https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058
--- Comment #5 from Oden Eriksson ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4)
> (In reply to Oden Eriksson from comment #3)
> > Thanks Neal, I applied those changes.
>
> Can you post updated Spec and SRPM links?
Yes, same as before. As in t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847772
Bug ID: 1847772
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-psmt2-frontend - Parser and
typechecker for an extension of SMT-LIB 2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Oden Eriksson from comment #3)
> Thanks Neal, I applied those changes.
Can you post updated Spec and SRPM links?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844837
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844837
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845362
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847743
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847743
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.uca...@gmail.com
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847743
Bug ID: 1847743
Summary: Review Request: R-BiocFileCache - Manage Files Across
Sessions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Bauer ---
COMPLETED TASKS:
- patch for python 3.9 compatibility
- move runtime requirements into subpackage
- unbundle glyphicons-halflings
- bootstrap java files are ASL 2.0 license
- unbundle jquery
TO-DO:
- unb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847117
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840377
--- Comment #5 from Igor Raits ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/socialscan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840377
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840296
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uhubctl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847117
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-zopeext
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845360
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Bauer ---
Yes, I am well into making all the changes, including unbundling jquery, the
fonts, and pysignals.
pysignals lives on pypi, so I anticipate that to be an easy review:
https://pypi.org/project/pysignals/
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847117
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Bauer ---
Yeah, I totally agree. If there were a whole bunch of examples, I'd be more
inclined to move them to docs, but we are just talking about a single file.
Let's just leave it as it is.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839773
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
> - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
> Note: python3-pytest4 is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
> See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
> guidelines/deprecating-package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
--- Comment #8 from Javier Peña ---
I see we have f31 and f32 builds now, any plans for a rawhide build?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847117
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zonexpertconsulting@outlook
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
--- Comment #8 from Jerry James ---
No need to apologize. Catching this sort of thing is what reviews are for.
Let me know when you are ready to proceed. If you decide to unbundle
pysignals, let me know and I will review that too.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735170
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Blocks|956806 (nodejs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839542
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/snallygaster
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821546
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-aeson-better-errors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735170
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jsmith.fedora@gma |
|il.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-607418a363 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-607418a363
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505
--- Comment #14 from Anil Tuncel ---
Hi Ankur,
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes I built an rpm. How can I push the rpm and the
SPEC file?
I just talked to Werner about scoop & MPI.
MPI support is not required for neuron and scoop requiremen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839542
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839542
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Bauer ---
H I see my work is cut out for me.
I must apologize. I've been using ouimeaux on several machines for years now
with success. I totally missed the additional libraries that were embedded into
the p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847117
Andrew Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847451
yanqiy...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Refere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847451
--- Comment #1 from yanqiy...@gmail.com ---
Requesting sponsor for this. Have introduced myself on the devel mailing list
and this is my second package submitted for review.
The first one can be found here[1], waiting for review.
[1] https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847451
Bug ID: 1847451
Summary: Review Request: gio-qt - Gio wrapper for Qt
applications
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Stat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825560
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo- |
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825560
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |fedora-review? needinfo-
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836309
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Tristan Cacqueray from comment #7)
> Jens, I'm not sure to understand what you meant by "trivial cabal-rpm diff"
Thanks for checking, yes that is basically what I mean by a trivial diff.
I t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836309
Tristan Cacqueray changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821809
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821808
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846096
--- Comment #2 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
- BuildRequires: gcc-c++ - fixed
- Dist tag - fixed
- rpmlint:
-- mixed spaces and tabs - fixed
-- url - I don't understand what is the problem; may be https://? Or network
error?
- Source0 URL - not ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456
--- Comment #12 from lnie ---
Hi Richard,
I have put the updated pdf file to a -doc subpackage,and here are the new built
links:
Spec
URL:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lnie/libvirt-test-API/fedora-32-x86_64/01466300-libvi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825560
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821808
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505
--- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hi Anil,
Thanks for working on this. Which rpm are you referring to? Have you built one,
and is it ready for review?
If scoop is required, we'll have to package it too. However, I note that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839773
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839773
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505
--- Comment #12 from Anil Tuncel ---
Hi Ankur,
I tried to install it from the github tar. Here are some remarks.
First of all, Version 1.9.48 of BluePyOpt on PyPi already contains the license
files and the tests.
The installation of rpm is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840296
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840296
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846096
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-eec8591e24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eec8591e24
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-44477df31a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-44477df31a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
56 matches
Mail list logo
