[Bug 1963409] Review Request: golang-gopkg-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963409 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Ooop aorry I missed the mail for this. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968305] Review Request: rust-msgbox - Simple message box GUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968305 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-029d07b207 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-029d07b207 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-029d07b207 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968232] Review Request: rust-tinyfiledialogs - Rust binding for the tinyfiledialogs C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968232 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d53decd8fc has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-d53decd8fc \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d53decd8fc See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968225] Review Request: rust-psd - A Rust API for parsing and working with PSD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968225 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-af822fbdd3 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-af822fbdd3 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-af822fbdd3 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e5c603142f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-e5c603142f` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e5c603142f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-22755a65c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-22755a65c6` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-22755a65c6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961783] Review Request: rofimoji - A character picker for rofi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961783 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-31c566a3df has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1964425] Review Request: python-ots - Python wrapper for the OpenType Sanitizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964425 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d35bfa99b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:23 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:25 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 Bug 1963341 depends on bug 1963340, which changed state. Bug 1963340 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 Bug 1963340 depends on bug 1962622, which changed state. Bug 1962622 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962622] Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:20 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 Bug 1963341 depends on bug 1962583, which changed state. Bug 1962583 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962622] Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 Bug 1962622 depends on bug 1962583, which changed state. Bug 1962583 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 Bug 1962583 depends on bug 1962574, which changed state. Bug 1962574 Summary: Review Request: rust-regalloc - Modular register allocation algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962574 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:16 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962574] Review Request: rust-regalloc - Modular register allocation algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962574 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:13 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 Bug 1962583 depends on bug 1962375, which changed state. Bug 1962375 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-meta - Metaprogram for cranelift-codegen code generator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962375 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962375] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-meta - Metaprogram for cranelift-codegen code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962375 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:10 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 Bug 1962583 depends on bug 1962372, which changed state. Bug 1962372 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-bforest - Forest of B+-trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962372 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962372] Review Request: rust-cranelift-bforest - Forest of B+-trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962372 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:14:08 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6569569d6f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961783] Review Request: rofimoji - A character picker for rofi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961783 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-86c956b384 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1964425] Review Request: python-ots - Python wrapper for the OpenType Sanitizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964425 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 01:12:54 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b0eb4ddec2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1951495] Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - NetBIOS Name Service Requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951495 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-11 00:53:01 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2c5040831f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1834427] Review Request: xf86-input-wacom - The Linux Wacom Project manages the drivers, libraries
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Victor Tejada Yau 's needinfo: Bug 1834427: Review Request: xf86-input-wacom - The Linux Wacom Project manages the drivers, libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834427 --- Comment #4 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968320] Review Request: rust-chlorine - C types for `no_std`, but builds faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968320 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e74f0f1283 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e74f0f1283 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968320] Review Request: rust-chlorine - C types for `no_std`, but builds faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968320 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e8463c3599 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e8463c3599 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968305] Review Request: rust-msgbox - Simple message box GUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968305 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-029d07b207 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-029d07b207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970619] Review Request: python-azure-common - Microsoft Azure Client Library for Python (Common)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970619 --- Comment #2 from Major Hayden 鸞 --- At the moment, none of them. Azure has some namespace packages but they aren't needed for Python 3.9. We could probably pick one of these packages to be the owner of that directory. The azure-common package is required by the most amount of SDK libraries, so we could have the base azure directory owned by this package. Would that work? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968232] Review Request: rust-tinyfiledialogs - Rust binding for the tinyfiledialogs C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968232 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d53decd8fc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d53decd8fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970619] Review Request: python-azure-common - Microsoft Azure Client Library for Python (Common)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970619
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley ---
What package owns %{python3_sitelib}/azure?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970649] New: Review Request: fkill-cli - Fabulously kill processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970649 Bug ID: 1970649 Summary: Review Request: fkill-cli - Fabulously kill processes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@musicinmybrain.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/fkill-cli.spec SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/fkill-cli-6.1.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Fabulously kill processes. Fedora Account System Username: music This is a command-line tool written with NodeJS. To review it, please make sure you are familiar with the new guidelines for NodeJS introduced in Fedora 34 (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/). Koji scratch builds: F35: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=69811796 F34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=69811797 (F33 and EPEL will not be supported.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968225] Review Request: rust-psd - A Rust API for parsing and working with PSD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968225 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-af822fbdd3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-af822fbdd3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968320] Review Request: rust-chlorine - C types for `no_std`, but builds faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968320 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-chlorine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1969737] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-debug - Debug utils for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1969737 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1966865 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966865 [Bug 1966865] rust-object-0.25.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1969737] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-debug - Debug utils for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1969737 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle --- Package updated to latest upstream: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-wasmtime-debug.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-wasmtime-debug-0.28.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970638] Review Request: python-azure-storage-common - Microsoft Azure Storage Common Client Library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970638 Major Hayden 鸞 changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-storage-common.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-storage-common-2.1.0-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Microsoft Azure Storage Common Client Library for Python Fedora Account System Username: mhayden Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=69807754 This is part of the Azure SDK/CLI work and its one of the base libraries for Azure's storage libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970638] Review Request: python-azure-storage-common - Microsoft Azure Storage Common Client Library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970638 Major Hayden 鸞 changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1953789 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953789 [Bug 1953789] Update package to use versioned subpackages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970638] New: Review Request: python-azure-storage-common - Microsoft Azure Storage Common Client Library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970638 Bug ID: 1970638 Summary: Review Request: python-azure-storage-common - Microsoft Azure Storage Common Client Library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: Microsoft Azure Storage Common Client Library for Python Fedora Account System Username: mhayden Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=69807754 This is part of the Azure SDK/CLI work and its one of the base libraries for Azure's storage libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968320] Review Request: rust-chlorine - C types for `no_std`, but builds faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968320 --- Comment #3 from Rémi Lauzier --- I am not sure how to correct this issue. rust-chlorine-devel.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/cargo/registry/chlorine-1.0.7/src/lib.rs rust-chlorine-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/rust-chlorine-devel/README.md -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968305] Review Request: rust-msgbox - Simple message box GUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968305 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-msgbox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968232] Review Request: rust-tinyfiledialogs - Rust binding for the tinyfiledialogs C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968232 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tinyfiledialogs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968225] Review Request: rust-psd - A Rust API for parsing and working with PSD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968225 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-psd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968612] Review Request: ghc-rpm-nvr - RPM package name-version-release data types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968612
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
2", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "GNU
General Public License v2.0 or later". 7 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-rpm-
nvr/review-ghc-rpm-nvr/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes
[Bug 1970619] Review Request: python-azure-common - Microsoft Azure Client Library for Python (Common)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970619 Major Hayden 鸞 changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1953789 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953789 [Bug 1953789] Update package to use versioned subpackages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970619] New: Review Request: python-azure-common - Microsoft Azure Client Library for Python (Common)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970619 Bug ID: 1970619 Summary: Review Request: python-azure-common - Microsoft Azure Client Library for Python (Common) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-common.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-common-1.1.27-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Microsoft Azure Client Library for Python (Common) Fedora Account System Username: mhayden This library and python-azure-core (see bug 1970073) are the base libraries for the Azure SDK (which are required for packing the Azure CLI). There is no license file currently but I have asked upstream to provide one[0]. https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python/pull/19191 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968320] Review Request: rust-chlorine - C types for `no_std`, but builds faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968320 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Shouldn't review when i'm tired - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970073] Review Request: python-azure-core - Azure Core shared client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970073 --- Comment #6 from Major Hayden 鸞 --- Upstream updated to 1.15.0. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-core.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-core-1.15.0-1.fc35.src.rpm Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6987 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968320] Review Request: rust-chlorine - C types for `no_std`, but builds faster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968320
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Ask upstream to provide the missing license files
- This should be fixed and the patch sent upstream;
rust-chlorine-devel.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/cargo/registry/chlorine-1.0.7/src/lib.rs
rust-chlorine-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/rust-chlorine-devel/README.md
Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "zlib/libpng license". 8 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/rust-chlorine/review-rust-
chlorine/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
chlorine-devel , rust-chlorine+default-devel , rust-
chlorine+int_extras-devel
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not
[Bug 1968305] Review Request: rust-msgbox - Simple message box GUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968305 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Specify what you did in the patch # Initial patched metadata # Remove Windows and Mac-only dependencies Patch0: msgbox-fix-metadata.diff - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968232] Review Request: rust-tinyfiledialogs - Rust binding for the tinyfiledialogs C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968232
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Ask upstream to provide a separate license file
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License
2.0", "zlib/libpng license". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/rust-
tinyfiledialogs/review-rust-tinyfiledialogs/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
tinyfiledialogs-devel , rust-tinyfiledialogs+default-devel
[?]: Package
[Bug 1968225] Review Request: rust-psd - A Rust API for parsing and working with PSD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968225 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968204] Review Request: maui-mauikit-filebrowsing - MauiKit File Browsing utilities and controls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968204
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Include examples/ in %doc
- You should add a comment explaining the licenses breakdown:
Name: maui-mauikit-filebrowsing
Version:1.2.2
Release:1%{?dist}
# LGPLv2+: main library
# BSD: examples
# CC0: qmldir
License:LGPLv2+ and BSD qnd CC0
- Install fails:
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'cmake(MauiKit)'
You have imported the package but haven't built it:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=33739
I took the liberty to build it in Rawhide.
- install src/controls/qmldir.license qnd add CC0 in the license field
- own %{_libdir}/cmake/MauiKitFileBrowsing
- Fix this typo:
maui-mauikit-filebrowsing.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
amoing -> among, amounting
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file qmldir.license is not marked as %license
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License GNU
Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later", "BSD 2-clause
"Simplified" License", "*No copyright* Creative Commons CC0 Universal
1.0 Public Domain Dedication", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
Version 2.1", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "GNU Library
General Public License v2 or later". 56 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/maui-
mauikit-filebrowsing/review-maui-mauikit-filebrowsing/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/cmake/MauiKitFileBrowsing
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or
[Bug 1968201] Review Request: daykountdown - Date countdown app
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968201 --- Comment #3 from Onuralp SEZER --- https://pagure.io/plasma-mobile-apps/blob/master/f/daykountdown/daykountdown-0-1.20210604git1def6cc9.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968201] Review Request: daykountdown - Date countdown app
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968201
--- Comment #2 from Onuralp SEZER ---
All fixed. (new SRPM created)
Thank you.
Version:0
Release:1.20210604git%{short_rev}%{?dist}
[…]
%changelog
* Sun Jun 06 2021 Onuralp SEZER
0-1.20210604git1def6cc9
- Initial version of the package
Also please note that you had reversed the date in your changelog entry<
- please remove trailing spaces
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774 Major Hayden 鸞 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-06-10 17:33:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-22755a65c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-22755a65c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e5c603142f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e5c603142f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1968201] Review Request: daykountdown - Date countdown app
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968201
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- The versionning sche;e is not correct. For prerelease GIT snapshot it should
be:
Version:0
Release:1.20210604git%{short_rev}%{?dist}
[…]
%changelog
* Sun Jun 06 2021 Onuralp SEZER
0-1.20210604git1def6cc9
- Initial version of the package
Also please note that you had reversed the date in your changelog entry<
- please remove trailing spaces
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 31 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/daykountdown/review-
daykountdown/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s)
[Bug 1968655] Review Request: headsetcontrol - A tool to control certain aspects of USB-connected headsets on Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968655 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/headsetcontrol -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970460] New: Review Request: goocanvas2-cairotypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460 Bug ID: 1970460 Summary: Review Request: goocanvas2-cairotypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@netcom-mail.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/goocanvas2-cairotypes.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/goocanvas2-cairotypes-0.001-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types Fedora Account System Username: martinkg rpmlint -i -v goocanvas2-cairotypes.spec /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/goocanvas2-cairotypes-0.001-1.fc34.src.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/goocanvas2-cairotypes-0.001-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/goocanvas2-cairotypes-debuginfo-0.001-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/goocanvas2-cairotypes-debugsource-0.001-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/goocanvas2-cairotypes-devel-0.001-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm goocanvas2-cairotypes.spec: I: checking goocanvas2-cairotypes.spec: I: checking-url https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/A/AS/ASOKOLOV/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes.src: I: checking goocanvas2-cairotypes.src: I: checking-url https://metacpan.org/dist/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes.src: I: checking-url https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/A/AS/ASOKOLOV/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes.x86_64: I: checking goocanvas2-cairotypes.x86_64: I: checking-url https://metacpan.org/dist/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes.x86_64: W: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so goocanvas2-cairotypes-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking goocanvas2-cairotypes-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url https://metacpan.org/dist/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking goocanvas2-cairotypes-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking-url https://metacpan.org/dist/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes-devel.x86_64: I: checking goocanvas2-cairotypes-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url https://metacpan.org/dist/GooCanvas2-CairoTypes (timeout 10 seconds) goocanvas2-cairotypes-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1950594] Re-Review Request: iaito - GUI for radare2 reverse engineering framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950594 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 13:01:31 --- Comment #4 from Michal Ambroz --- package is available in current release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967876] Review Request: perl-Statistics-ChiSquare - How well-distributed is your data?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967876 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1970378 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970378 [Bug 1970378] Upgrade perl-Crypt-Random to 1.54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970050] Review Request: cri-o - Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface for OCI-based containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970050] Review Request: cri-o - Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface for OCI-based containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/rhcontainerbot/rpms/cri-o/-/raw/1.21/cri-o.spec SRPM URL: https://haircommander.fedorapeople.org/cri-o-1.21.0-2.fc32.src.rpm Description: An OCI-compliant implementation of the Kubernetes CRI Fedora Account System Username: haircommander -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970050] Review Request: cri-o - Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface for OCI-based containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Summary|Review Request: cri-o: |Review Request: cri-o - |unretire cri-o package so |Kubernetes Container |it can be built as a module |Runtime Interface for |again |OCI-based containers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364736] Review Request: python-stackclimber - Allow a function to discover the module or script name of its caller, or its caller's caller.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364736 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|DEFERRED|NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Mattia Verga --- Ok thanks Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364738] Review Request: python-ahab - Docker event handling with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364738 Bug 1364738 depends on bug 1364737, which changed state. Bug 1364737 Summary: Review Request: python-magiclog - Easy logger management for libraries and CLI tools. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364737 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364737] Review Request: python-magiclog - Easy logger management for libraries and CLI tools.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364737 Vadim Rutkovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Flags|needinfo?(vrutkovs@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:25:46 --- Comment #6 from Vadim Rutkovsky --- Lets retire it - unfortunately I don't have time to work on this anymore -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364737] Review Request: python-magiclog - Easy logger management for libraries and CLI tools.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364737 Bug 1364737 depends on bug 1364736, which changed state. Bug 1364736 Summary: Review Request: python-stackclimber - Allow a function to discover the module or script name of its caller, or its caller's caller. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364736 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364736] Review Request: python-stackclimber - Allow a function to discover the module or script name of its caller, or its caller's caller.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364736 Vadim Rutkovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:25:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364736] Review Request: python-stackclimber - Allow a function to discover the module or script name of its caller, or its caller's caller.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364736 Vadim Rutkovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(vrutkovs@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Vadim Rutkovsky --- Lets retire it - unfortunately I don't have time to work on this anymore -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364737] Review Request: python-magiclog - Easy logger management for libraries and CLI tools.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364737 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(vrutkovs@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga --- The package was never imported. Moreover, the repository was never requested, so it will now require a fresh positive review flag if you want to create the repo. Vadim, are you still interested, or should we close this ticket? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1364736] Review Request: python-stackclimber - Allow a function to discover the module or script name of its caller, or its caller's caller.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364736 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(vrutkovs@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #10 from Mattia Verga --- This package was never imported nor built. Vadim, are you still interested or can we retire it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1350029] Review Request: libi40iw - userspace rdma library for Intel Ethernet Connection X722
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(tatyana.e.nikolov ||a...@intel.com) --- Comment #33 from Mattia Verga --- So, this package was never imported in Fedora. Tatyana, are you still interested in importing and building for Fedora, or should we properly retire it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1607713] Review Request: liberation-narrow-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607713 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:17:32 --- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1442566] Review Request: nodejs-is-valid-app - Wrapper around is-valid-instance and is-registered for validating base plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442566 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jsmith.fedora@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- Package was never imported, it will need a fresh review. Jared, are you still interested in packaging this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1550595] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd-selinux - SELinux policies for tpm2-abrmd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:13:35 --- Comment #38 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1586291] Review Request: slop - Select Operation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586291 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:12:36 --- Comment #18 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1369471] Review Request: rubygem-fluent-plugin-secure-forward - Fluentd input/output plugin to forward over SSL with authentications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369471 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Assignee|mru...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review+ | |needinfo?(yguenane@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:11:25 --- Comment #6 from Mattia Verga --- Package was never imported, no reply from the submitter to the previous needinfo, closing as DEADREVIEW. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1566061] Review Request: python-django-oauth-toolkit - OAuth2 goodies for Django
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566061 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:09:21 --- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1565113] Review Request: python-asana - Asana API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565113 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:08:37 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1561696] Review Request: python-social-auth-storage-sqlalchemy - The SQLAlchemy storage component of python-social-auth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561696 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:07:39 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, was later orphaned, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1452958] Review Request: sasutils - Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) Linux utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452958 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-06-10 09:06:36 --- Comment #11 from Mattia Verga --- Package imported, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
