[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2016-09-29 18:03:44



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/bitstream

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT
> (style) license
Right, I've lost this change apparently, I will update before import, thx for
notice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo  ---
maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT (style)
license

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo  ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342 ?
thanks in advance

Approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream-1.1-2.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG,
DVB, IETF.

Licence clarification requested to upstream
https://code.videolan.org/videolan/bitstream/issues/1
(but mpeg/psi/psi.h seems right to me)

Changelog:
* Mon Sep 26 2016 Nicolas Chauvet  - 1.1-2
- Only create a -devel package
- Remove Group from rpm
- Correct License MIT

koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15809678

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo  ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)

> [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package
>  Maybe should be change "Provides:   %{name}-devel =
> %{version}-%{release}" in "Provides:   %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" ?

as example see:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/cereal.git/tree/cereal.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo  ---
NON blocking issues:
"Group:" fields are no more necessary. Please remove

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo  ---
Issues:
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: bitstream : /usr/include/bitstream/atsc/a52.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/common.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/ci.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/bat.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/bat_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/datetime.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_40.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_41.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_42.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_43.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_44.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_45.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_46.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_47.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_48.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_49.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4d.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4e.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4f.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_50.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_51.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_52.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_53.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_54.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_55.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_56.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_57.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_58.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_59.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5d.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5e.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5f.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_60.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_61.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_62.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_63.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_64.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_65.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_66.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_67.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_68.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_69.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6d.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6e.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_7a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_7b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_7c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_83p28.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_88p28.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/descs_list.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/dit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/dit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/eit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/eit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/nit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/nit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/numbers.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/rst.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/rst_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sdt.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sdt_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/st.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/strings.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tdt.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tdt_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tot.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tot_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/sim.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/sub.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ieee/ethernet.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/ip.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtcp.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp3551.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp6184.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp7587.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/udp.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/mpeg/aac.h 

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: bitstream : /usr/include/bitstream/atsc/a52.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/common.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/ci.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/bat.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/bat_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/datetime.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_40.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_41.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_42.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_43.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_44.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_45.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_46.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_47.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_48.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_49.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4d.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4e.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_4f.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_50.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_51.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_52.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_53.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_54.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_55.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_56.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_57.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_58.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_59.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5d.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5e.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_5f.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_60.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_61.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_62.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_63.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_64.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_65.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_66.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_67.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_68.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_69.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6d.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_6e.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_7a.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_7b.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_7c.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_83p28.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/desc_88p28.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/descs_list.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/dit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/dit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/eit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/eit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/nit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/nit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/numbers.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/rst.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/rst_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sdt.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sdt_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sit.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/sit_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/st.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/strings.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tdt.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tdt_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tot.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si/tot_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/si_print.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/sim.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/dvb/sub.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ieee/ethernet.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/ip.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtcp.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp3551.h bitstream :
  /usr/include/bitstream/ietf/rtp6184.h bitstream 

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com
 Depends On|182235 (FE-Legal)   |



--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
There is no issue here. Thanks for letting me check it first.

Lifting FE-Legal.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436



--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
Blocked FE-Legal because the header contains structures related to possibly
patented format. I expect it's more around mux than codec, but need to be
confirmed. Also there is no implementation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||182235 (FE-Legal)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436

Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1376438




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376438
[Bug 1376438] Review Request: dvblast - Simple and powerful streaming
application
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org