[Bug 1913870] Review Request: qvge - visual graph editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870 --- Comment #14 from Otto Urpelainen --- Thank you Eugene, it is looking better! There is a small mistake, the file you link to is not srpm but binary rpm. I got the srpm from your Koji build to get fedora-review running. More comments to follow soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944398] Review Request: rust-cstr-argument - A trait for converting function arguments to null terminated strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 01:22:11 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a94f46ddfa has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 Bug 1941896 depends on bug 1944398, which changed state. Bug 1944398 Summary: Review Request: rust-cstr-argument - A trait for converting function arguments to null terminated strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944398 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-30e5a3e918 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-30e5a3e918 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f7c85ad7ff has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-f7c85ad7ff \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f7c85ad7ff See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944408] Review Request: rust-libsystemd-sys - FFI bindings to libsystemd and libelogind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944408 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5bac42dc9d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5bac42dc9d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0df12429d9 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0df12429d9 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0df12429d9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-239c87f476 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-239c87f476 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6249d1cdaa has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-6249d1cdaa \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6249d1cdaa See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1097714] Review Request: golang-github-spacemonkeygo-spacelog - Designed to help you build a flexible logging system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097714 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2021-05-05 00:45:33 --- Comment #5 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The submitter account doesn't exist anymore, therefore this ticket will be closed. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944422] Review Request: rust-systemd - A rust interface to libsystemd/libelogind provided APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944422 Bug 1944422 depends on bug 1944398, which changed state. Bug 1944398 Summary: Review Request: rust-cstr-argument - A trait for converting function arguments to null terminated strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944398 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944408] Review Request: rust-libsystemd-sys - FFI bindings to libsystemd and libelogind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944408 Bug 1944408 depends on bug 1944392, which changed state. Bug 1944392 Summary: Review Request: rust-build-env - Extract information about the build process from the environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944392 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 Bug 1941896 depends on bug 1944392, which changed state. Bug 1944392 Summary: Review Request: rust-build-env - Extract information about the build process from the environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944392 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944392] Review Request: rust-build-env - Extract information about the build process from the environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944392 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 01:22:08 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-89e16d5cad has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944764] Review Request: sameboy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator written in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944764 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2021-04-02 16:56:50 |2021-05-05 01:21:20 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3a74bf6b02 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947112] Review Request: golang-mvdan-sh-3 - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947112 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4e9816f435 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951611] Review Request: ghc-protolude - A small prelude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951611 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4594105a4f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951628] Review Request: ghc-wai-websockets - Provide a bridge between WAI and the websockets package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951628 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fcfe9fb740 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951398] Review Request: ghc-bower-json - Read bower.json from Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951398 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f48f55d359 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947112] Review Request: golang-mvdan-sh-3 - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 00:53:34 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-422c72371c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951611] Review Request: ghc-protolude - A small prelude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951611 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 00:53:05 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6ca438a1fb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951628] Review Request: ghc-wai-websockets - Provide a bridge between WAI and the websockets package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951628 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 00:53:03 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fdef8d6556 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951398] Review Request: ghc-bower-json - Read bower.json from Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 00:52:54 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e0117ca43a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1895567] Review Request: usd - 3D VFX pipeline interchange file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895567 --- Comment #23 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Thank you the update. I will for the reason behind the pyside error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 --- Comment #9 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Thank you for review and repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CLI-Osprey -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #3) > > FIX: Please add build-require > perl(lib) - t/load-on-use.t:5 Fixed. > TODO: Add version constrain to 'perl(Module::Build::Tiny) >= 0.034' Fixed. > FIX: Please add run-require > perl(Pod::Usage) - lib/CLI/Osprey/Role.pm:321 Fixed. Spec URL: https://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CLI-Osprey/perl-CLI-Osprey.spec SRPM URL: https://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CLI-Osprey/perl-CLI-Osprey-0.08-2.fc33.src.rpm > Resolution: > Approved Thank you, Jikta. I've requested the repository: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33797 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1954004] Review Request: perl-JSON-Create - Create JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954004 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Description verified from lib/JSON/Create.pod. Ok. License verified from Makefile.PL, and lib/JSON/Create.pod. Ok. Build-time dependencies are Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint *.spec /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/ perl-JSON-Create-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint output is Ok. File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p perl-JSON-Create-0.32-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.32()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.1) 1 perl(B) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(JSON::Parse) >= 0.60 1 perl(parent) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Unicode::UTF8) >= 0.62 1 perl(utf8) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary Requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Test-Lib-0.002-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(JSON::Create) = 0.32 1 perl(JSON::Create::Bool) = 0.32 1 perl(JSON::Create::PP) = 0.32 1 perl-JSON-Create = 0.32-1.fc35 1 perl-JSON-Create(x86-64) = 0.32-1.fc35 Binary Provides are Ok. The package builds in F35 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67220547). Ok. The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Resolution: Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires FIX: Please add build-require perl(lib) - t/load-on-use.t:5 TODO: Add version constrain to 'perl(Module::Build::Tiny) >= 0.034' $ rpm -qp --requires perl-CLI-Osprey-0.08-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::Descriptive) 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::Descriptive::Usage) 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::InlineSubcommand) 1 perl(Getopt::Long::Descriptive) >= 0.100 1 perl(Getopt::Long::Descriptive::Usage) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.1) 1 perl(Module::Runtime) 1 perl(Moo) 1 perl(Moo::Role) 1 perl(overload) 1 perl(Path::Tiny) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are almost Ok. FIX: Please add run-require perl(Pod::Usage) - lib/CLI/Osprey/Role.pm:321 $ rpm -qp --provides perl-CLI-Osprey-0.08-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(CLI::Osprey) = 0.08 1 perl-CLI-Osprey = 0.08-1.fc35 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::Descriptive) = 0.08 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::Descriptive::Usage) = 0.08 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::InlineSubcommand) = 0.08 1 perl(CLI::Osprey::Role) = 0.08 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-CLI-Osprey* perl-CLI-Osprey.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) MooX -> Mo Ox, Moo X, Moon perl-CLI-Osprey.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Cmd -> Cm, Cd, Cmdr perl-CLI-Osprey.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) MooX -> Mo Ox, Moo X, Moon perl-CLI-Osprey.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Cmd -> Cm, Cd, Cmdr 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint is ok Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines. Please correct all 'FIX' items and consider fixing 'TODO' item. Resolution: Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953817] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Utils - Utility functions for PPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953817 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-30e5a3e918 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-30e5a3e918 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1916041] Review Request: rubygem-xmlrpc - XMLRPC is a lightweight protocol that enables remote procedure calls over HTTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916041 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Valena --- (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4) Firstly, thanks for review! > Issues: > === > - license: it should be probably "Ruby or BSD"? Yes, you're right. Same as Ruby. https://github.com/ruby/xmlrpc/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > - there has been release 0.3.2 in the meantime (it's good the new dependency > on 'webrick' has been recently packaged in Fedora :-)) Sure, I'll bump the version. > > > Notes: > == > - the different version in changelog - but that's probably just due to the > workflow with "-1.1" version in COPR? Yes, this is a COPR thing, as you can have only one NVR available (new builds+specfiles+srpms with same NVR are removed). This ensures I can have persistent (latest) build available for the URL. It will be removed for the Fedora spec file. _ _ _ _ I've updated the spec file and moved the result here: https://github.com/fedora-distgit/rubygem-xmlrpc/blob/rawhide/rubygem-xmlrpc.spec I've also re-run the builds+tests: https://git.io/J3VmE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-239c87f476 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-239c87f476 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f7c85ad7ff has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f7c85ad7ff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6249d1cdaa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6249d1cdaa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0df12429d9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0df12429d9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/centos-packager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #8 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo centos-packager 1953690 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33790 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: > [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. This is easy to fix, just add "-p" to "install" commands to preserve timestamps. Please fix this on import. Otherwise, this looks good, so... PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: centos-packager-0.7.0-6.fc35.noarch.rpm
centos-packager-0.7.0-6.fc35.src.rpm
centos-packager.noarch: W: no-documentation
centos-packager.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/cbs koji
centos-packager.noarch: W:
[Bug 1956841] Review Request: python-podman - RESTful API for Podman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956841 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Walsh --- LGTM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948661] Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948661 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1895567] Review Request: usd - 3D VFX pipeline interchange file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895567 --- Comment #22 from Ben Beasley --- Still working on this. I do have an explanation for the pyside error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948661] Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948661 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mspa...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mspa...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Glib-IO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956841] Review Request: python-podman - RESTful API for Podman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956841 --- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- (In reply to Daniel Walsh from comment #1) > If this is supposed to be called python-podman, can you at least add > provides podman-py to the spec file, so someone would easily find it. > > dnf install podman-py ... Done * Tue May 04 2021 Lokesh Mandvekar - 3.1.1.3-2 - add Provides: podman-py, python3-podman, python-podman-py, python3-podman-py - update description SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/python-podman/blob/main/f/SRPMS/python-podman-3.1.1.3-2.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956841] Review Request: python-podman - RESTful API for Podman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956841 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Walsh --- If this is supposed to be called python-podman, can you at least add provides podman-py to the spec file, so someone would easily find it. dnf install podman-py ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1955618] Review Request: perl-XS-Parse-Keyword - XS functions to assist in parsing keyword syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955618 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-XS-Parse-Keyword-0.03- |perl-XS-Parse-Keyword-0.03- |1.fc35 |2.fc35 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar --- The gating fails because of a bug in perl. I will retry the gating once fixed perl-5.32.1-475.fc35 reaches the gating system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1945159] Review Request: rizin - reverse engineering framework, fork of radare2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-05-04 14:33:11 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA --- This package is already in distribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956841] Review Request: python-podman - RESTful API for Podman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956841 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jn...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956841] New: Review Request: python-podman - RESTful API for Podman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956841 Bug ID: 1956841 Summary: Review Request: python-podman - RESTful API for Podman Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: l...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pagure.io/python-podman/raw/main/f/python-podman.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/python-podman/blob/main/f/SRPMS/python-podman-3.1.1.3-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: RESTful API for Podman Provide a stable Podman API to call into. Fedora Account System Username: lsm5 koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67221201 $ rpmlint python-podman.spec RPMS/noarch/python-podman-3.1.1.3-1.fc34.noarch.rpm SRPMS/python-podman-3.1.1.3-1.fc34.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944392] Review Request: rust-build-env - Extract information about the build process from the environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944392 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-315754551a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-315754551a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-315754551a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(spen...@nvidia.co ||m) --- Comment #6 from Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) --- (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #5) > (In reply to Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) from comment #4) > > Any update on this BZ? > > See comment #3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139#c3 Thanks, Peter. @spen...@nvidia.com can you comment on that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-matplotlib-inline -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1952329] Review Request: src - Simple Revision Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952329
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Ben Beasley ---
Looks great! Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or generated". 12
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/reviewer/1952329-src/re-review/1952329-src/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI
[Bug 1853081] Review Request: mlxbf-bfscripts - Helper scripts for Mellanox BlueField systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853081 Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #6 from Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) --- Hi, What is the status of adding this package to Fedora? Thanks, Alaa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson --- (In reply to Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) from comment #4) > Any update on this BZ? See comment #3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139#c3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 --- Comment #4 from Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) --- Any update on this BZ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1835452] Review Request: mlxbf-bootctl - Bootloader control for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835452 Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ho...@redhat.com) --- Comment #13 from Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) --- Hi, What is the status of adding this package to Fedora? Thanks, Alaa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1955618] Review Request: perl-XS-Parse-Keyword - XS functions to assist in parsing keyword syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955618 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-XS-Parse-Keyword-0.03- ||1.fc35 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok --- APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f |needinfo+ |r) | --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Spec URL: https://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CLI-Osprey/perl-CLI-Osprey.spec SRPM URL: https://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CLI-Osprey/perl-CLI-Osprey-0.08-1.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953817] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Utils - Utility functions for PPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953817 Peter Oliver changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Peter Oliver --- Accepted! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f ||r) --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Please add valid link for spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1955618] Review Request: perl-XS-Parse-Keyword - XS functions to assist in parsing keyword syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955618 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XS-Parse-Keyword -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939391] Review Request: python-getkey - Read single characters and key-strokes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939391 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-getkey -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956746] New: Review Request: rust-vm-memory - Safe abstractions for accessing the VM physical memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956746 Bug ID: 1956746 Summary: Review Request: rust-vm-memory - Safe abstractions for accessing the VM physical memory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: slope...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slp/rust-vm-memory/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02161523-rust-vm-memory/rust-vm-memory.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slp/rust-vm-memory/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02161523-rust-vm-memory/rust-vm-memory-0.5.0-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Safe abstractions for accessing the VM physical memory. Fedora Account System Username: slp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643 --- Comment #3 from Lumír Balhar --- All updated except description which I update later according to info from upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956580] Review Request: alchemyquest - Reflection game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956580
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Hi Dennis,
Quick review, based in part on what I've seen when trying to adapt the
openalchemist spec, like you did.
Excuse the rough list below, rather short on time to make it into a nicer shape
now.
Issues:
- File conflicts with openalchemist, it would be cleaner to use
%{datadir}/alchemyquest rather than %{datadir/openalchemist}, which needs to be
changed upstream.
- A lot of s/openalchemist/alchemyquest/ needs to be done in the spec.
- I think providing 2 .desktop files, icons, etc.., one for alchemyquest and
one for openalchemist, would help transitioning from openalchemist to
alchemyquest.
- If you add the /usr/bin/openalchemist symlink, missing Obsoletes/Provides for
openalchemist.
Minor nits:
- Indent on the BR: make (which comes from the openalchemist spec, I know ;-))
- Spurious wildcard in %files for appdata and desktop file (from openalchemist
too)
- Sort BR:
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956240] Review Request: rust-edit - Open a file in the default text editor regardless of platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956240 Trystram changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- spec file : https://gitlab.com/jbtrystram/rust-edit/-/raw/main/rust-edit.spec SRPM file : https://gitlab.com/jbtrystram/rust-edit/-/raw/main/rust-edit-0.1.3-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: edit is a Rust library that lets you open and edit something in a text editor, regardless of platform. (Think git commit.) Fedora Account System Username: jbtrystram Koji build : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67203667 Hello, I need this library as a dependency for my other project that i would like to get into fedora. I have nother package approved and waiting for me to be sponsored as well : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951424 The aim is to get "drg" into fedora : https://github.com/drogue-iot/drg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956051] Review Request: R-vcd - Visualizing categorical data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956051 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Other than that, ready for approval:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Unknown or
generated". 11 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Note: No tests in upstream.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]:
[Bug 1955618] Review Request: perl-XS-Parse-Keyword - XS functions to assist in parsing keyword syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955618 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33788 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok --- Spec sanity: > URL:https://github.com/martinRenou/matplotlib-inline Consider using https://github.com/ipython/matplotlib-inline already: https://github.com/ipython/matplotlib-inline/commit/bd8dc4eeb1d705c340fbf16d0f7d995538a70b32 > %generate_buildrequires > %pyproject_buildrequires This happens after %prep, please move it there so the spec order == execution order. > %description > Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter Descriptions should be sentences and end with . I realize upstream does not give much info here :/ > # Remove bundled egg-info > rm -rf matplotlib-inline.egg-info This should be never needed with pyproject macros. (It is also rarely needed with the traditional macros.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1876864] Review Request: kealib - KEA is an HDF5 Based Raster File Format as a GDAL plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876864 --- Comment #11 from markusN --- Gentle ping to Robert-André Mauchin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953817] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Utils - Utility functions for PPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953817 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(rc040203@freenet. | |de) | --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius --- Thanks, updated package: Spec URL: https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-PPIx-Utils.spec SRPM URL: https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-PPIx-Utils-0.003-2.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1955903 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955903 [Bug 1955903] ipython-7.23.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956643] New: Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956643 Bug ID: 1956643 Summary: Review Request: python-matplotlib-inline - Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lbal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-matplotlib-inline.spec SRPM URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-matplotlib-inline-0.1.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Inline Matplotlib backend for Jupyter Fedora Account System Username: lbalhar The new version of ipython depends on this package - see https://github.com/ipython/ipython/blob/master/docs/source/whatsnew/version7.rst#ipython-723 Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67197182 This package has no tests yet but I've verified that the latest ipython and notebook build and work well with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1952329] Review Request: src - Simple Revision Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952329 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(bob.hepple@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #6 from Bob Hepple --- New build incorporating review comments: Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/src/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02161259-src/src.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/src/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02161259-src/src-1.28-2.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
