[Bug 1832632] Review Request: python-authres - RFC 8601 Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843256] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC/MIDI translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843256 --- Comment #2 from Stuart D Gathman --- Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/abcMIDI.spec SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f33/src/abcMIDI-2020.05.06-2.fc33.src.rpm Added patches to build on rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840224] Review Request: rust-expat-sys - XML parser library written in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840224
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
||needinfo?(igor.raits@gmail.
||com)
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Looks fine, APPROVED. One question -- we should check with Igor -- the build
script, build.rs is MPL-licensed. Since it does not actually end up in the
binary I think it's fine, but better check first. If the license of the build
script matters then the license becomes MIT and MPLv2.0 per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License
2.0". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1840224-rust-expat-
sys/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
expat-sys-devel , rust-expat-sys+default-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[Bug 1840022] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence2 - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3502347f39 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-3502347f39 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3502347f39 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840023] Review Request: php-doctrine-common3 - Common library for Doctrine projects version 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840023 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6388a57cf3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-6388a57cf3 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6388a57cf3 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834280] Review Request: ilua - Portable Lua kernel for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834280 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-41d6dff6de has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-41d6dff6de \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-41d6dff6de See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826736] Review Request: php-composer-semver2 - Semver library version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826736 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c7b0cb8345 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-c7b0cb8345 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c7b0cb8345 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840914] Review Request: mpsolve - Multiprecision polynomial solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-dd910447e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-dd910447e5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-dd910447e5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839352] Review Request: python-pypet - Parameter exploration toolbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-45e052ea70 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-45e052ea70` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-45e052ea70 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840020] Review Request: php-doctrine-inflector2 - Common string manipulations with regard to casing and singular/plural rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840020 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-018ea44b22 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-018ea44b22 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-018ea44b22 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843300] Review Request: cgreen - C unit-test library with mocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843300 Egor Artemov changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://github.com/souryogurt/cgreen-rpm/blob/master/cgreen.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/souryogurt/cgreen-rpm/blob/master/cgreen-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: A modern, portable, cross-language unit testing and mocking framework for C and C++. Fedora Account System Username: souryogurt Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45336936/ This is my first submission and I need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843300] Review Request: cgreen - C unit-test library with mocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843300 Egor Artemov changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://github.com/souryogurt/cgreen-rpm/blob/master/cgreen.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/souryogurt/cgreen-rpm/blob/master/cgreen-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: A modern, portable, cross-language unit testing and mocking framework for C and C++. Fedora Account System Username: souryogurt Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45336936// This is my first submission and I need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843300] Review Request: cgreen - C unit-test library with mocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843300 Egor Artemov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843300] New: Review Request: cgreen - C unit-test library with mocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843300 Bug ID: 1843300 Summary: Review Request: cgreen - C unit-test library with mocks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: egor.arte...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/souryogurt/cgreen-rpm/blob/master/cgreen.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/souryogurt/cgreen-rpm/blob/master/cgreen-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: A modern, portable, cross-language unit testing and mocking framework for C and C++. Fedora Account System Username: souryogurt Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45336936// This is my first submission and I need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843264] Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1843279 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 [Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1843264, 1843268 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 [Bug 1843264] Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 [Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1843279 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 [Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843279] New: Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 Bug ID: 1843279 Summary: Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/baresip.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/baresip-0.6.6-1.src.rpm Description: A modular SIP user-agent with support for audio and video, and many IETF standards such as SIP, RTP, STUN, TURN, and ICE for both, IPv4 and IPv6. Additional modules provide support for audio codecs like G.711, G.722, G.726, GSM, L16, MPA, and Opus, audio drivers like ALSA, GStreamer, JACK Audio Connection Kit, Portaudio, and PulseAudio, video codecs like VP8 or VP9, video sources like Video4Linux and X11 grabber, video outputs like SDL2 or X11, NAT traversal via STUN, TURN, ICE, NATBD, and NAT-PMP, media encryption via SRTP or DTLS-SRTP, management features like embedded web-server with HTTP interface, command-line console and interface, and MQTT. Fedora Account System Username: robert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843273] Review Request: python-jaraco-envs - Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843273 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1755042 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755042 [Bug 1755042] python-twine-3.1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835323] Review Request: python-tox-venv - Use Python 3 venvs for Python 3 tox testenvs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835323 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1755042 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755042 [Bug 1755042] python-twine-3.1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835340] Review Request: python-pytest-black - A pytest plugin to enable format checking with black
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835340 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1755042 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755042 [Bug 1755042] python-twine-3.1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835340] Review Request: python-pytest-black - A pytest plugin to enable format checking with black
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835340 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2020-06-02 23:41:22 --- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Closing this. The initial package I needed that for can be built without linting the code, which is the upstream's job anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835323] Review Request: python-tox-venv - Use Python 3 venvs for Python 3 tox testenvs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835323 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2020-06-02 23:40:38 --- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Closing this. tox-venv is a deprecated package, not recommended by upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843273] New: Review Request: python-jaraco-envs - Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843273 Bug ID: 1843273 Summary: Review Request: python-jaraco-envs - Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cstra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://cstratak.fedorapeople.org/python-jaraco-envs.spec SRPM URL: https://cstratak.fedorapeople.org/python-jaraco-envs-2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments Fedora Account System Username: cstratak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843264] Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1843268 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 [Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1843264 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 [Bug 1843264] Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843268] New: Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 Bug ID: 1843268 Summary: Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/librem.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/librem-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: Librem is a portable and generic library for real-time audio and video processing. Fedora Account System Username: robert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837019] Review Request: theme-switcher - Switch dark/light GTK theme automatically during day/night
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837019
--- Comment #4 from Lyes Saadi ---
Hello! Sorry for the late answer, had computer problems :P.
So, shouldn't this:
%systemd_user_post %{name}.service
Be this instead?
%systemd_user_post %{name}-auto.service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843264] New: Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 Bug ID: 1843264 Summary: Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libre.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libre-0.6.1-1.src.rpm Description: Libre is a portable and generic library for real-time communications with async IO support and a complete SIP stack with support for SDP, RTP/RTCP, STUN/TURN/ICE, BFCP and DNS Client. Fedora Account System Username: robert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843256] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC/MIDI translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843256 Stuart D Gathman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Stuart D Gathman --- Also, upstream has no SCM, and posts new latest every few months. I have been tracking changes in a mirror repo: https://github.com/sdgathman/abcmidi Should I continue to pull the zip file from upstream? Or from my mirror (which includes LICENSE, etc)? I've already gotten an opinion to continue with upstream format, but maybe there is a counter argument. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843256] New: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC/MIDI translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843256 Bug ID: 1843256 Summary: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC/MIDI translation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: stu...@gathman.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/abcMIDI.spec SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f31/src/abcMIDI-2020.05.06-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: The abcMIDI package contains four programs: abc2midi to convert ABC music notation to MIDI, midi2abc to convert MIDI files to (a first approximation to) the corresponding ABC, abc2abc to reformat and/or transpose ABC files, and yaps to typeset ABC files as PostScript. Fedora Account System Username: sdgathman NOTE: does not build on rawhide - compiler is more strict. I should have a patch to fix the issues by the time someone reviews this. The fatal issue is globals defined multiple times. Trivial to fix (if the instances are actually all the same). I'll fix a few warnings while I'm at it. License is embedded in readme.txt. Should I patch in a LICENSE file? I will contact upstream also. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685922] Review Request: packit - A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora operating system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685922 --- Comment #19 from Miroslav Suchý --- Ping, any progress on this? I see the bodhi-update filed. You can close this BZ then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840914] Review Request: mpsolve - Multiprecision polynomial solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-dd910447e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-dd910447e5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839257] Review Request: rust-wayland-sys - FFI bindings to the various libwayland-*.so libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839257 Stefano Figura changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Stefano Figura --- ACCEPT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839257] Review Request: rust-wayland-sys - FFI bindings to the various libwayland-*.so libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839257
--- Comment #1 from Stefano Figura ---
Looks fine to me, just a single minor (non-blocking) issues:
- A newer version of the crate exists as version 0.26.6 (this package is for
version 0.26.5)
Successful koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45327405
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /var/home/returntrip/reviews/1839257-rust-
wayland-sys/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
wayland-sys-devel , rust-wayland-sys+default-devel , rust-wayland-
sys+client-devel , rust-wayland-sys+cursor-devel , rust-wayland-
sys+dlib-devel , rust-wayland-sys+dlopen-devel , rust-wayland-sys+egl-
devel , rust-wayland-sys+lazy_static-devel , rust-wayland-sys+libc-
devel , rust-wayland-sys+server-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages
[Bug 1839257] Review Request: rust-wayland-sys - FFI bindings to the various libwayland-*.so libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839257 Stefano Figura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||stef...@figura.im Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|stef...@figura.im Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1824848] Review Request: jc - JSONifies the output of dozens of commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848 --- Comment #31 from Kelly Brazil --- Latest version (v1.11.2) update: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc-packaging/master/rpmbuild/SPEC/jc.spec https://jc-packages.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/fedora/jc-1.11.2-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840914] Review Request: mpsolve - Multiprecision polynomial solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpsolve -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1841336] Review Request: rust-khronos_api - The Khronos XML API Registry, exposed as byte string constants
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841336 Bug 1841336 depends on bug 1839330, which changed state. Bug 1839330 Summary: Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1841940] Review Request: rust-freetype-sys - Low level bindings for the FreeType font library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841940 Bug 1841940 depends on bug 1839330, which changed state. Bug 1839330 Summary: Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840224] Review Request: rust-expat-sys - XML parser library written in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840224 Bug 1840224 depends on bug 1839330, which changed state. Bug 1839330 Summary: Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839902] Review Request: rust-urlocator - Locate URLs in character streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839902 Bug 1839902 depends on bug 1839330, which changed state. Bug 1839330 Summary: Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840204] Review request: rust-x11-dl - X11 library bindings for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840204 Bug 1840204 depends on bug 1839330, which changed state. Bug 1839330 Summary: Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840179] Review Request: rust-euclid - Geometry primitives (basic linear algebra) for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840179 Bug 1840179 depends on bug 1839330, which changed state. Bug 1839330 Summary: Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839330] Review Request: rust-rustc_tools_util - Small helper to generate version information for git packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839330 Stefano Figura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-06-02 16:17:20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839259] Review Request: rust-wayland-scanner - Wayland Scanner for generating rust APIs from XML wayland protocol files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839259
--- Comment #1 from Stefano Figura ---
Looks fine to me, just a couple of minor (non-blocking) issues:
- Warning from rpmlint: the description contains "Intented" but it should be
"Intended"
- A newer version of the crate exists as version 0.26.6 (this package is for
version 0.26.5)
Successful koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45319308
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /var/home/returntrip/1839259-rust-wayland-
scanner/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
wayland-scanner-devel , rust-wayland-scanner+default-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no
[Bug 1828101] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-emoji-selector - GNOME Shell extension for copying emojis to the clipboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828101
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@lyes.eu
Flags||fedora-review?
||needinfo?(c...@redhat.com)
--- Comment #5 from Lyes Saadi ---
Hi! Sorry for this extremely late answer, I had things to take care of + a
computer issue :P. I'm taking this review request!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- convenience.js has a different license. Its License ("BSD") should
be added in the License Field.
I was able to trace the origin of the file to this repo:
https://github.com/gcampax/gnome-shell-extensions/blob/master/lib/convenience.js
and to this commit: e2a76b665a1e7902d825adc7add0ad3892007d86.
This file seems to be widely used in gnome extensions, as I did find
the license "header" in 800+ GitHub repos (forks have surely greatly
inflated that number though). And I don't think it would be right to
see this as a case of bundling, since, it's not really a library,
more of a single function. Plus I found 7 other packaged extensions
in the repos including convenience.js, none providing a bundling
declaration. So, no need to add a Provide: bundled(), adding the
License is mandatory though (no need to provide a separate License
file, adding BSD to the License field is enough).
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "GPL (v3 or later)". 49 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/var/home/lyes/Documents/reviews/1828101-gnome-shell-extension-emoji-
selector/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: this requires gnome-shell-extension-common which requires
gnome-shell which requires glib2
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/glib-2.0,
/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
[Bug 1584891] Review Request: nodejs-rollup-plugin-typescript - Seamless integration between Rollup and TypeScript.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584891 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 15:01:44 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1584840] Review Request: nodejs-tippex - Find and erase strings and comments in JavaScript code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584840 Bug 1584840 depends on bug 1584827, which changed state. Bug 1584827 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-rollup-plugin-buble - Compile ES2015 with buble https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584827 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1584840] Review Request: nodejs-tippex - Find and erase strings and comments in JavaScript code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584840 Bug 1584840 depends on bug 1584891, which changed state. Bug 1584891 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-rollup-plugin-typescript - Seamless integration between Rollup and TypeScript. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584891 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1584827] Review Request: nodejs-rollup-plugin-buble - Compile ES2015 with buble
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584827 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 15:00:58 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1584819] Review Request: nodejs-rollup-plugin-json - Convert .json files to ES6 modules:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584819 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:59:57 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:58:40 --- Comment #22 from Mattia Verga --- Closing due to nonresponsive submitter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839430] Review Request: rust-bzip2 - Bindings to libbzip2 for bzip2 compression and decompression exposed as Reader/Writer streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839430 --- Comment #1 from Breno --- Great, looks good to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839430] Review Request: rust-bzip2 - Bindings to libbzip2 for bzip2 compression and decompression exposed as Reader/Writer streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839430 Breno changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1584265] Review Request: nodejs-console-group - A basic console.group implementation for node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584265 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:56:22 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1581880] Review Request: nodejs-ts-node - TypeScript execution environment and REPL for node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581880 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jsmith.fedora@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #6 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved many years ago, but never imported. Are you still interested in getting it into Fedora repositories? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572339] Review Request: nodejs-test-exclude - Test for inclusion or exclusion of paths using pkg-conf and globs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572339 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:54:09 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories and it was later retired due to FTB, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572312] Review Request: nodejs-istanbul-reports - istanbul reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572312 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:52:22 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1549281] Review Request: texlive-base - TeX formatting system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549281 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:51:03 --- Comment #8 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:49:57 --- Comment #20 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1539078] Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539078 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-02 14:48:06 --- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 846561] Review Request: groovy-gram - A metadata processing engine for Groovy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846561 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i ||t) --- Comment #10 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved many years ago, but never imported. Are you still interested in getting it into Fedora repositories? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839259] Review Request: rust-wayland-scanner - Wayland Scanner for generating rust APIs from XML wayland protocol files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839259 Stefano Figura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stef...@figura.im Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|stef...@figura.im Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1430135] Review Request: golang-github-jefferai-jsonx - Go (golang) library to transform JSON into JSONx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430135 Bug 1430135 depends on bug 1430134, which changed state. Bug 1430134 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-Jeffail-gabs - Parse, create, and edit unknown or dynamic JSON in golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430134 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1430134] Review Request: golang-github-Jeffail-gabs - Parse, create, and edit unknown or dynamic JSON in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430134 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2017-10-15 23:50:25 |2020-06-02 14:41:36 --- Comment #16 from Mattia Verga --- This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket was never closed. I'm closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840914] Review Request: mpsolve - Multiprecision polynomial solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James --- Thank you, Erich. Let me know if you need more reviews. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834280] Review Request: ilua - Portable Lua kernel for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834280 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-41d6dff6de has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-41d6dff6de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Shikha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||extras...@fedoraproject.org ||, sshikha12...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(extras-qa@fedorap ||roject.org) --- Comment #122 from Shikha --- Hi, I am willing to maintain this package.http://escortwala.co.in/ https://escortsinbangalore.in/ http://bestescortinbangalore.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840023] Review Request: php-doctrine-common3 - Common library for Doctrine projects version 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840023 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6388a57cf3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6388a57cf3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839430] Review Request: rust-bzip2 - Bindings to libbzip2 for bzip2 compression and decompression exposed as Reader/Writer streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839430 Breno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brand...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|brand...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1811774] Review Request: rubygem-puppetserver-ca - A simple CLI tool for interacting with Puppet Server's Certificate Authority
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811774 Breno changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(brand...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Breno --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/puppet6-stable-el8-fedora/epel-8-x86_64/01421713-rubygem-puppetserver-ca/rubygem-puppetserver-ca.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/puppet6-stable-el8-fedora/epel-8-x86_64/01421713-rubygem-puppetserver-ca/rubygem-puppetserver-ca-1.8.0-1.el8.src.rpm Description: A simple CLI tool for interacting with Puppet Server's Certificate Authority. Fedora Account System Username: brandfbb Thanks for the review, Michel. It should be fixed now. I also bumped the version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840020] Review Request: php-doctrine-inflector2 - Common string manipulations with regard to casing and singular/plural rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840020 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-018ea44b22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-018ea44b22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840022] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence2 - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3502347f39 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3502347f39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826736] Review Request: php-composer-semver2 - Semver library version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826736 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c7b0cb8345 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c7b0cb8345 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839352] Review Request: python-pypet - Parameter exploration toolbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-45e052ea70 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-45e052ea70 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1842475] Review Request: python-publicsuffix2 - Get a public suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842475
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python3-devel
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License Mozilla Public License
(v2.0)", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License (v2.0)". 7 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1842475-python-
publicsuffix2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-
packages, /usr/lib/python3.9
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported
[Bug 1842475] Review Request: python-publicsuffix2 - Get a public suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842475 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826736] Review Request: php-composer-semver2 - Semver library version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826736 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-composer-semver2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825673] Review Request: padthv1 - An old-school polyphonic additive synthesizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825673 Martin Tarenskeen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl --- Comment #2 from Martin Tarenskeen --- +1 for this review request. synthv1, drumkv1, and samplv1 are already in Fedora, padthv1 is a member of the same family -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840022] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence2 - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840022 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-doctrine-persistence2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840020] Review Request: php-doctrine-inflector2 - Common string manipulations with regard to casing and singular/plural rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840020 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-doctrine-inflector2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840023] Review Request: php-doctrine-common3 - Common library for Doctrine projects version 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840023 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-doctrine-common3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821160] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-oi - Tools for the Go programming language's standard io package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821160 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-reiver-oi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820856] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-ansi - Easy to use ANSI control codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820856 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-jpillora-ansi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819257] Review Request: tiedot - NoSQL database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819257 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tiedot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827939] Review Request: ardour6 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939 --- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ardour6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834280] Review Request: ilua - Portable Lua kernel for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834280 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ilua -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821160] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-oi - Tools for the Go programming language's standard io package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821160 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820856] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-ansi - Easy to use ANSI control codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820856 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819257] Review Request: tiedot - NoSQL database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819257 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Hirotaka Wakabayashi from comment #3) > One point I forgot to say this before, but You can name > golang-github-houzuoguo-tiedot more shortly like tiedot because the package > is not a Source packages but a Go binary package. Here are guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/ > #_source_packages_src_rpm > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/ > #_go_binary_packages You are right. I will rename it. Thanks for your input and your time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819257] Review Request: tiedot - NoSQL database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819257 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: tiedot - |golang-github-houzuoguo-tie |NoSQL database |dot - NoSQL database| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840298] Review Request: ldapdomaindump - Active Directory information dumper via LDAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840298 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter --- %changelog * Tue Jun 02 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.9.3-1 - Add license and readme file - Update to latest upstream release 0.9.3 Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ldapdomaindump.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ldapdomaindump-0.9.3-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839889] Review Request: python-angr - A multi-architecture binary analysis toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839889 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- *** Bug 1817721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1817721] Review Request: python-angr - Multi-architecture binary analysis toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817721 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2020-06-02 09:51:22 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1839889 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839477] Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Issues were addressed, package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827939] Review Request: ardour6 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939 --- Comment #12 from Nils Philippsen --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1832632] Review Request: python-authres - RFC 8601 Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834280] Review Request: ilua - Portable Lua kernel for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834280 thrnc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from thrnc...@redhat.com --- Without the Lua logo the package seems to be all right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
