the upstream recommendations as possible: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/distribution-packaging as possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795076] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-log - Logging library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795076 --- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-anacrolix-log.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-anacrolix-log-0.6.0-1.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795076] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-log - Logging library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795076 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Matt Joiner from comment #5) > What project is this package being used for? I can bump the Go module > versions to accomodate if it helps. Heh I need it to update golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof → golang-github-anacrolix-missinggo → golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag which is not used anymore apparently. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800663] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-etree - Parse and generate XML easily in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800663 Nathan Scott changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802785] New: Review Request: dotnet-build-reference-packages - Reference packages needed by the .NET Core SDK build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802785 Bug ID: 1802785 Summary: Review Request: dotnet-build-reference-packages - Reference packages needed by the .NET Core SDK build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: oma...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://omajid.fedorapeople.org/package-review/dotnet-build-reference-packages/dotnet-build-reference-packages.spec SRPM URL: https://omajid.fedorapeople.org/package-review/dotnet-build-reference-packages/dotnet-build-reference-packages-0.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: This contains reference packages used for building .NET Core. This is not meant to be used by end-users directly. Fedora Account System Username: omajid Please note that this package requires the .NET Core SDK, which is tracked via a separate bugzilla. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801988] Review Request: golang-github-mattetti-filebuffer - Filebuffer provides file-like interfaces, backed by an in-memory byte buffer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801988
Andreas Gerstmayr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Gerstmayr ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in
[Bug 1802047] Review Request: rust-random-trait - Rust library for a random trait meant to produce random generic types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802047
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||ra...@electronsweatshop.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ra...@electronsweatshop.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[-]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Cannot run licensecheck: Command 'licensecheck -r
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/random-
trait-0.1.1' returned non-zero exit status 2.
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
random-trait-devel , rust-random-trait+default-devel , rust-random-
trait+doc-comment-devel , rust-random-trait+u128-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for
[Bug 1802047] Review Request: rust-random-trait - Rust library for a random trait meant to produce random generic types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802047 --- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow --- If you don't mind, I could also use review on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802699. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802292] Review Request: rust-serde-big-array - Big array helper for serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802292 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1802699 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802699 [Bug 1802699] Review Request: rust-average - Calculate statistics iteratively -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802699] New: Review Request: rust-average - Calculate statistics iteratively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802699 Bug ID: 1802699 Summary: Review Request: rust-average - Calculate statistics iteratively Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ra...@electronsweatshop.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/rust-average.spec SRPM URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/rust-average-0.10.3-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Calculate statistics iteratively. Fedora Account System Username: bowlofeggs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802699] Review Request: rust-average - Calculate statistics iteratively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802699 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1802292 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802292 [Bug 1802292] Review Request: rust-serde-big-array - Big array helper for serde -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Is it OK now, or is there anything else to address? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 --- Comment #10 from Breno --- Thanks for mentioning, Alejandro. I updated the ticket[1]. - B 1 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 Alejandro Alvarez changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 --- Comment #9 from Alejandro Alvarez --- (In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #7) > I'm setting fedora-review+ on Breno's behalf while the permissions issue is > sorted out. They rejected the repo because you are not the assigned reviewer :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694295] Review Request: gwe - System utility designed to provide information of NVIDIA card
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- > Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1/services Requires: dbus-common This minor issue can be fixed during importing to SCM. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694295] Review Request: gwe - System utility designed to provide information of NVIDIA card
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||vit...@easycoding.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #10 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1/services,
/usr/share/dbus-1
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set, locale,),
/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gwe/Xlib(defaulting, C, to, Failed,
set, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe/__pycache__(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set, locale,),
/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gwe/presenter(defaulting, C, to,
Failed, set, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe/presenter/__pycache__(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set,
locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gwe/util(defaulting, C, to,
Failed, set, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe/util/__pycache__(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set,
locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe/util/desktop(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set, locale,),
/usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe/util/desktop/__pycache__(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set,
locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gwe/view(defaulting, C, to,
Failed, set, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/gwe/view/__pycache__(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set,
locale,), /usr/share/doc/gwe(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set, locale,),
/usr/share/gwe(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set, locale,),
/usr/share/licenses/gwe(defaulting, C, to, Failed, set, locale,)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[Bug 1801765] Review Request: accounts-qml-module - QML bindings for libaccounts-qt + libsignon-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801765 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/accounts-qml-module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 jiri vanek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801765] Review Request: accounts-qml-module - QML bindings for libaccounts-qt + libsignon-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801765 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- Trying again, prior repo requests were closed/invalid because this review wasn't assigned properly. $ fedpkg request-repo accounts-qml-module 1801765;fedpkg request-branch --repo accounts-qml-module --all-releases https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22136 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22137 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22138 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22139 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801765] Review Request: accounts-qml-module - QML bindings for libaccounts-qt + libsignon-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801765 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801422] Review Request: ocaml-stdint - Various signed and unsigned integers for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801422 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-stdint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801988] Review Request: golang-github-mattetti-filebuffer - Filebuffer provides file-like interfaces, backed by an in-memory byte buffer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801988 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|agerstm...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802541] Review Request: python-mercantile - Web mercator XYZ tile utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802541 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |b'python-mercantile' - |python-mercantile - Web |b'Web mercator XYZ tile |mercator XYZ tile utilities |utilities' | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41477367 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802541] New: Review Request: b'python-mercantile' - b'Web mercator XYZ tile utilities'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802541 Bug ID: 1802541 Summary: Review Request: b'python-mercantile' - b'Web mercator XYZ tile utilities' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-mercantile.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-mercantile-1.1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: b'Mercantile is a module of utilities for working with XYZ style spherical\nmercator tiles (as in Google Maps, OSM, Mapbox, etc.) and includes a set of\ncommand line programs built on these utilities.' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1781608] Review Request: python-pathtools - bring python-pathtools out of retirement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781608 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9ed005ecfd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9ed005ecfd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
