https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839263
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Turns out the docs were missing because `Cargo.toml` has an `includes`
directive that only whitelists some source files and the `Cargo.toml` file.
Added the docs to it in a pull request and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839263
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(michel@michel-slm |
|.name)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839241
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Probably the missing dependencies Igor mentioned. Not sure why I didn't catch
it the first time - will take a look
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844918
--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
~
❯ fedpkg request-repo rust-choosier 1844918
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25646
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840179
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839902
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845362
Bug ID: 1845362
Summary: Review Request: R-BiocFileCache - Manage Files Across
Sessions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845360
Bug ID: 1845360
Summary: Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Manipulation of
SQLite-based annotations in Bioconductor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839263
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839259
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839259
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844918
--- Comment #1 from Stefano Figura ---
ACCEPT
The package looks good to me!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845322
Bug ID: 1845322
Summary: Review Request: python-kyotocabinet - Python3 wrapper
for kyotocabinet key-value storage.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821459
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821450
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Fabian,
Could you tell me why "golang-github-casbin-2" is needed?
You may know this already, but Golang source packages MUST be named after
their main import path and golang-github-casbin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845297
Bug ID: 1845297
Summary: Review Request: jgmenu - A simple X11 menu
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844918
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839241
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(michel@michel-slm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845269
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845269
Bug ID: 1845269
Summary: Review Request: minitest-stub-const -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845264
Bug ID: 1845264
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-regexp_property_values -
Inspect property values supported by Ruby's regex
engine
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826056
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839263
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(michel@michel-slm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839263
--- Comment #1 from Stefano Figura ---
Could you please address these two items?
- I noticed your comment about README.md and the license file missing but I see
that there is no PR/Issue upstream to address this.
- I have also noticed that a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845195
Bug ID: 1845195
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-regexp_parser - Scanner,
lexer, parser for ruby's regular expressions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839263
Stefano Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Thank you Neal,
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frostyx/repo2module/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01432043-repo2module/repo2module.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836309
--- Comment #4 from Tristan Cacqueray ---
Thank you for the review
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25628
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frostyx/repo2module/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01431188-repo2module/repo2module.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Thank you Fabio,
you are totally right about the "%global debug_package %{nil}".
I never knew how to fix the error about empty debug packages for pure-python
packages,
and setting debug_package to nil is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836309
--- Comment #3 from Tristan Cacqueray ---
What is the cabal-rpm diff? I re-run the `cabal-rpm spec time-manager` command
with cabal-rpm-2.0.4 and there was no diff.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836568
--- Comment #4 from Javier Peña ---
I see the spec runs pytest in %check, but does not include pytest as a build
requirement (not sure if there are other BRs). Could you fix that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844120
--- Comment #13 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
fedora-review -b 1844120
All review must be on rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844120
--- Comment #12 from ycollet ---
The command line I tested:
[SRPMS] $ fedora-review --verbose --mock-config fedora-32-x86_64 --rpm-spec
--name jamulus
Do you use some other specific flags ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636169
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Thanks - no rush, alpha2 was only released last week so I think we've got
a few weeks to go.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844120
--- Comment #11 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I use fedora-review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456
--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to lnie from comment #7)
> >There is documentation supplied upstream but it is not packaged.
> You mean I should package the pdf ,right?
What is the license of the PDF file? In any case
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844120
--- Comment #10 from ycollet ---
I filed an issue upstream related to the licenses:
https://github.com/corrados/jamulus/issues/341
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844120
--- Comment #9 from ycollet ---
I removed INSTALL.md from doc files.
I removed the opus code too (with a comment in the spec file).
What script do you use to check the licence of the various files in the archive
?
The link to the src rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
45 matches
Mail list logo
