[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 Christopher Brown changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #34 from Philip Kovacs --- Please close this bug duplicate of bug #1489668. This one is long stalled, the other is active. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 Philip Kovacs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pkde...@yahoo.com

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #32 from Adam Huffman --- Hi Andrew, I'm happy to review your 16.05.x package if you submit it. Haven't heard from David in several months, so this does appear to be stalled at the moment. Adam -- You are

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #31 from Andrew Elwell --- Hi, is there any movement on this? If not I'll start a new package based on the current upsream release of 16.05.5 (http://slurm.schedmd.com/download.html) Andrew -- You are

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #30 from Adam Huffman --- Hi David, Could you update to 15.08.11? Thanks, Adam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #29 from Adam Huffman --- Hi David, It's certainly acceptable to include patches in the RPM to fix these errors, while also submitting them upstream. Here are a couple of things highlighted by fedora-review:

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bl...@verdurin.com

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #28 from David Brown --- Adam, Some of these we can fix as package managers others (a lot of the errors) the slurm guys need to fix. slurm.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/bin/salloc Potential

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #27 from David Brown --- Adam, Okay here's a smaller rpmlint output. $ rpmlint results/15.08.10/1.el7/slurm-*.rpm slurm.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 15.08.10-1 ['15.08.10-1.el7.centos',

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #26 from Adam Huffman --- I see you've already done that - thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #25 from Adam Huffman --- Hi David, There's certainly no lack of things to clean up in the upstream build process... With my Copr builds I did the minimum to make the upstream spec file work. Perhaps you

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #24 from David Brown --- I should mention that those errors are from me commenting out all my sed rpath commands in the spec posted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #23 from David Brown --- Adam, The issue I was trying to fix was when rpmlint errors about the following... slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libpmi.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #22 from Adam Huffman --- Hi David, It's also worth mentioning that there are systemd unit files in the upstream source now. While you might want to patch them, you shouldn't need to include your own versions

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #21 from Adam Huffman --- Hi David, Thanks for the update. First observation is about the build part. I and someone on the mailing list found that the following in %build fixed the FORTIFY warnings during

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #20 from David Brown --- Adam, Here's the 15.08.10 scratch build of slurm. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13635064 https://github.com/dmlb2000/slurm-spec/raw/master/slurm.spec There's a

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #19 from Adam Huffman --- Hi David, If you can update this to 15.08.10, I'll try to find time to review it. Recently I've been building it for my own use on Copr, using minimal changes to the upstream spec,

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of linux-user-chroot?#b7afe5173cbd31b029b027b6f8a14baa5e6ce87a for epel7-archbootstrap and

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- dmlb2000's scratch build of slurm-15.08.4-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12095847 --

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Brown snecklif...@gmail.com --- Hi David, We are interested in getting the packaged for epel. I take it this is just awaiting review? Anything I can do to assist? Regards -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #15 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- Yes this package is still waiting for review. I'd love someone to review it and pass off on it. I can get an update to the current version though there isn't very many changes to the

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #13 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- This is for an updated rawhide build for 14.11.6 slurm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable - salable, callable, calculable slurm.src: W: strange-permission

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #12 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- This is for an updated rawhide build for 14.11.0 slurm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable - salable, callable, calculable slurm.src: W: strange-permission

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #10 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- I figured as much but its been a couple of weeks since I last poked at it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #11 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- Here's the updated upstream version rpmlint output. slurm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable - salable, callable, calculable slurm.src: W: strange-permission

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #6 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- Yup further investigation seems like the rpmlint stuff didn't find those lines but they are there in the init scripts... I'll have to look at the guidelines for what a SYSV init script

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #4 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- The first bit is a misspelling, it should be libibumad-devel and libibmad-devel. Those aren't supported in Fedora, not sure why, but they are supported in RHEL. I was going to look into

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #5 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- Here's the epel-6 build of the same spec. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7879588 slurm-slurmdbd.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/slurmdbd

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #2 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- I fixed some minor spelling and tab issues. 16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 23 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 --- Comment #1 from David Brown david.br...@pnnl.gov --- Here's the rpmlint output. slurm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable - salable, callable, calculable slurm.src:19: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 19,