[Bug 1795526] Review Request: ghc-cborg - Concise Binary Object Representation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795526 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen --- The revision to the Haskell Packaging Guidelines got approved by FPC btw. https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-09/fpc.2020-04-09-16.00.html (With a long discussion on the question about the corner case ghc-yesod-static vs static provides of ghc-yesod-devel..) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823001] Review Request: simde - SIMD Everywhere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001 --- Comment #1 from Jun Aruga --- This is a package for the header only library. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_header_only_libraries for detail. I tested following things. * Check by `rpmlint`: ok * Check the binary RPMs installation: ok * Scratch build: ok https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43199492 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f65cf84250 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f65cf84250 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f65cf84250 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823001] New: Review Request: simde - SIMD Everywhere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001 Bug ID: 1823001 Summary: Review Request: simde - SIMD Everywhere Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junaruga/fedora-simde/master/simde.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/junaruga/fedora-simde/blob/master/simde-0.0.1-1.git29b9110.fc33.src.rpm?raw=true Description: SIMD Everywhere Fedora Account System Username: jaruga -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821393] Review Request: pagure-cli - Pagure client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821393 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822971] Review Request: notcurses - character graphics and TUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971 --- Comment #1 from Nick Black --- Spec remains the same, but SRPM is now: https://www.dsscaw.com/repos/dnf/notcurses-1.2.8-1.fc32.src.rpm See https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues/465 for more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773467] Review Request: avocado-vt - A avocado plugin for virtualization related tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467 --- Comment #30 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/avocado-vt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822971] New: Review Request: notcurses - character graphics and TUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971 Bug ID: 1822971 Summary: Review Request: notcurses - character graphics and TUI library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: d...@qemfd.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/blob/master/tools/notcurses.spec SRPM URL: https://www.dsscaw.com/repos/dnf/notcurses-1.2.7-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: notcurses facilitates the creation of modern TUI programs, making full use of Unicode and 24-bit TrueColor. It presents an API similar to that of Curses, and rides atop Terminfo. Fedora Account System Username: nickblack This is my first Fedora package. David Cantrell has agreed to be a sponsor (thanks, David!). I am the upstream author, and prepared the Fedora spec with Mssr. Cantrell's assistance. I am also the maintainer of the Arch and Debian packages of notcurses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1813292] Review Request: pkgtreediff - Package tree diff tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813292 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-60f1285bce has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-60f1285bce \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-60f1285bce See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3c7a0db716 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-3c7a0db716 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3c7a0db716 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4f03022d56 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-4f03022d56 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4f03022d56 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822914] Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nmap - Nmap XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822914 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1822954 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822954 [Bug 1822954] Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822952] Review Request: golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus - Lightweight eventbus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822952 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1822954 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822954 [Bug 1822954] Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822954] Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822954 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Depends On||1822952, 1822949, 1822914 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822914 [Bug 1822914] Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nmap - Nmap XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822949 [Bug 1822949] Review Request: golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest - Simplified HTTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822952 [Bug 1822952] Review Request: golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus - Lightweight eventbus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822949] Review Request: golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest - Simplified HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822949 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1822954 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822954 [Bug 1822954] Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822362] Review Request: duc - Disk usage analyzer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822362 Robert Führicht changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robert.fuehri...@jku.at --- Comment #2 from Robert Führicht --- I've submitted this earlier (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764368), but it didn't gather enough attention. My 0.02 €: As duc relies on an index to work properly, I suggest periodical automated generation (similar to mlocate): > - Have a system-wide index available to root in /var/cache/duc, which is > updated without restriction daily and is used when root calls "duc ui". > - Have a service available for users they can use to index their > homedirectory. To match my use case I switched to a profile.d drop-in for now. What do you guys think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822954] New: Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822954 Bug ID: 1822954 Summary: Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/aquatone.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/aquatone-1.7.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/michenriksen/aquatone Description: A Tool for Domain Flyovers. Koji scratch build: fails due to missing dependencies rpmlint output: $ rpmlint aquatone-1.7.0-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint aquatone*.rpm aquatone.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aquatone 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822952] New: Review Request: golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus - Lightweight eventbus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822952 Bug ID: 1822952 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus - Lightweight eventbus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus-0-0.1.20200410gitd46933a.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/asaskevich/EventBus Description: Lightweight eventbus with async compatibility for Go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43193739 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus-0-0.1.20200410gitd46933a.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US async -> sync, a sync golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus-devel-0-0.1.20200410gitd46933a.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US async -> sync, a sync golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/asaskevich/EventBus/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822947] Review Request: golang-moul-http2curl - Convert Golang's http.Request to curl commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822947 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1822949 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822949 [Bug 1822949] Review Request: golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest - Simplified HTTP client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822949] Review Request: golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest - Simplified HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822949 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1822947 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822947 [Bug 1822947] Review Request: golang-moul-http2curl - Convert Golang's http.Request to curl commands -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822949] New: Review Request: golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest - Simplified HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822949 Bug ID: 1822949 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest - Simplified HTTP client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest-0.2.16-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/parnurzeal/gorequest Description: GoRequest is a simplified HTTP client. Koji scratch build: fails due to missing dependency rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest-0.2.16-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest-devel-0.2.16-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-parnurzeal-gorequest-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/parnurzeal/gorequest/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822947] New: Review Request: golang-moul-http2curl - Convert Golang's http.Request to curl commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822947 Bug ID: 1822947 Summary: Review Request: golang-moul-http2curl - Convert Golang's http.Request to curl commands Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-moul-http2curl.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-moul-http2curl-2.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/moul/http2curl Description: Convert Golang's http.Request to curl commands. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43193147 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-moul-http2curl-2.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-moul-http2curl.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-moul-http2curl-devel-2.2.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-moul-http2curl-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/moul.io/http2curl/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822362] Review Request: duc - Disk usage analyzer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822362 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter --- Please update the spec file according the guidelines. Multiple parts are obsolete. Also, the license is LGPLv3+ and not GPLv2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822921] New: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-burp - BurpSuite XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822921 Bug ID: 1822921 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-burp - BurpSuite XML parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-lair-framework-burp.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-lair-framework-burp-0-0.1.20200410git2dd6e92.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/lair-framework/go-burp Description: BurpSuite XML parsing library for Go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43192548 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-lair-framework-burp-0-0.1.20200410git2dd6e92.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-lair-framework-burp.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-lair-framework-burp-devel-0-0.1.20200410git2dd6e92.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-lair-framework-burp-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/lair-framework/go-burp/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822916] New: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nessus - Nessus XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822916 Bug ID: 1822916 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nessus - Nessus XML parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-lair-framework-nessus.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-lair-framework-nessus-0-0.1.20200410git585a96d.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/lair-framework/go-nessus Description: Nessus XML parsing library for Go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43192303 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-lair-framework-nessus-0-0.1.20200410git585a96d.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-lair-framework-nessus.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-lair-framework-nessus-devel-0-0.1.20200410git585a96d.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-lair-framework-nessus-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/lair-framework/go-nessus/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822914] New: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nmap - Nmap XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822914 Bug ID: 1822914 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nmap - Nmap XML parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-lair-framework-nmap.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-lair-framework-nmap-0-0.1.20200410git3507e0b.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/lair-framework/go-nmap Description: Nmap XML parsing library for Go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43192034 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-lair-framework-nmap-0-0.1.20200410git3507e0b.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-lair-framework-nmap.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-lair-framework-nmap-devel-0-0.1.20200410git3507e0b.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-lair-framework-nmap-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/lair-framework/go-nmap/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822561] Review Request: wget2 - the successor of GNU Wget, a file and recursive website downloader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822561 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682 Honggang LI changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ahleihel@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #34 from Honggang LI --- Hi, Alaa I tried to test rshim user space driver with machine qualcomm-amberwing-rep2-01 . But I can't get the /dev/rshim* file. Could you please have a look? thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819180] Review Request: ssh-chat - custom ssh server which serves a chat room instead of a shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819180 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Senderek --- The new systemd unit makes sure that the program is run as an UNPRIVILEGED user. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822561] Review Request: wget2 - the successor of GNU Wget, a file and recursive website downloader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822561 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov --- Also you likely mean devel sub-packages of these packages, not the packages itself: BuildRequires: glibc BuildRequires: zlib >= 1.2.3 BuildRequires: gnutls BuildRequires: libidn2 >= 0.14 BuildRequires: flex >= 2.5.35 BuildRequires: libpsl >= 0.5.0 # Optional # HTTP/2 support BuildRequires: libnghttp2 >= 1.3.0 # run the test suite BuildRequires: libmicrohttpd >= 0.9.51 # build distribution tarballs BuildRequires: lzip # coverage reports BuildRequires: lcov # automatic signature verification) BuildRequires: gpgme >= 0.4.2 # filtering by PCRE regex BuildRequires: pcre # HTTP zstd decompression) BuildRequires: libzstd >= 1.3.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822561] Review Request: wget2 - the successor of GNU Wget, a file and recursive website downloader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822561
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Provides: libtool
Provides: wget2-debugsource = 1.99.2-1
Provides: wget2-debuginfo = 1.99.2-1
# Versioned libraries
Provides: libwget.so.0
Provides: libwget_alloc.so.0
Provides: libwget_common.so.0
Provides: libwget_css.so.0
Provides: libwget_dns.so.0
Provides: libwget_dnscache.so.0
Provides: libwget_encoding.so.0
Provides: libwget_hashfile.so.0
Provides: libwget_hpkp_db.so.0
Provides: libwget_ip.so.0
Provides: libwget_iri.so.0
Provides: libwget_logger.so.0
Provides: libwget_metalink.so.0
^^^ This looks wrong. Please remove it.
%{_libdir}/libwget*.a
%{_libdir}/libwget*.la
^^^ These files shouldn't be packaged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816301] Review Request: openfoam - computational fluid dynamics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301 --- Comment #10 from david08...@gmail.com --- I agree, modules is probably the best way. That way back-to-back comparisons can use the same script, just different module load before. There is a documentation for MPI, which includes how to setup module files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI Some parts might be useful -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815726] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-material - A material design theme for MkDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok --- https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/issues/1582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816301] Review Request: openfoam - computational fluid dynamics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301 --- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- The most convenient + cleanest way to enable multiple versions to be installed on a system in parallel would probably be environment modules: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/EnvironmentModules/ That's how we include MPI based builds for tools. Would you take a look and see what you think? This is a fairly standard MPI build where an environment module is defined for nest-mpich and nest-openmpi. (Here, they're all built in the same spec file since they're part of the same package) https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nest/blob/master/f/nest.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816301] Review Request: openfoam - computational fluid dynamics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to mark.olesen from comment #7)
> (In reply to david08741 from comment #3)
>
> Nice to get the reviews - it shows that people care!
>
> > Not a full review, but some comments:
> >
> > Group: is deprecated, please remove
>
> OK for RedHat, probably leave for SuSE.
If you intend to use the same spec, you'll have to resort to using
conditionals:
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-specref-conditionals.html
The Fedora conditionals are listed here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/#_conditionals
I do not know what the conditionals for SuSE are, so you'll have to refer to
their documentation.
>
> > License should be: GPLv3+
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
>
> Interesting, any idea why are they not using or accepting
> https://spdx.org/licenses/?
> Thought this would be "standard".
The Red Hat/Fedora legal team oversees the licensing, so we stick to what they
suggest :)
>
> > Name should probably not include the version:
> > Name: openfoam
> >
> > I am not sure whether this is a MUST, but the release should start at 1 and
> > be bumped whenever you change the spec, without a new release:
>
> These are both open to discussion and suggestion about how best to solve.
> OpenFOAM releases on a 6-month cycle in Jun and Dec, with version (API)
> denoted as YYMM (eg, 1906, 1912).
>
> Since the API and the internal models most certainly change between these
> releases, it is fairly standard practice to have multiple versions installed
> or installable on the system. There are various reasons that this is
> desirable:
>
> - allows testing, porting of user models to the updated framework
> - allows back-to-back comparison of simulation results, validation cases etc.
> - avoids automatic upgrades of major versions. For some industries it is
> normal to continue with a particular major version for the development
> lifetime of a product (eg, a vehicle).
>
> The best way that I came up with was to have numbered packages (eg,
> openfoam1912, openfoam1906, etc) and use a top-level "openfoam" meta-package
> to define what is the most current release. I guess it could be comparable
> to having Qt4, Qt5, kde4, kde5, etc, except that the release numbers update
> every 6 months.
>
> On copr, I'm just now experimenting with using the bugfix (patch) value for
> the version. The patch value follows a YYMMDD value. This means that the
> current spec would then have
>
> Name: openfoam1912
> Version: 200316# <- 2020-03-16
>
> The release could than have the usual increment I guess?
This is OK. No problem here as long as the various openfoam packages don't
conflict with each other.
>
> > %defattr(-,root,root,-) isn't needed, please remove
> OK
>
> > I don't think prefix should be set; it is certainly not allowed to use /opt
>
> This was also something that was discussed off-line (Fedora and Debian).
> Need to have isolated, version-specific directories, but using an
> "alternatives" framework does not appear to be a good fit.
> We have approximately 300 executables and 160 libraries to deal with. I
> can't imagine fitting them all into alternatives. Besides which, the choice
> of which OpenFOAM version to use should be a user choice, not a systems
> choice.
>
> Did look at trying to drop everything into /usr/lib/, or even install as
> multi-arch, but without proper guidance decided on /opt for the moment.
>
> I am most certainly open to suggestions.
As noted, /opt certainly cannot be used. The best solution here depends on the
software. If it's only the binaries we need to worry about, they can simply be
suffixed with the version. This also clearly tells the user what version they
are using. This is how mpi variants for packages are built, for example.
Libraries are much trickier, especially if they use the same names between
variants. Are the soname versions different at least? Otherwise even using /opt
will only work if the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is updated each time to give the correct
version preference, right?
>
> > Buildroot should not be set:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections
>
> OK, might have been working from some older docs.
>
> > '%package -n %{name}-examples' -> '%package examples'
>
> Nice, much cleaner.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
[Bug 1822536] Review Request: A2 - This is Workload Automation Software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822536 atgenautomat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |POST CC||atgenautomat...@gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #3 from atgenautomat...@gmail.com --- ATGEN A2 is 'free' upto max 10 managed nodes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
