https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869128
Bob Hepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bob.hep...@gmail.com
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867267
Carson Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uhh...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869128
Bug ID: 1869128
Summary: Review Request: ilopona - toki pona dictionary
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862881
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e67ab07606 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862919
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ef7a40cb56 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866165
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862902
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-91faae3ba0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862862
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e7e88f2331 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865739
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-c5bbbd177c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862859
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866166
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5d5bd6bc43 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862855
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b1fd7b70a2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857747
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0e7ba24f67 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858193
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f258cf4851 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866143
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866166
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862862
Bug 1862862 depends on bug 1862859, which changed state.
Bug 1862859 Summary: Review Request: R-DT - R Wrapper of the JavaScript Library
'DataTables'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862859
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862859
Bug 1862859 depends on bug 1862855, which changed state.
Bug 1862855 Summary: Review Request: R-crosstalk - Inter-Widget Interactivity
for HTML Widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862855
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862881
Bug 1862881 depends on bug 1862859, which changed state.
Bug 1862859 Summary: Review Request: R-DT - R Wrapper of the JavaScript Library
'DataTables'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862859
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862855
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862881
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865739
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853053
Bug 1853053 depends on bug 1857747, which changed state.
Bug 1857747 Summary: Review Request: golang-uber-goleak - Goroutine leak
detector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857747
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862859
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862902
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857747
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862919
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869109
Bug ID: 1869109
Summary: Review Request: kgx - Mobile optimized Terminal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862623
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862621
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818999
--- Comment #7 from Nikhil Jha ---
Thanks & sorry for the late reply, I got busy with school again.
- Missing isa in the devel subpackage:
Fixed.
- Not needed
Fixed.
- Error in %changelog, March 30 is a Monday:
Fixed.
- Explicitly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862548
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869107
Nikhil Jha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1817424
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869107
Bug ID: 1869107
Summary: Review Request: purple-mm-sms - A libpurple plugin for
sending and receiving SMS via ModemManager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862080
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> Thanks for another review! You don't have to do all of them (today), you
> know. I linked only two of my open requests on purpose :-)
Yes, I know. I had
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862080
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for another review! You don't have to do all of them (today), you know.
I linked only two of my open requests on purpose :-)
> Whatever was causing the osgi-compendium problem appears to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862080
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862080
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862078
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks a lot for the fast review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862078
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862078
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> - While NOTICE.md does say that the license is EPL-2.0 or GPLv2 with an
> exception, please note that this file is licensed ASL-2.0:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- While NOTICE.md does say that the license is EPL-2.0 or GPLv2 with an
exception,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867981
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review!
I see the 2.0.0 release is quite recent, but it actually doesn't provide
substantial changes over 1.8.3 other than a few dependency bumps and import
changes (despite the version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867981
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867981
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625
--- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini ---
Great! I'll link the two that are currently blocking other work:
- stax-ex 1.7.7 → jaxb-stax-ex 1.8.3:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867981
(blocks xmlstreambuffer 1.5.9 update)
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James ---
Thank you, Fabio. Yes, I'm happy to do some reviews for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862620
--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith ---
Fantastic :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862620
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Thank you again, Jared. The permission issues are due to the systemd-nspawn
problem with the new glibc that has been discussed on fedora-devel-list
recently. Running mock with --isolation=simple works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862548
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862542
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862536
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862528
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862620
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862528
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862795
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862782
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862965
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862218
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729
Gris Ge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868846
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868846
--- Comment #2 from Qiyu Yan ---
> Could you split these into separate lines and sort them alphabetically?
> Also, can you check whether it's possible to use the "pkgconfig(foo)" format
> for the -devel packages?
Fixed, and I am planning to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868846
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868845
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868845
--- Comment #3 from Qiyu Yan ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1)
> Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49309699
>
> > License:LGPLv2
>
> licensecheck picked up a couple of files with a different
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809405
--- Comment #23 from Ntish ---
I have uploaded latest spec file and artifacts on
https://nitsharma.fedorapeople.org/
Thanks again :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809405
--- Comment #22 from Ntish ---
I followed below steps to have successful build.
1.) build sumatra package and generated tar file from it.
2.) generated rpm package via fedpkg from tar file above
3.) tested using mock.
I tried build from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809405
--- Comment #21 from Ntish ---
There seems to be an issue with the current structure of git repo, the name of
the repo is in consistence, somewhere it is Sumatra with a capital S, and at
some places it is small s. I have tried my best to have
77 matches
Mail list logo