[Bug 1827427] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-argos - Create GNOME Shell extensions in seconds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427 Jeremy Newton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexjn...@fastmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Newton --- Would you like to swap with me? :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818999] Review Request: ofono - open source telephony
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818999 --- Comment #4 from Nikhil Jha --- I need it for KDE Plasma Mobile on the PinePhone, but that needs oFono-phonesim too. I just haven't gotten around to making it. Are you going to submit it (probably as ofono-phonesim instead of just phonesim)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820842] Review Request: golang-github-kr-binarydist - Go implementation of the bspatch algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820842 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820844] Review Request: golang-github-bettercap-nrf24 - Allows interaction with nRF24LU1+ based dongles and the RFStorm firmware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820844 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818176] Review Request: calls - A phone dialer and call handler.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818176
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki ---
>%{_libdir}/calls/plugins/ofono/libofono.so
>%{_libdir}/calls/plugins/ofono/ofono.plugin
oFono is currently retired in Fedora and is going through a re-review. If the
upstream software allows to omit plugins from a build, for the time being you
may hide the oFono plugin behind an %if-%endif.
>%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/sm.puri.Calls.svg
Add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme".
>%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps/sm.puri.Calls-symbolic.svg
If I'm reading the XDG Icon Theme spec correctly, the icon name has to be an
exact match. Please rename the icon during %install to strip the "-symbolic"
suffix.
https://specifications.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html
>%{_datadir}/metainfo/sm.puri.Calls.appdata.xml
You must add "BuildRequires: libappstream-glib" and validate any appdata.xml
files installed.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/#_app_data_validate_usage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827427] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-argos - Create GNOME Shell extensions in seconds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427 Bug ID: 1827427 Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-argos - Create GNOME Shell extensions in seconds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mic...@michel-slm.name QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: gnome-shell-extension-argos.spec SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gnome-shell-extension-argos-3-1.20200110.fcb4751.fc32.src.rpm Description: Most GNOME Shell extensions do one thing: Add a button with a dropdown menu to the panel, displaying information and exposing functionality. Even in its simplest form, creating such an extension is a nontrivial task involving a poorly documented and ever-changing JavaScript API. Argos lets you write GNOME Shell extensions in a language that every Linux user is already intimately familiar with: Bash scripts. More precisely, Argos is a GNOME Shell extension that turns executables' standard output into panel dropdown menus. It is inspired by, and fully compatible with, the BitBar app for macOS. Argos supports many BitBar plugins without modifications, giving you access to a large library of well-tested scripts in addition to being able to write your own. note: the current extension needs a patch to work on GNOME 3.36, and upstream didn't want to merge it until that version is widespread - looks like some contributors are stepping in to maintain it across different GNOME versions but to be safe, it's easier to deploy this as an RPM for now. Fedora Account System Username: salimma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826950] Review Request: python-jsonfield - is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950 --- Comment #18 from Luis Bazan --- koji build --scratch rawhide python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Uploading srpm: python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:00 21.63 KiB 52.81 KiB/sec Created task: 43699551 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43699551 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free -> open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43699552 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 43699552 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 43699553 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43699553 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm) completed successfully -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826950] Review Request: python-jsonfield - is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950 --- Comment #17 from Luis Bazan --- Hi Miro Description fixed whitespace fixed source fixed Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826950] Review Request: python-jsonfield - is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950 --- Comment #16 from Luis Bazan --- SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonfield.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm rpmlint python-jsonfield.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7c6009f807 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-7c6009f807 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7c6009f807 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773382] Review Request: home-assistant-cli - Command-line tool for Home Assistant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773382 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d5459d86bc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d5459d86bc` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d5459d86bc See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820478] Review Request: php-sebastian-code-unit - Collection of value objects that represent the PHP code units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-50b45ebff6 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-50b45ebff6 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-50b45ebff6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821120] Review Request: wlogout - wayland based logout menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821120 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d755c36129 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d755c36129 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d755c36129 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815810] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3e25dca79a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-3e25dca79a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3e25dca79a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1824467] Review Request: freeopcua - Open Source C++ OPC-UA Server and Client Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824467 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e111837a32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-e111837a32` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e111837a32 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820847] Review Request: golang-github-adrianmo-nmea - NMEA parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820847 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo --- Package approved This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/user/canc/golang-github-adrianmo-nmea/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-github-magiconair-properties- devel, golang-github-revel-config-devel, golang-github-google- flatbuffers-devel, golang-github-joho-godotenv-devel, golang-github- peterbourgon-g2s-devel, golang-github-pengsrc-shared-devel, golang- github-erikstmartin-testdb-devel, golang-github-gorilla-csrf-devel, golang-github-jstemmer-gotags-devel, golang-github-zenazn-goji-devel, golang-github-prometheus-client-devel, golang-github-dsnet-golib- devel, golang-github-appc-spec-devel, golang-github-nats-io-devel, golang-github-abourget-teamcity-devel, golang-github-alecthomas- assert-devel, golang-github-google-certificate-transparency-devel, golang-github-jessevdk-flags-devel, golang-github-git-lfs-ntlm-devel, golang-github-hashicorp-raft-mdb-devel, golang-github-elastic-gosigar- devel, golang-github-libgit2-git2go-devel, golang-github-klauspost- compress-devel, golang-github-cockroachdb-apd-devel, golang-github- hashicorp-sockaddr-devel, golang-github-google-querystring-devel, golang-github-rogpeppe-charset-devel, golang-github-benbjohnson- immutable-devel, golang-github-dchest-safefile-devel, golang-github- emicklei-restful-swagger12-devel, golang-github-peterh-liner-devel, golang-github-burntsushi-locker-devel, golang-github-remeh- sizedwaitgroup-devel, golang-github-jsonnet-bundler-devel, golang- github-vividcortex-godaemon-devel, golang-github-ryanuber-glob-devel, compat-golang-github-check-devel, golang-github-skarademir- naturalsort-devel, golang-github-fatih-color-devel, golang-github- knieriem-markdown-devel, golang-github-elazarl-bindata-assetfs-devel, golang-github-renstrom-dedent-devel, golang-github-linuxkit-virtsock- devel, golang-github-opentracing-contrib-stdlib-devel, golang-github- ojii-gettext-devel, golang-github-cespare-xxhash-devel, golang-github- rs-cors-devel, golang-github-labbsr0x-goh-devel, compat-golang-github- asn1-ber-devel, golang-github-yudai-golcs-devel, golang-github- russellhaering-goxmldsig-devel, compat-golang-github-xorm-core-devel, golang-github-prometheus-devel, golang-github-chmduquesne-rollinghash- devel, golang-github-ema-qdisc-devel, golang-github-kardianos-service- devel, golang-github-macaron-binding-devel, golang-github-rakyll- statik-devel, golang-github-spacemonkeygo-openssl-devel, golang- github-bitly-simplejson-devel, golang-github-beevik-ntp-devel, golang- github-docker-cli-devel, golang-github-mattn-colorable-devel, golang- github-tinylib-msgp-devel, golang-github-nwidger-jsoncolor-devel, golang-github-jbenet-context-devel, golang-github-mholt-certmagic- devel, golang-github-vitrun-qart-devel, golang-github-appc-goaci- devel, golang-github-jzelinskie-whirlpool-devel, golang-github-census- instrumentation-opencensus-proto-devel, golang-github- chai2010-gettext-devel, golang-github-rcrowley-metrics-devel, golang- github-rubyist-tracerx-devel, golang-github-mitchellh-goamz-devel,
[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-761059aa6d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-761059aa6d \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-761059aa6d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826326] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-bubblemail - GNOME Shell indicator for new and unread mail using Bubblemail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826326 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-98a1412639 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-98a1412639 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-98a1412639 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823091] Review Request: python-freeipa - Lightweight FreeIPA client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-81f9f75f04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-81f9f75f04 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-81f9f75f04 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820847] Review Request: golang-github-adrianmo-nmea - NMEA parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820847 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820847] Review Request: golang-github-adrianmo-nmea - NMEA parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820847 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820891] Review Request: golang-github-chifflier-nfqueue - Go wrapper library for libnetfilter-queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol ||ter.ch) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820854] Review Request: golang-github-antchfx-jsonquery - Jsonq package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820854 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827399] Review Request: sqm-scripts - Traffic shaper scripts of the CeroWrt project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827399 Juan Orti Alcaine changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Juan Orti Alcaine --- Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jorti/sqm-scripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827399] New: Review Request: sqm-scripts - Traffic shaper scripts of the CeroWrt project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827399 Bug ID: 1827399 Summary: Review Request: sqm-scripts - Traffic shaper scripts of the CeroWrt project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j.orti.alca...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/sqm-scripts/sqm-scripts.spec SRPM URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/sqm-scripts/sqm-scripts-1.4.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: "Smart Queue Management", or "SQM" is shorthand for an integrated network system that performs better per-packet/per flow network scheduling, active queue length management (AQM), traffic shaping/rate limiting, and QoS (prioritization). Fedora Account System Username: jorti -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827341] Review Request: golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827341 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2-2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Converts markdown into roff (man pages) Fedora Account System Username: agerstmayr The current package golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man packages version 2.0.0 already, however it provides only the following go paths: golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/md2man) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/md2man)(commit=f79a8a8ca69da163eee19ab442bedad7a35bba5a) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-devel = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-ipath(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-ipath(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man)(commit=f79a8a8ca69da163eee19ab442bedad7a35bba5a) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 afaics the correct Go import path for version 2.0.0 would be: github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2/md2man ... which is required by another golang package (golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2), and exported by the spec file of this review request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827341] Review Request: golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827341 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2-2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Converts markdown into roff (man pages) Fedora Account System Username: agerstmayr This is "kind of" a rename of the golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man package. The current package golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man packages version 2.0.0 and specifies the following Provides: golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/md2man) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/md2man)(commit=f79a8a8ca69da163eee19ab442bedad7a35bba5a) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-devel = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-ipath(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-ipath(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man)(commit=f79a8a8ca69da163eee19ab442bedad7a35bba5a) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 However, afaics the correct Go import path for version 2.0.0 would be: github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2/md2man ... which is required by another golang package (golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827343] Review Request: golang-github-urfave-cli-2 - package for building command line apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827343 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2 - |golang-github-urfave-cli-2 |package for building|- package for building |command line apps in Go |command line apps in Go --- Comment #1 from Andreas Gerstmayr --- Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-urfave-cli-2/golang-github-urfave-cli-2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-urfave-cli-2/golang-github-urfave-cli-2-2.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827341] Review Request: golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827341 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2ma |golang-github-cpuguy83-md2m |n-2 - converts markdown |an-2 - converts markdown |into roff |into roff --- Comment #1 from Andreas Gerstmayr --- Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2-2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291 Dmitry Butskoy changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Butskoy --- OK. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291
--- Comment #4 from Nikola Forró ---
Thanks for the review.
> Probably using of traditional RPM_OPT_FLAGS and RPM_LD_FLAGS is preferrable,
> since EPELs (if any) know nothing about %{build_cflags} and %{build_ldflags}
I'm not targeting EPEL and I generally prefer macros over variables.
> To be a candidate to replace the old mailx-12.5, the current UI of s-nail is
> a bit different. Probably some tunes in /etc/*.rc file is needed. (Fe. for
> the current mailx it wass required to use "set bsdcompat" in /etc/mail.rc ).
Thanks, I'll look into that.
Updated to 14.9.18:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/s-nail/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01346026-s-nail/s-nail.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/s-nail/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01346026-s-nail/s-nail-14.9.18-1.fc33.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Butskoy --- > To be a candidate to replace the old mailx-12.5 Just a quick look shows something like: -S noemptystart -S prompt='& ' etc... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7c6009f807 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7c6009f807 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827341] Review Request: golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827341 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1827343 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827343 [Bug 1827343] Review Request: golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2 - package for building command line apps in Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827343] Review Request: golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2 - package for building command line apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827343 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgood...@redhat.com, ||nath...@redhat.com Depends On||1827341 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827341 [Bug 1827341] Review Request: golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827343] New: Review Request: golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2 - package for building command line apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827343 Bug ID: 1827343 Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2 - package for building command line apps in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: agerstm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2/golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2/golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2-2.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: A simple, fast, and fun package for building command line apps in Go. Fedora Account System Username: agerstmayr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827341] New: Review Request: golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827341 Bug ID: 1827341 Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2 - converts markdown into roff Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: agerstm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2/golang-gopkg-cpuguy83-md2man-2-2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Converts markdown into roff (man pages) Fedora Account System Username: agerstmayr This is "kind of" a rename of the golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man package. The current package golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man packages version 2.0.0 and specifies the following Provides: golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/md2man) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/md2man)(commit=f79a8a8ca69da163eee19ab442bedad7a35bba5a) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-devel = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-ipath(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 golang-ipath(github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man)(commit=f79a8a8ca69da163eee19ab442bedad7a35bba5a) = 2.0.0-0.4.20190624gitf79a8a8.fc31 However, afaics the correct Go import path for version 2.0.0 would be: github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2/md2man ... which is required by another golang package (golang-gopkg-urfave-cli-2). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Butskoy ---
(In reply to Dmitry Butskoy from comment #1)
> [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
Probably using of traditional RPM_OPT_FLAGS and RPM_LD_FLAGS is preferrable,
since EPELs (if any) know nothing about %{build_cflags} and %{build_ldflags}
> [!]: Latest version is packaged.
14.9.18 is recently released.
To be a candidate to replace the old mailx-12.5, the current UI of s-nail is a
bit different. Probably some tunes in /etc/*.rc file is needed. (Fe. for the
current mailx it wass required to use "set bsdcompat" in /etc/mail.rc ).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 --- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pydeps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Great, looks good! XXX APPROVED XXX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Butskoy ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]:
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 --- Comment #14 from Luis Bazan --- test pass! Ok -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 --- Comment #13 from Luis Bazan --- dot added SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/pydeps.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/pydeps-1.9.0-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1564720] Review Request: watchman - a file watching service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564720 --- Comment #6 from Jon Dufresne --- IIUC, this package was approved 2018-04-11 any reason it is still not available in the repository? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291 Dmitry Butskoy changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dmi...@butskoy.name -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825291] Review Request: s-nail - Environment for sending and receiving mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291 Dmitry Butskoy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||dmi...@butskoy.name Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 --- Comment #12 from Luis Bazan --- Hi Ankur whitespace fixed URL is ok Issue was created in upstream to fix test extra desc fixed SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/pydeps.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/pydeps-1.9.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1757674] Review Request: chatty - XMPP and SMS messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757674 Paul Dufresne changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dufres...@zoho.com --- Comment #4 from Paul Dufresne --- Was trying to look at spec file and got: No server is available to handle this request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820478] Review Request: php-sebastian-code-unit - Collection of value objects that represent the PHP code units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6848958f72 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6848958f72 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741624] Review Request: pydeps - Display module dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741624 --- Comment #11 from Luis Bazan --- Hi Ankur Let me change the version to 1.9.0 has already been released. Working on it! Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826950] Review Request: python-jsonfield - is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950 --- Comment #15 from Luis Bazan --- Hi Miro Working on it! Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819257] Review Request: golang-github-houzuoguo-tiedot - NoSQL database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819257 Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||hiw...@yahoo.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hiw...@yahoo.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820478] Review Request: php-sebastian-code-unit - Collection of value objects that represent the PHP code units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820478 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet --- Thanks for the review! SCM requests https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/24459 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/24460 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/24461 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820478] Review Request: php-sebastian-code-unit - Collection of value objects that represent the PHP code units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820478
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Remi,
Package approved.
Best,
Hirotaka Wakabayashi
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 44 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/vagrant/FedoraReview/1820478-php-
sebastian-code-unit/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann(php-phpunit-php-file-iterator3, php-
sebastian-global-state, php-sebastian-resource-operations2, php-
phpunit-git, php-sebastian-recursion-context3, php-phpunit-php-token-
stream3, php-phpunit-php-timer3, php-phpunit-Version, php-sebastian-
type2, php-sebastian-diff3, php-sebastian-recursion-context, php-
phpunit-php-token-stream4, php-sebastian-object-reflector, php-
sebastian-environment5, php-sebastian-global-state2, php-sebastian-
object-reflector2, php-phpunit-FinderFacade, php-phpunit-diff, php-
sebastian-resource-operations3, php-phpunit-php-text-template2, php-
sebastian-diff2, php-phpunit-php-token-stream2, php-sebastian-finder-
facade2, php-phpunit-environment, php-sebastian-diff4, php-sebastian-
resource-operations, php-sebastian-environment4, php-sebastian-type,
php-phpunit-PHPUnit-SkeletonGenerator, php-phpunit-php-timer2, php-
phpunit-php-invoker3, php-sebastian-code-unit-reverse-lookup, php-
phpunit-php-invoker2, php-sebastian-code-unit-reverse-lookup2, php-
sebastian-environment3, php-sebastian-recursion-context4, php-phpunit-
php-file-iterator2, php-sebastian-version3)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #107 from mehak bhatt --- She would unquestionably appreciate investing quality energy with you, having a great time in Dirty Talk, Kamasutra, Fetish, Clinic Sex, Position 69, a warm shower and offering you body to body rub, kissing, embracing, prodding, and playing with your longing to appreciate lovemaking. Each time you meet me, you're compelled to meet me no sooner. Shivani's telephone utilities in Delhi are in government as well as all throughout the nation. http://escortservice-delhi.com/ http://escortwala.co.in/bangalore-escorts.php http://escortwala.in/ http://escortservicesinbangalore.co.in/blog/escorts-in-whitefield-bangalore/ http://escortservicesinbangalore.co.in/blog/escort-in-electronic-city/ http://escortservicesinbangalore.co.in/blog/escorts-in-koramangala-bangalore/ http://www.escortwala.co.in/call-girls-in-brigade-road.php http://escortwala.in/escorts-in-mg-road.php http://www.escortwala.co.in/call-girls-in-Indranagar.php http://escortwala.in/escorts-in-Marathahalli.php http://meharkhan.com/ http://mehakbhatt.com/ http://mehakbhatt.com/all-latest-delhi-call-girls-whatsapp-numbers-and-photos/ http://mehakbhatt.com/sexy-bhabhi-romance-videos-online/ http://mehakbhatt.com/aerocity-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/mahipalpur-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/dwarka-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/model-town-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/karol-bagh-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/south-ex-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/cp-escorts/ http://mehakbhatt.com/gurgaon-escorts/ http://bestescortinbangalore.com/ http://escortsinbangalore.in/ http://escortswala.co.in/ http://tanishakhan.com/ http://mehakbhatt.com/delhi-transsexual-shemale-escorts-available-now/ http://mehakbhatt.com/big-boobs-escorts-in-delhi/ http://mehakbhatt.com/premium-body-to-body-massage-center-in-delhi-b2b-24-7/ http://mehakbhatt.com/sexy-bhabhi-romance-videos-online/ http://www.mastiindelhi.com/escorts-in-delhi/ http://mehakbhatt.com/big-boobs-escorts-in-delhi/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #108 from mehak bhatt --- The estimation of lively youthful magnificence in their 20s and the capacity to develop rapidly throughout everyday life, have propelled them to join the profession of the male joy. We are sure ladies and are not looking behind when shoppers in their organization are glad. In only a couple of moments, you lose control of your body and brain in the nightlife and the cutting edge way of life of our young, electrifying night sovereign. http://bookmybabe.club/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-marathahalli/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-whitefield/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-brigade-raod/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-koramangala/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-indiranagar/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-mg-raod/ http://bookmybabe.club/escorts-in-mg-raod/ https://www.chocolategirls.club/call-girls-in-bangalore.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-bangalore.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/call-girls-in-bangalore.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-whitefield.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-koramangala.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-indiranagar.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-electronic-city-it-park.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-brigade-road.html https://www.chocolategirls.club/escorts-in-marathahalli.html https://shehnaazkhan.com/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/full-b2b-massage-center-in-delhi-online-slot-booking/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/dwarka-escorts/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/aerocity-escorts/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/mahipalpur-escorts/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/cp-escorts/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/mg-road-escorts/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/gurgaon-escorts/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/best-russian-escorts-in-delhi-in-google-search/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/shemale-escorts-in-delhi https://shehnaazkhan.com/best-desi-indian-randi-chudai-photos-images-and-videos/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/top-3-adult-instagram-accounts-on-the-internet/ https://shehnaazkhan.com/viral-sexy-bhabhi-videos-and-photos-2020/ https://modelsinhyderbad.com/ https://modelsinhyderbad.com/bhagyanagar-escorts/ https://modelsinhyderbad.com/jubilee-hills-escorts/ https://modelsinhyderbad.com/gachibowli-escorts/ https://modelsinhyderbad.com/begumpet-escorts/ https://modelsinhyderbad.com/banjara-hills-escorts/ http://modelsofhyderabad.com/ http://www.mahektripathi.com/ http://socialsuccessor.club/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1824156] Review Request: exfatprogs - Userspace utilities for exFAT filesystems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156 --- Comment #12 from Eric Sandeen --- btw exfat-utils has now been renamed exfatprogs as of v1.0.2: === This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1). We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous release and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches! According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just renaming the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, fsck.exfat) still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package. === I'll probably chime in on that thread, I think keeping the binary names is the only way to go, but a conflicts: tag in packaging might be wise? -Eric -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 mehak bhatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||escortsinindi...@gmail.com --- Comment #106 from mehak bhatt --- Most famous spots are prestigious for its lively nightlife in the quickly developing and occupied the city of Delhi. Individuals living there are seen as inviting, sentimental, and love to appreciate life. As of late, Delhi accompanies have been driven by the rising needs of the reliable dating accomplice. You currently have a wide scope of choices for grown-up amusement under a solitary rooftop. You don't need to go anyplace else as your one-stop goal is directly at your entryway for your creative mind. Presently the profile of the friend dating young ladies is consistently there. Race to book various meeting arrangements! http://shrutiarora.com/ http://www.ddelhiescorts.com/ http://www.ddelhiescorts.com/mg-road-escorts.html http://www.ddelhiescorts.com/dwarka-escorts.html http://www.ddelhiescorts.com/aerocity-escorts.html http://www.ddelhiescorts.com/mahipalpur-escorts.html https://judgemysite.com/post-20556-how-to-book-genuine-delhi-escorts-girls-at-5-star-hotels.html http://www.ddelhiescorts.com/connaught-place-escorts.html http://shrutiarora.com/sexy-indian-online-randi-bhabhi-hot-photos-videos.html http://shrutiarora.com/aerocity-escorts-girl-whtsapp-number.html http://shrutiarora.com/connaught-place-escorts.html http://shrutiarora.com/dwarka-escorts.html http://shrutiarora.com/hauz-khas-escorts.html http://shrutiarora.com/mahipalpur-escorts.html http://shrutiarora.com/paharganj-escorts.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827170] Review Request: python-pyone - PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827170
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Nils Philippsen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[?]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[?]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package
[Bug 1678623] Review Request: strip-nondeterminism - File non-deterministic information stripper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- Last Closed||2020-04-23 12:48:16 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1118885] Review Request: gsimplecal - Simple GTK calendar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118885 --- Comment #12 from Ranjan Maitra --- I did review this package in 2015, according to the procedures in place then, when I was only eligible to be an unofficial reviewer, but nothing came of it in the sense that there was no action on the suggestions taken by the submitter. I am not sure if there is any value in progressing further without any assurance that the submitter is interested. In fact, the submitted links do not work. But you can feel free to take it over also. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827170] Review Request: python-pyone - PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827170 Nils Philippsen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nphil...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nphil...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1678623] Review Request: strip-nondeterminism - File non-deterministic information stripper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dridi.boukelmoune | |@gmail.com) | --- Comment #12 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- Apologies for the long silence, I'm barely keeping my Fedora commitments afloat these days. Feel free to either take over or close this ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826998] Review Request: python-python-language-server - Python Language Server for the Language Server Protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826998 --- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Thanks Lumir. SPEC URL: https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/2019-2020/pyls/rnd1/python-language-server.spec SRPM URL: https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/2019-2020/pyls/rnd1/python-language-server-0.31.10-1.fc32.src.rpm Changelog: * Thu Apr 23 2020 Mukundan Ragavan - 0.31.10-1 - Fix license field - Update to 0.31.10 - Fix requires list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1206732] Review Request: python-gccjit - Python bindings for libgccjit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206732 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256502] Review Request: python-getdns - python bindings for getdns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256502 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1370064] Review Request: honggfuzz - A general-purpose, easy-to-use fuzzer with interesting analysis options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064 marco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mai...@live.de --- Comment #14 from marco --- What is needed to move forward here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820805] Review Request: golang-github-bettercap-gatt - Go package for building Bluetooth Low Energy peripherals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820805 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #1) > - Package contains bundled copies of libraries. xpc and gioctl under > MIT/Expat license. It would be good to mention that in comment around > License tag and add bundled provides > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling. I think > that those libraries are rather minimal source libraries and it is fine to > bundle them for time being(when tracked), possibly work with upstream to > de-bundle them. It looks like that the bundled parts are included to fix build issues. I opened an issue about the unbundling. %changelog * Thu Apr 23 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0-0.2.20200404git569d3d9 - Add details about the bundling (rhbz#1820805) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-bettercap-gatt.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-bettercap-gatt-0-0.2.20200423git569d3d9.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401596] Review Request: python-yamllint - A linter for YAML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401596 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2020-04-23 12:32:57 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- This package was never successfully built in Fedora and later removed: commit 32fe21b7d85d40f58ed06a258ae777c15bc69e26 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Igor Gnatenko Date: Mon Jul 9 14:27:08 2018 +0200 There is yamllint package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401365] Review Request: bladerf - A Software Defined Radio (SDR) platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401365 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 673115] Review Request: dee-qt - Qt bindings and QML plugin for Dee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673115 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2020-04-23 12:30:13 --- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar --- This package has never been built and later removed: commit 2ec1b6225a08b70bbb348c8b1d9727b01b916331 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Jaroslav Reznik Date: Wed Jun 11 11:15:19 2014 +0200 Not actually imported - discontinued project -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1030751] Review Request: python-bbcode - A pure python bbcode parser and formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1059281] Review Request: monitoring-plugins - Host/service/network monitoring program plugins for a variety of different systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059281 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 865615] Review Request: python-gerrit - Python interface to Gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865615 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||python-gerrit-0.0.1-2.gita7 ||ffd76.fc17 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|p...@draigbrady.com Last Closed||2020-04-23 12:18:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1123401] Review Request: python-scraperwiki - Local version of ScraperWiki libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123401 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1364620] Review Request: python-XStatic-tv4 - tv4 - Tiny Validator (for v4 JSON Schema) JavaScript library packaged for setuptools (easy_install) / pip.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364620 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1361672] Review Request: python-fmn-sse - allows fedora users to view their fedmsg feed in realtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361672 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1027541] Review Request: cb2bib - A tool for extracting bibliographic reference s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027541 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1339302] Review Request: libinvm-cli - Framework library supporting common Intel NVM storage CLI applications.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339302 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||libinvm-cli-1.0.0.1096-1.fc ||23 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-23 12:12:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357114] Review Request: ceph-installer - An HTTP API for deployment of Ceph clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357114 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|f...@fcami.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1308742] Review Request: collectd5 - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308742 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1121146] request ganeti for epel7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121146 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1340946] Review Request: photoqt - A fast Qt image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340946 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||photoqt-1.4-3.fc24 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-23 11:58:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826439] Review Request: libvma - LD_PRELOAD-able library with standard BSD sockets API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439 Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ahlei...@redhat.com, ||ho...@redhat.com, ||mschm...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 901783] Review Request: dream - Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) software receiver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901783 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827170] Review Request: python-pyone - PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827170 Vipul Siddharth changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pyone/python-pyone.spec SRPM URL: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pyone/python-pyone-5.10.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python. Fedora Account System Username:siddharthvipul1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1313157] Review Request: nagios-server-addons - Nagios server plugins and helpers for Gluster monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313157 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1151809] Review Request: js-punycode - Punycode conversion library for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151809 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827170] New: Review Request: python-pyone - PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827170 Bug ID: 1827170 Summary: Review Request: python-pyone - PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: siddharthvip...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pyone/python-pyone.spec SRPM URL: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pyone/python-pyone-5.10.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: PyOne is an implementation of Open Nebula XML-RPC bindings in Python. Fedora Account System Username:siddharthvipul1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1249078] Review Request: supernova - Use novaclient with multiple OpenStack nova environments the easy way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||supernova-2.0.9-2.fc22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@petetravis.com Last Closed||2020-04-23 11:53:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1126100] Review Request: disco - Erlang/Python Lightweight Map Reduce Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126100 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1081434] Review Request: ip2location - IP2location library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|puiterw...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1081434] Review Request: ip2location - IP2location library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language Compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|rel...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1166188] Review Request: lapack - Numerical linear algebra package libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166188 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||lapack-3.4.2-8.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-23 11:45:41 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- What a shame approving your own review request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1000862] Review Request: emacs-mallard-mode - Emacs major mode for editing Mallard pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000862 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1066176] Review Request: min-metadata-service - Client for EC2/OpenStack metadata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066176 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||min-metadata-service-2014.3 ||-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-04-23 11:42:16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1098330] Review Request: judy-fk - General purpose dynamic array with fixed-length keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098330 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||judy-fk-1.0.6-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-04-23 11:40:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1060929] Review Request: rubygem-gpgme - Ruby bindings for the GPGME (GnuPG Made Easy) library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060929 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
