[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Dennis Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #78 from

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #77 from Fedora Update System --- swift-lang-4.2-0.32.20180703git107e307.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a6771080d7 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #76 from

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #75 from Fedora Update System --- swift-lang-4.2-0.30.20180709gitd9561d9.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0ef0cca109 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #74 from Mohan Boddu --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/swift-lang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Tom Stellard changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hobbes1...@gmail.com|tstel...@redhat.com --- Comment #73

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #72 from Ron Olson --- Hey Tom, Mohan in #fedora-releng asked if you would explicitly acknowledge you're okay with this review: [10:33:35] <+mboddu> tachoknight: I hit "The review is not approved by the assignee of the Bugzilla

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Tom Stellard changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #71 from

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #70 from Ron Olson --- Made a new build from the July 5th sources. If it complicates things at this point I'll hold off on any new builds. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #69 from Ron Olson --- Okay, I fixed the issues. Thanks for reviewing this Tom, I feel like I've learned a lot and I think the package is far better than when we started. Spec URL:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #68 from Tom Stellard --- Below is the full review report. I've listed two items in the issues section that should be fixed before this request gets approved, but otherwise this package looks good. Package Review ==

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #67 from Ron Olson --- I checked the regex and your change seems to do the trick, thanks! Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.27.20180704gitf56a941.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #66 from Tom Stellard --- The lldb shared objects are versioned e.g. liblldb.so.6.0.0, so the regex you are using to filter the provides does not match them. I think you can fix this by dropping the $ or by adding .* after so.

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #65 from Ron Olson --- Okay, the Swift run-time libs are in their own package, removed the 'which' buildrequires, and filtered the lldb libraries. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #64 from Tom Stellard --- This looks better now. Just a few more things that the fedora-review tool caught: - Drop BuildRequires: which -+ Filter Provdes for liblldb*

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #63 from Ron Olson --- Whoops, sorry about that. Fixed now. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.25.20180702gitc2e1567.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #62 from Tom Stellard --- There are still headers in /usr/include/lldb with the latest build, can you remove these. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #61 from Ron Olson --- Nope, I removed the headers; they are not necessary for runtime. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.24.20180701git6079032.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #60 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #59) > I cleaned up the lldb stuff, but the headers in /usr/lib/swift/clang/include > are indeed necessary; they're used when importing a module (e.g. Glibc, >

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #59 from Ron Olson --- I cleaned up the lldb stuff, but the headers in /usr/lib/swift/clang/include are indeed necessary; they're used when importing a module (e.g. Glibc, Foundation, Dispatch) into a Swift program. Spec URL:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #58 from Tom Stellard --- - Does swift need all the lldb headers that are installed? - Are the clang headers in /usr/lib/swift/clang/include still necessary now that we are using system clang? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #57 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-06-28 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.21.20180628git9f8f2a1.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #56 from Ron Olson --- Swift doesn't use python, but lldb does. According to https://forums.swift.org/t/thoughts-on-python-3-for-swifts-lldb/14098/2 they seem to do no testing of python3. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #55 from Tom Stellard --- Is python2 required or can swift use python3? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #54 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-06-26 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.20.20180626gitbe3b9a7.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #53 from Ron Olson --- I asked over on the Swift Forums (https://forums.swift.org/t/building-swift-toolchain-using-gcc/13686/9) and the two member of the core team that I've chatted with indicate that the system-provided clang is

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #52 from Tom Stellard --- According to a discussion I had on #llvm, we should be able to build swift with system clang and possibly even system gcc. It is Fedora policy to build with gcc if upstream supports it[1], so I think we

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #51 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-06-12 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM swift-lang-4.2-0.19.20180612gitbb9532c.fc29.src.rpm for Fedora 29:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #50 from Ron Olson --- > Could we use system ninja instead of building it with system clang? Yep, that worked well; I added ninja in the %buildrequires section, removed the source file, and added a patch to disable the Swift

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #49 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #48) > No, Swift is built using a special version of clang that has additional > Swift-specific stuff added to it: https://swift.org/source-code/ under > Cloned

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #48 from Ron Olson --- No, Swift is built using a special version of clang that has additional Swift-specific stuff added to it: https://swift.org/source-code/ under Cloned Repositories. System clang is used, though, for building

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #47 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #42) > Hope that helped clear it up; was very confusing to me at first (especially > when the LLVM toolchain versions matched between what was installable and > what

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Tom Stellard changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(tstellar@redhat.c |needinfo+ |om)

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(tstellar@redhat.c

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #44 from Ron Olson --- Did the session log help? The clang that Swift builds is just for building Swift, and then uses the installed clang for building Swift-based binaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #43 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-06-02 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.13.20180602gitadad0f5.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #42 from Ron Olson --- Hope that helped clear it up; was very confusing to me at first (especially when the LLVM toolchain versions matched between what was installable and what was built just for bootstrapping). -- You are

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #41 from Ron Olson --- Swift does have its own clang for building itself, but it uses the system clang for compiling Swift code. Here's a session capture that illustrates this: [rolson@thinky swift-source]$

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #40 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #38) > You mean a build requirement for Swift itself? The Swift toolchain uses it > post-installation to build a Swift-based binary. Can you

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #39 from Richard Shaw --- Oh, and no need to supply source RPMs for each release, they're typically universal unless you have hardcoded customizations that are different between them. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #38 from Ron Olson --- You mean a build requirement for Swift itself? The Swift toolchain uses it post-installation to build a Swift-based binary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #37 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #36) > Clang does the actual compilation of Swift code into a binary. If it's only a build requirement, then you can drop Requires: clang --

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #36 from Ron Olson --- Clang does the actual compilation of Swift code into a binary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #35 from Tom Stellard --- Why does swift Require: clang ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #34 from Richard Shaw --- Nope! Just been busy lately... I'll shoot to get started today but will likely be after the holiday weekend before I get it done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #33 from Ron Olson --- Is there anything else I need to do? The package has been working for me quite well on my machines; I use Swift more on Fedora than I do on a Mac. ;) -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #32 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-05-20 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.10.20180520gitbb77484.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 27:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #31 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-05-08 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.8.20180508git0e6d867.fc27.src.rpm for Fedora 27:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #30 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-05-02 build (first cut from the Swift master branch for what will be the actual 4.2 release): Spec URL:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #29 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-04-22 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.6.20180422git5030d38 for Fedora 27:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #28 from Ron Olson --- Updated for Fedora 28 (will be included in builds going forward): SRPM 4.2-0.5.20180418gitac06163 for Fedora 28:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #27 from Ron Olson --- Updated to the 2018-04-16 build: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.5.20180418gitac06163 for Fedora 27:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #26 from Ron Olson --- I've made all of Tom's changes. The static libraries are internal compiler libraries. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #25 from Tom Stellard --- A few other things that the review tool caught: - BuildRequires: python-devel -> python2-devel or python3-devel - Need %license LICENSE.txt in %files - The static libraries in

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #24 from Ron Olson --- Sure thing! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #23 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #22) > Swift is very sensitive to the location of all parts of its toolchain; "lib" > is hard-coded in some way or another across all the projects

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #22 from Ron Olson --- Swift is very sensitive to the location of all parts of its toolchain; "lib" is hard-coded in some way or another across all the projects that make up the Swift toolchain. The past

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #21 from Tom Stellard --- Why are libraries installed to /usr/lib instead of %{_libdir}? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #20 from Richard Shaw --- Just got back from a very cold and wet Boy Scout camping trip. Will check it out when I recover :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #19 from Ron Olson --- Updated to Swift 4.2: Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec 4.2-20180411git537a846 for Fedora 27:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #18 from Ron Olson --- As an update, Swift 4.1 was released yesterday but does not include any of my pull requests. Looking through their blog I found out that the final cut from master was actually several

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #17 from Ron Olson --- Hey Richard, thanks for the feedback. My responses to each of your points: 1: Will do 2: Will do 3: Will investigate and will do if possible 4: Swift builds and requires its own

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw --- I forgot to post the links to the guidelines... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Snapshots and

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #14 from Ron Olson --- I've updated the spec file and generated two new rpm files to take into account a bug fix that I submitted to Apple and they merged: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/14589. This

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Ron Olson changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #13

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa --- Ron, that's perfectly fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #11 from Ron Olson --- I believe I've resolved all the known outstanding issues and have updated the spec and RPMs at https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/. 4.1 is still not released; would it be

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #10 from Ron Olson --- Well, I asked on the LLDB board on the Swift forums and it seems pretty certain that Swift must include its own copy of LLDB:

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #9 from Ron Olson --- (In reply to Ron Olson from comment #8) > I've been playing around with a downloaded copy of Swift in conjunction with > an installed copy of lldb and I believe that the swift binary is

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #8 from Ron Olson --- I've been playing around with a downloaded copy of Swift in conjunction with an installed copy of lldb and I believe that the swift binary is explicitly looking for lldb in the same

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #7 from Ron Olson --- There's an issue with excluding LLDB from being installed as part of the Swift package, the one that is already available in Fedora does not know about Swift (of course), but that makes

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #6 from Ron Olson --- I figured out how to exclude LLDB from the rpm, but running the REPL brings up this message: *** You are running Swift's integrated REPL, *** *** intended for compiler and stdlib

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #5 from Ron Olson --- Figured out the issue with the Koji job dying: One of the sub-projects uses rsync instead of cp and it wasn't listed in the BRs and apparently rsync is not installed by default...?

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #4 from Ron Olson --- Yep, I realized I needed to explicitly limit the architectures. I have limited it to only x86_64, added the pod2man dependency, reorganized the %prep section, and it builds on my

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Please split your BR on multiple lines. - It seems you're missing a /usr/bin/pod2man dependency, provided by perl-podlators. CMake Error at

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #1 from Ron Olson --- The current released version of Swift (4.0.3) does not have the patches necessary to build on Fedora, so I'm using the latest snapshot that does build correctly. Chatting on IRC, the

[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 Ron Olson changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|All |x86_64 -- You