[Bug 1795526] Review Request: ghc-cborg - Concise Binary Object Representation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795526 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- cborg -> serialise -> dhall -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798393] Review Request: ghc-lens-family-core - Haskell 98 Lens Families
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798393 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- Needed for dhall -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803320] Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal - ANSI terminal backend for the »prettyprinter« package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803320 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- Needed for dhall and ghcide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803320] New: Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal - ANSI terminal backend for the »prettyprinter« package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803320 Bug ID: 1803320 Summary: Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal - ANSI terminal backend for the »prettyprinter« package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews//ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews//ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal-1.1.1.2-2.fc31.src.rpm Description: This package defines a renderer for documents generated by the `prettyprinter` package, suitable for displaying them on ANSI-compatible terminals, including colors, boldening, underlining and italication. For more information about the prettyprinter in general, refer to the main `prettyprinter` package documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803320] Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal - ANSI terminal backend for the »prettyprinter« package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803320 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41512653 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803097] Review Request: mango-hud - Vulkan overlay layer for monitoring FPS, temperatures, CPU/GPU load and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Artem --- https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01240583-mango-hud/mango-hud.spec https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01240583-mango-hud/mango-hud-0.2.0-2.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803302] Review Request: github-cli - The GitHub CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302 --- Comment #1 from Joe Doss --- Here are the Package Reviews for the dependencies for this Package Review in order: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803303 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803304 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803306 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803312 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803309 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803310 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803311 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803312] New: Review Request: golang-github-hinshun-vt10x - Package vt10x is a vt10x terminal emulation backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803312 Bug ID: 1803312 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-hinshun-vt10x - Package vt10x is a vt10x terminal emulation backend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240575-golang-github-hinshun-vt10x/golang-github-hinshun-vt10x.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240575-golang-github-hinshun-vt10x/golang-github-hinshun-vt10x-0-0.1.20200214gitd55458d.fc31.src.rpm Description: Package vt10x is a vt10x terminal emulation backend, influenced largely by st, rxvt, xterm, and iTerm as reference. Use it for terminal muxing, a terminal emulation frontend, or wherever else you need terminal emulation. Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803311] New: Review Request: golang-github-tj-css - CSS utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803311 Bug ID: 1803311 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-tj-css - CSS utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240096-golang-github-tj-css/golang-github-tj-css.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240096-golang-github-tj-css/golang-github-tj-css-0-0.1.20200214git220a796.fc31.src.rpm Description: CSS utilities (just hex parsing for now) Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803310] New: Review Request: golang-github-vilmibm-termd - Package termd provides terminal markdown rendering, with code block syntax highlighting support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803310 Bug ID: 1803310 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-vilmibm-termd - Package termd provides terminal markdown rendering, with code block syntax highlighting support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240097-golang-github-vilmibm-termd/golang-github-vilmibm-termd.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240097-golang-github-vilmibm-termd/golang-github-vilmibm-termd-0.0.4-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Package termd provides terminal markdown rendering, with code block syntax highlighting support Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803309] New: Review Request: golang-github-netflix-expect - An expect-like golang library to automate control of terminal or console based programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803309 Bug ID: 1803309 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-netflix-expect - An expect-like golang library to automate control of terminal or console based programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240098-golang-github-netflix-expect/golang-github-netflix-expect.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240098-golang-github-netflix-expect/golang-github-netflix-expect-0-0.1.20200214git0e00d91.fc31.src.rpm Description: An expect-like golang library to automate control of terminal or console based programs. Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803306] New: Review Request: golang-github-google-shlex - A simple lexer for go that supports shell-style quoting, commenting, and escaping.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803306 Bug ID: 1803306 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-google-shlex - A simple lexer for go that supports shell-style quoting, commenting, and escaping. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240572-golang-github-google-shlex/golang-github-google-shlex.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240572-golang-github-google-shlex/golang-github-google-shlex-0-0.1.20200214gite7afc7f.fc31.src.rpm Description: A simple lexer for go that supports shell-style quoting, commenting, and escaping. Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803301] Review Request: golang-xorm - Simple and Powerful ORM for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803301 --- Comment #1 from Mark Goodwin --- Note this has a versioned BR on golang(xorm.io/builder) >= 0.3.6 Current golang-xorm-builder in rawhide and f32 is version is 0.3.5-2. I've issued PRs to update to 0.3.6-1, see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-xorm-builder/pull-requests For the golang-xorm review, either wait for golang-xorm-builder 0.3.6-1 in the buildroots, or download http://people.redhat.com/mgoodwin/review/golang-xorm-builder-devel-0.3.6-1.fc32.noarch.rpm and put it in a directory somewhere and use fedora-review -L Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803305] New: Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-version - A Go (golang) library for parsing and verifying versions and version constraints
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803305 Bug ID: 1803305 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-version - A Go (golang) library for parsing and verifying versions and version constraints Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240106-golang-github-hashicorp-version/golang-github-hashicorp-version.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240106-golang-github-hashicorp-version/golang-github-hashicorp-version-1.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: A Go (golang) library for parsing and verifying versions and version constraints Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803304] New: Review Request: golang-gopkg-yaml-3 - YAML support for the Go language V3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803304 Bug ID: 1803304 Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-yaml-3 - YAML support for the Go language V3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240569-golang-gopkg-yaml-3/golang-gopkg-yaml-3.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240569-golang-gopkg-yaml-3/golang-gopkg-yaml-3-3.0.0-1.20200214gita6ecf24.fc31.src.rpm Description: YAML support for the Go language. This is V3. Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803303] New: Review Request: golang-github-alecaivazis-survey - A golang library for building interactive prompts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803303 Bug ID: 1803303 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alecaivazis-survey - A golang library for building interactive prompts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240113-golang-github-alecaivazis-survey/golang-github-alecaivazis-survey.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240113-golang-github-alecaivazis-survey/golang-github-alecaivazis-survey-v2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: A golang library for building interactive prompts with full support for windows and posix terminals Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803302] New: Review Request: github-cli - The GitHub CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302 Bug ID: 1803302 Summary: Review Request: github-cli - The GitHub CLI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240552-github-cli/github-cli.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jdoss/github/fedora-31-x86_64/01240552-github-cli/github-cli-0.5.5-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: The GitHub CLI https://cli.github.com/ Fedora Account System Username: jdoss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803301] New: Review Request: golang-xorm - Simple and Powerful ORM for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803301 Bug ID: 1803301 Summary: Review Request: golang-xorm - Simple and Powerful ORM for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgood...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mgoodwin/review/golang-xorm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mgoodwin/review/golang-xorm-0.8.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Simple and Powerful Object/Relational Manager for Go Fedora Account System Username: mgoodwin This complements golang-xorm-builder and golang-xorm-core. All three are needed as devel build deps for grafana-6.6.1. The rpmlint "obsolete-not-provided" warning is expected and similar as for golang-xorm-builder. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796268] Package review request - nodejs-p-try
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- Hi, soory for the delay Thank you I fixed the changelog , the links are the same . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795283] Review request: python-odml - File format to store metadata in an organised way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795283 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-odml-1.4.4-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1794877] Review Request: goodvibes - Lightweight Radio PlayerLightweight Radio Player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794877 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- goodvibes-0.5.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694295] Review Request: gwe - System utility designed to provide information of NVIDIA card
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-02-15 02:17:28 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- gwe-0.13.3-6.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1765214] Review Request: google-roboto-mono-fonts - Google Roboto Mono fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765214 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-02-15 02:17:04 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- google-roboto-mono-fonts-2.002-0.1.20200129git.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795283] Review request: python-odml - File format to store metadata in an organised way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795283 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-02-15 02:17:02 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-odml-1.4.4-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1794877] Review Request: goodvibes - Lightweight Radio PlayerLightweight Radio Player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794877 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-02-15 02:17:18 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- goodvibes-0.5.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-outdated-0.2.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f1eff92b2b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- tucnak-4.20-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7978a86266 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- tucnak-4.20-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-03cc1abfaf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786953] Review Request: python-aiounittest - Test asyncio code more easily
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786953 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-aiounittest-1.3.1-2.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #2 from Omair Majid --- Sorry about that. I think I hit the disk quota and the server silently truncated the file. Here's a link that should work: https://spideroak.com/share/N5WWC2TJMQ/fedora/home/omajid/dotnet3.1/dotnet3.1.spec https://spideroak.com/share/N5WWC2TJMQ/fedora/home/omajid/dotnet3.1/dotnet3.1-3.1.101-1.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803281] New: Review Request: fonts-rpm-macros - rpm automation for fonts packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803281 Bug ID: 1803281 Summary: Review Request: fonts-rpm-macros - rpm automation for fonts packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01240322-fonts-rpm-macros/fonts-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01240322-fonts-rpm-macros/fonts-rpm-macros-2.0.1-2.fc33.src.rpm Description: rpm macros, templates and documentation for the packaging of fonts in Fedora Technical core of Fedora’s fonts packaging guidelines Fedora Account System Username: nim It is the technical core of the new fonts packaging guidelines approved by FPC the 2020-02-13: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-02-13/fpc.2020-02-13-17.00.txt https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/935 They will be published on: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/ The current guidelines PR is here: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 The whole https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/ copr showcases how the macro work, with updates to existing Font packages and brand new packages. It is a descendant of the previous canonical Fedora font packaging support package, fontpackages, which will be replaced (that’s why its initial version is 2.0.0). Most of it has been rewritten except the fontconfig templates. Constrains: — the fonts-srpm-macros subpackage will need to be included in the default buildroot — it relies on redhat-rpm-config ≥ 137 That restricts the applicability of the new guidelines to fedora ≥ 31 (less if we only change the buildroot for Fedora 32 and 33). Legacy fontpackages macros are grandfathered for now to avoid breaking existing packages. However, they are much more limited than the new macros, and require more packager manual work, which is often ignored or poorly done. Therefore they will be retired after one or two releases to force a level (and complete) packaging field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803276] New: Review Request: rubygem-cane - Provides complexity and style checkers allowing integration with custom metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276 Bug ID: 1803276 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cane - Provides complexity and style checkers allowing integration with custom metrics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: brand...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/skywalkerz0r/rubygem-cane/epel8/rubygem-cane.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/not-yet-in-epel8/epel-8-x86_64/01240294-rubygem-cane/rubygem-cane-3.0.0-1.el8.src.rpm Description: Provides complexity and style checkers allowing integration with custom metrics This package is a requirement for puppet 6. Using fedora-review you can manually download the packages[1], put them in a directory "deps-dir" and run: $ fedora-review -n rubygem-cane -L ./deps-dir Thanks. Fedora Account System Username: brandfbb 1 https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/r/rubygem-redcarpet-3.3.2-17.el8.x86_64.rpm https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/r/rubygem-redcarpet-doc-3.3.2-17.el8.noarch.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800663] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-etree - Parse and generate XML easily in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800663 Mark Goodwin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mark Goodwin --- Andreas, try now - I just bounced it from + to ? and back to + -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802987] Review Request: rust-thiserror-impl - Implementation detail of the `thiserror` crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802987 --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- New Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-thiserror-impl.spec New SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-thiserror-impl-1.0.11-1.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1770967] Review Request: python-arviz - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770967 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-arviz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803223] New: Review Request: starlark - Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803223 Bug ID: 1803223 Summary: Review Request: starlark - Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/asaezmor/shared/starlark.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/asaezmor/shared/golang-github-google-starlark-0.0.0-1.20200207git32f3451.fc32.src.rpm Description: Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language. Fedora Account System Username: alexsaezm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785974] Review Request: python-qtsass - Compile SCSS files to valid Qt stylesheets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785974 --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- I'm AFK until the end of next week. I can finish the review then. If somebody wants to take over before that, please do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475564] Review Request: python-pytest-fixture-config - Simple configuration objects for Py.test fixtures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475564 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-14 16:25:46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f1eff92b2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f1eff92b2b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-03cc1abfaf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-03cc1abfaf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7978a86266 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7978a86266 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed|2020-01-06 10:48:55 |2020-02-14 15:05:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot --- Hey, don't give up, the guidelines changes mostly simplify the spec part of the packaging, and it would be nice to have people from other packager teams taking a look as what we do in Fedora, if only to tell us when our choices are braindamaged. As you wrote upstream is not likely to change so it won't be an heavy maintenance package either way -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411201] Review Request: js-jquery-file-upload - File Upload widget for jQuery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411201 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-14 14:28:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421406] Review Request: python-libtmux - Scripting library for tmux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421406 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-14 14:26:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974 --- Comment #3 from Adam Borowski --- Hmm... if you've already did the work, it'd probably be better for you to take it. Our upstream isn't very likely to produce frequent (or any) updates — Intel isn't exactly known for font making. I'm a part of the fonts team of another distribution (one with a red swirl...), but I have never packaged any font for a RPM distribution before, thus teaching me for an one-off piece is probably not worth your time. One improvement your packaging doesn't have is a fontconfig alias from "Intel Clear" to "Clear Sans" (the first name tends to come in documents from Intel, the second is one on publicly released font), but even that I've mindlessly lifted from Debian, so it probably fails to obey Fedora rules wrt. eg. sequence numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-outdated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787069] Review Request: ddnet - DDraceNetwork, a cooperative racing mod of Teeworlds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787069 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ddnet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tucnak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 --- Comment #7 from Aniket Pradhan --- Ach... Forgot to do that. Done. :D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 Aniket Pradhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- > Generic: > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) > > ^ Refer to the diff below. You probably forgot to update the srpm > after you added in the comment. :P > > ``` > 2,3d1 > < # Test in mock: > < # mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 rebuild > ./python-outdated-0.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm --with=tests --enable-network > ``` > Ugh, sorry about that XD Could you set the fedora-review flag to + please, otherwise fedpkg request-repo won't work :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@cchtml.com QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |m...@cchtml.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth --- The SRPM is malformed. # [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/michael/rpmbuild/SOURCES/dotnet-v3.1.101-SDK.tar.gz;5e46a445: cpio: read failed - No such file or directory error: ./dotnet3.1-3.1.101-1.fc33.src.rpm cannot be installed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787069] Review Request: ddnet - DDraceNetwork, a cooperative racing mod of Teeworlds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787069 --- Comment #14 from Michael --- Updated spec file: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ElXreno/ddnet/d793394035fd23d1966afdb8069cd6225aa1baef/ddnet.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5213/41495213/ddnet-12.9.1-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot --- See also: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/package/intel-clear-sans-fonts/ I don’t especially want to end up as Clear Sans Fedora maintainer (I have more than enough things on my plate already) but the packaging will need to be converted to the Fonts Guidelines FPC approved yesterday, as soon as the corresponding macro package hits fedora devel and fedora 32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803097] New: Review Request: mango-hud - Vulkan overlay layer for monitoring FPS, temperatures, CPU/GPU load and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097 Bug ID: 1803097 Summary: Review Request: mango-hud - Vulkan overlay layer for monitoring FPS, temperatures, CPU/GPU load and more Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01239816-mango-hud/mango-hud.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01239816-mango-hud/mango-hud-0.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: A modification of the Mesa Vulkan overlay. Including GUI improvements, temperature reporting, and logging capabilities. Fedora Account System Username: atim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj
||ect.org, ma...@mavit.org.uk
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kilob...@angband.pl
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Peter Oliver ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated",
"Apache License (v2.0)". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/mavit/1795974-intel-clear-sans-
fonts/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot
[Bug 1800675] Review Request: golang-github-crewjam-saml - SAML library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800675 Bug 1800675 depends on bug 1800666, which changed state. Bug 1800666 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-dchest-uniuri - generates random strings good for use in URIs to identify unique objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800666 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1800666] Review Request: golang-github-dchest-uniuri - generates random strings good for use in URIs to identify unique objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800666 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-14 12:53:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787619] Review Request: tucnak - VHF contest logging program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787619 --- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Thanks for the reivew, I requested branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940
--- Comment #5 from Aniket Pradhan ---
Everything seems perfect.
You forgot to update the srpm with the new spec (refer to the comment/diff
below).
It's a small change.
APPROVED. ^.^
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 8 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/major/Documents/NeuroFed/reviews/review-python-
outdated/licensecheck.txt
^ There seems to be something wrong with fedora-review... Ignore this
message
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/outdated(to, locale,, defaulting, Failed, C, set),
/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/outdated-0.2.0-py3.8.egg-info(to,
locale,, defaulting, Failed, C, set), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/outdated/__pycache__(to, locale,, defaulting, Failed, C,
set), /usr/share/doc/python3-outdated(to, locale,, defaulting, Failed,
C, set), /usr/share/licenses/python3-outdated(to, locale,, defaulting,
Failed, C, set)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s)
[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot --- Thanks for the CC Please be aware that FPC approved yesterday a change in Fedora fonts packaging guidelines. They won’t change the packaging style in stable releases, but they *will* change the packaging style and checks in devel as soon as the associated macro package lands in koji (and, maybe also in fc32 for new font packages like yours) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Peter Oliver changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://fedoraproject.org/w ||iki/HfG_Schw%C3%A4bisch_Gm% ||C3%BCnd_OpenMoji_fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #2 from Peter Oliver --- Requested licence texts be included upstream at https://github.com/hfg-gmuend/openmoji/pull/130. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Peter Oliver changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Peter Oliver --- Note that fedora-review has the following issue: 02-14 11:43 root INFO Downloading (Source5): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.txt 02-14 11:43 root DEBUGDownload error on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.txt, : 'Error 403 downloading https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.txt' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/source.py", line 76, in __init__ self.filename = self._get_file(url, ReviewDirs.upstream, my_logger) File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/helpers_mixin.py", line 109, in _get_file self.urlretrieve(link, path) File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/helpers_mixin.py", line 88, in urlretrieve raise DownloadError(istream.getcode(), url) FedoraReview.helpers_mixin.DownloadError: 'Error 403 downloading https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.txt' 02-14 11:43 root WARNING Cannot download url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.txt 02-14 11:43 root INFO No upstream for (Source5): legalcode.txt However, this file downloads just fine with curl or Firefox, and also in Copr, so I think the webserver must be refusing connections from fedora-review for some reason and this can be safely ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803059] New: Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Bug ID: 1803059 Summary: Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ma...@mavit.org.uk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pagure.io/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts/raw/master/f/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mavit/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01238698-hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts-12.1.0-3.fc32.src.rpm Description: Emojis with a line-drawn style Fedora Account System Username: mavit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1798940] Review Request: python-outdated - Check if a version of a PyPI package is outdated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- This is ready for review. littleutils has been built. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773467] Review Request: avocado-vt - A avocado plugin for virtualization related tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467 --- Comment #18 from lnie --- Hi, Sorry for the so long delay.Cleber agrees that the top-level requires should be moved to subpackage.I have moved them there and cleaned up a bit,and here is the new build: SRPM:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lnie/avocado-vt/fedora-31-x86_64/01239257-avocado-vt/avocado-vt-75.0-1.fc31.src.rpm SPEC:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lnie/avocado-vt/fedora-31-x86_64/01239257-avocado-vt/avocado-vt.spec I didn't remove the python3-devel requires,as the passfd.c is still there and very needed by the test.I will try to work on removing the c file with code modified accordingly，if we must have python3-devel requires removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787069] Review Request: ddnet - DDraceNetwork, a cooperative racing mod of Teeworlds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787069
--- Comment #13 from Artem ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #12)
> 2. Change %{optflags} -flto
> to
> %{optflags} -flto=auto
This will makes non reproducible builds. Don't do this and don't push with
'auto' in repos.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694295] Review Request: gwe - System utility designed to provide information of NVIDIA card
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e224e7e7e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e224e7e7e2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803000] New: Review Request: rust-unbytify - Convert units of digital information from string into the numeric equivalent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803000 Bug ID: 1803000 Summary: Review Request: rust-unbytify - Convert units of digital information from string into the numeric equivalent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-unbytify.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-unbytify-0.2.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Convert units of digital information from string into the numeric equivalent and the other way around. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802997] New: Review Request: rust-quale - Rust port of the `which` utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802997 Bug ID: 1802997 Summary: Review Request: rust-quale - Rust port of the `which` utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-quale.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-quale-1.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Rust port of the `which` utility. Locates an executable in the user’s path. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802994] New: Review Request: rust-process_path - Rust library to get the path of the currently executing process
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802994 Bug ID: 1802994 Summary: Review Request: rust-process_path - Rust library to get the path of the currently executing process Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-process_path.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-process_path-0.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Rust library to get the path of the currently executing process. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802993] New: Review Request: rust-getch - Portable implementation of getch, using _getch on Windows, and termios on Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802993 Bug ID: 1802993 Summary: Review Request: rust-getch - Portable implementation of getch, using _getch on Windows, and termios on Unix Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-getch.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-getch-0.2.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Portable implementation of getch, using _getch on Windows, and termios on Unix. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802992] New: Review Request: rust-anyhow - Flexible concrete Error type built on std::error::Error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802992 Bug ID: 1802992 Summary: Review Request: rust-anyhow - Flexible concrete Error type built on std::error::Error Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-anyhow.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-anyhow-1.0.26-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Flexible concrete Error type built on std::error::Error. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802988] New: Review Request: rust-thiserror - Derive(Error)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802988 Bug ID: 1802988 Summary: Review Request: rust-thiserror - Derive(Error) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-thiserror.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-thiserror-1.0.10-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Derive(Error). Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802153] Review Request: tagsoup - A SAX-compliant HTML parser written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802153 jiri vanek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-14 09:32:48 --- Comment #4 from jiri vanek --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41490627 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802987] New: Review Request: rust-thiserror-impl - Implementation detail of the `thiserror` crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802987 Bug ID: 1802987 Summary: Review Request: rust-thiserror-impl - Implementation detail of the `thiserror` crate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-thiserror-impl.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-thiserror-impl-1.0.10-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Implementation detail of the `thiserror` crate. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802986] New: Review Request: rust-procfs - Interface to the linux procfs pseudo-filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802986 Bug ID: 1802986 Summary: Review Request: rust-procfs - Interface to the linux procfs pseudo-filesystem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-procfs.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-procfs-0.7.7-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Interface to the linux procfs pseudo-filesystem. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802984] New: Review Request: rust-fedora - Base library for interacting with fedora services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802984 Bug ID: 1802984 Summary: Review Request: rust-fedora - Base library for interacting with fedora services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fedora.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fedora-0.2.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Base library for interacting with fedora services. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41490764 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731583] Review Request: python-pingouin - Statistical package for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731583 Timothée Floure changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-14 08:08:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1778456] Review Request: cdist - Usable configuration management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778456 Timothée Floure changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-14 08:02:19 --- Comment #5 from Timothée Floure --- Closing, as cdist is now in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787069] Review Request: ddnet - DDraceNetwork, a cooperative racing mod of Teeworlds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787069 Vasiliy Glazov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
